Usability evaluation of a clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management

Implementation Science

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Kastner, Monika ^a   Lottridge, Danielle ^b   Marquez, Christine ^c   Newton, David ^c   Straus, Sharon E ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650957242     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-96     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA. World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporosis Int 1997, 7:407-13.
2. Osteoporosis Canada. Accessed in December, 2010., http://www.osteoporosis.ca/english/home/
3. Goeree R, O'Brien B, Pettitt D, Cuddy L, Ferraz M, Adachi JD. An assessment of the burden of illness due to osteoporosis in Canada. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 1996, 18(Suppl (July)):15-24.
4. Cummings SR, Melton LJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 2002, 359:1761-7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08657-9, 12049882.
5. Poole KES, Compston JE. Clinical review: Osteoporosis and its management. BMJ 2006, 333:1251-6. 10.1136/bmj.39050.597350.47, 1702459, 17170416.
6. International Osteoporosis Foundation. Accessed in April, 2010., http://www.iofbonehealth.org/facts-and-statistics.html
7. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy. NIH consensus statements. 2000, 17(1):1-45. Accessed in December, 2010., http://consensus.nih.gov/2000/2000Osteoporosis111html.htm
8. Lips P, van Schoor NM. Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 2005, 16:447-455.
9. Brown JP, Josse RG, . for the Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada (revised, August 26, 2004). CMAJ 2002, 167(10):S1-S34. 134653, 12427685, for the Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada.
10. The Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Canadian Consensus Conference on Osteoporosis, 2006 Update. Accessed in April 2010., http://www.sogc.org/guidelines/index_e.asp
11. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care: Prevention of Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Fractures in Postmenopausal Women. Accessed in May 2010., http://www.ctfphc.org
12. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 50, January 2004. Osteoporosis Obstet Gynecol 2004, 103(1):203-16.
13. Osteoporosis, Clinical Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment: Update on pharmacological interventions and algorithm for management. 2003, Royal College of Physicians, Bone and Tooth Society of Great Britain, Accessed in April, 2010., http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk
14. Cranney A, Papaioannou A, Zytaruk N, Hanley D, Adachi J, et al. for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of Osteoporosis Canada Parathyroid hormone for the treatment of osteoporosis: a systematic review. CMAJ 2006, 175(1):52-59. 1482742, 16818910, for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of Osteoporosis Canada.
15. Jaglal SB, McIsaac WJ, Hawker G, Carroll J, Jaakkimainen L, et al. Information needs in the management of osteoporosis in family practice: an illustration of the failure of the current guideline implementation process. Osteoporosis Int 2003, 14:672-6.
16. Papaioannou A, Giangregorio L, Kvern B, Boulos P, Ioannidis G, Adachi JD. The osteoporosis care gap in Canada. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004, 6:5-11.
17. Cheng N, Green ME. Osteoporosis screening for men: Are family physicians following guidelines?. Can Fam Phys 2008, 54:1140-1. e1-5.
18. Kastner M, Straus SE. Clinical decision support tools for osteoporosis disease management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. JGIM 2008, 23(12):2095-2105. 10.1007/s11606-008-0812-9, 2596508, 18836782.
19. Kastner M, Li J, Lottridge D, Marquez C, Newton D, Straus SE. Development of a Prototype Clinical Decision Support Tool for Osteoporosis Disease Management: A Qualitative Study of Focus Groups. BMC Med Inform Dec Mak 2010, 10:40.
20. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, Sam J, Haynes RB. Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review. JAMA 2005, 293:1223-38. 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223, 15755945.
21. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005, 330:765-73. 10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F, 555881, 15767266.
22. Graham TAD, Kushniruk AW, Bullard MJ, et al. How usability of a web-based clinical decision support system has the potential to contribute to adverse medical events. AMIA Ann Symp Proc 2008, 257-61.
23. Kushniruk AW, Triola MM, Borycki EM, et al. Technology induced error and usability: the relationship between usability problems and prescription errors when using handheld application. Int J Med Inform 2005, 74(7-8):519-526. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.01.003, 16043081.
24. Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. JAMIA 2004, 11:104-112. 353015, 14633936.
25. Trivedi MH, Daly EJ, Kern JK, et al. Barriers to implementation of a computerized decision support system for depression: an observational report on lessons learned in "real world" clinical settings. BMC Med Inform and Dec Mak 2009, 9:6.
26. Varonen H, Korteeisto T, Kaia M, . for the EBMeDs Study Group What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians. Family Practice 2008, 25:162-167. 10.1093/fampra/cmn020, 18504253, for the EBMeDs Study Group.
27. Eccles M, Ssteen N, et al. Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2002, 325:1-7. 10.1136/bmj.325.7370.941, 1123541, 12098707.
28. Kushniruk AW, Patel VL. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J Biomed Inform 2004, 37(1):56-76. 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.01.003, 15016386.
29. Ericsson K, Simon H. Protocol analysis: verbal reports of data 1993, Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
30. Nielsen J. Usability engineering 1993, New York: Academic Press.
31. Kushniruk A. Evaluation in the design of health information systems: application of approaches emerging from usability engineering. Computers in Biol and Med 2002, 32:141-149.
32. Dumas JS. User-based Evaluations 2003, 1093-1117. The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, Jacko JA, Sears A.
33. Daniels J, Fels S, Kushniruk AW, et al. A framework for evaluating usability of clinical monitoring technology. J Clin Mon Comp 2007, 21:323-330.
34. Vizri RA. Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough?. Human Factors 1992, 34:457-68.
35. Brooke J. SUS: A "quick and dirty" usability scale 1996, Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis, Jordan PW, Thomas B, Werdmeester BA, McClelland AL.
36. Flanagan JC. The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin 1954, 51(4):327-359. 10.1037/h0061470, 13177800.
37. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 1998, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2.
38. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods 2002, California: Sage Publications Inc, 3.
39. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008, 337:979-983.
40. Toth-Pal E, Wardh I, Strender LE, Nilsson G. Implementing a clinical decision-support system in practice: A qualitative analysis of influencing attitudes and characteristics among general practitioners. Informatics for Health & Social Care 2008, 33(1):39-54.