Development of two shortened systematic review formats for clinicians

Implementation Science

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Perrier, Laure ^a,b   Persaud, Nav ^a,b   Ko, Anita ^c   Kastner, Monika ^a   Grimshaw, Jeremy ^d   McKibbon, K Ann ^e   Straus, Sharon E ^a  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^e MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evidence based medicine; Review literature as topic

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL MEDICINE; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; LITERATURE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY;

CLINICAL MEDICINE; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84878894414     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-68     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou R, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. 3rd edition. Edinburgh 2005, New York: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone.
2. Cochrane Collaboration. About Cochrane Reviews Available at: http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane-reviews. Accessed March 3, 2013.
3. Alper BS, Hand JA, Elliott SG, Kinkade S, Hauan MJ, Onion DK, Sklar BM. How much effort is needed to keep up with the literature relevant for primary care?. J Med Libr Assoc 2004, 92(4):429-437. 521514, 15494758.
4. Laupacis A, Straus S. Systematic reviews: time to address clinical and policy relevance as well as methodological rigor. Ann Intern Med 2007, 147(4):273-274. 10.7326/0003-4819-147-4-200708210-00180, 17638716.
5. De Vito C, Nobile CG, Furnari G, Pavia M, De Giusti M, Angelillo IF, Villari P. Physicians' knowledge, attitudes and professional use of RCTs and meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey. Eur J Public Health 2009, 19(3):297-302. 10.1093/eurpub/ckn134, 19129347.
6. Coumou HC, Meijman FJ. How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. J Med Libr Assoc 2006, 94(1):55-60. 1324772, 16404470.
7. Grandage KK, Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF. When less is more: a practical approach to searching for evidence-based answers. J Med Libr Assoc 2002, 90(3):298-304. 116402, 12113514.
8. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, Chambliss ML, Vinson DC, Stevermer JJ, Pifer EA. Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study. BMJ 2002, 324(7339):710. 10.1136/bmj.324.7339.710, 99056, 11909789.
9. Perrier L, Mrklas K, Lavis JN, Straus SE. Interventions encouraging the use of systematic reviews by health policymakers and managers: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2011, 6:43. 10.1186/1748-5908-6-43, 3104485, 21524292.
10. Perrier L, Mrklas K, Shepperd S, Dobbins M, McKibbon KA, Straus SE. Interventions encouraging the use of systematic reviews in clinical decision-making: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2011, 26(4):419-426. 10.1007/s11606-010-1506-7, 3055967, 20953729.
11. Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Nylund HK, Oxman AD. User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful summary of findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2010, 63(6):607-619. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.013, 20434023.
12. Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information. J Clin Epidemiol 2010, 63(6):620-626. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.014, 20434024.
13. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006, 26(1):13-24. 10.1002/chp.47, 16557505.
14. Health Information Research Unit. McMaster PLUS Available at: http://hiru.mcmaster.ca/hiru/HIRU_McMaster_PLUS_projects.aspx. Accessed February 15, 2013.
15. Licht DM, Polzella DJ, Boff K. Human Factors, Ergonomics, and Human Factors Engineering: An Analysis of Definitions. CSERIAC-89-01 1989, CSERIAC: Wright Patterson AFB, Dayton, OH.
16. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services HHS Web Communications and New Media Division Available at: http://www.usability.gov. Accessed February 15, 2013, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
17. McGowan J, Grad R, Pluye P, Hannes K, Deane K, Labrecque M, Welch V, Tugwell P. Electronic retrieval of health information by healthcare providers to improve practice and patient care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, (3).
18. Atkinson RA, Derry SJ, Renkl A, Wortham D. Learning from examples: Instructional principles from worked examples research. Rev Educ Res 2000, 70(2):181-214.
19. Lee AY, Hutchison L. Improving learning from examples through reflection. J Exp Psychol Appl 1998, 4(3):187-210.
20. Robertson I, Kahney H. The use of examples in expository texts: Outline of an interpretation theory for text analysis. Instruc Sci 1996, 24:93-123.
21. Moreno R, Mayer RE. Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multi-media messages. J Educ Psych 2000, 92(4):724-733.
22. Czuchry M, Dansereau DF. The generation and recall of personally relevant information. J Exp Info 1998, 66(4):293-315.
23. Thomas JC. Story-based mechanisms of tacit knowledge transfer 2002, ECSCW 2001 Workshop on Managing Tacit Knowledge.
24. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996, 312(7023):71-72. 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71, 2349778, 8555924.
25. El Dib RP, Atallah AN, Andriolo RB. Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care. J Eval Clin Pract 2007, 13(4):689-692. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00886.x, 17683315.
26. Clarke L, Clarke M, Clarke T. How useful are Cochrane reviews in identifying research needs?. J Health Serv Res Policy 2007, 12(2):101-103. 10.1258/135581907780279648, 17407660.
27. Lottridge DM, Chignell M, Danicic-Mizdrak R, Pavlovic NJ, Kushniruk A, Straus SE. Group differences in physician responses to handheld presentation of clinical evidence: a verbal protocol analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2007, 7:22. 10.1186/1472-6947-7-22, 1976086, 17655759.
28. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, Bergus GR, Levy BT, Chambliss ML, Evans ER. Analysis of questions asked by family physicians regarding patient care. West J Med 2000, 172(5):315-319. 10.1136/ewjm.172.5.315, 1070879, 18751285.
29. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Chambliss ML, Ebell MH, Rosenbaum ME. Answering physicians' clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005, 12(2):217-224. 551553, 15561792.
30. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, Bergus GR, Levy BT, Chambliss ML, Evans ER. Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care. BMJ 1999, 319(7206):358-361. 28191, 10435959.
31. Ely JW, Levy BT, Hartz A. What clinical information resources are available in family physicians' offices?. J Fam Pract 1999, 48(2):135-139.
32. Ely JW, Yankowitz J, Bowdler NC. Evaluation of pregnant women exposed to respiratory viruses. Am Fam Physician 2000, 61(10):3065-3074.
33. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Gorman PN, Ebell MH, Chambliss ML, Pifer EA, Stavri PZ. A taxonomy of generic clinical questions: classification study. BMJ 2000, 321(7258):429-3.
34. Ely JW. Why can't we answer our questions?. J Fam Pract 2001, 50(11):974-975.
35. Nielsen J, Molich R. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proceedings of the ACM CHI 90 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference 1990 1990, 249-256. Seattle, Washington,USA, Carrasco J, Whiteside J.
36. Nielsen J. Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. Proceedings of the ACM CHI 92 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference June 3-7, 1992 1992, 373-380. Monterey, California, Bauersfeld P, Bennett J, Lynch G.
37. Usability inspection methods 1994, New York: Wiley, Nielsen J, Mack R.
38. Nielsen J. Usability engineering 1994, Boston: AP Professional.
39. Nielsen J. Determining the number of evaluators Available at: http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_evaluation.html#evaluatornumber. Accessed March 3, 2013.
40. Jovicic A, Chignell M, Wu R, Straus SE. Is Web-only self-care education sufficient for heart failure patients?. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009, 2009:296-300. 2815415, 20351868.
41. Nielsen J. Heuristic evaluation. Usability inspection methods 1994, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Nielsen J, Mack RL.
42. Nielsen J. How to conduct a usability evaluation Available at: http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_evaluation.html. Accessed March 3, 2013.
43. van Zuuren EJ, Gupta AK, Gover MD, Graber M, Hollis S. Systematic review of rosacea treatments. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007, 56(1):107-115. 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.04.084, 17190628.
44. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research 1991, 404. London, England: Chapman and Hall.
45. Cranney M, Walley T. Same information, different decisions: the influence of evidence on the management of hypertension in the elderly. Br J Gen Pract 1996, 46(412):661-663. 1239820, 8978112.
46. Young JM, Glasziou P, Ward JE. General practitioners' self ratings of skills in evidence based medicine: validation study. BMJ 2002, 324(7343):950-951. 10.1136/bmj.324.7343.950, 102329, 11964341.
47. O'Donnell CA. Attitudes and knowledge of primary care professionals towards evidence-based practice: a postal survey. J Eval Clin Pract 2004, 10(2):197-205. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2003.00458.x, 15189386.
48. Allen M, MacLeod T, Handfield-Jones R, Sinclair D, Fleming M. Presentation of evidence in continuing medical education programs: a mixed methods study. JCEHP 2010, 30(4):221-228.
49. Hartley J. Designing instructional and informational text. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology 2004, 917-948. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Jonassen D, 2.
50. Wilhite SC. Headings as memory facilitators: the importance of prior knowledge. J Educ Psych 1989, 81:115-117.
51. Niegemann HM. Influences of titles on the recall of instructional texts. Discourse processing 1982, Amsterdam: North-Holland, Flammer A, Kintsch W.
52. Sadoski M, Goetz ET, Rodriguez M. Engaging texts: effects of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and recall in four text types. J Educ Psych 2000, 92(1):85-95.
53. Lakoff G. Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Concepts 1973, 2:458-508.
54. Riggle KB. Using the active and passive voice appropriately in on-the-job writing. J Tech Writ Commun 1998, 28(1):85-117.