Systematic reviews and research waste

The Lancet

Volumn 387, Issue 10014, 2016, Pages 122-123

  Chalmers, Iain ^a   Glasziou, Paul ^b  

^a James Lind Initiative   (United Kingdom)

^b BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); FRUSTRATION; FUNDING; HUMAN; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); ECONOMICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; RESEARCH;

EID: 84954070494     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01353-7     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. I Roberts, K Ker How systematic reviews cause research waste Lancet 386 2015 1536
2. KF Schulz, I Chalmers, RJ Hayes, DG Altman Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials JAMA 273 1995 408 412
3. J Savović, HE Jones, DG Altman et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized controlled trials Ann Intern Med 157 2012 429 438
4. I Chalmers Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak BMJ 333 2006 594 596
5. K Ker, P Edwards, P Perel, H Shakur, I Roberts Effect of tranexamic acid on surgical bleeding: systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis BMJ 344 2012 e3054
6. P Glasziou, I Chalmers How systematic reviews can reduce waste in research http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2015/10/29/how-systematic-reviews-can-reduce-waste-in-research/ Oct 29, 2015 (accessed Dec 4, 2015).