Exploring Faculty Approaches to Feedback in the Simulated Setting: Are They Evidence Informed?

Simulation in Healthcare

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 195-200

  Roze Des Ordons, Amanda Lee ^a   Cheng, Adam ^a   Gaudet, Jonathan E ^a   Downar, James ^b   Lockyer, Jocelyn M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

faculty development; Feedback; qualitative; simulation

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK; EDUCATION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SIMULATION TRAINING; STANDARDS; VIDEORECORDING;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FORMATIVE FEEDBACK; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SIMULATION TRAINING; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 85048710168     PISSN: 15592332     EISSN: 1559713X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000289     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Kogan JR, Conforti LN, Bernabeo EC, Durning SJ, Hauer KE, Holmboe ES. Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills. Med Educ 2012;46:201-215.
2. Rudolph JW, Foldy EG, Robinson T, Kendall S, Taylor SS, Simon R. Helping without harming: the instructor's feedback dilemma in debriefing - a case study. Simul Healthc 2013;8:304-316.
3. Eppich W, Cheng A. Competency-based simulation education: should competency standards apply to simulation educators? BMJ Stel 2015; 1:3-4.
4. Cheng A, Grant V, Robinson T, et al. The promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS) approach to health care debriefing: a faculty development guide. Clin Simul Nurs 2016;12: 419-428.
5. Cheng A, Grant V, Dieckmann P, Arora S, Robinson T, Eppich W. Faculty development for simulation programs: five issues for the future of debriefing training. Simul Healthc 2015;10:217-222.
6. Lefroy J, Watling C, Teunissen PW, Brand P. Guidelines: the do's, don'ts and don't knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspect Med Educ 2015;4:284-299.
7. Dath D, Dobst I. The importance of faculty development in the transition to competency-based medical education. Med Teach 2010;32:683-686.
8. Carraccio C, Englander R, Van Melle E, et al. Advancing competency-based medical education: a charter for clinician-educators. Acad Med 2016;91:645-649.
9. Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: Sage; 2013.
10. King N: Doing template analysis. In: Symon G, Cassell C, eds. Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges. London: Sage; 2012:426-450.
11. Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qual Health Res 2017; 27:591-608.
12. van Nieuwerburgh C. Coaching in Education: Getting Better Results for Students, Educators, and Parents. London: Karnac Books; 2012.
13. Aggarwal R, Mytton OT, Derbrew M, et al. Training and simulation for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:i34-i43.
14. Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Med Teach 2013;35: e1511-e1530.
15. Holmboe ES, Ward DS, Reznick RK, et al. Faculty development in assessment: the missing link in competency-based medical education. Acad Med 2011;86:460-467.
16. Berendonk C, Stalmeijer RE, Schuwirth LW. Expertise in performance assessment: assessors' perspectives. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2013;18:559-571.