Assessing the climate change impacts of biogenic carbon in buildings: A critical review of two main dynamic approaches

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2018, Pages

  Breton, Charles ^a   Blanchet, Pierre ^a   Amor, Ben ^b   Beauregard, Robert ^a   Chang, Wen Shao ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biogenic carbon; Climate change; Dynamic life cycle assessment; Embodied carbon; Life cycle assessment; Sustainable buildings; Wood construction

Indexed keywords

BIOGENIC EMISSION; BUILDING; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; CONSTRUCTION; DECISION MAKING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY; WOOD;

EID: 85048575782     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su10062020     Document Type: Review

References (177)

1. Rockström, J.; Gaffney, O.; Rogelj, J.; Meinshausen, M.; Nakicenovic, N.; Schellnhuber, H.J. A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science 2017, 355, 1269-1271
2. UNEP; SBCI. Buildings and Climate Change: A Summary for Decision-Makers; United Nations Environment Programme: Paris, France, 2009
3. Levine, M.; ürge-Vorsatz, D.; Blok, K.; Geng, L.; Harvey, D.; Lang, S.; Levermore, G.;MongameliMehlwana, A.; Mirasgedis, S.; Novikova, A.; et al. Residential and commercial buildings. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave, R., Meyer, L.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2007; Chapter 6; pp. 387-446. ISBN 9780521880091
4. Lucon, O.; ürge-Vorsatz, D.; Zain Ahmed, A.; Akbari, H.; Bertoldi, P.; Cabeza, L.F.; Eyre, N.; Gadgil, A.; Harvey, L.D.D.; Jiang, Y.; et al. Buildings. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014; Chapter 9; pp. 671-738
5. De Wolf, C.; Pomponi, F.; Moncaster, A. Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice. Energy Build. 2017, 140, 68-80
6. Moncaster, A.M.; Symons, K.E. A method and tool for 'cradle to grave' embodied carbon and energy impacts of UK buildings in compliance with the new TC350 standards. Energy Build. 2013, 66, 514-523
7. Dixit, M.K.; Fernández-Solís, J.L.; Lavy, S.; Culp, C.H. Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 1238-1247
8. Ibn-Mohammed, T.; Greenough, R.; Taylor, S.; Ozawa-Meida, L.; Acquaye, A. Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings-A review of current trends. Energy Build. 2013, 66, 232-245
9. Rouleau, J.; Gosselin, L.; Blanchet, P. Understanding energy consumption in high-performance social housing buildings: A case study from Canada. Energy 2018, 145, 677-690
10. Cole, R.J.; Kernan, P.C. Life-cycle energy use in office buildings. Build. Environ. 1996, 31, 307-317
11. Sartori, I.; Hestnes, A.G. Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article. Energy Build. 2007, 39, 249-257
12. Ramesh, T.; Prakash, R.; Shukla, K.K. Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 1592-1600
13. Anand, C.K.; Amor, B. Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 67, 408-416
14. Lessard, Y.; Anand, C.K.; Blanchet, P.; Frenette, C.; Amor, B. LEED v4: Where Are We Now? Critical Assessment through the LCA of an Office Building Using a Low Impact Energy Consumption Mix. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017
15. Fouquet, M.; Levasseur, A.; Margni, M.; Lebert, A.; Lasvaux, S.; Souyri, B.; Buhé, C.; Woloszyn, M. Methodological challenges and developments in LCA of low energy buildings: Application to biogenic carbon and global warming assessment. Build. Environ. 2015, 90, 51-59
16. Ciais, P.; Sabine, C.; Bala, G.; Bopp, L.; Brovkin, V.; Canadell, J.; Chhabra, A.; DeFries, R.; Galloway, J.; Heimann, M.; et al. Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles. In Climate Change 2013-The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2013; Chapter 6; pp. 465-570. ISBN 9781107661820
17. USGBC. LEED v4 for Building Design and Construction; U.S. Green Building Council: Washington, DC, USA, 2018
18. Skullestad, J.L.; Bohne, R.A.; Lohne, J. High-rise Timber Buildings as a Climate Change Mitigation Measure-A Comparative LCA of Structural System Alternatives. Energy Procedia 2016, 96, 112-123
19. Lenzen, M.; Treloar, G. Embodied energy in buildings: Wood versus concrete-Reply to Börjesson and Gustavsson. Energy Policy 2002, 30, 249-255
20. Dodoo, A.; Gustavsson, L.; Sathre, R. Lifecycle carbon implications of conventional and low-energy multi-storey timber building systems. Energy Build. 2014, 82, 194-210
21. Bejo, L. Operational vs. Embodied Energy: A Case for Wood Construction. Drv. Ind. 2017, 68, 163-172
22. Gustavsson, L.; Pingoud, K.; Sathre, R. Carbon Dioxide Balance of Wood Substitution: Comparing Concreteand Wood-Framed Buildings. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2006, 11, 667-691
23. Pan, Y.; Birdsey, R.A.; Fang, J.; Houghton, R.; Kauppi, P.E.; Kurz, W.A.; Phillips, O.L.; Shvidenko, A.; Lewis, S.L.; Canadell, J.G.; et al. A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World's Forests. Science 2011, 333, 988-993
24. Seidl, R.; Thom, D.; Kautz, M.; Martin-Benito, D.; Peltoniemi, M.; Vacchiano, G.; Wild, J.; Ascoli, D.; Petr, M.; Honkaniemi, J.; et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 395-402
25. Kurz, W.A.; Shaw, C.H.; Boisvenue, C.; Stinson, G.; Metsaranta, J.; Leckie, D.; Dyk, A.; Smyth, C.E.; Neilson, E.T. Carbon in Canada's boreal forest-A synthesis. Environ. Rev. 2013, 21, 260-292
26. Nabuurs, G.J.; Masera, O.; Andrasko, K.; Benitez-Ponce, P.; Boer, R.; Dutschke, M.; Elsiddig, E.A.; Ford-Robertson, J.; Frumhoff, P.; Karjalainen, T.; et al. Forestry. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave, R., Meyer, L.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2007; Chapter 9; pp. 541-584. ISBN 0521880114
27. Smyth, C.E.; Stinson, G.; Neilson, E.; Lemprière, T.C.; Hafer, M.; Rampley, G.J.; Kurz, W.A. Quantifying the biophysical climate change mitigation potential of Canada's forest sector. Biogeosciences 2014, 11, 3515-3529
28. Giesekam, J.; Pomponi, F. Briefing: Embodied carbon dioxide assessment in buildings: Guidance and gaps. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustain. 2017, 1-8
29. Gasser, T.; Guivarch, C.; Tachiiri, K.; Jones, C.D.; Ciais, P. Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2 °C. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7958
30. Lemprière, T.C.; Kurz, W.A.; Hogg, E.H.; Schmoll, C.; Rampley, G.J.; Yemshanov, D.; McKenney, D.W.; Gilsenan, R.; Beatch, A.; Blain, D.; et al. Canadian boreal forests and climate change mitigation. Environ. Rev. 2013, 21, 293-321
31. Thormark, C. The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building. Build. Environ. 2006, 41, 1019-1026
32. Pajchrowski, G.; Noskowiak, A.; Lewandowska, A.; Strykowski, W. Wood as a building material in the light of environmental assessment of full life cycle of four buildings. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 52, 428-436
33. Fava, J.A. Will the Next 10 Years be as Productive in Advancing Life Cycle Approaches as the Last 15 Years? Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2006, 11, 6-8
34. McManus, M.C.; Taylor, C.M. The changing nature of life cycle assessment. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 82, 13-26
35. Guinée, J.B.; Heijungs, R.; Huppes, G.; Zamagni, A.; Masoni, P.; Buonamici, R.; Ekvall, T.; Rydberg, T. Life Cycle Assessment: Past, Present, and Future. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 90-96
36. Hellweg, S.; Milai Canals, L. Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science 2014, 344, 1109-1113
37. De Rosa, M.; Schmidt, J.; Brandão, M.; Pizzol, M. A flexible parametric model for a balanced account of forest carbon fluxes in LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2017, 22, 172-184
38. Helin, T.; Sokka, L.; Soimakallio, S.; Pingoud, K.; Pajula, T. Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment-A review. GCB Bioenergy 2013, 5, 475-486
39. Guinée, J.B.; Heijungs, R.; van der Voet, E. A greenhouse gas indicator for bioenergy: Some theoretical issues with practical implications. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2009, 14, 328-339
40. Levasseur, A.; Lesage, P.; Margni, M.; Deschênes, L.; Samson, R. Considering Time in LCA: Dynamic LCA and Its Application to Global Warming Impact Assessments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 3169-3174
41. Collinge, W.O.; Landis, A.E.; Jones, A.K.; Schaefer, L.A.; Bilec, M.M. Dynamic life cycle assessment: Framework and application to an institutional building. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2013, 18, 538-552
42. Su, S.; Li, X.; Zhu, Y.; Lin, B. Dynamic LCA framework for environmental impact assessment of buildings. Energy Build. 2017, 149, 310-320
43. Buyle, M.; Braet, J.; Audenaert, A. Life Cycle Assessment of an Apartment Building: Comparison of an Attributional and Consequential Approach. Energy Procedia 2014, 62, 132-140
44. Suh, S.; Huppes, G. Methods for life cycle inventory of a product. J. Clean. Prod. 2005, 13, 687-697
45. Brander, M.; Tipper, R.; Hutchison, C.; Davis, G. Consequential and Attributional Approaches to LCA: A Guide to Policy Makers with Specific Reference to Greenhouse Gas LCA of Biofuels; Ecometrica Press: Edinburgh, UK, 2008; Volume 44
46. Grant, M.J.; Booth, A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inf. Libr. J. 2009, 26, 91-108
47. Nelson, J. Using conceptual depth criteria: Addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research. Qual. Res. 2016, 69-71
48. Booth, A. Unpacking your literature search toolbox: On search styles and tactics. Health Inf. Libr. J. 2008, 25, 313-317
49. Mason, M. Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Forum Qual. Sozialforsch. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 2010, 11
50. O'Reilly, M.; Parker, N. 'Unsatisfactory Saturation': A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qual. Res. 2013, 13, 190-197
51. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097
52. Brandão, M.; Levasseur, A.; Kirschbaum, M.U.F.; Weidema, B.P.; Cowie, A.L.; Jørgensen, S.V.; Hauschild, M.Z.; Pennington, D.W.; Chomkhamsri, K. Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2013, 18, 230-240
53. Brandão, M.; Levasseur, A. Assessing Temporary Carbon Storage in Life Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprinting: Outcomes of an Expert Workshop; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2011
54. Levasseur, A.; Cavalett, O.; Fuglestvedt, J.S.; Gasser, T.; Johansson, D.J.A.; Jørgensen, S.V.; Raugei, M.; Reisinger, A.; Schivley, G.; Strømman, A.; et al. Enhancing life cycle impact assessment from climate science: Review of recent findings and recommendations for application to LCA. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 71, 163-174
55. Levasseur, A. Climate Change. In Life Cycle Impact Assessment; Hauschild, M.Z., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Eds.; LCA Compendium-The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 39-50. ISBN 978-94-017-9743-6
56. Cherubini, F.; Fuglestvedt, J.S.; Gasser, T.; Reisinger, A.; Cavalett, O.; Huijbregts, M.A.J.; Johansson, D.J.A.; Jørgensen, S.V.; Raugei, M.; Schivley, G.; et al. Bridging the gap between impact assessment methods and climate science. Environ. Sci. Policy 2016, 64, 129-140
57. Pawelzik, P.; Carus, M.; Hotchkiss, J.; Narayan, R.; Selke, S.;Wellisch, M.;Weiss, M.;Wicke, B.; Patel, M.K. Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials-Reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2013, 73, 211-228
58. Brown, S.; Lim, B.; Schlamadinger, B. Evaluating approaches for estimating net emissions of carbon dioxide from forest harvesting and wood products. In Proceedings of the IPCC/OECD/IEA Programme on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Dakar, Senegal, 5-7 May 1998; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Geneva, Switzerland, 1998
59. Apps, M.J.; Kurz, W.A.; Beukema, S.J.; Bhatti, J.S. Carbon budget of the Canadian forest product sector. Environ. Sci. Policy 1999, 2, 25-41
60. De Rosa, M.; Pizzol, M.; Schmidt, J. How methodological choices affect LCA climate impact results: The case of structural timber. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2018, 23, 147-158
61. Guest, G.; Cherubini, F.; Strømman, A.H. Global Warming Potential of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Biomass Stored in the Anthroposphere and Used for Bioenergy at End of Life. J. Ind. Ecol. 2013, 17, 20-30
62. Jørgensen, S.V.; Hauschild, M.Z.; Nielsen, P.H. The potential contribution to climate change mitigation from temporary carbon storage in biomaterials. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2015, 20, 451-462
63. Levasseur, A.; Lesage, P.; Margni, M.; Samson, R. Biogenic Carbon and Temporary Storage Addressed with Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment. J. Ind. Ecol. 2013, 17, 117-128
64. Ellison, D.; Lundblad, M.; Petersson, H. Carbon accounting and the climate politics of forestry. Environ. Sci. Policy 2011, 14, 1062-1078
65. 2 emissions from bioenergy. Ecol. Model. 2011, 223, 59-66
66. Jolliet, O.; Brent, A.; Goedkoop, M.; Itsubo, N.; Mueller-Wenk, R.; Peña, C.; Schenk, R.; Stewart, M.; Weidema, B.; Bare, J.; et al. Final Report of the LCIA Definition Study; Life Cycle Impact Assessment Programme of the Life Cycle Initiative: Paris, France, 2003
67. Cherubini, F.; Bright, R.M.; Strømman, A.H. Global climate impacts of forest bioenergy: What, when and how to measure? Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 014049
68. Peters, G.P.; Aamaas, B.; Lund, M.T.; Solli, C.; Fuglestvedt, J.S. Alternative 'Global Warming' Metrics in Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study with Existing Transportation Data. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 8633-8641
69. 2 fluxes in life cycle assessment. GCB Bioenergy 2012, 4, 784-798
70. Shine, K.P.; Derwent, R.G.;Wuebbles, D.J.; Morcrette, J.-J. Radiative forcing of climate. In Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Report Prepared by Working Group I for Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Houghton, J.T., Jenkins, G.J., Ephraum, J.J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA; Melbourne, Australia, 1990; Chapter 2; pp. 41-68. ISBN 0521407206
71. 2 emission metrics for forest bioenergy. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20186
72. Shine, K.P.; Fuglestvedt, J.S.; Hailemariam, K.; Stuber, N. Alternatives to the Global Warming Potential for Comparing Climate Impacts of Emissions of Greenhouse Gases. Clim. Chang. 2005, 68, 281-302
73. Shine, K.P.; Berntsen, T.K.; Fuglestvedt, J.S.; Skeie, R.B.; Stuber, N. Comparing the climate effect of emissions of short-and long-lived climate agents. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2007, 365, 1903-1914
74. Shine, K.P. The global warming potential-The need for an interdisciplinary retrial. Clim. Chang. 2009, 96, 467-472
75. Fuglestvedt, J.S. Metrics of Climate Change: Assessing Radiative Forcing and Emission Indices. Clim. Chang. 2003, 58, 267-331
76. Pierrehumbert, R.T. Short-Lived Climate Pollution. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2014, 42, 341-379
77. Smith, S.J.;Wigley, T.M.L. GlobalWarming Potentials: 2. Accuracy. Clim. Chang. 2000, 44, 459-469
78. Cherubini, F.; Tanaka, K. Amending the Inadequacy of a Single Indicator for Climate Impact Analyses. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 12530-12531
79. Allen, M.R.; Fuglestvedt, J.S.; Shine, K.P.; Reisinger, A.; Pierrehumbert, R.T.; Forster, P.M. New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2016, 6, 773-776
80. Jolliet, O.; Antón, A.; Boulay, A.-M.; Cherubini, F.; Fantke, P.; Levasseur, A.; McKone, T.E.; Michelsen, O.; Milà i Canals, L.; Motoshita, M.; et al. Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: Impacts of climate change, fine particulate matter formation, water consumption and land use. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2018, 1-19
81. Myhre, G.; Shindell, D.; Bréon, F.-M.F.-M.; Collins, W.; Fuglestvedt, J.S.; Huang, J.; Koch, D.; Lamarque, J.-F.J.-F.; Lee, D.; Mendoza, B.; et al. Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing-Supplementary Material. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya, 2013; Chapter 8SM; pp. 1-44
82. 2 Avoided Emissions and Sequestration-Description and Applications in Forestry. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2000, 5, 51-60
83. Fearnside, P.M.; Lashof, D.A.; Moura-Costa, P. Accounting for time in mitigating global warming through land-use change and forestry. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2000, 5, 239-270
84. Clift, R.; Brandão, M. Carbon Storage and Timing of Emissions-A Note by Roland Clift and Miguel Brandao; Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey: Surrey, UK, 2008
85. Marland, G.; Marland, E.S.; Shirley, K.; Cantrell, J.; Stellar, K. Accounting for sequestered carbon: The value of temporary storage. In Assessing Temporary Carbon Storage in Life Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprinting: Outcomes of an Expert Workshop; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2011; pp. 51-53
86. Marland, G.H.; Marland, E.S. Trading permanent and temporary carbon emissions credits. Clim. Chang. 2009, 95, 465-468
87. Kirschbaum, M.U.F. To sink or burn? A discussion of the potential contributions of forests to greenhouse gas balances through storing carbon or providing biofuels. Biomass Bioenergy 2003, 24, 297-310
88. Kirschbaum, M.U.F. Can Trees Buy Time? An Assessment of the Role of Vegetation Sinks as Part of the Global Carbon Cycle. Clim. Chang. 2003, 58, 47-71
89. Kirschbaum, M.U.F. Temporary Carbon Sequestration Cannot Prevent Climate Change. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2006, 11, 1151-1164
90. Kirschbaum, M.U.F. Temporary Carbon Sequestration Cannot Prevent Climate Change. In Assessing Temporary Carbon Storage in Life Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprinting: Outcomes of an Expert Workshop; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2011; pp. 38-50
91. Levasseur, A.; Lesage, P.; Margni, M.; Brandão, M.; Samson, R. Assessing temporary carbon sequestration and storage projects through land use, land-use change and forestry: Comparison of dynamic life cycle assessment with ton-year approaches. Clim. Chang. 2012, 115, 759-776
92. 2: Where Should Humanity Aim? Open Atmos. Sci. J. 2008, 2, 217-231
93. Jørgensen, S.V.; Hauschild, M.Z.; Nielsen, P.H. Assessment of urgent impacts of greenhouse gas emissions-The climate tipping potential (CTP). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2014, 19, 919-930
94. Røyne, F.; Peñaloza, D.; Sandin, G.; Berlin, J.; Svanström, M. Climate impact assessment in life cycle assessments of forest products: Implications of method choice for results and decision-making. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 116, 90-99
95. Tellnes, L.G.F.; Ganne-Chedeville, C.; Dias, A.; Dolezal, F.; Hill, C.; Escamilla, E.Z. Comparative assessment for biogenic carbon accounting methods in carbon footprint of products: A review study for construction materials based on forest products. IForest 2017, 10, 815-823
96. Peñaloza, D.; Erlandsson, M.; Falk, A. Exploring the climate impact effects of increased use of bio-based materials in buildings. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 125, 219-226
97. Jørgensen, S.V.; Hauschild, M.Z. Need for relevant timescales when crediting temporary carbon storage. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2013, 18, 747-754
98. Guest, G.; Bright, R.M.; Cherubini, F.; Strømman, A.H. Consistent quantification of climate impacts due to biogenic carbon storage across a range of bio-product systems. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2013, 43, 21-30
99. Suter, F.; Steubing, B.; Hellweg, S. Life Cycle Impacts and Benefits of Wood along the Value Chain: The Case of Switzerland. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 874-886
100. Perez-Garcia, J.; Lippke, B.; Comnick, J.; Manriquez, C. An assessment of carbon pools, storage, and wood products market substitution using life-cycle analysis results. Wood Fiber Sci. 2005, 37, 140-148
101. Sathre, R.; O'Connor, J. Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution. Environ. Sci. Policy 2010, 13, 104-114
102. Smyth, C.E.; Rampley, G.; Lemprière, T.C.; Schwab, O.; Kurz, W.A. Estimating product and energy substitution benefits in national-scale mitigation analyses for Canada. GCB Bioenergy 2017, 9, 1071-1084
103. Yan, Y. Integrate carbon dynamic models in analyzing carbon sequestration impact of forest biomass harvest. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 581-587
104. 2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 015007
105. Boucher, O.; Reddy, M.S. Climate trade-offbetween black carbon and carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 193-200
106. Boucher, O.; Friedlingstein, P.; Collins, B.; Shine, K.P. The indirect global warming potential and global temperature change potential due to methane oxidation. Environ. Res. Lett. 2009, 4, 044007
107. Ericsson, N.; Porsö, C.; Ahlgren, S.; Nordberg, Å.; Sundberg, C.; Hansson, P.-A. Time-dependent climate impact of a bioenergy system-Methodology development and application to Swedish conditions. GCB Bioenergy 2013, 5, 580-590
108. Hammar, T.; Ortiz, C.A.; Stendahl, J.; Ahlgren, S.; Hansson, P.-A. Time-Dynamic Effects on the Global Temperature When Harvesting Logging Residues for Bioenergy. BioEnergy Res. 2015, 8, 1912-1924
109. Ortiz, C.A.; Hammar, T.; Ahlgren, S.; Hansson, P.-A.; Stendahl, J. Time-dependent global warming impact of tree stump bioenergy in Sweden. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 371, 5-14
110. Aracil, C.; Haro, P.; Giuntoli, J.; Ollero, P. Proving the climate benefit in the production of biofuels from municipal solid waste refuse in Europe. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 2887-2900
111. Kilpeläinen, A.; Kellomäki, S.; Strandman, H. Net atmospheric impacts of forest bioenergy production and utilization in Finnish boreal conditions. GCB Bioenergy 2012, 4, 811-817
112. Haus, S.; Gustavsson, L.; Sathre, R. Climate mitigation comparison of woody biomass systems with the inclusion of land-use in the reference fossil system. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 65, 136-144
113. Sathre, R.; Gustavsson, L. Time-dependent radiative forcing effects of forest fertilization and biomass substitution. Biogeochemistry 2012, 109, 203-218
114. Giuntoli, J.; Caserini, S.; Marelli, L.; Baxter, D.; Agostini, A. Domestic heating from forest logging residues: Environmental risks and benefits. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 99, 206-216
115. Giuntoli, J.; Agostini, A.; Caserini, S.; Lugato, E.; Baxter, D.; Marelli, L. Climate change impacts of power generation from residual biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 89, 146-158
116. Kendall, A. Time-adjusted global warming potentials for LCA and carbon footprints. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2012, 17, 1042-1049
117. Petersen, A.K.; Solberg, B. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Costs over the Life Cycle ofWood and Alternative Flooring Materials. Clim. Chang. 2004, 64, 143-167
118. Petersen, A.K.; Solberg, B. Greenhouse gas emissions, life-cycle inventory and cost-efficiency of using laminated wood instead of steel construction. Environ. Sci. Policy 2002, 5, 169-182
119. Kirkinen, J.; Palosuo, T.; Holmgren, K.; Savolainen, I. Greenhouse Impact Due to the Use of Combustible Fuels: Life Cycle Viewpoint and Relative Radiative Forcing Commitment. Environ. Manag. 2008, 42, 458-469
120. Kirkinen, J. Greenhouse Impact Assessment of Some Combustible Fuels with a Dynamic Life Cycle Approach; VTT Publications: Espoo, Finland, 2010
121. O'Hare, M.; Plevin, R.J.; Martin, J.I.; Jones, A.D.; Kendall, A.; Hopson, E. Proper accounting for time increases crop-based biofuels' greenhouse gas deficit versus petroleum. Environ. Res. Lett. 2009, 4, 024001
122. Kendall, A.; Price, L. Incorporating Time-Corrected Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Vehicle Regulations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 2557-2563
123. Kendall, A.; Chang, B.; Sharpe, B. Accounting for Time-Dependent Effects in Biofuel Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 7142-7147
124. Collinge, W.O.; Liao, L.; Xu, H.; Saunders, C.L.; Bilec, M.M.; Landis, A.E.; Jones, A.K.; Schaefer, L.A. Enabling dynamic life cycle assessment of buildings with wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST), Chicago, IL, USA, 16-18 May 2011; pp. 1-6
125. 2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: Atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. GCB Bioenergy 2011, 3, 413-426
126. Peñaloza, D.; Erlandsson, M.; Pousette, A. Climate impacts from road bridges: Effects of introducing concrete carbonation and biogenic carbon storage in wood. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2018, 14, 56-67
127. Almeida, J.; Degerickx, J.; Achten, W.M.J.; Muys, B. Greenhouse gas emission timing in life cycle assessment and the global warming potential of perennial energy crops. Carbon Manag. 2015, 6, 185-195
128. Pittau, F.; Krause, F.; Lumia, G.; Habert, G. Fast-growing bio-based materials as an opportunity for storing carbon in exterior walls. Build. Environ. 2018, 129, 117-129
129. Gaudreault, C.; Miner, R. Temporal Aspects in Evaluating the Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Benefits of Using Residues from Forest Products Manufacturing Facilities for Energy Production. J. Ind. Ecol. 2015, 19, 994-1007
130. Yang, J.; Chen, B. Global warming impact assessment of a crop residue gasification project-A dynamic LCA perspective. Appl. Energy 2014, 122, 269-279
131. Beloin-Saint-Pierre, D.; Heijungs, R.; Blanc, I. The ESPA (Enhanced Structural Path Analysis) method: A solution to an implementation challenge for dynamic life cycle assessment studies. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2014, 19, 861-871
132. Beloin-Saint-Pierre, D.; Levasseur, A.; Margni, M.; Blanc, I. Implementing a Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment Methodology with a Case Study on Domestic Hot Water Production. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 1128-1138
133. Dyckhoff, H.; Kasah, T. Time Horizon and Dominance in Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment. J. Ind. Ecol. 2014, 18, 799-808
134. Pinsonnault, A.; Lesage, P.; Levasseur, A.; Samson, R. Temporal differentiation of background systems in LCA: Relevance of adding temporal information in LCI databases. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2014, 19, 1843-1853
135. Bright, R.M.; Cherubini, F.; Strømman, A.H. Climate impacts of bioenergy: Inclusion of carbon cycle and albedo dynamics in life cycle impact assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2012, 37, 2-11
136. Guest, G.; Strømman, A.H. Climate Change Impacts Due to Biogenic Carbon: Addressing the Issue of Attribution Using Two Metrics with Very Different Outcomes. J. Sustain. For. 2014, 33, 298-326
137. Mehr, J.; Vadenbo, C.; Steubing, B.; Hellweg, S. Environmentally optimal wood use in Switzerland-Investigating the relevance of material cascades. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 131, 181-191
138. 2 for bioenergy: Contributions from carbon fluxes and albedo dynamics. Environ. Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 045902
139. 2: Reconciling single stand and landscape level approaches. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 129, 292-301
140. Collinge, W.O.; Landis, A.E.; Jones, A.K.; Schaefer, L.A.; Bilec, M.M. Indoor environmental quality in a dynamic life cycle assessment framework for whole buildings: Focus on human health chemical impacts. Build. Environ. 2013, 62, 182-190
141. Collinge, W.O.; Landis, A.E.; Jones, A.K.; Schaefer, L.A.; Bilec, M.M. Productivity metrics in dynamic LCA for whole buildings: Using a post-occupancy evaluation of energy and indoor environmental quality tradeoffs. Build. Environ. 2014, 82, 339-348
142. Pingoud, K.; Ekholm, T.; Savolainen, I. Global warming potential factors and warming payback time as climate indicators of forest biomass use. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2012, 17, 369-386
143. 2. Ecol. Model. 2013, 248, 130-134
144. Helin, T.; Salminen, H.; Hynynen, J.; Soimakallio, S.; Huuskonen, S.; Pingoud, K. Global warming potentials of stemwood used for energy and materials in Southern Finland: Differentiation of impacts based on type of harvest and product lifetime. GCB Bioenergy 2016, 8, 334-345
145. Joos, F.; Roth, R.; Fuglestvedt, J.S.; Peters, G.P.; Enting, I.G.; von Bloh, W.; Brovkin, V.; Burke, E.J.; Eby, M.; Edwards, N.R.; et al. Carbon dioxide and climate impulse response functions for the computation of greenhouse gas metrics: A multi-model analysis. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 2793-2825
146. 2 and temperature impulse response functions. Earth Syst. Dyn. 2013, 4, 267-286
147. Huijbregts, M.A.J. A critical view on scientific consensus building in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2014, 19, 477-479
148. Tellnes, L.G.F.; Gobakken, L.R.; Flæte, P.O.; Alfredsen, G. Carbon footprint including effect of carbon storage for selected wooden facade materials. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2014, 9, 139-143
149. 2 fluxes from bioenergy and climate-A response. Ecol. Model. 2013, 253, 79-81
150. Wigley, T.M.L. A simple inverse carbon cycle model. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 1991, 5, 373-382
151. Joos, F.; Bruno, M.; Fink, R.; Siegenthaler, U.; Stocker, T.F.; Le Quéré, C.; Sarmiento, J.L. An efficient and accurate representation of complex oceanic and biospheric models of anthropogenic carbon uptake. Tellus B 1996, 48, 397-417
152. 2 in the ocean-An inorganic ocean-Circulation carbon cycle model. Clim. Dyn. 1987, 2, 63-90
153. Schnute, J. A Versatile Growth Model with Statistically Stable Parameters. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1981, 38, 1128-1140
154. Liu, Z.; Li, F. The generalized Chapman-Richards function and applications to tree and stand growth. J. For. Res. 2003, 14, 19-26
155. Marland, E.S.; Stellar, K.; Marland, G.H. A distributed approach to accounting for carbon in wood products. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2010, 15, 71-91
156. KT Innovations; Thinkstep; Autodesk Tally-OVERVIEW. Available online: http://choosetally.com/overview (accessed on 2 April 2018)
157. UBUBI-The Cloud-Powered LCA Tool for Sustainable Buildings. Available online: http://www.ububi. org/papers.html (accessed on 2 April 2018)
158. Dupuis, M.; April, A.; Lesage, P.; Forgues, D. Method to Enable LCA Analysis through Each Level of Development of a BIM Model. Procedia Eng. 2017, 196, 857-863
159. Hollberg, A.; Ruth, J. LCA in architectural design-A parametric approach. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2016, 21, 943-960
160. Lolli, N.; Fufa, S.M.; Inman, M. A Parametric Tool for the Assessment of Operational Energy Use, Embodied Energy and Embodied Material Emissions in Building. Energy Procedia 2017, 111, 21-30
161. Pauliuk, S.; Majeau-Bettez, G.; Mutel, C.L.; Steubing, B.; Stadler, K. Lifting Industrial Ecology Modeling to a New Level of Quality and Transparency: A Call for More Transparent Publications and a Collaborative Open Source Software Framework. J. Ind. Ecol. 2015, 19, 937-949
162. Steubing, B. Activity Browser-A Free and Extendable LCA Software. Available online: https://bitbucket. org/bsteubing/activity-browser (accessed on 2 April 2018)
163. 2 Dynamic Carbon Footprinter. Available online: http://www.ciraig.org/en/dynco2.php (accessed on 27 March 2018)
164. Cabeza, L.F.; Rincón, L.; Vilariño, V.; Pérez, G.; Castell, A. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 29, 394-416
165. Erlandsson, M.; Borg, M. Generic LCA-methodology applicable for buildings, constructions and operation services-Today practice and development needs. Build. Environ. 2003, 38, 919-938
166. Khasreen, M.; Banfill, P.F.; Menzies, G. Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review. Sustainability 2009, 1, 674-701
167. Ortiz, O.; Castells, F.; Sonnemann, G. Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 28-39
168. Buyle, M.; Braet, J.; Audenaert, A. Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 26, 379-388
169. Zabalza Bribián, I.; Aranda Usón, A.; Scarpellini, S. Life cycle assessment in buildings: State-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification. Build. Environ. 2009, 44, 2510-2520
170. Säynäjoki, A.; Heinonen, J.; Junnila, S.; Horvath, A. Can life-cycle assessment produce reliable policy guidelines in the building sector? Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 013001
171. Pomponi, F.; Moncaster, A. Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment-What does the evidence say? J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 181, 687-700
172. Tittmann, P.; Yeh, S. A Framework for Assessing the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Benefits of Forest Bioenergy and Biofuel in an Era of Forest Carbon Management. J. Sustain. For. 2013, 32, 108-129
173. Law, B.E.; Harmon, M.E. Forest sector carbon management, measurement and verification, and discussion of policy related to climate change. Carbon Manag. 2011, 2, 73-84
174. Lippke, B.; Oneil, E.; Harrison, R.; Skog, K.E.; Gustavsson, L.; Sathre, R. Life cycle impacts of forest management and wood utilization on carbon mitigation: Knowns and unknowns. Carbon Manag. 2011, 2, 303-333
175. Geng, A.; Yang, H.; Chen, J.; Hong, Y. Review of carbon storage function of harvested wood products and the potential of wood substitution in greenhouse gas mitigation. For. Policy Econ. 2017, 85, 192-200
176. Sathre, R.; O'Connor, J. A Synthesis of Research on Wood Products & Greenhouse Gas Impacts, 2nd ed.; FPInnovations: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2010
177. Pomponi, F.; D'Amico, B.; Moncaster, A. A Method to Facilitate Uncertainty Analysis in LCAs of Buildings. Energies 2017, 10, 524