Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice

Energy and Buildings

Volumn 140, Issue , 2017, Pages 68-80

  De Wolf, Catherine ^a   Pomponi, Francesco ^a   Moncaster, Alice ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Construction sector; Embodied carbon dioxide equivalent; Greenhouse gas emissions; Industry practice

Indexed keywords

BUILDING CODES; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

CONSTRUCTION SECTORS; CONSTRUCTION WORKS; CURRENT CONSTRUCTION; EMBODIED CARBONS; ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATIONS; INDUSTRY PRACTICES; MULTIPLE DATA SOURCES; STANDARDIZED METHODS;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 85011879329     PISSN: 03787788     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.075     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. [1] UNEP SBCI, Buildings and Climate Change. Summary for Decision-Makers, United Nations Environment Program Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative (2009).
2. [2] Sartori, I., Hestnes, A.G., Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: a review article. Energy Build. 39 (2007), 249–257.
3. [3] Giordano, R., Serra, V., Tortalla, E., Valentini, V., Aghemo, C., Embodied energy and operational energy assessment in the framework of nearly zero energy building and building energy rating. Energy Proceedia 78 (2015), 3204–3209.
4. [4] International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Retrieved July 29, 2016, from: www.iso.org.
5. [5] European Norms, Sustainability of construction works, Retrieved July 29, 2016, from www.cen.eu.
6. [6] Pomponi, F., Moncaster, A.M., Embodied carbon in the built environment: management, mitigation, and reduction – what does the evidence say?. J. Environ. Manage., 2016 (in press).
7. [7] IWLCiB, Implementing Whole Life Carbon in Buildings, Innovate UK and UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Retrieved December 1, 2016, from: gow.epsrc.ac.uk/NGBOViewGrant.aspx?GrantRef=EP/N509024/1.
8. [8] Morgan, D.L., The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. 2008, SAGE, Publications, Inc.
9. [9] Knight, A., Ruddock, L., Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment. 2008, Wiley-Blackwell.
10. [10] Moncaster, A.M., Symons, K.E., A method and tool for ‘cradle to grave’ embodied carbon and energy impacts of UK buildings in compliance with the new TC350. Energy Build. 66 (2013), 514–523.
11. [11] Cabeza, L.F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., Castell, A., Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 29 (2014), 394–416.
12. [12] Dixit, M.K., Fernández-Solís, J.L., Lavy, S., Culp, C.H., Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: a literature review. Energy Build. 42:8 (2010), 1238–1247, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.02.016.
13. [13] Clark, D.H., What Color Is Your Building? Measuring and Reducing the Energy and Carbon Footprint of Buildings. 2013, RIBA Publishing, London 263 p.
14. [14] Ding, G.K.C., The Development of a Multi-criteria Approach for the Measurement of Sustainable Performance for Built Projects and Facilities., 2004, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia (Ph.D. Thesis).
15. [15] Cole, R.J., Kernan, P.C., Life-cycle energy use in office buildings. Build. Environ. 31:4 (1996), 307–317.
16. [16] Eaton, K.J., Amato, A., A comparative life cycle assessment of steel and concrete framed office buildings. J. Constr. Steel Res. 46 (1998), 1–3 CD-ROM.
17. [17] De Wolf, C., Ochsendorf, J., Cox, D., Hattan, A., Yang, F., Charlson, A., Survey of material quantities and embodied carbon in existing building structures. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng.—Eng. Sustain. 169:ES4 (2016), 150–161, 10.1680/ensu.15.00033.
18. [18] Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., Shukla, K.K., Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: an overview. Energy Build. 42 (2010), 1592–1600.
19. [19] Sinha, R., Lennartsson, M., Frostell, B., Environmental footprint assessment of building structures: a comparative study. Build. Environ. 104 (2016), 162–171.
20. [20] Anand, C.K., Amor, B., Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: a critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 67 (2017), 408–416.
21. [21] Giesekam, J., Barrett, J.R., Taylor, P., Construction sector views on low carbon building materials. Build. Res. Inf. 44:4 (2016), 423–444.
22. [22] Ng, S.T., Wong, J., Skitmore, M., Challenges facing carbon dioxide labelling of construction materials. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng.—Eng. Sustain. 166:ES1 (2013), 20–31.
23. [23] Fouché, M., Crawford, R., The Australian construction industry's approach to embodied carbon assessment: a scoping study. Crawford, R.H., Stephan, A., (eds.) Living and Learning: Research for a Better Built Environment: 49th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association, University of Melbourne, 2015, 578–587.
24. [24] Davies, P.J., Emmitt, S., Firth, S.K., Challenges for capturing and assessing initial embodied energy: a contractor's perspective. Constr. Manage. Econ. 32:3 (2014), 290–308, 10.1080/01446193.2014.884280.
25. [25] Lützkendorf, T., Foliente, G., Balouktsi, M., Wiberg, A.H., Net-zero buildings: incorporating embodied impacts. Build. Res. Inf. 43:1 (2015), 62–81, 10.1080/09613218.2014.935575.
26. [26] Gavotsis, E., Moncaster, A., Improved embodied energy and carbon accounting: recommendations for industry and policy. Athens J. Technol. Eng. 2:1 (2015), 9–23.
27. [27] Simonen, K., Motivating Low-Carbon Construction: Opportunities and Challenges A Road Map for Rapid and Significant Impact, Carbon Leadership Forum White Paper. 2011, University of Washington, Department of Architecture, Seattle.
28. [28] Ariyaratne, C.I., Moncaster, A.M., Stand-alone calculation tools are not the answer to embodied carbon assessment. Energy Procedia 62 (2014), 150–159, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.376.
29. [29] Dixit, M.K., Fernández-Solís, J.L., Lavy, S., Culp, C.H., Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: a review paper. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16:6 (2012), 3730–3743.
30. [30] Moncaster, A., Song, J., A comparative review of existing data and methodologies for calculating embodied energy and carbon of buildings. Int. J. Sustain. Build. Technol. Urban Dev. 3:1 (2012), 26–36, 10.1080/2093761X. 2012.673915.
31. [31] Skanska, Carbon Footprinting in Construction – examples from Finland, Norway, Sweden, UK and US, Case Study 76, Report, 2010.
32. [32] Knight, D., Addis, B., Embodied carbon dioxide as a design tool – a case study. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng.—Civil Eng. 164:4 (2011), 171–176.
33. [33] Arup, British Land 5 Broadgate Embodied Carbon Tracking Report, (2014) London.
34. [34] Statsbygg, Klimagassregnskap. No Versjon 3 – A Model For Sitannet Calculation Of Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions For Buildings, Report, September 2011.
35. [35] UK Green Building Council, Embodied Carbon Week – Seeing the whole picture, Key findings from Embodied Carbon Week (2014).
36. [36] Embodied Carbon Industry Task Force, Embodied Carbon Industry Task Force Recommendations, June 2014, Report.
37. [37] WRAP, Share and compare embodied carbon data, Embodied Carbon Database, Retrieved August 1, 2016, from: ecdb.wrap.org.uk.
38. [38] Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), Methodology to Calculate Embodied Carbon of Materials, Professional Information Paper. 2012, RICS QS & Construction Standards, United Kingdom.
39. [39] Low Carbon Construction Innovation & Growth Team (LCCIGT), HM Government Final Report, 2010.
40. [40] A. McIntosh, G. Roberts, Whole-life carbon footprint measurement and offices, British Council for Offices (BCO) report, March 2012.
41. [41] S. Sturgis, G. Roberts, Redefining zero: carbon profiling as a solution to whole life carbon emission measurement in buildings, RICS Research Report, May 2010.
42. [42] American Institute of Architects (AIA), AIA guide to building life cycle assessment in practice, United States, Retrieved on August 11, 2016, from www.org/aiaucmp/groups/aia/documents/pdf/aiab082942.pdf.
43. [43] Tally™ beta, Revit add-in Tally™ Real Time Environmental Impact tool, Kieran Timberlake Research Group.
44. [44] Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, Impact Estimator for Buildings, (2009).
45. [45] MMG, Milieugerelateerde Materiaalprestatie van Gebouwelementen, Retrieved May 17, 2016, from: www.ovam.be.
46. [46] SBToolCZ, Retrieved May 4, 2016, from: www.sbtool.cz.
47. [47] Skidmore, Owings and Merrill (SOM), Environmental Analysis Tool™, Retrieved August 1, 2016, from www.som.com/publication/environmental-analysis-tool-tm.
48. [48] BEES, Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability, Retrieved June 19, 2016 from www.nist.gov/el/economics/BEESSoftware.cfm.
49. [49] C. Jensen, Environment Agency carbon calculator tool, Retrieved on June 19, 2016 from www.ice.org.uk/disciplines-and-resources/best-practice/environment-agency-carbon-calculator-tool.
50. [50] GaBi PE International, GaBi 4 extension database III: steel module and GaBi 4 extension database XIV: construction materials module, Retrieved May 1, 2016, from www.gabi-software.com.
51. [51] SimaPro, The world's most widely used LCA software, Retrieved July 12, 2016, from www.simapro.co.uk.
52. [52] OpenLCA, Retrieved June 15, 2016, from www.openlca.org.
53. [53] Kotaji, S., Schuurmans, A., Edwards, S., Life-Cycle Assessment in Building and Construction: A State-of-the-art Report, 2003., 2003, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), USA ISBN 1-880611-59-7.
54. [54] EcoInvent, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Retrieved May 13, 2016, from www.ecoinvent.ch.
55. [55] H. Lehtinen, A., Saarentaus, J., Rouhiainen, M., Pitts, A. Azapagic, A Review of LCA Methods and Tools and their Suitability for SMEs, report compiled as part of the BIOCHEM project, work package 3, deliverable 3.2, Europe Innova, Eco-Innovation, May 2011.
56. [56] Thornton Tomasetti, Embodied Carbon and Energy Efficiency Tool, Retrieved August 9, 2016, from core.thorntontomasetti.com/embodied-carbon-efficiency-tool/.
57. [57] C. De Wolf, J. Ochsendorf, Participating in an Embodied Carbon Database, Structural Engineer, February Issue (2014) 30–31.
58. [58] National Ready Mixed Concrete Association (NRMCA), Sustainability and the Concrete Industry, Retrieved February 18, 2016, from www.nrmca.org/sustainability/index.asp.
59. [59] Collins, F., Inclusion of carbonation during the life cycle of built and recycled concrete: influence on their carbon footprint. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15:6 (2010), 549–556.
60. [60] Young, S.B., Shannon, T., Russell, A., What LCA can Tell Us About the Cement Industry. Five Winds International. 2002, World Business Council for Sustainable Development 117 p.
61. [61] World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), Cement Sustainability Initiative, Getting the Numbers Right Report, Retrieved May 16, 2015, from: www.wbcsdcement.org.
62. [62] Chapman, P.F., Roberts, F., Metal Resources and Energy. 1983, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
63. [63] Institute of Stainless Steel Forum (ISSF), ISSF – Stainless steel LCI spreadsheet, Brussels (2004).
64. [64] World Steel, Life cycle thinking. World steel association, Retrieved February 18, 2016, from www.worldsteel.org/steel-by-topic/life-cycle-assessment.html.
65. [65] Pullen, S., Estimating the embodied energy of timber building products. J. Inst. Wood Sci. 15:3(87) (2000), 147–151.
66. [66] CORRIM, Carbon Accounting. Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials, Retrieved February 18, 2014, from www.corrim.org/research/carbon.asp.
67. [67] Hammond, G., Jones, C., Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE), Version 1.6a. Sustainable Energy Research Team (SERT). 2010, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bath, UK: University of Bath.
68. [68] Hutchins Black Book, The cost and carbon guide. 2011, Franklin + Andrews −Mott MacDonald, United Kingdom 740 p.
69. [69] Quartz, Retrieved February 16, 2016, from www.quartzproject.org/p/CP168-a00/q/concrete#cp.
70. [70] U.S. LCI Database, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Retrieved June 1, 2016, from www.nrel.gov/lci/.
71. [71] Webster, M.D., Meryman, H., Slivers, A., Rodriguez-Nikl, T., Lemay, L., Simonen, K., Structure and Carbon – How Materials Affect the Climate. 2012, SEI Sustainability Committee, Reston, VA : American Society of Civil Engineers.
72. [72] Bouwkwaliteit, Nationale Milieudatabase, The Netherlands. Retrieved April 26, 2016, from www.milieudatabase.nl.
73. [73] EPD Database, Retrieved July 8, 2016, from www.health.belgium.be/en/database-environmental-product-declarations-epd.
74. [74] INIES, Environmental and health reference data for building. Retrieved July 27, 2016, from: www.inies.fr.
75. [75] Ökobaudat, Informationsportal nachhaltiges bauen, Germany. Retrieved April 26, 2016 from www.oekobaudat.de.
76. [76] IVAM, IVAM LCA Data 4.0, Building Ecology, Retrieved on May 27, 2016, from www.buildingecology.com/sustainability/life-cycle-assessment/life-cycle-assessment-software/ivam-lca-data-4.0.
77. [77] IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Retrieved May 19, 2016, from: www.ivl.se/engelska/.
78. [78] BPLCI, The Building Products Life Cycle Inventory, Retrieved June 10, 2016, from www.bpic.asn.au/lci/.
79. [79] Robati, M., McCarthy, T.J., Kokogiannakis, G., Incorporating environmental evaluation and thermal properties of concrete mix designs. Constr. Build. Mater. 128 (2016), 422–435.
80. [80] eTool, Life Cycle Assessment Software in, 2014.
81. [81] BPIC, Building Product Life Cycle Inventory, Building Product Innovation Council, 2014.
82. [82] Crawford, R., Life Cycle Assessment in the Built Environment. 2011, Taylor & Francis.
83. [83] AusLCI, The Australian National Life Cycle Inventory Database, 2016.
84. 2 Coefficients for NZ Building Materials, Wellington,Centre for Building Performance Research. 2003, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
85. [85] ELCD, EPLCA European reference Life-Cycle Database, Retrieved June 18, 2016, from eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ELCD3/.
86. [86] Business, Innovation and Skills, Low Carbon Construction, Innovation & Growth Team, Final Report., 2010, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London.
87. [87] Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), Government conversion factors for company reporting, Retrieved May 13, 2016, from: www.ukconversionfactorscarbonsmart.co.uk.
88. [88] WRAP, Net Waste Tool, Retrieved May 1, 2016, from nwtool.wrap.prg.uk.
89. [89] BCIS, Building Cost Information Service (BCIS) Life Expectancy of building Components 2006, RICS NRM 3, United Kingdom.
90. [90] CIBSE, CIBSE Guide M 2014, RICS NRM 3, for M& E assets, United Kingdom.
91. [91] Product Environmental Footprinting (PEF) Method, Retrieved May 17, 2016, from ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/pdf/footprint/PEFmethodologyfinaldraft.pdf.
92. [92] Vuorinen, O., CEN Standardization on Sustainability of Construction Works. 2012, Rakennusteollisuus, Finish Association of Construction Product Industries, Helsinki, Finland presentation May 14–15, 19 p.
93. [93] Ciroth, A., Muller, S., Weidema, B.P., Lesage, P., Empirically based uncertainty factors for the pedigree matrix in ecoinvent. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21:9 (2016), 1338–1348.
94. [94] PAS2050, Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services, BSI report (2011).
95. [95] ILCD, International Reference Life Cycle Data System Handbook, Institute for Environment and Sustainability in the European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Retrieved April 30, 2016, from: eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/?page_id=86.
96. [96] Science Based Targets, Driving Ambitious Corporate Climate Action, Retrieved June 10, 2016, from sciencebasedtargets.org.
97. [97] Dow Jones Sustainability World Index (DJSI), RobercoSam, Retrieved on June 18, 2016 from: www.sustainability-indices.com/index-family-overview/djsi-family-overview/index.jsp.
98. [98] GRESB, Enhancing and protecting shareholder value by evaluating and improving the sustainability performance of real assets, Retrieved on June 17, 2016, from: www.gresb.com.
99. [99] CDP, Reporting to CDP's climate change program, Retrieved June 18, 2016 from: www.cdp.net/en-US/Respond/Pages/carbon.aspx.
100. [100] RE100, The world's most influential companies, Retrieved June 16, 2016, from there100.org.
101. [101] SE 2050, The Structural Engineering 2050 Commitment Initiative, Carbon Leadership Forum, Internal Report, 2016.
102. [102] Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology (BREEAM), Retrieved September 15, 2015, from www.breeam.org.
103. [103] USGBC, LEED v4 for Building Design and Construction. 2013, U.S. Green Building Council, Washington D.C 154 p.
104. [104] Lloyd, S.M., Ries, R., Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life-cycle assessment: a survey of quantitative approaches. J. Ind. Ecol. 11 (2007), 161–179.
105. [105] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Working Group, Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis. [T.F. Stocker, D., Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M., Tignor, S.K., Allen, J., Boschung, A., Nauels, Y., Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)], Cambridge University Press Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp.
106. [106] American Concrete Institute (ACI), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-95) and Commentary (ACI 318R-95), Retrieved December 1, 2016, from: law.resource.org/pub/us/cfr/ibr/001/aci.318.1995.pdf.
107. [107] American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), Specifications, Codes and Standards, Retrieved December 1, 2016, from: www.aisc.org/content.aspx?id=2884.
108. [108] Eurocodes, EN 1990: Basis for structural design, Retrieved December 1, 2016, from: eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/showpage.php?id=130.
109. [109] Australian/New Zealand Standard (AU/NZS), Structural design actions, Retrieved December 1, 2016, from: https://law.resource.org/pub/nz/ibr/as-nzs.1170.0.2002.pdf.