Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy

Environmental Research Letters

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Sterman, John D ^a   Siegel, Lori ^b   Rooney Varga, Juliette N ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Climate Interactive   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL   (United States)

Author keywords

bioenergy; biofuels; climate change; greenhouse gas emissions; system dynamics; wood pellets

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC RADIATION; BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE MODELS; COAL; COMBUSTION; FORESTRY; FOSSIL FUELS; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; HARDWOODS; HARVESTING; LIFE CYCLE; SOIL TESTING; SUPPLY CHAINS; WOOD;

BIO-ENERGY; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; RADIATIVE FORCINGS; SUBSTITUTION OF WOODS; SUPPLY CHAIN EMISSIONS; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; WOOD PELLET;

COAL COMBUSTION;

ATMOSPHERIC GAS; BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON FLUX; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; EUROPEAN UNION; GREENHOUSE GAS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; PLANTATION FORESTRY; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; POWER GENERATION; TIMBER HARVESTING; WOOD;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 85041094879     PISSN: 17489318     EISSN: 17489326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa512     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Achat D, Deleuze C, Landmann G, Pousse N, Ranger J and Augusto L 2015 Quantifying consequences of removing harvesting residues on forest soils and tree growth-a meta-analysis Forest Ecol. Manage. 348 124-41
2. Biofuture Platform 2017 Biofuture@COP23: Major countries agree to scale up the low carbon bioeconomy and develop sustainable biofuels targets http://biofutureplatform.org/major-countries-agree-scale-low-carbon-bioeconomy-develop-sustainable-biofuels-targets/
3. Brack D 2017 The Impacts of of the Demand for Woody Biomass for Power and Heat on Climate and Forests (London: Chatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs)
4. Buchholz T, Hurteau M D, Gunn J and Saah D 2016 A global meta-analysis of forest bioenergy greenhouse gas emission accounting studies Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy 8 281-9
5. Cornwall W 2017 Is wood a green source of energy? Scientists are divided Science 355 18-21
6. Creutzig F et al 2015 Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: An assessment Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy 7 916-44
7. DeCicco J M 2013 Biofuel's carbon balance: Doubts, certainties and implications Clim. Change 121 801-14
8. Doyle A and Roche A 2017 Reuters Nineteen nations say they will use more bioenergy to slow climate change www.reuters.com/article/us-climatechange-accord-biofuels/nineteen-nations-say-theyll-use-more-bioenergy-to-slow-climate-change-idUSKBN1DG2DO
9. European Commission 2003 Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 (Brussels: European Parliament) 32-46 pp http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32003L0087
10. Fahey T J et al 2005 The biogeochemistry of carbon at Hubbard Brook Biogeochemistry 75 109-76
11. FAO 2016 Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: How are the World's Forests Changing? (Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) www.fao.org/3/a-i4793e.pdf
12. Figueres C, Schellnhuber H J, Whiteman G, Rockstrom J, Hobley A and Rahmstorf S 2017 Three years to safeguard our climate Nature 546 593-5
13. Helin T, Sokka L, Soimakallio S, Pingoud K and Pajula T 2013 Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment- A review Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy 5 475-86
14. IEA 2012 Technology Roadmap: Bioenergy for Heat and Power (Paris: International Energy Agency) www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/2012-Bioenergy-Roadmap-2nd-Edition-WEB.pdf
15. IEA 2016 World Energy Outlook (Paris: International Energy Agency) www.iea.org/newsroom/news/2016/november/world-energy-outlook-2016.html
16. IPCC 2013 Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1
17. IPCC 2014 Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ed C B Field et al (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 1-32 pp www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2
18. IRENA 2015 Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2014 (Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency) www.irena.org/DocumentDownloads/Publications/IRENA-RE-Power-Costs-2014-report.pdf
19. Ito A and Inatomi M 2012 Use of a process-based model for assessing the methane budgets of global terrestrial ecosystems and evaluation of uncertainty Biogeosciences 9 759-73
20. Knutti R and Sedlacek J 2013 Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections Nat. Clim. Change 3 369-73
21. Leturcq P 2014 Wood preservation (carbon sequestration) or wood burning (fossil-fuel substitution), which is better for mitigating climate change? Ann. Forest Sci. 71 117-24
22. Netherlands Enterprise Agency 2011 CO2-tool electricity gas and heat from biomass-version 1.0.1 (Assen, The Netherlands) www.rvo.nl/file/1252
23. Ocko I B, Hamburg S P, Jacob D J, Keith D W, Keohane N O, Oppenheimer M, Roy-Mayhew J D, Schrag D P and Pacala S W 2017 Unmask temporal trade-offs in climate policy debates Science 356 492-3
24. Odeh N A and Cockerill T T 2008 Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage Energ. Policy 36 367-80
25. Penman J, Gytarsky M and Hiraishi T 2003 Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry (Hayama, Kanagawa: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gpglulucf.html
26. Richards F J 1959 A flexible growth function for empirical use J. Exp. Bot. 10 290-300
27. Röder M, Whittaker C and Thornley P 2015 How certain are greenhouse gas reductions from bioenergy? Life cycle assessment and uncertainty analysis of wood pellet-to-electricity supply chains from forest residues Biomass Bioenergy 79 50-63
28. Saunois M et al 2016 The global methane budget 2000-2012 Earth Syst. Sci. Data 8 697-751
29. Schulze E-D, Körner C, Law B, Haberl H and Luyssaert S 2012 Large-scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy 4 611-6
30. Shoemaker J K, Keenan T F, Hollinger D Y and Richardson A D 2014 Forest ecosystem changes from annual methane source to sink depending on late summer water balance Geophys. Res. Lett. 41 673-9
31. Smith J E, Heath L S, Skog K E and Birdsey R A 2006 Methods for calculating forest ecosystem and harvested carbon with standard estimates for forest types of the United States www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/22954
32. Sterman J, Fiddaman T, Franck T, Jones A, McCauley S, Rice P, Sawin E and Siegel L 2012 Climate interactive: The C-ROADS climate policy model Syst. Dyn. Rev. 28 295-305
33. Sterman J D, Fiddaman T, Franck T, Jones A, McCauley S, Rice P, Sawin E and Siegel L 2013 Management flight simulators to support climate negotiations Environ. Modell. Softw. 44 122-35
34. Stupak I et al 2007 Sustainable utilisation of forest biomass for energy-possibilities and problems: Policy, legislation, certification, and recommendations and guidelines in the Nordic, Baltic, and other European countries Biomass Bioenergy 31 666-84
35. Ter-Mikaelian M T, Colombo S J and Chen J 2015 The burning question: Does forest bioenergy reduce carbon emissions? A review of common misconceptions about forest carbon accounting J. Forest. 113 57-68
36. Thrän D, Peetz D and Schaubach K 2017 Global Wood Pellet Industry and Trade Study 2017 (Paris: IEA Bioenergy) 243 p http://task40.ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/IEA-Wood-Pellet-Study-final-2017-06.pdf
37. US Forest Service 2000 Landowners Handbook for Managing Southern Pines (Atlanta, GA: US Forest Service-Southern Region) http://ncforestry.info/fs/managing-southern-pines/
38. US EIA 2016 International Energy Outlook 2016 (Washington, DC: US Energy Information Administration) 276 p www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/0484(2016).pdf
39. Vuuren D et al 2011 The representative concentration pathways: An overview Clim. Change 109 5-31
40. Woodall C W et al 2015 The US Forest Carbon Accounting Framework: Stocks and Stock Change 1990-2016 (Newtown Square, PA: US Forest Service) www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/49858
41. York R 2012 Do alternative energy sources displace fossil fuels? Nat. Clim. Change 2 441-3