Erratum: TISSUES 2.0: An integrative web resource on mammalian tissue expression (Database (2018) DOi: 10.1093/database/bay003);TISSUES 2.0: An integrative web resource on mammalian tissue expression

Database

Volumn 2018, Issue 2018, 2018, Pages

  Palasca, Oana ^a,b   Santos, Alberto ^a   Stolte, Christian ^c   Gorodkin, Jan ^b   Jensen, Lars Juhl ^a,b  

^a University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c NEW YORK GENOME CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; HUMAN; INTERNET; MAMMAL; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOUSE; PIG; RAT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; INTERNET; MAMMALS; DATA CURATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MICE; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; RATS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SWINE;

EID: 85047932882     PISSN: 17580463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/database/bay028     Document Type: Erratum

References (57)

1. Hunter, P. (2008) The Paradox of Model Organisms. The Use of Model Organisms in Research Will Continue despite Their Shortcomings. EMBO Rep., 9, 717-720.
2. Aitman, T.J., Boone, C., Churchill, G.A., et al. (2011) The future of model organisms in human disease research. Nat. Rev. Genet., 12, 575-582.
3. Mackay, T.F.C. (2014) Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet., 15, 22-33.
4. Greaves, P., Williams, A., and Eve, M. (2004) First dose of potential new medicines to humans: how animals help. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc., 3, 226-236.
5. Boverhof, D.R., Chamberlain, M.P., Elcombe, C.R. et al. (2011) Transgenic animal models in toxicology: historical perspectives and future outlook. Toxicol. Sci., 121, 207-233.
6. Helke, K.L., and Swindle, M.M. (2013) Animal models of toxicology testing: the role of pigs. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol., 9, 127-139.
7. Lin, S., Lin, Y., Nery, J.R. et al. (2014) Comparison of the transcriptional landscapes between human and mouse tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 17224-17229.
8. Hardison, R.C. (2016) A guide to translation of research results from model organisms to human. Genome Biol., 17, 161.
9. Kryuchkova-Mostacci, N. and Robinson-Rechavi, M. (2016) Tissue-specificity of gene expression diverges slowly between orthologs, and rapidly between paralogs. PLoS Comput. Biol., 12, e1005274.
10. Zhao, S., Fung-Leung, W.-P., Bittner, A. et al. (2014) Comparison of RNA-seq and microarray in transcriptome profiling of activated T cells. PLoS ONE, 9, e78644.
11. Fu, X., Fu, N., Guo, S. et al. (2009) Estimating accuracy of rna-seq andmicroarrays with proteomics. BMCGenomics, 10, 161.
12. Bradford, J.R., Hey, Y., Yates, T. et al. (2010) A comparison of massively parallel nucleotide sequencing with oligonucleotide microarrays for global transcription profiling. BMC Genomics, 11, 282.
13. Bloom, J.S., Khan, Z., Kruglyak, L. et al. (2009) Measuring differential gene expression by short read sequencing: quantitative comparison to 2-channel gene expression microarrays. BMC Genomics, 10, 221.
14. Seemann, S.E., Anthon, C., Palasca, O. et al. Quality Assessment of Domesticated Animal Genome Assemblies. Bioinform Biol Insights, 9, 49-58.
15. GTEx Consortium. (2015) Human genomics. the genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science, 348, 648-660.
16. Uhlen, M., Oksvold, P., Fagerberg, L. et al. (2010) Towards a knowledge-based human protein atlas. Nat. Biotechnol., 28, 1248-1250.
17. Uhlén, M., Fagerberg, L., Hallström, B.M. et al. (2015) Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science, 347, 1260419.
18. Wu, C., Orozco, C., Boyer, J. et al. (2009) BioGPS: an extensible and customizable portal for querying and organizing gene annotation resources. Genome Biol., 10, R130.
19. Bastian, F.G., Parmentier, J., Roux, S. et al. Bgee: integrating and comparing heterogeneous transcriptome data among species. In Data Integration in the Life Sciences. Berlin: Springer, 2008, 124-31.
20. Wang, M., Herrmann, C.J., Simonovic, M. et al. (2015) Version 4.0 of PaxDb: protein abundance data, integrated across model organisms, tissues, and cell-lines. Proteomics, 15, 3163-3168.
21. Santos, A., Tsafou, K., Stolte, C.et al. (2015) Comprehensive comparison of large-scale tissue expression datasets. PeerJ, 3, e1054.
22. SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Members. (2016) The SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics' resources: focus on curated databases. Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D27-D37.
23. Szklarczyk, D., Franceschini, A., Wyder, S. et al. (2015) STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res., 43, D447-D452.
24. Gremse, M., Chang, A., Schomburg, I. et al. (2011) The BRENDA Tissue Ontology (BTO): the first all-integrating ontology of all organisms for enzyme sources. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D507-D513.
25. Pafilis, E., Frankild, S.P., Fanini, L. et al. (2013) The SPECIES and ORGANISMS resources for fast and accurate identification of taxonomic names in text. PLoS ONE, 8, e65390.
26. Wheeler, D.L., Church, D.M., Federhen, S. et al. (2003) Database resources of the national center for biotechnology. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 28-33.
27. Binder, J.X., Pletscher-Frankild, S., Tsafou, K. et al. (2014) COMPARTMENTS: unification and visualization of protein subcellular localization evidence. Database, 2014, bau012.
28. Su, A.I., Wiltshire, T., Batalov, S. et al. (2004) A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 101, 6062-6067.
29. Lattin, J.E., Schroder, K., Su, A.I. et al. (2008) Expression analysis of G protein-coupled receptors in mouse macrophages. Immun. Res., 4, 5.
30. Kinsella, R.J., Kähäri, A., Haider, S. et al. (2011) Ensembl BioMarts: a hub for data retrieval across taxonomic space. Database, 2011, bar030.
31. Merkin, J., Russell, C., Chen, P. et al. (2012) Evolutionary dynamics of gene and isoform regulation in mammalian tissues. Science, 338, 1593-1599.
32. Rustici, G.R., Gabriella, K., Misha, K. et al. (2008) Data storage and analysis in arrayexpress and expression profiler. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics Chapter 7, Unit 7.13
33. ENCODE Project Consortium. (2012) An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature, 489, 57-74.
34. Pervouchine, D.D., Djebali, S., Breschi, A. et al. (2015) Enhanced transcriptome maps from multiple mouse tissues reveal evolutionary constraint in gene expression. Nat. Commun., 6, 5903.
35. Sloan, C.A., Chan, E.T., Davidson, J.M. et al. (2016) ENCODE data at the ENCODE portal. Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D726-D732.
36. Walker, J.R., Su, A.I., Self, D.W. et al. (2004) Applications of a rat multiple tissue gene expression data set. Genome Res., 14, 742.
37. Yu, Y., Ying, Y., Fuscoe, J.C. et al. (2014) A rat RNA-seq transcriptomic bodymap across 11 organs and 4 developmental stages. Nat. Commun., 5, 3230.
38. Freeman, T.C., Alasdair, I., Kenneth Baillie, J. et al. (2012) A gene expression atlas of the domestic pig. BMC Biology, 10, 90.
39. Farajzadeh, L., Hornshøj, H., Momeni, J. et al. (2013) Pairwise comparisons of ten porcine tissues identify differential transcriptional regulation at the gene, isoform, promoter and transcription start site level. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 438, 346-352.
40. Trapnell, C., Williams, B.A., Pertea, G. et al. (2010) Transcript assembly and quantification by rna-seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol., 28, 511-515.
41. Clark, T.A., Schweitzer, A.C., Chen, T.X. et al. (2007) Discovery of tissue-specific exons using comprehensive human exon microarrays. Genome Biol., 8, R64.
42. Fagerberg, L., Hallström, B.M., Oksvold, P. et al. (2014) Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteom. MCP, 13, 397-406.
43. Krupp, M., Marquardt, J.U., Sahin, U. et al. (2012) RNA-seq atlas - a reference database for gene expression profiling in normal tissue by next-generation sequencing. Bioinformatics, 28, 1184-1185.
44. Yates, A., Akanni, W., Ridwan Amode, M. et al. (2016) Ensembl 2016. Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D710-D716.
45. Dobin, A., Davis, C.A., Schlesinger, F. et al. (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-Seq aligner. Bioinformatics, 29, 15-21.
46. UniProt Consortium. (2014) Activities at the universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D191-D198.
47. Sudmant, P.H., Alexis, M.S. and Burge, C.B. (2015) Meta-analysis of RNA-Seq expression data across species, tissues and studies. Genome Biol., 16, 287.
48. Huerta-Cepas, J., Szklarczyk, D., Forslund, K. et al. (2016) eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D286-D293.
49. Pletscher-Frankild, S., Palleja, K., Tsafou, J.X. et al. (2014) DISEASES: text mining and data integration of disease-gene associations. Methods 74, 83-89.
50. McMaster, P.D. (1922) Do species lacking a gall bladder possess its functional equivalent? J. Exp. Med., 35, 127-140.
51. Nguyen, D.T., Mathias, S., Bologa, C. et al. Pharos: Collating protein information to shed light on the druggable genome. Nucleic Acids Res., 45, D995-D1002.
52. Bossi, A. and Lehner, B. (2009) Tissue specificity and the human protein interaction network. Mol. Syst. Biol., 5, 260.
53. Greene, C.S., Krishnan, A., Wong, A.K. et al. (2015) Understanding multicellular function and disease with human tissue-specific networks. Nat. Genet., 47, 569-576.
54. Kotlyar, M., Pastrello, C., Sheahan, N. et al. (2016) Integrated interactions database: tissue-specific view of the human and model organism interactomes. Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D536-D541.
55. Szklarczyk, D., Santos, A., von Mering, C. et al. (2016) STITCH 5: augmenting protein-chemical interaction networks with tissue and affinity data. Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D380-D384.
56. Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O. et al. (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res., 13, 2498-2504.
57. Iqbal, K., Liu, F., Gong, C.-X. et al. (2010) Tau in Alzheimer disease and related tauopathies. Curr. Alzheimer Res., 7, 656-664.