An analysis of Australian STEM education strategies

Policy Futures in Education

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2019, Pages 122-139

  Murphy, Steve ^a   MacDonald, Amy ^a   Danaia, Lena ^a   Wang, Cen ^a  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

early childhood; educational practice; policy analysis; primary; secondary; STEM education

Indexed keywords

EID: 85047408135     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14782103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1478210318774190     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Andersen L, Chen JA, (2016) Do high‐ability students disidentify with science? A descriptive study of US ninth graders in 2009. Science Education 100(1): 57–77.
2. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2016) National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy. Achievement in Reading, Writing, Language Conventions and Numeracy: National Report for 2016. Available at: http://www.nap.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/2016-naplan-national-report.pdf?sfvrsn=2 (accessed 12 September 2017).
3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2017) General capabilities. Available at: https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities (accessed 12 September 2017).
4. Australian Government Department of Education and Training (2017) Quality schools: Commonwealth and state responsibilities for schools funding. Canberra: Australian Government. Available at: https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/commonwealth_and_state_responsibilities_for_school_funding.pdf (accessed 12 September 2017).
5. Australian Industry Group (2013) Lifting our Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM) Skills. Available at: http://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/368546/lifting_our_stem_skills_13.pdf (accessed 30 August 2017).
6. Australian Industry Group (2015) Progressing STEM Skills in Australia. Available at: http://cdn.aigroup.com.au/Reports/2015/14571_STEM_Skills_Report_Final_-.pdf (accessed 21 August 2017).
7. Becker KH, Park K, (2011) Effects of integrative approaches among Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) subjects on students' learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 12(5–6): 23–37.
8. Blackley S, Howell J, (2015) A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 40(7): 102–112.
9. Breiner JM, Harkness SS, Johnson CC. (2012) What Is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics 112(1): 3–11.
10. Brown J, (2012) The Current Status of STEM Education Research. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 13(5): 7–11.
11. Bybee RW, (2013) The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
12. Capraro R, Slough S, (2013) Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM Project-Based Learning. In: Capraro R, Capraro M, Morgan J, (eds) STEM Project-Based Learning (2nd edn). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp 1–6.
13. Connolly N, (2017) NAP Sample Assessment: Science Literacy 2015. Available at: http://www.nap.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/20170309-nap_sl_final.pdf?sfvrsn=2 (accessed 3 September 2017).
14. Education Council (2015) National STEM School Education Strategy 2016–2026. Available at: http://www.scseec.edu.au/site/DefaultSite/filesystem/documents/National%20STEM%20School%20Education%20Strategy.pdf. (accessed 10 January 2017).
15. Elder GH, (1985) Perspectives on the life course. In: Elder GH, (ed.) Life course dynamics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp 23–49.
16. Fensham PJ, (2008) Science education policy-making: Eleven emerging issues. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001567/156700E.pdf (accessed 21 August 2017).
17. Gamse BC, Martinez A, Bozzi L, (2017) Calling STEM experts: How can experts contribute to students' increased STEM engagement? International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement 7(1): 31–59.
18. Gee KA, Wong KK, (2012) A cross national examination of inquiry and its relationship to student performance in science: Evidence from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006. International Journal of Educational Research 53: 303–318.
19. Goodrum D, Druhan A, Abbs J, (2012) The status and quality of Year 11 and 12 Science in Australian Schools. Available at: https://www.science.org.au/files/userfiles/support/reports-and-plans/2015/year11and12report.pdf. (accessed 21 August 2017).
20. Gough A, (2015) STEM policy and science education: Scientistic curriculum and sociopolitical silences. Cultural Studies of Science Education 10(2): 445–458.
21. Hefty LJ, (2015) STEM Gives Meaning to Mathematics. Teaching Children Mathematics 21(7): 422–429
22. Honey M, Pearson G, Schweingruber H, (2014) STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Available at: https://www.nap.edu/read/18612/chapter/1 (accessed 20 July 2017).
23. Hunt R, Walsh K, (2011) Parents’ views about child sexual abuse prevention education: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 36(2): 63–76.
24. Joffe H, (2011) Thematic analysis. In: Harper D, Thompson AR, (eds) Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, pp 209–223.
25. Johnston J, (2011) The impact of home and school on early years scientific development. Education in Science 245: 30–31.
26. Kelley T, (2010) Staking the claim for the “T” in STEM. Journal of Technology Studies 36(1): 2–11.
27. Kelley TR, Brenner DC, Pieper JT, (2010) Two approaches to engineering design: Observations in STEM education. Journal of sTEm Teacher Education 47(2): 5–40.
28. Lai Poh T, Causo A, Pei-Wen T. (2016) A review on the use of robots in education and young children. Journal of Educational Technology and Society 19(2): 148–163.
29. Lee JS, Ginsburg HP, (2009) Early childhood teachers’ misconceptions about mathematics education for young children in the United States. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 34(4): 37–45.
30. MacDonald A and Carmichael C (2017) Early mathematical competencies and later achievement: Insights from the longitudinal study of australian children. Mathematics Education Research Journal. DOI: 10.1007/s[94-017-0230-6
31. McDonald CV, (2016) STEM education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Science Education International 27(4): 530–569.
32. MacLeod K, (2013) Physics education and STSE: Perspectives from the literature. European Journal of Physics Education 4(4): 1–12.
33. McPhan G, Morony W, Pegg J. (2008) Maths? Why not? Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
34. Marginson S, Tytler R, Freeman B. (2013) STEM: Country comparisons. Report for the Australian Council of Learned Academies. Available at: https://acola.org.au/wp/PDF/SAF02Consultants/SAF02_STEM_%20FINAL.pdf (accessed 10 August 2017).
35. Marzano RJ, Heflebower T, (2012) Teaching and assessing 21st century skills. Bloomington: Marzano Research Laboratory.
36. Milford T, Tippett C, (2015) The design and validation of an early childhood STEM classroom observational protocol. International Research in Early Childhood Education 6(1): 24–37.
37. Moomaw S, Davis JA, (2010) STEM comes to preschool. Young Children 65(5): 12–18.
38. Moore TJ, Smith KA, (2014) Advancing the state of the art of STEM integration. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 15(1): 5–10.
39. Morrison J, Roth McDuffie A, French B, (2015) Identifying key components of teaching and learning in a STEM school. School Science and Mathematics 115(5): 244–255.
40. OECD Global Science Forum (2006) Evolution of student interest in Science and Technology Studies Policy Report. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/science/sci-tech/36645825.pdf (accessed 2 August 2017).
41. Office of the Chief Scientist (2013) Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in the national interest: A strategic approach. Available at: http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/STEMstrategy290713FINALweb.pdf. (accessed 21 August 2017).
42. Office of the Chief Scientist (2014) Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics: Australia’s future. Available at: http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/STEM_AustraliasFuture_Sept2014_Web.pdf. (accessed 3 August 2017).
43. Pallas AM, (2004) Educational transitions, trajectories, and pathways. In: Mortimer JT, Shanahan MJ, (eds) Handbook of the life course. New York: Springer, pp. 165–184.
44. Panizzon D, Westwell M, (2009) Engaging students in STEM-related subjects. What does the research evidence say? Available at: http://www.flinders.edu.au/shadomx/apps/fms/fmsdownload.cfm?file_uuid=A5917489-C8D7-01A1-D537-13FFAA534FEB&siteName=flinders (accessed 2 August 2017).
45. Patrick H, Mantzicopoulos P, Samarapungavan A, (2009) Motivation for learning science in Kindergarten: Is there a gender gap and does integrated inquiry and literacy instruction make a difference. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46(2): 166–191.
46. Perry B and MacDonald A (2015) Educators’ expectations and aspirations around young children’s mathematical knowledge. Professional Development in Education 41(2): 366–381.
47. Perry B, MacDonald A and Gervasoni A (Eds.). (2015) Mathematics and Transition to School: International Perspectives. Singapore: Springer.
48. Petersen JL, Hyde JS, (2017) Trajectories of self-perceived math ability, utility value and interest across middle school as predictors of high school math performance. Educational Psychology 37: 438–456.
49. Prinsley R, Baranyai K, (2015) STEM skills in the workforce: What do employers want? Available at: http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/OPS09_02Mar2015_Web.pdf (accessed 10 August 2017).
50. Prinsley R, Johnston E, (2015) Transforming STEM teaching in Australian primary schools: Everybody’s business. Available at: http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/Transforming-STEM-teaching_FINAL.pdf (accessed 10 August 2017).
51. Ralph RA, (2015) Post secondary project-based learning in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Journal of Technology and Science Education 6(1): 26–35.
52. Redmond A, Thomas J, High K. (2011) Enriching science and math through engineering. School Science and Mathematics 111(8): 399–408.
53. Reimers JE, Farmer CL, Klein-Gardner SS, (2015) An introduction to the standards for preparation and professional development for teachers of engineering. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research 5(1): Article 5.
54. Rennie L, Wallace J, Venville G, (2012) Exploring curriculum integration: Why integrate? In: Rennie L, Venville G, Wallace J, (eds) Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, reflections, and ways forward. New York: Routledge, pp 1–11.
55. Robnett RD, Leaper C, (2013) Friendship groups, personal motivation, and gender in relation to high school students' STEM career interest. Journal of Research on Adolescence 23: 652–664.
56. Roth W-M, Van Eijck M, (2010) Fullness of life as minimal unit: Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) learning across the life span. Science Education 94(6): 1027–1048.
57. Shanahan M-C, Burke LE, Francis K, (2016) Using a boundary object perspective to reconsider the meaning of STEM in a Canadian context. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 16(2): 129–139.
58. Stacey K, Vincent J, Stephens M. (2015) Desktop review of mathematics school education and pedagogical approaches and learning resources. Available at: https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/trim_review_paper_2_-_aas_-_final.pdf (accessed 2 August 2017).
59. Starkey L, (2012) Teaching and learning in the digital age. New York: Taylor and Francis.
60. Thomson S, De Bortoli L, Underwood C, (2016) PISA 2015: A first look at Australia's results. Available at: http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1021&context=ozpisa (accessed 21 August 2017).
61. Thomson S, Wenert N, O'Grady E. (2016) TIMSS 2015: a first look at Australia's results. Available at: http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=timss_2015 (accessed 21 August 2017).
62. Tytler R, Osborne J, Williams G. (2008) Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the Primary-Secondary school transition. Available at: https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/openpathinscitechmathenginprimsecschtrans.pdf (accessed 20 June 2017).
63. UNESCO (2015) Incheon Declaration and SDGE - Education 2030 Framework for Action. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002456/245656E.pdf (accessed 21 August 2017).
64. van Tuijl C, van der Molen J, (2016) Study choice and career development in STEM fields: An overview and integration of the research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 26(2): 159–183.
65. Von Secker C, (2002) Effects of inquiry-based teacher practices on science excellence and equity. Journal of Educational Research 95(3): 151–160.
66. Wang MT, Degol J, (2013) Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy–value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review 33: 304–340.
67. Watts TW, Duncan GJ, Siegler RS, Davis-Kean PE, (2014) What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher 43(7): 352–360.
68. Yildirim B, (2016) An analyses and meta-synthesis of research on STEM education. Journal of Education and Practice 7(34): 23–33.