Enablers and barriers to university technology transfer engagements with small- and medium-sized enterprises: perspectives of Principal Investigators

Small Enterprise Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 274-289

  O’Reilly, Paul ^a   Cunningham, James A ^b  

^a DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Ireland)

^b NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

barriers; collaboration; commercialization; enablers; Principal Investigators; SMEs; Technology transfer; technology transfer offices

Indexed keywords

EID: 85046654542     PISSN: 13215906     EISSN: 11750979     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13215906.2017.1396245     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Adler, N., Elmquist, M., & Norrgren, F. (2009). The challenge of managing boundary-spanning research activities: Experiences from the Swedish context. Research Policy, 38(7), 1136–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.05.001
2. Agrawal, A. (2001). University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 285–302. doi: 10.1111/1468-2370.00069
3. Albats, E., Fiegenbaum, I., & Cunningham, J. A. (2017). A micro level study of university industry collaborative lifecycle key performance indicators. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–43.
4. Amesse, F., & Cohendet, P. (2001). Technology transfer revisited from the perspective of the knowledge-based economy. Research Policy, 30, 1459–1478. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00162-7
5. Ansett, S. (2005). Boundary spanner: The gatekeeper of innovation in partnerships. In Accountability Forum. 6(4):36–44.
6. Archibugi, D., Evangelista, R., Perani, G., & Rapiti, F. (1996). L’innovazione nelle imprese Italiane: un’analisi dai risultati dell’indagine Istat. Economia e politica industriale, 89, 147–185.
7. Birnbaum-More, P.-H., Rossini, F.-A., & Baldwin, D.-R. (1990). International research management: Studies in interdisciplinary methods from business, government, and academia (p. 221). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8. Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39, 858–868. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006
9. Chai, S., & Shih, W. (2016). Bridging science and technology through academic–industry partnerships. Research Policy, 45(1), 148–158. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.007
10. Collier, A., Gray, B., & Ahn, M. (2011). Enablers and barriers to university and high technology SME partnerships. Small Enterprise Research, 18(1), 2–18. doi: 10.5172/ser.18.1.2
11. Cowan, R., David, P., & Foray, D. (2000). The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 211–253. doi: 10.1093/icc/9.2.211
12. Cunningham, J., & Harney, B. (2006). Strategic management of technology transfer: The new challenge on campus. Cork: Oak Tree Press.
13. Cunningham, J. A., O’Reilly, P., Dolan, B., O’Kane, C., & Mangematin, V. (2016). Publicly funded principal investigators allocation of time for public sector entrepreneurship activities. Economia e Politica Industriale, 43(4), 383–408. doi: 10.1007/s40812-016-0054-5
14. Cunningham, J. A., O’Reilly, P., Dolan, B., O’Kane, C., & Mangematin, V. (2017). Gender differences and academic entrepreneurship: A study of scientists in the PI role. Gender and Entrepreneurial Activity, 221–251.
15. Cunningham, J., O’Reilly, P., O’Kane, C., & Mangematin, V. (2014). The inhibiting factors that principal investigators experience in leading publicly funded research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1), 93–110. doi: 10.1007/s10961-012-9269-4
16. Cunningham, J. A., & Link, A. N. (2015). Fostering university-industry R&D collaborations in European Union countries. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 849–860 doi: 10.1007/s11365-014-0317-4
17. Cunningham, J., O’Reilly, P., O’Kane, C., & Mangematin, V. (2015). Managerial challenges of publicly funded principal investigators. International Journal of Technology Management, 68(3-4), 176–202. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2015.069669
18. Cunningham, J. A., O’Reilly, P., O’Kane, C., & Mangematin, V. (2016a). Publicly funded principal investigators as transformative agents of public sector entrepreneurship. In D. B. Audretsch and A. N. Link (Eds.), Essays in public sector entrepreneurship (pp. 67–94). Springer International Publishing.
19. Cunningham, J. A., O’Reilly, P., O’Kane, C., & Mangematin, V. (2016b). At the frontiers of scientific advancement: The factors that influence scientists to become or choose to become publicly funded principal investigators. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 778–797. doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9400-4
20. Das, T., & Teng, B. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26, 31–61. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600105
21. Davenport, S., Grimes, C., & Davies, J. (1998). Research collaboration and behavioural additionality: A New Zealand case study. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(1), 55–68. doi: 10.1080/09537329808524304
22. Del Giudice, M., Nicotra, M., Romano, M., & Schillaci, C. E. (2017). Entrepreneurial performance of principal investigators and country culture: Relations and influences. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 320–337. doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9499-y
23. Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
24. Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunity and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
25. Faber, J., van Dijk, J., & van Rijnsoever, F. (2016). Incentives and barriers for R&D-based SMEs to participate in European research programs: An empirical assessment for the Netherlands. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 414–428. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scv050
26. Fitzgerald, C., & Cunningham, J. A. (2016). Inside the university technology transfer office: Mission statement analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(5), 1235–1246. doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9419-6
27. Frestedt, J. (2008). The role and impact of the principal investigator. Monitor, 31–35.
28. Gambardella, A. (1993). Innovazione tecnologiche e accumulazione delle conoscenze: quale modello per le piccole e medie imprese italiane degli anni ’90? Piccola Impresa/Small Business, 2, 73–90.
29. Gately, C., & Cunningham, J. (2014). The Contributions and Disconnections Between Writing a Business Plan and The Start-up Process for Incubator Technology Entrepreneurs. In Andrew C. Corbett, Donald S. Siegel, Jerome A. Katz (Eds.) Academic entrepreneurship: Creating an entrepreneurial ecosystem (Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Volume 16) (pp. 197–241). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
30. Geoghegan, W., & Pontikakis, D. (2008). From ivory tower to factory floor? How universities are changing to meet the needs of industry. Science and Public Policy, 35(7), 462–474. doi: 10.3152/030234208X329095
31. Goduscheit, R., & Knudsen, M. (2015). How barriers to collaboration prevent progress in demand for knowledge: A dyadic study of small and medium-sized firms, research and technology organizations and universities. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(1), 29–54. doi: 10.1111/caim.12101
32. Goel, R. K., Göktepe-Hultén, D., & Grimpe, C. (2017). Who instigates university–industry collaborations? University scientists versus firm employees. Small Business Economics, 48(3), 503–524. doi: 10.1007/s11187-016-9795-9
33. Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2001). Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: Evidence from the advanced technology program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 87–98. doi: 10.1023/A:1007888312792
34. Hausman, A. (2005). Innovativeness among small businesses: Theory and propositions for future research. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(8), 773–782. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.12.009
35. Hedlund, G. (1999). The intensity and extensity of knowledge and the multinational corporation as a nearly recomposable system (NRS). MIR: Management International Review, 39(1) 5–44
36. Hoffman, K., Parejo, M., Bessant, J., & Perren, L. (1998). Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: A literature review. Technovation, 18(1), 39–55. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00102-8
37. Huggins, R., & Johnston, A. (2009). Knowledge networks in an uncompetitive region: SME innovation and growth. Growth and Change, 40, 227–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2009.00474.x
38. Hughes, T., O’Regan, N., & Sims M.A. (2009). The effectiveness of knowledge networks: an investigation of manufacturing SMEs. Education and Training, 51(8/9), 665–681. doi: 10.1108/00400910911005226
39. Knight, G. (2001). Entrepreneurship and strategy in the international SME. Journal of International Management, 7, 155–171. doi: 10.1016/S1075-4253(01)00042-4
40. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation. Research Policy, 33, 1201–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004
41. Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. N. (2013). Knowledge spillovers, collective entrepreneurship, and economic growth: The role of universities. Small Business Economics, 41, 797–817. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9507-7
42. Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. N. (2015). Public sector entrepreneurship: US technology and innovation policy. Oxford University Press, USA
43. Lin, C., Tan, B., & Chang, S. (2002). The critical factors for technology absorptive capacity. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(6), 300–308. doi: 10.1108/02635570210431993
44. Link, A. N., & Link, K. R. (2003). On the growth of US science parks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 81–85. doi: 10.1023/A:1021634904546
45. Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (2015). SME innovation, exporting and growth: A review of existing evidence. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 28–48. doi: 10.1177/0266242614550190
46. Mangematin, V., O’Reilly, P., & Cunningham, J. (2014). Principal investigators as boundary spanners, science and market shapers. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s10961-012-9270-y
47. McAdam, M., Miller, K., & McAdam, R. (2016). Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective. Technovation, 50, 69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.002
48. Menter, M. (2016). Principal investigators and the commercialization of knowledge. In D. Audretsch, E. Lehmann, M. Meoli, S. Vismara (Eds.), University evolution, entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness (pp. 193–203). Springer International Publishing.
49. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
50. Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., & Duran, X. (2002). Measuring third stream activities. Brighton: SPRU.
51. O’Kane, C., Cunningham, J., O’Reilly, P., & Mangematin, V. (2014). Underpinning strategic behaviours and posture of principal investigators in transition/uncertain environments. Long Range Planning, 43(3), 200–214.
52. O’Kane, C., Mangematin, V., Geoghegan, W., & Fitzgerald, C. (2015). University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy. Research Policy, 44(2), 421–437. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.003
53. Oliver, A., & Liebeskind, J. (1997). Three levels of networking for sourcing intellectual capital in biotechnology: Implications for studying interorganizational networks. International Studies of Management & Organization, 27(4), 76–103. doi: 10.1080/00208825.1997.11656719
54. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., … Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university– industry relations. Research Policy, 42, 423–442. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
55. Phan, P. H., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 165–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.001
56. Raffa, M., & Zollo, G. (1998). Economia del software. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
57. Ravasi, D., & Turati, C. (2005). Exploring entrepreneurial learning: A comparative study of technology development projects. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 137–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.11.002
58. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation. New York, NY: Free Press.
59. Rogers, E. M., Takegami, S., & Yin, J. (2001). Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation, 21, 253–261. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00039-0
60. Rothwell, R. (1994). The changing nature of the innovation process: Implications for SMEs. In R. Oakey (Ed.), New technology based firms in the 1990s. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
61. Rothwell, R., & Dodgson, M. (1991). External linkages and innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. R&D Management, 21(2), 125–138.
62. Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy, 30, 509–532. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3
63. Santoro, M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy, 31, 1163–1180. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1
64. Sheehan, J., & Wyckoff, A. (2003). Targeting R&D: Economic and policy implications of increasing R&D spending (STI Working Paper 2003/8). Paris: Science and Innovation Unit, OECD.
65. Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160882
66. Srinivasan, R., Lilian, G., & Rangaswamy, A. (2002). Technological opportunism and radical technology adoption: An application to e-business. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 47–60. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.66.3.47.18508
67. Syed-Ikhsan, S., & Rowland, F. (2004). Knowledge management in a public organization: A study on the relationship between organizational elements and the performance of knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(2), 95–111. doi: 10.1108/13673270410529145
68. Thune, T. (2007). University–industry collaboration: The network embeddedness approach. Science and Public Policy, 34(3), 158–168. doi: 10.3152/030234207X206902
69. Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2004). Are faculty critical? Their role in university–industry licensing. Contemporary Economic Policy, 22(2), 162–178. doi: 10.1093/cep/byh012
70. Van Dijk, B., den Hertog, R., Menkveld, B., & Thurk, R. (1997). Some new evidence on the determinants of large and small firm innovation. Small Business Economics, 9(4), 335–343. doi: 10.1023/A:1007995919950
71. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1307–1314. doi: 10.1002/smj.360
72. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.