PIs as boundary spanners, science and market shapers

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-10

  Mangematin, Vincent ^a   O'Reilly, Paul ^b   Cunningham, James ^c  

^a GRENOBLE ECOLE DE MANAGEMENT   (France)

^b DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Ireland)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Enactment; Principal investigators; Research avenues; Scientific entrepreneurs

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895062354     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-012-9270-y     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adler, N., Elmquist, M., & Norrgren, F. (2009). The challenge of managing boundary-spanning research activities: Experiences from the Swedish context. Research Policy, 38(7), 1136-1149.
2. Baglieri, D., & Lorenzoni, G. (2013). Closing the distance between academia and market. Experimentation and user entrepreneurial processes. The Journal of Technology Transfer (forthcoming).
3. Birnbaum-More, P.-H., Rossini, F.-A., & Baldwin, D.-R. (1990). International research management: Studies in interdisciplinary methods from business, government, and academia (p. 221). New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Boardman, P. C., & Ponomariov, B. L. (2013). Management knowledge and the organization of team science in university research centers. The Journal of Technology Transfer (forthcoming).
5. Boehm, D., & Hogan, T. (2013). 'A jack of all trades'--The role of PIs in the establishment and management of collaborative networks in scientific knowledge commercialisation. The Journal of Technology Transfer (forthcoming).
6. Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599-616.
7. Callon, M., & Law, J. (1989). On the construction of sociotechnical networks: Content and context revisited, Knowledge and society: Studies in the sociology of science past and present. Greenwich: JAI Press.
8. Casati, A., & Genet, C. (2013). Principal investigators as scientific entrepreneurs. The Journal of Technology Transfer (forthcoming).
9. Catherine, D., Corolleur, C., Carrere, M., & Mangematin, V. (2004). Turning scientific and technological human capital into economic capital: The experience of biotech start-ups in France. Research Policy, 33(4), 631-642.
10. Comacchio, A., Bonesso, S., & Pizzi, C. (2011). Boundary spanning between industry and university: The role of technology transfer centres. The Journal of Technology Transfer (forthcoming).
11. Cunningham, J., O'Reilly, P., O'Kane, C., & Mangematin, V. (2013). The inhibiting factors that principal investigators experience in leading publicly funded research projects. The Journal of Technology Transfer (forthcoming).
12. Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293-305.
13. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamic of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
14. Feeney, M., & Welsh, E. (2013). Academic outcomes among principal Investigators, co-principal investigators, and non-PI researchers. The Journal of Technology Transfer (forthcoming).
15. Frestedt, J. (2008). The role and impact of the principal investigator. Monitor, 31-35 (Sept).
16. Gibbons, M. (1994). Transfer sciences: Management of distributed knowledge production. Empirica, 21(3), 259-270.
17. Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38(6), 922-935.
18. Jimenez-Saez, F., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Zofio, J. L., & Castro-Martinez, E. (2011). Evaluating research efficiency within national R&D programmes. Research Policy, 40(2), 230-241.
19. Kato, M., & Odagiri, H. (2012). Development of university life-science programs and university/industry joint research in Japan. Research Policy, 41(5), 939-952.
20. Kidwell, D. (2013). Navigating the role of the principal investigator: A comparison of four cases. The Journal of Technology Transfer (forthcoming).
21. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1977). Producing and reproducing knowledge: Descriptive and constructive? Social Science Information, 6, 669-696.
22. Laredo, P. (2003). Six major challenges facing public intervention in higher education, science, technology and innovation. Science and Public Policy, 30(1), 4-13.
23. Leigh Star, S., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's meseum of vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
24. Morgan, M. S. (2012). The world in the model: How economists work and think. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). 'Mode 2 revisited': The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41, 179-194.
26. Ponomariov, B. L., & Boardman, P. C. (2010). Influencing scientists' collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39(5), 613-624.
27. Tyler, J. E. (2011). Redeploying Bayh-Dole: Beyond Merely doing good to optimizing the potential in results of taxpayer-funded research. The Journal of Technology Transfer (forthcoming).
28. Vogel, R. (2012). The visible colleges of management and organization studies: A bibliometric analysis of academic journals. Organization Studies, 33(8), 1015-1043.
29. Wu, Y. (2010). Tackling undue concentration of federal research funding: An empirical assessment on NSF's experimental program to stimulate competitive research (EPSCoR). Research Policy, 39(6), 835-841.