Knowledge networks in an uncompetitive region: SME innovation and growth

Growth and Change

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 227-259

  Huggins, Robert ^a   Johnston, Andrew ^b  

^a CARDIFF METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC SECTOR; SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISE;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; HUMBERSIDE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE; YORKSHIRE;

EID: 66949164840     PISSN: 00174815     EISSN: 14682257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2009.00474.x     Document Type: Article

References (130)

1. Acs, Z.J., and D.B. Audretsch. 1988. Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. American Economic Review 78(4): 678-690.
2. Adler, P.S., and S.W. Kwon. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review 27(1): 17-40.
3. Almeida, P., G. Dokko, and L. Rosenkopf. 2003. Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: Increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? Research Policy 32(2): 301-315.
4. Arthur, B. 1989. Competing technologies and lock-in by historical events: The dynamics of allocation under increasing returns. The Economic Journal 99(1): 116-131.
5. Asheim, B., P. Cooke, and R. Martin, eds. 2006. Clusters and regional development: Critical reflections and explorations. London: Routledge.
6. Asheim, B., and A. Isaksen 2003. SMEs and the regional dimension of innovation. In Regional innovation policy for small-medium enterprises, ed. B. Asheim, A. Isaksen, C. Nauwelaers, and F. Tödtling, 21-48. London: Edward Elgar.
7. Asheim, B., A. Isaksen, C. Nauwelaers, and F. Tödtling, eds. 2003. Regional innovation policy for small-medium enterprises. London: Edward Elgar.
8. Athreye, S. 2004. Agglomeration and growth: A study of the Cambridge hi-tech cluster. In Building high-tech clusters Silicon Valley and beyond, ed. T. Bresnahan and A. Gambardella, 121-159. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bathelt, H., A. Malmberg, and P. Maskell. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28(1): 31-56.
10. Beckman, C.M., P.R. Haunschild, and D.J. Phillips. 2004. Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organisation Science 15(3): 259-275.
11. Bellini, N., and M. Landabaso. 2007. Learning about innovation in Europe's regional policy. In The learning region: Foundations, state of the art, future, ed. R. Rutten and F. Boekema, 231-251. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
12. Benneworth, P., and D. Charles. 2005. University spin-off policies and economic development in less successful regions: Learning from two decades of policy practice. European Planning Studies 13(4): 537-557.
13. Boschma, R.A. 2004. Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional Studies 38(9): 1001-1014.
14. Bresnahan, T., and A. Gambardella, eds. 2004. Building high-tech clusters: Silicon Valley and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Boschma, R., and K. Frenken. 2006. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 6(3): 273-302.
16. Breschi, S., and F. Lissoni. 2001. Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: Knowledge "tacitness" reconsidered. Papers in Regional Science 80(2): 255-273.
17. Bristow, G. 2005. Everyone's a "winner": Problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness. Journal of Economic Geography 5(3): 285-304.
18. Brown, P., A. Green, and H. Lauder. 2001. High skills: Globalization, competitiveness, and skill formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Carbonara, N. 2002. New models of inter-firm networks within industrial districts. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 14(3): 229-246.
20. Castells, M., and P. Hall. 1994. Technopoles of the world: The making of the twenty-first century industrial complexes. London: Routledge.
21. Chesbrough, H.W. 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
22. Cohen, W.M., and D.A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128-152.
23. Cooke, P. 2004. Regional innovation systems - An evolutionary approach. In Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalised world, ed. P. Cooke, M. Heidenreich, and H. Braczyk, 1-18. London: Routledge.
24. Cooke, P. 2007. Regional innovation systems, asymmetric knowledge and the legacies of learning. In The learning region: Foundations, state of the art, future, ed. R. Rutten and F. Boekema, 184-205. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
25. Cooke, P., M. Heidenreich, and H. Braczyk, eds. 2004. Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalised world. London: Routledge.
26. Cooke, P., and R. Huggins. 2003. High-technology clustering in Cambridge. In The institutions of local development, ed. F. Sforzi, 51-74. Aldershot: Ashgate.
27. Cowan, R., N. Jonard, and M. Özman. 2003. Knowledge dynamics in a network industry. Maastricht: Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.
28. Crescenzi, R. 2005. Innovation and regional growth in the enlarged Europe: The role of local innovative capabilities, peripherality, and education. Growth and Change 36(4): 471-507.
29. Curran, J., and R. Blackburn. 1994. Small firms and local economic networks: The death of the local economy. London: Paul Chapman.
30. Davenport, S. 2005. Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition. Research Policy 34(5): 683-701.
31. DiMaggio, P.J., and W.W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(1): 147-160.
32. Doloreux, D. 2004. Regional innovation systems in Canada: A comparative study. Regional Studies 38(5): 481-494.
33. Doloreux, D., and S. Dionne. 2008. Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatière, Canada. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 20(3): 259-283.
34. Drejer, I., and A. Lund Vinding. 2007. Searching near and far: Determinants of innovative firms' propensity to collaborate across geographical distance. Industry and Innovation 14(3): 259-275.
35. Drucker, P.F. 1989. The new realities: In government and politics/in economics and business/in society and world view. New York: Harper & Row.
36. DTI. 2003. Innovation report-Competing in the global economy: The innovation challenge. London: HMSO.
37. Dunning, J.H. 2000. Regions, globalization, and the knowledge economy: The issues stated. In Regions, globalization, and the knowledge-based economy, ed. J. Dunning, 7-41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Freel, M. 2002. On regional systems of innovation: Illustrations from the West Midlands. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20(5): 633-654.
39. Garnsey, E., and P. Heffernan. 2005. High-technology clustering through spin-out and attraction: The Cambridge case. Regional Studies 39(8): 1127-1114.
40. Garnsey, E., and H. Lawton Smith. 1998. Proximity and complexity in the emergence of high technology industry: The Oxbridge comparison. Geoforum 29(4): 433-450.
41. Gertler, M., and D. Wolfe. 2004. Ontario's regional innovation system. In Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalised world, ed. P. Cooke, M. Heidenreich, and H. Braczyk, 91-124. London: Routledge.
42. Giuliani, E. 2007. The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: Evidence from the wine industry. Journal of Economic Geography 7(2): 139-168.
43. Glückler, J. 2007. Economic geography and the evolution of networks. Journal of Economic Geography 7(5): 619-634.
44. Goman, C.K. 2000. The human side of high-tech: Lessons from the technology frontier. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
45. Grabher, G. 1993. The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks, ed. G. Grabher, 255-277. London: Routledge.
46. Grabher, G., and O. Ibert. 2006. Bad company? The ambiguity of personal knowledge networks. Journal of Economic Geography 6(3): 251-271.
47. Grant, R., and C. Baden-Fuller. 2004. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies 41(1): 61-84.
48. Greene, F., P. Tracey, and M. Cowling. 2007. Recasting the city into city-regions: Place promotion, competitiveness benchmarking and the quest for urban supremacy. Growth and Change 38(1): 1-22.
49. Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal 20(5): 397-420.
50. Gulati, R. 2007. Managing network resources: Alliances, affiliations and other relational assets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Gulati, R., and M. Gargiulo. 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology 104(5): 1439-1493.
52. Hite, J., and W. Hesterly. 2001. The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 22(3): 275-286.
53. Hospers, G. 2005. Best practices and the dilemma of regional cluster policy in Europe. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 96(4): 452-457.
54. Hospers, G. 2006. Silicon somewhere? Political Studies 27(1): 1-15.
55. Huggins, R. 1996. Innovation, technology support and networking in South Wales. European Planning Studies 4(6): 757-768.
56. Huggins, R. 1997. Competitiveness and the global region: The role of networking. In Innovation, networks and learning regions? ed. J. Simmie, 97-119. London: Jessica Kingsley.
57. Huggins, R. 2000a. The business of networks: Inter-firm interaction, institutional policy and the TEC experiment. Aldershot: Ashgate.
58. Huggins, R. 2000b. The success and failure of policy-implanted inter-firm network initiatives: Motivations, processes and structure. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 12(1): 111-135.
59. Huggins, R. 2001. Inter-firm network policies and firm performance: Evaluating the impact of initiatives in the UK. Research Policy 30(3): 443-458.
60. Huggins, R. 2003. Creating a UK competitiveness index: Regional and local benchmarking. Regional Studies 1: 89-96.
61. Huggins, R., and W. Davies. 2006. European competitiveness index. Cardiff: Robert Huggins Associates.
62. Huggins, R., and J. Day. 2006. UK competitiveness index 2006. London: The Work Foundation.
63. Huggins, R., and H. Izushi. 2007. Competing for knowledge: Creating, connecting and growing. London: Routledge.
64. Ireland, R.D., M.A. Hitt, and D. Vaidyanath. 2002. Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management 28(3): 413-446.
65. Johannisson, B. 1995. Paradigms and entrepreneurial networks-Some methodological challenges. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 7(3): 215-232.
66. Johannisson, B. 1998. Personal networks in emerging knowledge-based firms: Spatial and functional patterns. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 10(4): 297-312.
67. Johannisson, B., M. Ramírez-Pasillas, and G. Karlsson. 2002. The institutional emeddedness of local inter-firm networks: A leverage for business creation. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 14(4): 297-315.
68. Johnson, D.K.N., N. Siripong, and A.S. Brown. 2006. The demise of distance? The declining role of physical proximity for knowledge transmission. Growth and Change 37(1): 19-33.
69. Keeble, D., C. Lawson, H. Lawton Smith, B. Moore, and F. Wilkinson. 1998. Internationalisation processes, networking and local embeddedness in technology-intensive small firms. Small Business Economics 11(4): 327-342.
70. Keeble, D., C. Lawson, B. Moore, and F. Wilkinson. 1999. Collective learning processes, networking and institutional thickness in the Cambridge region. Regional Studies 33(4): 319-332.
71. Kim, T.-Y., H. Oh, and A. Swaminathan. 2006. Framing interorganizational network change: A network inertia perspective. Academy of Management Review 31(3): 704-720.
72. Kingsley, G., and E.J. Malecki. 2004. Networking for competitiveness. Small Business Economics 23(1): 71-84.
73. Knoben, J., and L. Oerlemans. 2006. Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews 8(2): 71-89.
74. Labianca, G., and D.J. Brass. 2006. Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review 31(3): 596-614.
75. Lagendijk, A., and A. Lorentzen. 2007. Proximity, knowledge and innovation in peripheral regions. On the intersection between geographical and organizational proximity. European Planning Studies 15(4): 457-466.
76. Lawson, C., and E. Lorenz. 1999. Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity. Regional Studies 33(4): 305-317.
77. Lawton Smith, H. 2003. Knowledge organizations and local economic development: The cases of Oxford and Grenoble. Regional Studies 37(9): 899-919.
78. Lechner, C., and M. Dowling. 2003. Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 15(1): 1-26.
79. Lechner, C., M. Dowling, and I. Welpe. 2006. Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix. Journal of Business Venturing 21(4): 514-540.
80. Lichtenthaler, U. 2005. External commercialization of knowledge: Review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 7(4): 231-255.
81. Lissoni, F. 2001. Knowledge codification and the geography of innovation: The case of Brescia mechanical cluster. Research Policy 30(9): 1481-1500.
82. Lublinski, A. 2003. Does geographic proximity matter? Evidence from clustered and non-clustered aeronautic firms in Germany. Regional Studies 37(5): 453-467.
83. Malecki, E.J. 2004. Jockeying for position: What it means and why it matters to regional development policy when places compete. Regional Studies 38(9): 1101-1120.
84. Malecki, E.J. 2007. Cities and regions competing in the global economy: Knowledge and local development policies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25(5): 638-654.
85. Malecki, E.J., and G.-J. Hospers. 2007. Knowledge and the competitiveness of places. In The learning region: Foundations, state of the art, future, ed. R. Rutten and F. Boekema, 143-159. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
86. Malmberg, A., and P. Maskell. 2006. Localized learning revisited. Growth and Change 37(1): 1-18.
87. Martin, R., and P. Sunley. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6(4): 395-437.
88. McEvily, B., and A. Zaheer. 1999. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 20(12): 1133-1156.
89. Meagher, K., and M. Rogers. 2004. Network density and R&D spillovers. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 53(2): 237-260.
90. Morgan, K. 1997. The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies 31(5): 491-503.
91. Morrison, A. 2008. Gatekeepers of knowledge within industrial districts: Who they are, how they interact. Regional Studies 42(6): 817-835.
92. Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge-creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93. North, D., and D. Smallbone. 2000. Innovative activity in SMEs and rural economic development: Some evidence from England. European Planning Studies 8(1): 87-106.
94. Oerlemans, L., M. Meeus, and F. Boekema. 2001. Firm clustering and innovation: Determinants and effects. Papers in Regional Science 80: 337-356.
95. Oliver, C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal 18(9): 697-713.
96. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1999. The knowledge-based economy: A set of facts and figures. Paris: OECD.
97. Owen-Smith, J., and W.W. Powell. 2004. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organisation Science 15(1): 5-21.
98. Palazzo, G. 2005. Postnational constellations of innovativeness: A cosmopolitan approach. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17(1): 55-72.
99. Patrucco, P. 2003. Institutional variety, networking and knowledge exchange: Communication and innovation in the case of the Brianza technological district. Regional Studies 37(2): 159-172.
100. Podolny, J.M., and K.L. Page. 1998. Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology 24(1): 57-76.
101. Porter, M. 1998. On competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
102. Ringberg, T., and M. Reihlen. 2008. Towards a socio-cognitive approach to knowledge transfer. Journal of Management Studies 45(5): 912-935.
103. Robson, P.J.A., and R.J. Bennett. 2000. SME growth: The relationship with business advice and external collaboration. Small Business Economics 15(3): 193-208.
104. Romijn, H., and M. Albaladejo. 2002. Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in Southeast England. Research Policy 31(7): 1053-1067.
105. Romijn, H., and M. Albu. 2002. Innovation, networking and proximity: Lessons from small high technology firms in the UK. Regional Studies 36(1): 81-86.
106. Rutten, R., and F. Boekema. 2007. The learning region: Foundations, state of the art, future. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
107. Sánchez, A.M. 1992. Regional innovation and small high technology firms in peripheral regions. Small Business Economics 4(1): 153-168.
108. Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
109. Saxenian, A. 2005. From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development 40(1): 35-61.
110. Seely Brown, J., and P. Duguid. 2001. Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organisation Science 12(1): 198-213.
111. Smallbone, D., D. North, and I. Vickers. 2003. The role and characteristics of SMEs in innovation. In Regional innovation policy for small medium enterprises, ed. B. Asheim, A. Isaksen, C. Nauwelaers, and F. Tödtling, 3-20. London: Edward Elgar.
112. Sorenson, O., J.W. Rivkin, and L. Fleming. 2006. Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy 35: 994-1017.
113. Storper, M. 1995. The resurgence of regional economics, ten years later. European Urban and Regional Studies 2(2): 191-221.
114. Storper, M. 1997. The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford Press.
115. Stuart, T.E. 1998. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 43(3): 668-698.
116. Stuart, T.E. 2000. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal 21(8): 791-811.
117. Teixeira, A., P. Santos, and Oliveira Brochado, A. 2006. Does proximity really matter in international R&D cooperative projects? Paper presented at European Network on Industrial Policy (EUNIP) 9th International Conference, Limerick, Ireland. June 20-22, 2006.
118. Thorpe, R., R. Holt, A. Macpherson, and L. Pittaway. 2005. Using knowledge within small and medium-sized firms: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews 7(4): 257-281.
119. Tödtling, F., and A. Kaufmann. 1999. Innovation systems in regions of Europe: A comparative perspective. European Planning Studies 7(1): 699-717.
120. Tödtling, F., and A. Kaufmann. 2002. SMEs in regional innovation systems and the role of innovation support - The case of upper Austria. Journal of Technology Transfer 27(1): 15-26.
121. Tödtling, F., P. Lehner, and M. Trippl. 2006. Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links. European Planning Studies 14(8): 1036-1058.
122. Tödtling, F., and M. Trippl. 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differential regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34(8): 1203-1219.
123. Tracey, P., and G.L. Clark. 2003. Alliances, networks and competitive strategy: Rethinking clusters of innovation. Growth and Change 34(1): 1-16.
124. Tushman, M., and R. Katz. 1980. External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Science 26(11): 1071-1085.
125. Vaessen, P., and D. Keeble. 1995. Growth-oriented SMEs in unfavourable regional environments. Regional Studies 29(6): 489-505.
126. Virkkala, S. 2007. Innovation and networking in peripheral areas: A case study of emergence and change in rural manufacturing. European Planning Studies 15(4): 511-529.
127. Watts, H.D., A.M. Wood, and P. Wardle. 2003. Making friends or making things?: Interfirm transactions in the Sheffield metal-working cluster. Urban Studies 40(3): 615-630.
128. Watts, H.D., A.M. Wood, and P. Wardle. 2006. Owner-managers, clusters and local embeddedness: Small firms in the Sheffield (UK) metal-working cluster. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 18(3): 185-205.
129. Wolfe, D., and M. Gertler. 2004. Clusters from the inside and out: Local dynamics and global linkages. Urban Studies 41(5-6): 1071-1093.
130. Zaheer, A., and G. Bell. 2005. Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal 26(9): 809-825.