IQOS: Evidence of pyrolysis and release of a toxicant from plastic

Tobacco Control

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 34-41

  Davis, Barbara ^a   Williams, Monique ^a   Talbot, Prue ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

char; electronic nicotine delivery devices; ENDS; heat not burn tobacco products; new tobacco products; nicotine; pyrolysis; quality control

Indexed keywords

NICOTINE; PLASTIC; POLYMER;

CHEMISTRY; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEAT; HUMAN; MASS FRAGMENTOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; PYROLYSIS; SMOKING; TOBACCO;

ELECTRONIC NICOTINE DELIVERY SYSTEMS; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; HOT TEMPERATURE; HUMANS; NICOTINE; PLASTICS; POLYMERS; PYROLYSIS; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; TOBACCO SMOKING;

EID: 85046635615     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054104     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Marynak KL, Gammon DG, King BA, et al. National and State trends in sales of cigarettes and E-cigarettes, U.S, 2011-2015. Am J Prev Med 2017;53:96-101.
2. CDC Offce on Smoking. Smoking and tobacco use; fact sheet; economic facts about U.S. Tobacco production and use.
3. Smith MR, Clark B, Lüdicke F, et al. Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. Part 1: Description of the system and the scientifc assessment program. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2016;81(Suppl 2):S17-26.
4. Phillip Morris International. iQOS user manual. 2007;67:37. 2nd ed https://www. pmiscience.com/sites/default/fles/appendix_3_-_ths_safety_warnings_and_ instructions.pdf
5. Schaller J P, Keller D, Poget L, et al. Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. Part 2: Chemical composition, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and physical properties of the aerosol. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2016;81(Suppl 2):S27-47.
6. Schaller J P, Pijnenburg J P, Ajithkumar A, et al. Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. Part 3: Infuence of the tobacco blend on the formation of harmful and potentially harmful constituents of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 aerosol. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2016;81(Suppl 2):S48-58.
7. iQOS. Phillip Morris International. https://www.pmi.com/smoke-free-products (accessed 8 Oct 2017).
8. Wong ET, Kogel U, Veljkovic E, et al. Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. Part 4: 90-day OECD 413 rat inhalation study with systems toxicology endpoints demonstrates reduced exposure effects compared with cigarette smoke. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2016;81(Suppl 2):S59-81.
9. Sewer A, Kogel U, Talikka M, et al. Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2 (THS2.2). Part 5: microRNA expression from a 90-day rat inhalation study indicates that exposure to THS2.2 aerosol causes reduced effects on lung tissue compared with cigarette smoke. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2016;81(Suppl 2):S82-92.
10. Oviedo A, Lebrun S, Kogel U, et al. Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. Part 6: 90-day OECD 413 rat inhalation study with systems toxicology endpoints demonstrates reduced exposure effects of a mentholated version compared with mentholated and non-mentholated cigarette smoke. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2016;81(Suppl 2):S93-122.
11. Kogel U, Titz B, Schlage WK, et al. Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. Part 7: systems toxicological assessment of a mentholated version revealed reduced cellular and molecular exposure effects compared with mentholated and non-mentholated cigarette smoke. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2016;81(Suppl 2):S123-38.
12. Haziza C, de La Bourdonnaye G, Skiada D, et al. Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. Part 8: 5-day randomized reduced exposure clinical study in Poland. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2016;81(Suppl 2):S139-50.
13. Martin F, Talikka M, Ivanov N V, et al. Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. Part 9: Application of systems pharmacology to identify exposure response markers in peripheral blood of smokers switching to THS2.2. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2016;81:S151-7.
14. Velicer C, St Helen G, Glantz SA. Tobacco papers and tobacco industry ties in regulatory toxicology and pharmacology. J Public Health Policy 2018;39:e1001145-15.
15. Williams M, Talbot P. Variability among electronic cigarettes in the pressure drop, airfow rate, and aerosol production. Nicotine Tob Res 2011;13:1276-83.
16. Knoll M, Talbot P. Cigarette smoke inhibits oocyte cumulus complex pick-up by the oviduct in vitro independent of ciliary beat frequency. Reprod Toxicol 1998;12:57-68.
17. Knoll M, Shaoulian R, Magers T, et al. Ciliary beat frequency of hamster oviducts is decreased in vitro by exposure to solutions of mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke. Biol Reprod 1995;53:29-37.
18. Phillip Morris Incorporated, Phillip. PatentNumber: 5, 724, 998. Phillip Morris Incorporated, ed. 2013;697:1-13.
19. Hall AH, Isom GE, Rockwood GA. Toxicology of cyanides and cyanogens: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
20. Williams M, Villarreal A, Davis B, et al. Comparison of the Performance of Cartomizer Style Electronic Cigarettes from Major Tobacco and Independent Manufacturers. PLoS One 2016;11:e0149251.
21. Baker RR. A review of pyrolysis studies to unravel reaction steps in burning tobacco. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 1987;11:555-73.
22. Baker RR, Bishop LJ. The pyrolysis of tobacco ingredients. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2004;71:223-311.
23. Auer R, Concha-Lozano N, Jacot-Sadowski I, et al. Heat-not-burn tobacco cigarettes: smoke by any other name. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177:1050-2.
24. Azimi B, Nourpanah P, Rabiee M. null) SA. Poly (ϵ-caprolactone) fber: an overview. J Eng Fiber Fabr 2014;9:74-90.
25. Thomas TA, Brooks JW. Accidental cyanide poisoning. Anaesthesia 1970;25:110-4.
26. Zheng S, Yuan X, Wang W, et al. Two fatal intoxications with cyanohydrins. J Anal Toxicol 2016;40:388-95.
27. Tardiff RG, Rodricks J V, eds. Toxic substances and human risk: principles of data interpretation. New York: Springer US, 1987. doi.
28. National Library of Medicine HSDB Database. Glycolonitrile. Toxnet toxicology data network. https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/a?dbs+hsdb:@term+@ DOCNO+ 2123 (accessed 21 Aug 2017).
29. Registry of toxic effects of chemical substances. Acetonitrile, Hydroxy 2017:1-2.
30. Williams JM, Gandhi KK, Lu SE, et al. Shorter interpuff interval is associated with higher nicotine intake in smokers with schizophrenia. Drug Alcohol Depend 2011;118:313-9.
31. Reilly SM, Goel R, Bitzer Z, et al. Effects of topography-related puff parameters on carbonyl delivery in mainstream cigarette smoke. Chem Res Toxicol 2017;30:1463-9.