Escalation behavior as a specific case of goal-directed activity: A persistence paradigm

Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 273-285

  Fox, Shaul ^a   Huffman, Michael ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036441064     PISSN: 01973533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2404_3     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Amsel, A. (1992). Frustration theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: progress and problems. In R. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. McGuire, T. Newcomb, M. Rosenberg, & P. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5-27). Chicago: Rand McNally.
3. Aronson, E. (1976). The social animal. San Francisco: Freeman.
4. Arkes, H. R., & Ayton, P. (1999). The sunk cost and Concord effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals? Psychological Bulletin, 125, 591-600.
5. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124-140.
6. Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1974). The dynamics of achievement-oriented activity. In J. W. Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.), Motivation and achievement (pp. 271-325). Washington, DC: Winston.
7. Atkinson, J. W., & Cartwright, D. (1964). Some neglected variables in contemporary conception of decision and performance. Psychological Reports, 14, 575-590.
8. Atkinson, J. W., & Raynor, J. O. (Eds.). (1974). Motivation and achievement. Washington, DC: Winston.
9. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479.
11. Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic.
12. Berkowitz, L. (1962). Aggression. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 59-72.
14. Boehne, D. M., & Paese, P. W. (2000). Deciding whether to complete or terminate an unfinished project: A strong test of the project completion hypothesis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 178-194.
15. Boulding, W., Morgan, R., & Staelin, R. (1992). Pulling the plug to stop the new product drain. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 164-176.
16. Bowen, M. G. (1987). The escalation phenomenon reconsidered. Decision dilemmas or decision errors? Academy of Management Review, 12, 52-66.
17. Brockner, J. (1992). The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review, 17, 39-62.
18. Brockner, J., & Rubin, J. Z. (1985). Entrapment in escalating conflicts. New York: Springer-Verlag.
19. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20. Carver, C. S., Lawrence, J. W., & Scheier, M. F. (1996). A control-process perspective on the origins of affect. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation (pp. 11-52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. Cialdini, R. B., Cacioppo, J. T., Bassett, R., & Miller, J. (1978). Low-ball procedure for producing compliance: Commitment then cost. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 463-476.
22. Conlon, D. E., & Garland, H. (1993). The role of project completion information in resource allocation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 402-413.
23. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Feather, N. T. (1962). The study of persistence. Psychological Bulletin, 59, 94-115.
25. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
26. Fox, S., Schmida, A., & Yinon, Y. (1995). Escalation behavior in domains related and unrelated to decision makers' academic background. Journal of Psychology and Business, 10, 245-259.
27. Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 196-202.
28. Garland, H. (1990). Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to and ongoing project. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 728-731.
29. Garland, H., & Conlon, D. E. (1998). Too close to quit: The role of project completion in maintaining commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 2025-2048.
30. Garland, H., & Newport, S. (1991). Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 55-69.
31. Garland, H., Sandefur, C. A., & Rogers, A. C. (1990). De-escalation of commitment in oil exploration when sunk costs and negative feedback coincide. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 721-727.
32. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). The volitional benefits of planning. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action (pp. 287-312). New York: Guilford.
33. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.
34. Heath, c. (1995). Escalation and de-escalation of commitment in response to sunk cost: The role of budgeting in mental accounting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 38-54.
35. Isaac, J. D., Sansone, C., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Other people as a source of interest in an activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 239-265.
36. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
37. Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). Goals as knowledge structures. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action (pp. 599-618). New York: Guilford.
38. Lewin, K.(1935).A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39. Lewin, K.(1936).Principles of toplogical psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41. Moreland, R. L., & Zajonc, R. B. (1982) Exposure effects in person perception: Familiarity, similarity, and attraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 395-415.
42. McDougall, W. (1908). An introduction to social psychology. London: Methuen.
43. McCain, B. E. (1986). Continuing investment under conditions of failure: A laboratory study of the limits of escalation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 280-284.
44. Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1986). Opportunity cost and the framing of resource allocation decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 348-356.
45. Northcraft, G. B., & Wolf, G. (1984). Dollars, sense, and sunk costs: A life cycle model of resource allocation decisions. Academy of Management Review, 9, 225-234.
46. Ovsiankina, M. (1929). Die Wiederaufnahme unterbrochener Handlungen [Resuming interrupted tasks]. Psychologische Forschung, 11, 302-379.
47. Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (1987). Self-regulatory perseveration and the depressive self-focusing style: A self-awareness theory of reactive depression. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 122-138.
48. Ross, J., & Staw, B. M. (1993). Organizational escalation and exit: Lessons from the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 701-732.
49. Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). "I don't feel like it": The function of interest in self-regulation. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation (pp. 203-228). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
50. Sawyer, J. E. (1992). Goal and process clarity: Specification of multiple constructs of role ambiguity and a structural equation model of their antecedents and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 130-142.
51. Schaubroeck, J., & Davis, E. (1994). Prospect theory predictions when escalation is not the only chance to recover sunk costs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 59-82.
52. Schoorman, F. D. (1988). Escalation bias in performance appraisal: An unintended consequence of supervisor participation in hiring decision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 58-62.
53. Schwarz, N., & Bohner, O. (1996). Feelings and their motivational implications. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action (pp. 119-145). New York: Guilford.
54. Simonson, I., & Staw, B. M. (1992). Deescalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing course of action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 419-426.
55. Snir, R. (1993). The relation of escalation to decision timing, interpersonal rivalry and the need of achievement. Unpublished master's thesis, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
56. Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27-44.
57. Staw, B. M. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6, 577-587.
58. Staw, B. M. (1982). Counterforces to change. In P. S. Goodman Associates (Ed.), Change in organizations (pp. 87-121). London: Jossey-Bass.
59. Staw, B. M. (1997). The escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal. In Z. Shapira (Ed.), Organizational decision making (pp. 191-215). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
60. Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1987). Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 39-78.
61. Tesser, A., Martin, L. L., & Cornell, D. P. (1996). On the substitutability of self-protective mechanisms. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action (pp. 48-38). New York: Guilford.
62. Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Appleton-Century.
63. Weiner, B. (1972). Theories of motivation. Chicago: Markham.
64. Weiner, B. (1974). The effects of unsatisfied achievement motivation on persistence and subsequent performance. In J. W. Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.), Motivation and achievement (pp. 347-357). Washington, DC: Winston.
65. Whyte, G. (1986). Escalating commitment to a course of action: a reinterpretation. Academy of Management Review, 11, 311-321.
66. Whyte, G. (1991). Decision failures: Why they occur and how to prevent them. Academy of Management Executive, 5, 23-31.
67. Whyte, G., Saks, A. M., & Hook, S. (1997). When success breeds failure: The role of self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 415-432.
68. Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1982). Symbolic self-completion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
69. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt. 2).
70. Zeigarnik, B. (1927). Uber das Behalten von erledigten und unerledigten Handlungen [On finished and unfinished tasks]. Psychologische Forschung, 9, 1-85.