Characterization challenges for a cellulose nanocrystal reference material: dispersion and particle size distributions

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2018, Pages

  Jakubek, Zygmunt J ^a   Chen, Maohui ^a   Couillard, Martin ^b   Leng, Tianyang ^a   Liu, Leslie ^a   Zou, Shan ^a   Baxa, Ulrich ^c   Clogston, Jeffrey D ^c   Hamad, Wadood Y ^d   Johnston, Linda J ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA   (Canada)

^c FREDERICK NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR CANCER RESEARCH   (United States)

^d FPINNOVATIONS   (Canada)

Author keywords

Atomic force microscopy; Biopolymer; Cellulose nanocrystals; Dispersion; Dynamic light scattering; Particle size distribution; Transmission electron microscopy

Indexed keywords

AGGLOMERATION; ASPECT RATIO; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BENCHMARKING; BIOPOLYMERS; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; CHARACTERIZATION; CRYSTALLITE SIZE; DISPERSION (WAVES); DYNAMIC LIGHT SCATTERING; HIGH RESOLUTION TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; NANOCRYSTALS; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

CELLULOSE NANO-CRYSTALS; CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTAL (CNCS); INDIVIDUAL PARTICLES; MORPHOLOGY CHARACTERIZATIONS; POLYDISPERSE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS; POSITIVELY CHARGED; REFERENCE MATERIAL; SULFURIC ACID HYDROLYSIS;

DISPERSIONS;

CELLULOSE; NANOCRYSTAL;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; MATERIAL COATING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PARTICLE SIZE; PHOTON CORRELATION SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

AGGLOMERATION; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; PARTICLE SIZE; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 85044994030     PISSN: 13880764     EISSN: 1572896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-018-4194-6     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Babick F, Mielke J, Wohlleben W, Weigel S, Hodoroaba V-D (2016) How reliably can a material be classified as a nanomaterial? Available particle sizing techniques at work. J Nanopart Res 18:158
2. Beck S, Bouchard J, Berry R (2011) Controlling the reflection wavelength of iridescent solid films of nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 12:167–172
3. Beck S, Bouchard J, Berry R (2012) Dispersibility in water of dried nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 13:1486–1494
4. Bonevich JE, Haller WK (2010) Measuring the size of nanoparticles using transmission electron microscopy. NIST-NCL Joint Assay Protocol, PCC-7, Washington, DC
5. Brinkmann A, Chen M, Couillard M, Jakubek ZJ, Leng T, Johnston LJ (2016) Correlating cellulose nanocrystal particle size and surface area. Langmuir 32:6105–6114
6. Cherhal F, Cousin F, Capron I (2015) Influence of charge density and ionic strength on the aggregation process of cellulose nanocrystals in aqueous suspension, as revealed by small-angle neutron scattering. Langmuir 31:5596–5602
7. Davis CS, Moon RJ, Ireland S, Foster EJ, Johnston LJ, Shatkin JA, Nelson K, Forster AM, Postek MT, Vladar AE, Gilman JW (2015) NIST-TAPPI workshop on measurement needs for cellulose nanomaterials. NIST Special Publication #1192. doi: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1192
8. De Temmerman P-J, Lammertyn J, De Ketelare B, Kestens V, Roebben G, Verleysen E, Mast J (2014) Measurement uncertainties of size, shape, and surface measurements using transmission electron microscopy of near-monodisperse, near-spherical nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 16:2177
9. Delvallee A, Feltin N, Ducourtieux S, Trabelsi M, Hochepied JF (2016) Toward an uncertainty budget for measuring nanoparticles by AFM. Metrologia 53:41–50
10. Dufresne A (2013) Nanocellulose: a new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater Today 16:220–227
11. Eichhorn S (2011) Cellulose nanowhiskers: promising materials for advanced applications. Soft Matter 7:303–315
12. Elazzouzi-Hafraoui S, Nishiyama Y, Putaux J-L, Heux L, Dubreuilf F, Rochas C (2008) The shape and size distribution of crystalline nanoparticles prepared by acid hydrolysis of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 9:57–65
13. Grulke EA, Yamamoto K, Kumagi K, Hausler I, Osterle W, Ortel E, Hodoroaba V-D, Brown SC, Chan C, Zheng J, Yamamoto K, Yashiki K, Song NW, Kim YH, Stefaniak AB, Schwegler-Berry D, Coleman VA, Jamting AK, Hermann J, Arakawa T, Burchett WW, Lambert JW, Stromberg AJ (2017) Size and shape distributions of primary crystallites in titania aggregates. Adv Powder Technol 28:1647–1659
14. Guan X, Cueto R, Russo P, Qi Y, Wu Q (2012) Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation with multiangle light scattering detection for characterization of cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 13:2671–2679
15. Hamad WY, Hu TQ (2010) Structure-property-yield inter-relationships in nanocrystalline cellulose extraction. Can J Chem Eng 88:392–402
16. Hoo CM, Doan T, Starostin N, West PE (2010) Optimal sample preparation for nanoparticle metrology (statistical size measurements) using atomic force microscopy. J Nanopart Res 12:939–949
17. Hu Y, Abidi N (2016) Distinct nematic self-assembling behavior caused by different size-unified cellulose nanocrystals via a multistage separation. Langmuir 32:9863–9872
18. ISO (19716:2016) Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals
19. 4-hydrolyzed cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir 26:17919–17925
20. Kaushik M, Chen WC, van de Ven TGM, Moore A (2014) An improved methodology for imaging cellulose nanocrystals by transmission electron microscopy. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29:77–84
21. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindstrom T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 50:5438–5466
22. Kovacs T, Naishi V, O’Connor B, Blaise C, Gagnez F, Hall L, Trudeau V, Martel P (2010) An ecotoxicological characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC). Nanotoxicology 4:255–270
23. Meli F, Klein T, Buhr E, Frase CG, Gleber G, Krumrey M, Duta A, Duta S, Korpelainen V, Bellotti R, Picotto GB, Boyd RD, Cuenat A (2012) Traceable size determination of nanoparticles, a comparison among European Metrology Institutes. Meas Sci Technol 23:125005
24. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994
25. Mukerjee A, Hackley VA (2017) Separation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals by multi-detector asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation. Analyst 143:731–740
26. Postek MT, Vladar A, Dagata J, Farkas N, Ming B, Wagner R, Raman A, Moon RJ, Sabo R, Wegner TH, Beecher J (2011) Development of the metrology and imaging of cellulose nanocrystals. Meas Sci Technol 22:024005
27. Reid MS, Villalobos M, Cranston ED (2017) Benchmarking cellulose nanocrystals: from the laboratory to industrial production. Langmuir 33:1583–1598
28. Rice SB, Chan C, Brown SC, Eschbach P, Han L, Esnor DS, Stefaniak AB, Bonevich J, Vladar AE, Hight Walker AR, Zheng J, Starnes C, Stromberg A, Ye J, Grulke EA (2013) Particle size distributions by transmission electron microscopy: an interlaboratory comparison case study. Metrologia 50:663–678
29. Shafiei-Sabet S, Hamad WY, Hatzikiriakos SG (2012) Rheology of nanocrystalline cellulose aqueous suspensions. Langmuir 28:17124–17133
30. Shatkin JA, Kim B (2015) Cellulose nanomaterials: life cycle risk assessment and environmental health and safety roadmap. Environ Sci Nano 2:477–499
31. Shatkin JA, Wegner TH, Bilek EM, Cowie J (2014) Market projections of cellulose nanomaterial-enabled products—part 1: applications. TAPPI J 13:9–16
32. Taurozzi JS, Hackley VA, Wiesner MR (2011) Ultrasonic dispersion of nanoparticles for environmental, health and safety assessment—issues and recommendations. Nanotoxicology 5:711–729
33. Trache D, Hussin MH, Haafiz MKM, Thakur VK (2017) Recent progress in cellulose nanocrystals: sources and production. Nanoscale 9:1763–1786
34. Uhlig M, Fall A, Wellert S, Lehmann M, Prévost S, Wågberg L, von Klitzing R, Nyström G (2016) Two-dimensional aggregation and semidilute ordering in cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir 32:442–450