Size and shape distributions of primary crystallites in titania aggregates

Advanced Powder Technology

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2017, Pages 1647-1659

  Grulke, Eric A ^a   Yamamoto, Kazuhiro ^b   Kumagai, Kazuhiro ^b   Häusler, Ines ^c   Österle, Werner ^c   Ortel, Erik ^c   Hodoroaba, Vasile Dan ^c   Brown, Scott C ^d   Chan, Christopher ^e   Zheng, Jiwen ^f   Yamamoto, Kenji ^g   Yashiki, Kouji ^g   Song, Nam Woong ^h   Kim, Young Heon ^h   Stefaniak, Aleksandr B ⁱ   Schwegler Berry, D ⁱ   Coleman, Victoria A ^j   Jämting, Åsa K ^j   Herrmann, Jan ^j   Arakawa, Toru ^k   Burchett, Woodrow W ^l   Lambert, Joshua W ^l   Stromberg, Arnold J ^l   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^c BAM FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TESTING   (Germany)

^d CHEMOURS COMPANY   (United States)

^e DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

^f CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^g ISHIHARA SANGYO KAISHA LTD   (Japan)

^h Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science   (South Korea)

ⁱ NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (United States)

^j NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^k Tayca Corporation   (Japan)

^l UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Measurement uncertainty; Shape distribution; Size distribution; TEM; Titania

Indexed keywords

ASPECT RATIO; CODES (SYMBOLS); CRYSTALLITE SIZE; DATA VISUALIZATION; HIGH RESOLUTION TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VISUALIZATION;

INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON; LOG-NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY; PRIMARY CRYSTALLITES; REPRODUCIBILITIES; SHAPE DESCRIPTORS; SHAPE DISTRIBUTION; TITANIA;

WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 85019080033     PISSN: 09218831     EISSN: 15685527     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2017.03.027     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. ISO, ISO 9276-1 Representation of results of particle size analysis – Part 1: Graphical representation, in, ISO, Geneva, 1998.
2. ISO, ISO 9276-2 Representation of results of particle size analysis – Part 2: Calculation of average particle sizes/diameters and moments from particle size distributions, in, ISO, Geneva, 2001.
3. ISO, ISO 9276-3 Representation of Results of Particle Size Analysis – Part 3: Fitting of an Experimental Cumulative Curve to a Reference Model, ISO, Geneva, 2008.
4. ISO, ISO 9276-5 Representation of Results of Particle Size Analysis Part 5: Methods of Calculation Relating to Particle Size Analyses using Logarithmic Normal Probability Distribution, ISO, Geneva, 2005, pp. 12.
5. ISO, ISO 9276-6 Representation of Results of Particle Size Analysis – Part 6: Descriptive and Quantitative Representation of Particle Shape and Morphology, ISO, Geneva, 2008, pp. 23.
6. ISO, ISO 5725-1:1994(en) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of Measurement Methods and Results — Part 1: General Principles and Definitions, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1994.
7. ISO, ISO 5725-2:1994(en) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of Measurement Methods and Results — Part 2: Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1994.
8. ISO, ISO 13322-1 Particle Size Analysis – Image Analysis Methods – Part 1: Static Image Analysis Methods, ISO, Geneva, 2004, pp. 39.
9. NIST, Report of Investigation. Reference Material 8012. Gold nanoparticles, Nominal 30 nm Diameter, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2007, pp. 10.
10. V. Kestens, G. Roebben, Certification Report – The Certification of Equivalent Diameters of a Mixture of Silica Nanoparticles in Aqueous Solution: ERM-FD102, IRMM, Geel, Belgium, 2014.
11. Masuda, H., Iinoya, K., Theoretical study of the scatter of experimental data due to particle-size-distribution. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 4 (1970), 60–66.
12. Masuda, H., Gotoh, K., Study on the sample size required for the estimation of mean particle diameter. Adv. Powder Technol. 10 (1999), 159–173.
13. Yoshida, H., Mori, Y., Masuda, H., Yamamoto, T., Particle size measurement of standard reference particle candidates and theoretical estimation of uncertainty region. Adv. Powder Technol. 20 (2009), 145–149.
14. Yoshida, H., Yamamoto, T., Fukui, K., Masuda, H., Theoretical calculation of uncertainty region based on the general size distribution in the preparation of standard reference particles for particle size measurement. Adv. Powder Technol. 23 (2012), 185–190.
15. Rice, S.B., Chan, C., Brown, S.C., Eschbach, P., Han, L., Ensor, D.S., Stefaniak, A.B., Bonevich, J., Vladar, A.E., Walker, A.R.H., Zheng, J., Starnes, C., Stromberg, A., Ye, J., Grulke, E.A., Particle size distributions by transmission electron microscopy: an interlaboratory comparison case study. Metrologia 50 (2013), 663–678.
16. VAMAS, VAMAS Guidelines for the Design and Operation of Interlaboratory Comparisons (ILCs), VAMAS, Washington, DC, 2001, pp. 4.
17. ISO, ISO 5725 Accuracy (trueness and precision) of Measurement Methods and Results – Part 1: General Principles and Definitions, ISO, Geneva, 1998.
18. Boyd, R.D., Cuenat, A., Meli, F., Frase, C.G., Klein, T., Krumrey, M., Glever, G., Duta, A., Duta, S., Hogstrom, R., Prieto, E., Good practice guide for the determination of the size distribution of spherical nanoparticle samples. Measurement Good Practice Guide No. 119, 2011, National Physical Laboratory.
19. Albers, P., Maier, M., Reisinger, M., Hannebauer, B., Weinand, R., Physical boundaries within aggregates – differences between amorphous, para-crystalline, and crystalline structures. Cryst. Res. Technol. 50 (2015), 846–865.
20. Pratsinis, S.E., Zhu, W., Vemury, S., The role of gas mixing in flame synthesis of titania powders. Powder Technol. 86 (1996), 87–93.
21. 2 catalysts. J. Catal. 192 (2000), 185–196.
22. 2 catalysts. J. Catal. 240 (2006), 114–125.
23. 2 photocatalysts in phenol decomposition. Appl. Catal. B 84 (2008), 356–362.
24. 2. Sanxia Daxue Xuebao, Ziran Kexueban 30 (2008), 68–71.
25. Periasamy, V.S., Athinarayanan, J., Al-Hadi, A.M., Juhaimi, F.A., Mahmoud, M.H., Alshatwi, A.A., Identification of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food products: induce intracellular oxidative stress mediated by TNF and CYP1A genes in human lung fibroblast cells. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 39 (2015), 176–186.
26. 2 on its optical property and photocatalytic reactivity exemplified by 2-chlorophenol. Appl. Catal. B 68 (2006), 1–11.
27. 2 (1 0 1) nanobelts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (2010), 6679–6685.
28. 2 particles in aqueous photooxidation. Catal. Today 88 (2003), 49–59.
29. 2 (rutile) particles, revealed by in situ FTIR absorption and photoluminescence measurements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004), 1290–1298.
30. Soto, K., Garza, K.M., Murr, L.E., Cytotoxic effects of aggregated nanomaterials. Acta Biomater. 3 (2007), 351–358.
31. Horie, M., Nishio, K., Fujita, K., Endoh, S., Miyauchi, A., Saito, Y., Iwahashi, H., Yamamoto, K., Murayama, H., Nakano, H., Nanashima, N., Niki, E., Yoshida, Y., Protein adsorption of ultrafine metal oxide and its influence on cytotoxicity toward cultured cells. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 22 (2009), 543–553.
32. Fadeel, B., Garcia-Bennett, A.E., Better safe than sorry: understanding the toxicological properties of inorganic nanoparticles manufactured for biomedical applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 62 (2010), 362–374.
33. Nalabotu, S.K., Blough, E.R., Toxicology of Nanoparticles., 2013, CRC Press, 337–354.
34. 2 nanocolloids with respect to their age, size, and structure. Langmuir 22 (2006), 598–604.
35. 2 nanoparticles produced by sol-gel technique. AIP Conf. Proc. 935 (2007), 120–125.
36. Zimnyakov, D.A., Zdrajevsky, R.A., Yuvchenko, S.A., Ushakova, O.V., Angelsky, O.V., Yermolenko, S.B., Enhancement of light depolarization by random ensembles of titania-based low-dimensional nanoparticles. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 152 (2015), 37–44.
37. Barnard, A.S., Impact of distributions on the photocatalytic performance of anatase nanoparticle ensembles. J. Mater. Chem. A 3 (2015), 60–64.
38. 2-MWCNTs for methanol, ethanol, and isopropanol in alkaline media. J. Electroanal. Chem. 741 (2015), 56–63.
39. 2 single crystals: facile shape-, size-, and phase-controlled growth and efficient photocatalytic performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5 (2013), 11249–11257.
40. 2 agglomerates in electrostatically stabilized aqueous dispersions. Powder Technol. 160 (2005), 121–126.
41. Suda, Y., Morimoto, T., Nagao, M., Adsorption of alcohols on titanium dioxide (rutlie) surface. Langmuir 3 (1987), 99–104.
42. Greenwood, R., Kendall, K., Selection of suitable dispersants for aqueous suspensions of zirconia and titania powders using acoustophoresis. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 19 (1999), 479–488.
43. Partch, R., Brown, S., Aerosol and solution modification of particle-polymer interfaces. J. Adhes. 67 (1998), 259–276.
44. Iguchi, Y., Kuwata, S., Manufacture of Hydrophobic Titanium Oxide Fine Powder. 1993, Shinetsu Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Japan, 5.
45. J.E. Bonevich, W.K. Haller, Measuring the size of nanoparticles using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), in: NIST (Ed.) NIST-NCL Joint Assay Protocol, PCC-7 Version 1.1, NIST-NCL, Washington, DC, 2010, pp. 13.
46. Rizzo, M.L., Szekely, G.J., Energy distance. Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev.: Comput. Stat. 8 (2016), 27–38.
47. Szekely, G.J., Rizzo, M.L., Testing for Equal Distributions in High Dimension., 2004, Bowling Green State University.
48. Linsinger, T., Roebben, G., Gilligand, D., Calzolai, L., Rossi, F., Gibson, N., Klein, C., Requirements of Measurements for the Implementation of the European Commission Definition of the Term “nanomaterial”. Commission, E., (eds.), 2012, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements.
49. McCaffrey, J.P., Baribeau, J.M., A transmission electron microscope (TEM) calibration standard sample for all magnification, camera constant, and image-diffraction pattern rotation calibrations. Microsc. Res. Tech. 32 (1995), 449–454.
50. Buhr, E., Senftleben, N., Klein, T., Bergmann, D., Gnieser, D., Frase, C.G., Bosse, H., Characterization of nanoparticles by scanning electron microscopy in transmission mode. Meas. Sci. Technol., 20, 2009, 084025 (084029pp).
51. Klein, T., Buhr, E., Johnsen, K.P., Frase, C.G., Traceable measurement of nanoparticle size using a scanning electron microscope in transmission mode (TSEM). Meas. Sci. Technol., 22, 2011 (094002/094001-094002/094009).
52. Klein, T., Buhr, E., Johnsen, K.P., Frase, C.G., TSEM – a review of scanning electron microscopy in transmission mode and its applications. Adv. Imag. Electron Phys. 171 (2012), 297–356.
53. Rosin, P., Rammler, E., The laws governing the fineness of powdered coal. J. Inst. Fuel 7 (1933), 29–36.