Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China

Chinese Geographical Science

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 86-99

  Qiao, Xuning ^a   Gu, Yangyang ^a,b,c   Zou, Changxin ^b   Wang, Lei ^d   Luo, Juhua ^c   Huang, Xianfeng ^e  

^a HENAN POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NANJING INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

^c NANJING INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND LIMNOLOGY   (China)

^d LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Guizhou Institute of Environmental Science and Designing   (China)

Author keywords

ecosystem services; Principal Component Analysis; spatial pattern; synergies; Taihu Lake Basin (TLB); trade offs

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TRADE-OFF;

CHINA; TAIHU BASIN;

EID: 85044964112     PISSN: 10020063     EISSN: 1993064X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. APBS (Anhui Provincial Bureau of Statistics), 2011. Anhui Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China: China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)
2. Bateman I J, Harwood A R, Mace G M et al., 2013. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science, 341(6141): 45–50. doi: 10. 1126/science.1234379
3. Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J, 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12(12): 1394–1404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387. x
4. Brauman K A, Daily G C, Duarte T K et al., 2007. The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32(1): 67–98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758
5. Carpenter S R, Mooney H A, Agard J et al., 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(5): 1305–1312. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808772106
6. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R et al., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
7. DeFries R S, Foley J A, Asner G P, 2004. Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(5): 249–257. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0249:LCBHNA]2.0.CO;2
8. Derissen S, Latacz-Lohmann U, 2013. What are PES? A review of definitions and an extension. Ecosystem Services, 6: 12–15. doi: 10. 1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.002
9. Fan Yulong, Hu Nan, Ding Shengyan et al., 2016. Progress in terrestrial ecosystem services and biodiversity. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(15): 4583–4593. (in Chinese).
10. Field C B, Randerson J T, Malmström C M, 1995. Global net primary production: combining ecology and remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 51(1): 74–88. doi: 10.1016/ 0034-4257(94)00066-V
11. Fischer G, Nachtergaele F, Prieler S et al., 2008. Global agro-ecological zones assessment for agriculture (GAEZ 2008). Rome, Italy: IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria and FAO.
12. Foley J A, De Fries R, Asner G P et al., 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734): 570–574. doi: 10. 1126/science.1111772
13. Fu B J, Gulinck H, 1994. Land evaluation in an area of severe erosion: the Loess Plateau of China. Land Degradation and Development, 5(1): 33–40. doi: 10.1002/ldr.3400050105
14. Fu B J, Wang S, Su C H et al., 2013. Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(1): 4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.002
15. Goldstein J H, Caldarone G, Duarte T K et al., 2012. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(19): 7565–7570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120104 0109
16. Guo L, 2007. Ecology: doing battle with the green monster of Taihu Lake. Science, 317(5842): 1166–1166. doi: 10.1126/ science.317.5842. 1166
17. Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M et al., 2012. Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecology and Society, 17(3): 22. doi: 10.5751/es-04853-170322
18. Jiao Y Y, Chen Q K, Chen X et al., 2014. Occurrence and transfer of a cyanobacterial neurotoxin β-methylamino-L-alanine within the aquatic food webs of Gonghu Bay (Lake Taihu, China) to evaluate the potential human health risk. Science of the Total Environment, 468-469: 457–463. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.064
19. Jin Yan, Huang Jingfeng, Peng Dailiang, 2009. A new quantitative model of ecological compensation based on ecosystem capital in Zhejiang Province, China. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 10(4): 301–305. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0820222
20. JPBS (Jiangsu Provincial Bureau of Statistics), 2011. Jiangsu Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China: China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)
21. Legendre P, Legendre L, 1998. Numerical Ecology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. Li J, Ren Z Y, Zhou Z X, 2006. Ecosystem services and their values: a case study in the Qinba mountains of China. Ecological Research, 21(4): 597–604. doi: 10.1007/s11284-006-0148-z
23. Li J, Zhou Z X, 2016. Natural and human impacts on ecosystem services in Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(7): 6803–6815. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5867-7
24. Li Z F, Luo C, Xi Q et al., 2015. Assessment of the AnnAGNPS model in simulating runoff and nutrients in a typical small watershed in the Taihu Lake basin, China. Catena, 133: 349–361. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.06.007
25. Liu G L, Zhang L C, Zhang Q et al., 2015. The response of grain production to changes in quantity and quality of cropland in Yangtze River Delta, China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 95(3): 480–489. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6745
26. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Island Press.
27. Piao S L, Fang J Y, Ciais P et al., 2009. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature, 458(7241): 1009–1013. doi: 10.1038/nature07944
28. Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E et al., 2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33: 118–129. doi: 10.1016/j. landusepol.2012.12.013
29. Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B et al., 1993. Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 7(4): 811–841. doi: 10.1029/93gb02725
30. Qiu J X, Turner M G, 2013. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(29): 12149–12154. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310539 110
31. Rangel T F, Diniz-Filho J A F, Bini L M, 2010. SAM: a comprehensive application for Spatial Analysis in Macroecology. Ecography, 33(1): 46–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06299.x
32. Rao Enming, Xiao Yi, Ouyang Zhiyun, 2014. Assessment of flood regulation service of lakes and reservoirs in china. Journal of Natural Resources, 29(8): 1356–1365. (in Chinese).
33. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G D, Bennett E M, 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(11): 5242–5247. doi: 10. 1073/pnas.0907284107
34. Ricketts T H, Daily G C, Ehrlich P R et al., 2004. Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(34): 12579–12582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405147101
35. Rodríguez J P, Beard Jr T D, Bennett E M et al., 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 11(1): 28. doi: 10.5751/ES-01667-110128
36. Rounsevell M D A, Annetts J E, Audsley E et al., 2003. Modelling the spatial distribution of agricultural land use at the regional scale. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 95(2–3): 465–479. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00217-7
37. Sayer J, Cassman K G, 2013. Agricultural innovation to protect the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(21): 8345–8348. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208054110
38. SBS (Shanghai Bureau of Statistic), 2011. Shanghai Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China: China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)
39. State Council of China, 2014. National New-Type Urbanization Plan 2014-2020. Beijing, China: People's Publishing House. (in Chinese)
40. Su C H, Fu B J, He C S et al., 2012a. Variation of ecosystem services and human activities: a case study in the Yanhe Watershed of China. Acta Oecologica, 44: 46–57. doi: 10.1016/j. actao.2011.11.006
41. Su C H, Fu B J, Wei Y P et al., 2012b. Ecosystem management based on ecosystem services and human activities: a case study in the Yanhe watershed. Sustainability Science, 7(1): 17–32. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0145-1
42. Turner K G, Odgaard M V, Bøcher P K et al., 2014. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125: 89–104. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007
43. USGS, 2004. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, 1 Arc Second scene SRTM_u03_n008e004, Unfilled Unfinished 2.0, Global Land Cover Facility. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
44. Vos W, Meekes H, 1999. Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 46(1–3): 3–14. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046 (99)00043-2
45. Wang G X, Zhang L M, Zhuang Q L et al., 2016. Quantification of the soil organic carbon balance in the Tai-Lake paddy soils of China. Soil and Tillage Research, 155: 95–106. doi: 10. 1016/j.still.2015.08.003
46. Wang Liyan, Xiao Yi, Ouyang Zhiyun et al., 2017. Gross ecosystem product accounting in the national key ecological function area: an example of Arxan. China Population, Resources and Environment, 27(3): 146–154. (in Chinese).
47. Wen Yuanguang, Liu Shirong, 1995. Quantitative analysis of the characteristics of rainfall interception of main forest ecosystems in China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 31(4): 289–298. (in Chinese)
48. Xu X B, Yang G S, Tan Y et al., 2016. Ecological risk assessment of ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China from 1985 to 2020. Science of the Total Environment, 554-555: 7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.120
49. Yang G F, Ge Y, Xue H et al., 2015. Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban-rural complexes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 136: 110–121. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.006
50. Yin Y X, Xu Y P, Chen Y, 2009. Relationship between flood/drought disasters and ENSO from 1857 to 2003 in the Taihu Lake basin, China. Quaternary International, 208(1–2): 93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2008.12.016
51. Yu T, Zhang Y, Hu X N et al., 2012. Distribution and bioaccumulation of heavy metals in aquatic organisms of different trophic levels and potential health risk assessment from Taihu lake, China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 81: 55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv. 2012.04.014
52. Zhao M S, Running S W, 2010. Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 Through 2009. Science, 329(5994): 940–943. doi: 10.1126/science. 1192666
53. ZPBS (Zhejiang Provincial Bureau of Statistics), 2011. Zhejiang Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China: China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)