Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 29, 2013, Pages 12149-12154

  Qiu, Jiangxiao ^a   Turner, Monica G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydrologic Services; Landscape Heterogeneity; Sustainability; Wisconsin; Yahara Watershed

Indexed keywords

FRESH WATER;

AGRICULTURAL PARAMETERS; AGRICULTURAL WATERSHED; ARTICLE; CROP PRODUCTION; ECOSYSTEM; LANDSCAPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES; URBANIZATION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

HYDROLOGIC SERVICES; LANDSCAPE HETEROGENEITY; SUSTAINABILITY; WISCONSIN; YAHARA WATERSHED;

AGRICULTURE; CARBON; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GROUNDWATER; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RECREATION; SOIL; URBANIZATION; WATER SUPPLY; WISCONSIN;

EID: 84880346557     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1310539110     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis (Island Press, Washington, DC).
2. Daily GC, Matson PA (2008) Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(28):9455-9456.
3. Carpenter SR, et al. (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(5):1305-1312.
4. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12(12):1394-1404.
5. Nicholson E, et al. (2009) Priority research areas for ecosystem services in a changing world. J Appl Ecol 46(6):1139-1144.
6. Peterson GD, et al. (2003) Assessing future ecosystem services: A case study of the Northern Highlands Lake District, Wisconsin. Conserv Ecol 7(3):1.
7. Rodriguez JP, et al. (2006) Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 11(1):28.
8. Costanza R, et al. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260.
9. Schröter D, et al. (2005) Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310(5752):1333-1337.
10. Naidoo R, Ricketts TH (2006) Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation. PLoS Biol 4(11):e360.
11. Lavorel S, et al. (2011) Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. J Ecol 99(1):135-147.
12. Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Muller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic 21:17-29.
13. Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC (2006) Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol 4(11):e379.
14. Egoh B, et al. (2008) Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127(1-2):135-140.
15. Naidoo R, et al. (2008) Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(28):9495-9500.
16. Anderson BJ, et al. (2009) Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities. J Appl Ecol 46(4):888-896.
17. Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Bode M, Richardson DM (2009) Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa. Biol Conserv 142(3):553-562.
18. Nelson E, et al. (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7(1):4-11.
19. Holland RA, et al. (2011) Spatial covariation between freshwater and terrestrial ecosystem services. Ecol Appl 21(6):2034-2048.
20. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(11):5242-5247.
21. Maes J, Paracchini ML, Zulian G, Dunbar MB, Alkemade R (2012) Synergies and tradeoffs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol Conserv 155:1-12.
22. Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M, Kroll F, Seppelt R (2012) Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: An integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle region, Germany. Ecol Soc 17(3):22.
23. Turner MG, Donato DC, Romme WH (2012) Consequences of spatial heterogeneity for ecosystem services in changing forest landscapes: Priorities for future research. Land Ecol, 10.1007/s10980-012-9741-4.
24. Brauman KA, Daily GC, Duarte TK, Mooney HA (2007) The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:67-98.
25. Carpenter SR, et al. (1998) Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8(3):559-568.
26. Tilman D (1999) Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: The need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(11):5995-6000.
27. Matson PA, Parton WJ, Power AG, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277(5325):504-509.
28. Daily GC, et al. (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7(1):21-28.
29. Tallis H, Kareiva P, Marvier M, Chang A (2008) An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(28):9457-9464.
30. Goldstein JH, et al. (2006) Business strategies for conservation on private lands: Koa forestry as a case study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(26):10140-10145.
31. Eigenbrod F, et al. (2009) Ecosystem service benefits of contrasting conservation strategies in a human-dominated region. Proc Biol Sci 276(1669):2903-2911.
32. Reyers B, Polasky S, Tallis H, Mooney HA, Larigauderie A (2012) Finding common ground for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bioscience 62(5):503-507.
33. Curtis JT (1959) The Vegetation of Wisconsin: An ordination of Plant Communities (Univ of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI).
34. Turner MG, Carpenter SR, Gustafson EJ, Naiman RJ, Person SM (1998) in Status and Trends of the Nation's Biological Resources, eds Mac MJ, Opler PA, Puckett CE, Doran PD (US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA), pp 37-61.
35. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418(6898):671-677.
36. Musacchio LR (2009) The scientific basis for the design of landscape sustainability: A conceptual framework for translational landscape research and practice of designed landscapes and the six Es of landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecol 24(8):993-1013.
37. Weller DE, Baker ME, Jordan TE (2011) Effects of riparian buffers on nitrate concentrations in watershed discharges: New models and management implications. Ecol Appl 21(5):1679-1695.
38. Power AG (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365(1554):2959-2971.
39. Dabney SM (1998) Cover crop impacts on watershed hydrology. J Soil Water Conserv 53(3):207-213.
40. Dale VH, Lowrance R, Mulholland P, Robertson GP (2010) Bioenergy sustainability at the Regional Scale. Ecol Soc 15(4):23.
41. Carpenter SR (2005) Eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems: Bistability and soil phosphorus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(29):10002-10005.
42. Bennett EM, Balvanera P (2007) The future of production systems in a globalized world. Front Ecol Environ 5(4):191-198.
43. Bohensky EL, Reyers B, Van Jaarsveld AS (2006) Future ecosystem services in a Southern African river basin: A scenario planning approach to uncertainty. Conserv Biol 20(4):1051-1061.
44. Sophocleous M (2002) Interactions between groundwater and surface water: The state of the science. Hydrogeol J 10(1):52-67.
45. Brunke M, Gonser T (1997) The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshw Biol 37(1):1-33.
46. Verhoeven JTA, Arheimer B, Yin CQ, Hefting MM(2006) Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality. Trends Ecol Evol 21(2):96-103.
47. Zedler JB, Kercher S (2005) Wetland resources: Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:39-74.
48. Peterjohn WT, Correll DL (1984) Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65(5):1466-1475.
49. Maitre V, Cosandey AC, Desagher E, Parriaux A (2003) Effectiveness of groundwater nitrate removal in a river riparian area: The importance of hydrogeological conditions. J Hydrol 278(1-4):76-93.
50. Burkhard B, et al. (2012) Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Indic 21:1-6.
51. Eigenbrod F, et al. (2010) The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol 47(2):377-385.
52. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS v3: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps (Univ of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA).
53. Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2002) Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).
54. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using Multivariate Statistics (Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA).
55. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied Logistic Regression (Wiley, New York).
56. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available at www.R-project.org.