Precision and accuracy of a digital impression scanner in full-arch implant rehabilitation

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 171-175

  Pesce, Paolo ^a   Pera, Francesco ^a   Setti, Paolo ^a   Menini, Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; HUMAN; IMPLANT-SUPPORTED DENTURE; TOOTH IMPLANT;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS;

EID: 85044791238     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5535     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 100:285-291
2. Heckmann SM, Karl M, Wichmann MG, Winter W, Graef F, Taylor TD. Cement fixation and screw retention: Parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:466-473
3. Pera F, Pesce P, Bevilacqua M, Setti P, Menini M. Analysis of different impression techniques and materials on multiple implants through 3-dimensional laser scanner. Implant Dent 2016; 25:232-237
4. Buzayan MM, Yunus NB. Passive fit in screw retained multiunit implant prosthesis understanding and achieving: A review of the literature. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2014;14:16-23
5. Wilk BL. Intraoral digital impressioning for dental implant restorations versus traditional implant impression techniques. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2015;36:529-533
6. Menini M, Setti P, Pera F, Pera P, Pesce P. Accuracy of multiunit implant impression: Traditional techniques versus a digital procedure. Clin Oral Investig 2017. Epub ahead of print
7. Giménez B, özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, Pradíes G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17(suppl):e54-e64
8. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy in dental medicine, a new way to measure trueness and precision. J Vis Exp 2014;86
9. Tealdo T, Menini M, Bevilacqua M, et al. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in edentulous patients' maxillae: A 6-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2014;27:207-214
10. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:7-13
11. Eisenmann E, Mokabberi A, Walter MH, Freesmeyer WB. Improving the fit of implant-supported superstructures using the spark erosion technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:810-818
12. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-848
13. Brånemark PI, Engstrand P, Ohrnell LO, et al. Brånemark Novum: A new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1:2-16
14. Jemt T, Lie A. Accuracy of implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw: Analysis of precision of fit between cast gold-alloy frameworks and master casts by means of a threedimensional photogrammetric technique. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:172-180
15. Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:648-653
16. Chew AA, Esguerra RJ, Teoh KH, Wong KM, Ng SD, Tan KB. Three-dimensional accuracy of digital implant impressions: Effects of different scanners and implant level. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32:70-80
17. Güth JF, Runkel C, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Keul C. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:1445-1455