The cis-regulatory dynamics of embryonic development at single-cell resolution

Nature

Volumn 555, Issue 7697, 2018, Pages 538-542

  Cusanovich, Darren A ^a   Reddington, James P ^b   Garfield, David A ^b,e   Daza, Riza M ^a   Aghamirzaie, Delasa ^a   Marco Ferreres, Raquel ^b   Pliner, Hannah A ^a   Christiansen, Lena ^c   Qiu, Xiaojie ^a   Steemers, Frank J ^c   Trapnell, Cole ^a   Shendure, Jay ^a,d   Furlong, Eileen E M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^c ILLUMINA INC   (United States)

^d HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOASSAY; CELL; DIFFERENTIATION; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FLY; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHROMATIN; CIS REGULATORY SEQUENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ECTODERM; EGG LAYING; EMBRYO; ENHANCER REGION; FEMALE; GASTRULATION; GENOME; MALE; MESODERM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY SEQUENCE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; CELL LINEAGE; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYOLOGY; ENDODERM; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; INSECT GENOME; METABOLISM; REPRODUCIBILITY; TRANSGENIC ORGANISM;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; METAZOA;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CHROMATIN; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; ENDODERM; ENHANCER ELEMENTS, GENETIC; FEMALE; GASTRULATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENOME, INSECT; MALE; MESODERM; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; ORGANISMS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

EID: 85044334985     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature25981     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Cusanovich, D. A. et al. Multiplex single cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing. Science 348, 910-914 (2015).
2. Maduro, M. F., Meneghini, M. D., Bowerman, B., Broitman-Maduro, G. &Rothman, J. H. Restriction of mesendoderm to a single blastomere by the combined action of SKN-1 and a GSK-3β homolog is mediated by MED-1 and-2 in C. elegans. Mol. Cell 7, 475-485 (2001).
3. Sethi, A. J., Wikramanayake, R. M., Angerer, R. C., Range, R. C. &Angerer, L. M. Sequential signaling crosstalk regulates endomesoderm segregation in sea urchin embryos. Science 335, 590-593 (2012).
4. Rodaway, A. &Patient, R. Mesendoderm. An ancient germ layer? Cell 105, 169-172 (2001).
5. Thomas, S. et al. Dynamic reprogramming of chromatin accessibility during Drosophila embryo development. Genome Biol. 12, R43 (2011).
6. Bonn, S. et al. Tissue-specific analysis of chromatin state identifies temporal signatures of enhancer activity during embryonic development. Nat. Genet. 44, 148-156 (2012).
7. Kvon, E. Z. et al. Genome-scale functional characterization of Drosophila developmental enhancers in vivo. Nature 512, 91-95 (2014).
8. Gallo, S. M. et al. REDfly v3.0: toward a comprehensive database of transcriptional regulatory elements in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D118-D123 (2011).
9. Frise, E., Hammonds, A. S. &Celniker, S. E. Systematic image-driven analysis of the spatial Drosophila embryonic expression landscape. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 345 (2010).
10. Tomancak, P. et al. Systematic determination of patterns of gene expression during Drosophila embryogenesis. Genome Biol 3, research0088.1 (2002).
11. Bonn, S. et al. Cell type-specific chromatin immunoprecipitation from multicellular complex samples using BiTS-ChIP. Nat. Protoc. 7, 978-994 (2012).
12. Doe, C. Q. Temporal patterning in the Drosophila CNS. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33, 219-240 (2017).
13. Ciglar, L. &Furlong, E. E. Conservation and divergence in developmental networks: a view from Drosophila myogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 754-760 (2009).
14. Spahn, P. et al. Multiple regulatory safeguards confine the expression of the GATA factor serpent to the hemocyte primordium within the Drosophila mesoderm. Dev. Biol. 386, 272-279 (2014).
15. Reuter, R. The gene serpent has homeotic properties and specifies endoderm versus ectoderm within the Drosophila gut. Development 120, 1123-1135 (1994).
16. Cannavò, E. et al. Genetic variants regulating expression levels and isoform diversity during embryogenesis. Nature 541, 402-406 (2017).
17. Van Der Maaten, L. &Hinton, G. H. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579-2605 (2008).
18. Rodriguez, A. &Laio, A. Machine learning. Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks. Science 344, 1492-1496 (2014).
19. Qiu, X. et al. Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell developmental trajectories. Nat. Methods 14, 979-982 (2017).
20. Lecuit, T., Samanta, R. &Wieschaus, E. slam encodes a developmental regulator of polarized membrane growth during cleavage of the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Cell 2, 425-436 (2002).
21. Beiman, M., Shilo, B. Z. &Volk, T. Heartless, a Drosophila FGF receptor homolog, is essential for cell migration and establishment of several mesodermal lineages. Genes Dev. 10, 2993-3002 (1996).
22. Okumura, T., Matsumoto, A., Tanimura, T. &Murakami, R. An endodermspecific GATA factor gene, dGATAe, is required for the terminal differentiation of the Drosophila endoderm. Dev. Biol. 278, 576-586 (2005).
23. Clark, H. F. et al. Dachsous encodes a member of the cadherin superfamily that controls imaginal disc morphogenesis in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 9, 1530-1542 (1995).
24. Simcox, A. A. &Sang, J. H. When does determination occur in Drosophila embryos? Dev. Biol. 97, 212-221 (1983).
25. Tingvall, T. O., Roos, E. &Engström, Y. The GATA factor serpent is required for the onset of the humoral immune response in Drosophila embryos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3884-3888 (2001).
26. Cao, J. et al. Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science 357, 661-667 (2017).
27. McKenna, A. et al. Whole-organism lineage tracing by combinatorial and cumulative genome editing. Science 353, aaf7907 (2016).
28. Raj, B. et al. Simultaneous single-cell profiling of lineages and cell types in the vertebrate brain by scGESTALT. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/205534 (2017).
29. Karaiskos, N. et al. The Drosophila embryo at single-cell transcriptome resolution. Science 358, 194-199 (2017).
30. Frieda, K. L. et al. Synthetic recording and in situ readout of lineage information in single cells. Nature 541, 107-111 (2017).
31. Tomancak, P. et al. Global analysis of patterns of gene expression during Drosophila embryogenesis. Genome Biol. 8, R145 (2007).
32. Hammonds, A. S. et al. Spatial expression of transcription factors in Drosophila embryonic organ development. Genome Biol. 14, R140 (2013).
33. Sandmann, T., Jakobsen, J. S. &Furlong, E. E. ChIP-on-chip protocol for genome-wide analysis of transcription factor binding in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2839-2855 (2006).
34. Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. &Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213-1218 (2013).
35. Amini, S. et al. Haplotype-resolved whole-genome sequencing by contiguitypreserving transposition and combinatorial indexing. Nat. Genet. 46, 1343-1349 (2014).
36. Langmead, B. &Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357-359 (2012).
37. Fraley, C. &Raftery, A. E. Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis and density estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 97, 611-631 (2002).
38. Fraley, C., Raftery, A. E., Murphy, T. B. &Scrucca, L. Version 4 for R: Normal Mixture Modeling for Model-Based Clustering, Classification, and Density Estimation Technical Report No. 597 (Department of Statistics, Univ. of Washington, 2012).
39. Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
40. Quinlan, A. R. &Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841-842 (2010).
41. Trapnell, C. et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381-386 (2014).
42. Setty, M. &Leslie, C. S. SeqGL identifies context-dependent binding signals in genome-wide regulatory element maps. PLOS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004271 (2015).
43. Ghandi, M., Lee, D., Mohammad-Noori, M. &Beer, M. A. Enhanced regulatory sequence prediction using gapped k-mer features. PLOS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003711 (2014).
44. Grant, C. E., Bailey, T. L. &Noble, W. S. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27, 1017-1018 (2011).
45. Van Der Maaten, L. Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 3221-3245 (2014).
46. Sandmann, T., Jakobsen, J. S. &Furlong, E. E. ChIP-on-chip protocol for genome-wide analysis of transcription factor binding in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2839-2855 (2006).
47. Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. &Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213-1218 (2013).
48. Amini, S. et al. Haplotype-resolved whole-genome sequencing by contiguitypreserving transposition and combinatorial indexing. Nat. Genet. 46, 1343-1349 (2014).
49. Langmead, B. &Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357-359 (2012).
50. Fraley, C. &Raftery, A. E. Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis and density estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 97, 611-631 (2002).
51. Fraley, C., Raftery, A. E., Murphy, T. B. &Scrucca, L. Version 4 for R: Normal Mixture Modeling for Model-Based Clustering, Classification, and Density Estimation Technical Report No. 597 (Department of Statistics, Univ. of Washington, 2012).
52. Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
53. Quinlan, A. R. &Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841-842 (2010).
54. Trapnell, C. et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381-386 (2014).
55. Setty, M. &Leslie, C. S. SeqGL identifies context-dependent binding signals in genome-wide regulatory element maps. PLOS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004271 (2015).
56. Ghandi, M., Lee, D., Mohammad-Noori, M. &Beer, M. A. Enhanced regulatory sequence prediction using gapped k-mer features. PLOS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003711 (2014).
57. Grant, C. E., Bailey, T. L. &Noble, W. S. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27, 1017-1018 (2011).
58. Van Der Maaten, L. Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 3221-3245 (2014).