Conservation and divergence in developmental networks: a view from Drosophila myogenesis

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 754-760

  Ciglar, Lucia ^a   Furlong, Eileen EM ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; EYES ABSENT PROTEIN; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; MYOCYTE ENHANCER FACTOR 2; MYOD PROTEIN; MYOGENIC FACTOR; MYOGENIC FACTOR 5; MYOGENIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR TWIST; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DROSOPHILA; MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT; MYOBLAST; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS REGULATION; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENES, INSECT; GENOME, INSECT; HUMANS; MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT;

VERTEBRATA;

EID: 70549096299     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.10.001     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Tapscott S.J., Davis R.L., Thayer M.J., Cheng P.F., Weintraub H., and Lassar A.B. MyoD1: a nuclear phosphoprotein requiring a Myc homology region to convert fibroblasts to myoblasts. Science 242 (1988) 405-411
2. Weintraub H., Tapscott S.J., Davis R.L., Thayer M.J., Adam M.A., Lassar A.B., and Miller A.D. Activation of muscle-specific genes in pigment, nerve, fat, liver, and fibroblast cell lines by forced expression of MyoD. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86 (1989) 5434-5438
3. Kassar-Duchossoy L., Gayraud-Morel B., Gomes D., Rocancourt D., Buckingham M., Shinin V., and Tajbakhsh S. Mrf4 determines skeletal muscle identity in Myf5:Myod double-mutant mice. Nature 431 (2004) 466-471
4. Pownall M.E., Gustafsson M.K., and Emerson Jr. C.P. Myogenic regulatory factors and the specification of muscle progenitors in vertebrate embryos. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 18 (2002) 747-783
5. Thisse B., el Messal M., and Perrin-Schmitt F. The twist gene: isolation of a Drosophila zygotic gene necessary for the establishment of dorsoventral pattern. Nucleic Acids Res 15 (1987) 3439-3453
6. Baylies M.K., and Bate M. Twist: a myogenic switch in Drosophila. Science 272 (1996) 1481-1484
7. Baylies M.K., Bate M., and Ruiz Gomez M. Myogenesis: a view from Drosophila. Cell 93 (1998) 921-927
8. Leptin M. Twist and snail as positive and negative regulators during Drosophila mesoderm development. Genes Dev 5 (1991) 1568-1576
9. Broadie K.S., and Bate M. The development of adult muscles in Drosophila: ablation of identified muscle precursor cells. Development 113 (1991) 103-118
10. Sandmann T., Girardot C., Brehme M., Tongprasit W., Stolc V., and Furlong E.E. A core transcriptional network for early mesoderm development in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev 21 (2007) 436-449. Genome-wide ChIP-on-chip experiments with Drosophila Twist and the integration of binding data for Mef2 facilitated the assembly of initial regulatory network of early mesoderm specification. The identification of multiple groups of genes essential for diverse cellular processes, such as transcription, cell migration and proliferation, as direct Twist targets, gives Twist the ability to act as a true master regulator of Drosophila myogenesis.
11. Michelson A.M., Abmayr S.M., Bate M., Arias A.M., and Maniatis T. Expression of a MyoD family member prefigures muscle pattern in Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev 4 (1990) 2086-2097
12. Paterson B.M., Walldorf U., Eldridge J., Dubendorfer A., Frasch M., and Gehring W.J. The Drosophila homologue of vertebrate myogenic-determination genes encodes a transiently expressed nuclear protein marking primary myogenic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88 (1991) 3782-3786
13. Misquitta L., and Paterson B.M. Targeted disruption of gene function in Drosophila by RNA interference (RNA-i): a role for nautilus in embryonic somatic muscle formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96 (1999) 1451-1456
14. Balagopalan L., Keller C.A., and Abmayr S.M. Loss-of-function mutations reveal that the Drosophila nautilus gene is not essential for embryonic myogenesis or viability. Dev Biol 231 (2001) 374-382. By generating an EMS loss-of-function allele, the authors assess the requirement of the closest Drosophila MyoD ortholog, nautilus, in muscle development. Surprisingly, they show that nau mutant embryos do not have general muscle defects, but rather have defects in specific muscle subtypes.
15. Keller C.A., Grill M.A., and Abmayr S.M. A role for nautilus in the differentiation of muscle precursors. Dev Biol 202 (1998) 157-171
16. Wei Q., Rong Y., and Paterson B.M. Stereotypic founder cell patterning and embryonic muscle formation in Drosophila require nautilus (MyoD) gene function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 (2007) 5461-5466. By creating novel genetic alleles, the authors readdress the importance of nautilus in Drosophila muscle development and show that its deletion strongly interferes with somatic muscle specification. Muscle disruption correlated with a loss of the founder cell marker rP298.
17. Wei Q., Marchler G., Edington K., Karsch-Mizrachi I., and Paterson B.M. RNA interference demonstrates a role for nautilus in the myogenic conversion of Schneider cells by daughterless. Dev Biol 228 (2000) 239-255
18. Keller C.A., Erickson M.S., and Abmayr S.M. Misexpression of nautilus induces myogenesis in cardioblasts and alters the pattern of somatic muscle fibers. Dev Biol 181 (1997) 197-212
19. Fukushige T., and Krause M. The myogenic potency of HLH-1 reveals wide-spread developmental plasticity in early C. elegans embryos. Development 132 (2005) 1795-1805. This study reveals the ability of HLH-1, the C. elegans ortholog of MyoD, to convert a wide range of blastomeric cells to myogenic cell fate. This competence of CeMyoD to act as a myogenic regulatory factor is reminiscent of vertebrate MyoD, being thus an important example of functional conservation across evolution.
20. Chen L., Krause M., Sepanski M., and Fire A. The Caenorhabditis elegans MYOD homologue HLH-1 is essential for proper muscle function and complete morphogenesis. Development 120 (1994) 1631-1641
21. Fukushige T., Brodigan T.M., Schriefer L.A., Waterston R.H., and Krause M. Defining the transcriptional redundancy of early bodywall muscle development in C. elegans: evidence for a unified theory of animal muscle development. Genes Dev 20 (2006) 3395-3406. In a series of elegant experiments the authors solve the discrepency between the potency of CeMyoD to induce muscle cell fate and its relatively mild mutant phenotype by showing that the requirement of HLH-1 (CeMyoD) is masked by functional redundancy with UNC-120 (SRF) and HND-1 (HAND). The vertebrate orthologs of both proteins are involved in development of other muscle tissues, which suggests that the C. elegans genes maintain a more ancestral function where all three factors are required in the same developmental process.
22. Thisse C., Perrin-Schmitt F., Stoetzel C., and Thisse B. Sequence-specific transactivation of the Drosophila Twist gene by the dorsal gene product. Cell 65 (1991) 1191-1201
23. Jiang J., Kosman D., Ip Y.T., and Levine M. The dorsal morphogen gradient regulates the mesoderm determinant Twist in early Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev 5 (1991) 1881-1891
24. Bate M., and Rushton E. Myogenesis and muscle patterning in Drosophila. C R Acad Sci III 316 (1993) 1047-1061
25. Riechmann V., Irion U., Wilson R., Grosskortenhaus R., and Leptin M. Control of cell fates and segmentation in the Drosophila mesoderm. Development 124 (1997) 2915-2922
26. Tapanes-Castillo A., and Baylies M.K. Notch signaling patterns Drosophila mesodermal segments by regulating the bHLH transcription factor Twist. Development 131 (2004) 2359-2372
27. Carmena A., Bate M., and Jimenez F. Lethal of scute, a proneural gene, participates in the specification of muscle progenitors during Drosophila embryogenesis. Genes Dev 9 (1995) 2373-2383
28. Bodmer R. The gene tinman is required for specification of the heart and visceral muscles in Drosophila. Development 118 (1993) 719-729
29. Azpiazu N., and Frasch M. tinman and bagpipe: two homeo box genes that determine cell fates in the dorsal mesoderm of Drosophila. Genes Dev 7 (1993) 1325-1340
30. Liu Y.H., Jakobsen J.S., Valentin G., Amarantos I., Gilmour D.T., and Furlong E.E. A systematic analysis of Tinman function reveals Eya and JAK-STAT signaling as essential regulators of muscle development. Dev Cell 16 (2009) 280-291. Using global ChIP-on-chip data for Tinman, the main specification factor of dorsal mesoderm in Drosophila, the authors uncovered a more prominent role of Tinman in body wall muscle development than previously anticipated. Two newly identified aspects are analyzed in more detail; Tin-dependent expression of eya in mesoderm and its role in muscle specification, remindful of vertebrate Eya proteins, and the novel role of JAK/STAT signalling in myogenesis in Dosophila as well as zebrafish.
31. Olson E.N. Gene regulatory networks in the evolution and development of the heart. Science 313 (2006) 1922-1927
32. Tajbakhsh S., Borello U., Vivarelli E., Kelly R., Papkoff J., Duprez D., Buckingham M., and Cossu G. Differential activation of Myf5 and MyoD by different Wnts in explants of mouse paraxial mesoderm and the later activation of myogenesis in the absence of Myf5. Development 125 (1998) 4155-4162
33. Tajbakhsh S., Rocancourt D., Cossu G., and Buckingham M. Redefining the genetic hierarchies controlling skeletal myogenesis: Pax-3 and Myf-5 act upstream of MyoD. Cell 89 (1997) 127-138
34. Buckingham M., and Relaix F. The role of Pax genes in the development of tissues and organs: Pax3 and Pax7 regulate muscle progenitor cell functions. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23 (2007) 645-673
35. Bopp D., Jamet E., Baumgartner S., Burri M., and Noll M. Isolation of two tissue-specific Drosophila paired box genes, Pox meso and Pox neuro. EMBO J 8 (1989) 3447-3457
36. Duan H., Zhang C., Chen J., Sink H., Frei E., and Noll M. A key role of Pox meso in somatic myogenesis of Drosophila. Development 134 (2007) 3985-3997. Deletion of pox meso, the only Drosophila mesoderm-specific Pax gene, shows that it is essential for the development of distinct lateral and ventral muscle fibers. These rather mild defects reveal a divergent regulatory function of the Drosophila Pax genes from their vertebrate orthologs, which play a prominent role in skeletal myogenesis.
37. Pignoni F., Hu B., Zavitz K.H., Xiao J., Garrity P.A., and Zipursky S.L. The eye-specification proteins So and Eya form a complex and regulate multiple steps in Drosophila eye development. Cell 91 (1997) 881-891
38. Hanson I.M. Mammalian homologues of the Drosophila eye specification genes. Semin Cell Dev Biol 12 (2001) 475-484
39. Heanue T.A., Reshef R., Davis R.J., Mardon G., Oliver G., Tomarev S., Lassar A.B., and Tabin C.J. Synergistic regulation of vertebrate muscle development by Dach2, Eya2, and Six1, homologs of genes required for Drosophila eye formation. Genes Dev 13 (1999) 3231-3243
40. Grifone R., Laclef C., Spitz F., Lopez S., Demignon J., Guidotti J.E., Kawakami K., Xu P.X., Kelly R., Petrof B.J., et al. Six1 and Eya1 expression can reprogram adult muscle from the slow-twitch phenotype into the fast-twitch phenotype. Mol Cell Biol 24 (2004) 6253-6267
41. Relaix F., and Buckingham M. From insect eye to vertebrate muscle: redeployment of a regulatory network. Genes Dev 13 (1999) 3171-3178
42. Clark I.B., Boyd J., Hamilton G., Finnegan D.J., and Jarman A.P. D-six4 plays a key role in patterning cell identities deriving from the Drosophila mesoderm. Dev Biol 294 (2006) 220-231. The authors identified a novel gene acting in the specification of ventral mesoderm in Drosophila, D-six4. Mutant embryos show severe disruption of ventral and lateral muscles. These results are highly similar to what was observed for eya (see ref. [30]) and extend the well-established role of Eya-Six proteins in vertebrate myogenesis to invertebrates.
43. Amin N.M., Lim S.E., Shi H., Chan T.L., and Liu J. A conserved Six-Eya cassette acts downstream of Wnt signaling to direct non-myogenic versus myogenic fates in the C. elegans postembryonic mesoderm. Dev Biol (2009). This study identified EYA-1 and CEH-34 (CeSix), members of conserved Eya and Six TF families, respectively, as key regulators of non-muscle cell fate during C. elegans body wall muscle development. Both factors have common upstream regulators and upon misexpression are able to induce cell fate to the non-muscle lineage. These findings highlight an unexpected, more ancestral role of the Eya-Six TFs in myogenesis.
44. Potthoff M.J., and Olson E.N. MEF2: a central regulator of diverse developmental programs. Development 134 (2007) 4131-4140
45. Penn B.H., Bergstrom D.A., Dilworth F.J., Bengal E., and Tapscott S.J. A MyoD-generated feed-forward circuit temporally patterns gene expression during skeletal muscle differentiation. Genes Dev 18 (2004) 2348-2353
46. Dodou E., Xu S.M., and Black B.L. mef2c is activated directly by myogenic basic helix-loop-helix proteins during skeletal muscle development in vivo. Mech Dev 120 (2003) 1021-1032
47. Cripps R.M., Black B.L., Zhao B., Lien C.L., Schulz R.A., and Olson E.N. The myogenic regulatory gene Mef2 is a direct target for transcriptional activation by Twist during Drosophila myogenesis. Genes Dev 12 (1998) 422-434
48. Molkentin J.D., Black B.L., Martin J.F., and Olson E.N. Cooperative activation of muscle gene expression by MEF2 and myogenic bHLH proteins. Cell 83 (1995) 1125-1136
49. Tanaka K.K., Bryantsev A.L., and Cripps R.M. Myocyte enhancer factor 2 and chorion factor 2 collaborate in activation of the myogenic program in Drosophila. Mol Cell Biol 28 (2008) 1616-1629. This study identifies CF2 as a new factor that synergistically actives the actin57B enhancer together with Mef2. A similar cooperative activity between CF2 and Mef2 regulates enhancers of other muscle structural genes, suggesting that CF2 may act as a more general co-activator of Mef2 activity during late stages of development.
50. Deng H., Hughes S.C., Bell J.B., and Simmonds A.J. Alternative requirements for Vestigial, Scalloped, and Dmef2 during muscle differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Cell 20 (2009) 256-269. This paper establishes Drosophila Vestigial and Scalloped proteins as direct interaction partners of Mef2 in the developing body wall and cardiac muscle. Ectopic expression of either vestigial or scalloped blocks muscle differentiation.
51. Maeda T., Chapman D.L., and Stewart A.F. Mammalian vestigial-like 2, a cofactor of TEF-1 and MEF2 transcription factors that promotes skeletal muscle differentiation. J Biol Chem 277 (2002) 48889-48898
52. Liotta D., Han J., Elgar S., Garvey C., Han Z., and Taylor M.V. The Him gene reveals a balance of inputs controlling muscle differentiation in Drosophila. Curr Biol 17 (2007) 1409-1413. This study shows that Him prevents premature activation of late myogenic genes by counteracting Mef2 activity during early stages of myogenesis. Prolonged expression of Him leads to a failure in muscle differentiation that can be partially rescued by increasing Mef2 levels, suggesting that the balance between the levels of these two factors is essential for muscle differentiation.
53. Soler C., and Taylor M.V. The Him gene inhibits the development of Drosophila flight muscles during metamorphosis. Mech Dev (2009). Similar to the embryonic function of Him, the authors demonstrate that Him is necessary to antagonize the activity of Mef2, and hence prevent untimely differentiation during adult muscle development as well. A novel aspect is the positive regulation of Him by Notch signalling, thereby identifying a new mechanism of Notch-mediated inhibition of differentiation.
54. Elgar S.J., Han J., and Taylor M.V. mef2 activity levels differentially affect gene expression during Drosophila muscle development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105 (2008) 918-923. Using an allelic series of Mef2 mutants, the authors show that different Mef2 downstream target genes require different levels of Mef2 activity for their expression. Interestingly, this is somewhat correlated with the onset of the genes' expression, where late muscle differentiation genes are dependent on high levels of Mef2 for their expression.
55. de Angelis L., Zhao J., Andreucci J.J., Olson E.N., Cossu G., and McDermott J.C. Regulation of vertebrate myotome development by the p38 MAP kinase-MEF2 signaling pathway. Dev Biol 283 (2005) 171-179
56. Bergstrom D.A., Penn B.H., Strand A., Perry R.L., Rudnicki M.A., and Tapscott S.J. Promoter-specific regulation of MyoD binding and signal transduction cooperate to pattern gene expression. Mol Cell 9 (2002) 587-600
57. Edgar B.A., Lehman D.A., and O'Farrell P.H. Transcriptional regulation of string (cdc25): a link between developmental programming and the cell cycle. Development 120 (1994) 3131-3143
58. Grosshans J., and Wieschaus E. A genetic link between morphogenesis and cell division during formation of the ventral furrow in Drosophila. Cell 101 (2000) 523-531
59. Spring J., Yanze N., Middel A.M., Stierwald M., Groger H., and Schmid V. The mesoderm specification factor Twist in the life cycle of jellyfish. Dev Biol 228 (2000) 363-375
60. Sandmann T., Jensen L.J., Jakobsen J.S., Karzynski M.M., Eichenlaub M.P., Bork P., and Furlong E.E. A temporal map of transcription factor activity: mef2 directly regulates target genes at all stages of muscle development. Dev Cell 10 (2006) 797-807
61. Dichoso D., Brodigan T., Chwoe K.Y., Lee J.S., Llacer R., Park M., Corsi A.K., Kostas S.A., Fire A., Ahnn J., et al. The MADS-Box factor CeMEF2 is not essential for Caenorhabditis elegans myogenesis and development. Dev Biol 223 (2000) 431-440
62. Wang Z., Wang D.Z., Hockemeyer D., McAnally J., Nordheim A., and Olson E.N. Myocardin and ternary complex factors compete for SRF to control smooth muscle gene expression. Nature 428 (2004) 185-189