Non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring revisited

Intensive Care Medicine

Volumn 44, Issue 12, 2018, Pages 2213-2215

  Michard, Frederic ^a   Sessler, Daniel I ^b   Saugel, Bernd ^c  

^a Denens   (Switzerland)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTERY WALL; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; DIGITAL ARTERY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSIVE PATIENT; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PULSE WAVE; PULSE WAVE TRANSIT TIME; TONOMETRY; VALIDATION PROCESS; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; DEVICES; INTENSIVE CARE; PROCEDURES;

ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; CRITICAL CARE; HUMANS;

EID: 85042919786     PISSN: 03424642     EISSN: 14321238     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5108-x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Smolle KH, Schmid M, Prettenthaler H, Weger C (2015) The accuracy of the CNAP device compared with invasive radial artery measurements for providing continuous noninvasive arterial blood pressure readings at a medical intensive care unit: a method-comparison study. Anesth Analg 121:1508–1516
2. Martina JR, Westerhof BE, van Goudoever J et al (2012) Noninvasive continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring with Nexfin. Anesthesiology 116:1092–1103
3. Bartels K, Esper SA, Thiele RH (2016) Blood pressure monitoring for the anesthesiologist: a practical review. Anesthesiology 122:1866–1879
4. Weiss E, Gayat E, Duman-Nizard V, Le Guen M, Fischler M (2014) Use of the Nexfin device to detect acute arterial pressure variations during anaesthesia induction. Br J Anaesth 113:52–60
5. Kim SH, Lilot M, Sidhu KS et al (2014) Accuracy and precision of continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring compared with invasive arterial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 120:1080–1097
6. Gratz I, Deal E, Spitz F et al (2017) Continuous non-invasive finger cuff CareTaker comparable to invasive intra-arteiral pressure in patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery. BMC Anesthesiol 17:48
7. Dueck R, Goedje O, Clopton P (2012) Noninvasive continuous beat-to-beat radial artery pressure via TL-200 applanation tonometry. J Clin Monit Comput 26:75–83
8. Saugel B, Meidert AS, Hapfelmeier A et al (2013) Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure measurement based on radial artery tonometry in the intensive care unit: a method comparison study using the T-Line TL-200pro device. Br J Anaesth 111:185–190
9. Foldi S, Horvath T, Zieger F et al (2017) A novel non-invasive blood pressure waveform measuring system compared to Millar applanation tonometry. J Clin Monit Comput. 10.1007/s10877-017-0070-7 (epub ahead of print)
10. Bilo G, Zorzi C, Ochoa Munera JE et al (2015) Validation of the Somnotouch-NIBP noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 20:291–294
11. Weenk M, van Goor H, Frietman B et al (2017) Continuous monitoring of vital signs using wearable devices on the general ward: pilot study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 5:e91
12. Sessler DI, Meyhoff CS, Zimmerman NM et al (2017) Period-dependent associations between hypotension during and for 4 days after noncardiac surgery and a composite of myocardial infarction and death: a substudy of the POISE-2 trial. Anesthesiology. 10.1097/aln.0000000000001985 (epub ahead of print)
13. Saugel B, Grothe O, Nicklas JY (2017) Error grid analysis for arterial pressure method comparison studies. Anesth Analg. 10.1213/ane.0000000000002585 (epub ahead of print)
14. Dagdeviren C, Su Y, Joe P et al (2014) Conformable amplified lead zirconate titanate sensors with enhanced piezoelectric response for cutaneous pressure monitoring. Nat Commun 5:4496
15. Khan Y, Ostfeld AE, Lochner CM et al (2016) Monitoring of vital signs with flexible and wearable medical devices. Adv Mater 28:4373–4395
16. Boland CS, Khan U, Ryan G et al (2016) Sensitive electromechanical sensors using viscoelastic graphene-polymer nanocomposites. Science 354:1257–1260
17. Michard F, Gan TJ, Kehlet H (2017) Digital innovations and emerging technologies for enhanced recovery programmes. Br J Anaesth 119:31–39