Digital innovations and emerging technologies for enhanced recovery programmes

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 119, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 31-39

  Michard, F ^a   Gan, T J ^b   Kehlet, H ^c  

^a Denens   (Switzerland)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Digital innovation; Enhanced recovery programme; Wearable sensor

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ENHANCED RECOVERY PROGRAM; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSOR; SMARTPHONE; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; TEXT MESSAGING; CHECKLIST; CONVALESCENCE; HEMODYNAMICS; MOBILIZATION; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROCEDURES;

CHECKLIST; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EARLY AMBULATION; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PAIN MEASUREMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SMARTPHONE; TEXT MESSAGING;

EID: 85026668178     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex140     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 1997;78:606-17
2. Nicholson A, Lowe MC, Parker J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. Br J Surg 2014;101:172-88
3. Miller TE, Thacker JK, White WD, et al. Reduced length of stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. Anesth Analg 2014;118:1052-61
4. Thiele RH, Rea KM, Turrentine FE, et al. Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220:430-43
5. Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, et al. A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2007;94:224-31
6. Lyon A, Solomon MJ, Harrison JD. A qualitative study assessing the barriers to implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery. World J Surg 2014;38:1374-80
7. ERAS Compliance Group. The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg 2015;26:1153-9
8. Bakker N, Cakir H, Doodeman HJ, et al. Eight years of experience with enhanced recovery after surgery in patients with colon cancer: impact of measures to improve adherence. Surgery 2015;157:1130-6
9. Pecorelli N, Hershom O, Baldini G, et al. Impact of adherence to care pathway interventions on recovery following bowel resection within an established enhanced recovery program. Surg Endosc 2017;31:1760-71
10. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 2008;248:189-98
11. Levett DZ, Edwards M, Grocott M, et al. Preparing the patient for surgery to improve outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2016;30:145-57
12. Gupta R, Gan TJ. Preoperative nutrition and prehabilitation. Anesthesiol Clin 2016;34:143-53
13. Mayo NE, Feldman L, Scott S, et al. Impact of preoperative change in physical function on postoperative recovery: argument supporting prehabilitation for colorectal surgery. Surgery 2011;150:505-14
14. Burke LE, Ma J, Azar KML, et al. Current science on consumer use of mobile health for cardiovascular disease prevention. Circulation 2015;132:1157-213
15. Chow CK, Redfern J, Hillis GS, et al. Effect of lifestyle-focused text messaging on risk factor modification in patients with coronary heart disease. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;314:1255-63
16. Stephens J, Allen J. Mobile phone interventions to increase physical activity and reduce weight: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2013;28:320-9
17. Uhlig K, Pqtel K, Ip S, et al. Self-measured blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:185-94
18. Liang X, Wang Q, Yang X, et al. Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med 2011;28:455-63
19. Fanning J, Mullen SP, McAuley E. Increasing physical activity with mobile devices: a meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2012;14:e161
20. Whittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, et al. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:CD006611
21. Thakkar J, Kurup R, Laba TL, et al. Mobile telephone text messaging for medication adherence in chronic disease: a metaanalysis. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:340-9
22. Bellamy MC. Wet, dry or something else? Br J Anaesth 2006;97:755-7
23. Michard F, Biais M. Rational fluid management: dissecting facts from fiction. Br J Anaesth 2012;108:369-71
24. Thacker JK, Mountford WK, Ernst FR, et al. Perioperative fluid utilization variability and association with outcomes: Considerations for enhanced recovery efforts in sample US surgical populations. Ann Surg 2016;263:502-10
25. Thiele RH, Raghunathan K, Brudney CS, et al. American society for enhanced recovery (ASER) and perioperative quality initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on perioperative fluid management within an enhanced recovery pathway for colorectal surgery. Periop Med 2016;17:24
26. Cannesson M, Gan TJ. PRO: perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy is an essential element of an enhanced recovery protocol. Anesth Analg 2016;122:1258-60
27. Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, et al. Effect of perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA 2014;311:2181-90
28. Benes J, Giglio MT, Brienza N, et al. The effects of goaldirected fluid therapy based on dynamic parameters on post-surgical outcome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care 2014;18:584
29. Michard F. Hemodynamic monitoring in the era of digital health. Ann Intensive Care 2016;6:15
30. Kim SH, Lilot M, Sidhu KS, et al. Accuracy and precision of continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring compared with invasive arterial pressure. Anesthesiology 2014;120
31. Maus TM, Reber B, Banks DA, et al. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011;25:770-5
32. Waldron NH, Miller TE, Thacker JK, et al. A prospective comparison of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor versus esophageal Doppler monitor for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery patients. Anesth Analg 2014;118:966-75
33. Vieillard-Baron A, Slama M, Mayo P, et al. A pilot study on safety and clinical utility of a single-use 72-hour indwelling transesophageal echocardiography probe. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:629-35
34. Chu H, Wang Y, Sun Y, et al. Accuracy of pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Monit Comput 2016;30:265-74
35. Pestana D, Espinosa E, Eden A, et al. Perioperative goaldirected hemodynamic optimization using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in major abdominal surgery. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, pragmatic trial: POEMAS study. Anesth Analg 2014;119:579-87
36. Yang J, Foglesong CP, Canales C, et al. Assessment of postoperative outcomes in relation to pleth variability index (PVI) based on goal-directed therapy. ASA 2014; abstract A1207
37. Broch O, Carstens A, Gruenevald M, et al. Non-invasive hemodynamic optimization in major abdominal surgery: a feasibility study. Minerva Anesthesiol 2016;82:1158-69
38. Joshi GP, Kehlet H. CON: perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy is an essential element of an enhanced recovery protocol? Anesth Analg 2016;122:1261-3
39. Srinivasa S, Taylor MH, Singh PP, et al. Randomized clinical trial of goal-directed fluid therapy within an enhanced recovery protocol for elective colectomy. Br J Surg 2013;100:66-74
40. Lai CW, Starkie T, Creanor S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of stroke volume optimization during elective major abdominal surgery in patients stratified by aerobic fitness. Br J Anaesth 2015;115:578-89
41. Michard F. Decision support for hemodynamic management: from graphical displays to closed loops. Anesth Analg 2013;117:876-82
42. Joosten A, Alexander B, Delaporte A, Lilot M, Rinehart J, Cannesson M. Perioperative goal directed therapy using automated closed-loop fluid management: the future? Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2015;47:517-23
43. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology 2012;116:248-73
44. Oderda GM, Gan TJ, Johnson BH, et al. Effect of opioid-related adverse events on outcomes in selected surgical patients. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2013;27:62-70
45. Kehlet H, Dahl JB. The value of "multimodal" or "balanced analgesia" in postoperative pain treatment. Anesth Analg 1993;77:1048-56
46. Storm H. Changes in skin conductance as a tool to monitor nociceptive stimulation and pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008;21:796-804
47. Jess G, Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK, et al. Monitoring heart rate variability to assess experimentally induced pain using the analgesia nociception index. A randomised volunteer study. Eur J Anaesth 2016;33:118-25
48. Melia U, Gabarron E, Agusti M, et al. Comparison of the qCON and qNOX indices for the assessment of unconsciousness level and noxious stimulation response during surgery. J Clin Monit Comput 2016; epub ahead of print
49. Ledowski T, Tiong WS, Lee C, Wong B, Fiori T, Parker N. Analgesia nociception index: evaluation as a new parameter for acute postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth 2013;111:627-9
50. Cowen R, Stasiowska MK, Laycock H, et al. Assessing pain objectively: the use of physiological markers. Anaesthesia 2015;70:828-47
51. Martini CH, Boon M, Broens SJL, et al. Ability of the nociception level, a multiparameter composite of autonomic signals, to detect noxious stimuli during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2015;123:524-34
52. Edry R, Recea V, Dikust Y, et al. Preliminary intraoperative validation of the nociception level index. A noninvasive nociception monitor. Anesthesiology 2016;125:193-203
53. The International Surgical Outcomes Study Group. Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth 2016;117:601-9
54. Bartels K, Karhausen J, Clambey ET, et al. Perioperative organ injury. Anesthesiology 2013;119:1474-89
55. Boehm O, Baumgarten G, Hoeft A. Epidemiology of the highrisk population: perioperative risk and mortality after surgery. Curr Opin Crit Care 2015;21:322-7
56. Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1368-75
57. Abenstein JP, Narr BJ. An ounce of prevention may equate to a pound of cure. Can early detection and intervention prevent adverse events? Anesthesiology 2010;112:272-3
58. Overdyk FJ, Carter R, Maddox RR, et al. Continuous oximetry/capnometry monitoring reveals frequent desaturation and bradypnea during patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg 2007;105:412-8
59. Weigner MB, Lee LA; for the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation. No patient shall be harmed by opioid-induced respiratory depression. APSF Newsletter 2011;26:21-40
60. Taenzer AH, Pyke JB, McGrath SP, et al. Impact of pulse oximetry surveillance on rescue events and intensive acre unit transfers. A before-and-after concurrence study. Anesthesiology 2010;112:282-7
61. Botto F, Alonso-Coello P, Chan MT, et al. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a large, international, prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria, characteristics, predictors, and 30-day outcomes. Anesthesiology 2014;120:564-78
62. Franklin C, Mathew J. Developing strategies to prevent in hospital cardiac arrest: analyzing responses of physicians and nurses in the hours before the event. Crit Care Med 1994;22:244-7
63. Bellomo R, Ackerman M, Bailey M, et al. A controlled trial of electronic automated advisory vital signs monitoring in general hospital wards. Crit Care Med 2012;40:2349-61
64. Brown H, Terrence J, Vasquez P, et al. Continuous monitoring in an inpatient medical-surgical unit: a controlled clinical trial. Am J Med 2014;127:226-32
65. Michard F. A sneak peek into digital innovations and wearable sensors for cardiac monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput 2017;31:253-9
66. Donnelly N, Harper R, McCanderson J, et al. Development of a ubiquitous clinical monitoring solution to improve patient safety and outcomes. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012;2012:6088-73
67. McGillion M, Yost J, Turner A, et al. Technology-enabled remote monitoring and self-management-Vision for patient empowerment following cardiac and vascular surgery: User testing and randomized controlled trial protocol. JMIR Res Protoc 2016;5:e149
68. Chen L, Dubrawski A, Wang D, et al. Using supervised machine learning to classify real alerts and artifact in online multisignal vitalmonitoring data. Crit Care Med 2016;44:e456-63
69. Hravnak M, Edwards L, Clontz A, et al. Defining the incidence of cardiorespiratory instability in patients in step-down units using an electronic integrated monitoring system. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1300-8
70. Ronen M, Weissbrod R, Overdyk FJ, et al. Smart respiratory monitoring: clinical development and validation of the IPI (integrated pulmonary index) algorithm. J Clin Monit Comput 2017;31:435-42
71. Pinsky MR, Clermont G, Hravnak M. Predicting cardiorespiratory instability. Crit Care 2016;20:70
72. Konan S, Hossain F, Patel S, et al. Measuring function after hip and knee surgery: the evidence to support performancebased functional outcome tasks. Bone Joint J 2014;96:1431-5
73. Shirley ED, Sanders JO. Measuring quality of care with patient satisfaction scores. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016;98:e83
74. Harding P, Holland AE, Delany C, et al. Do activity levels increase after total hip and knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:1502-11
75. Webster F, Perruccio AV, Jenkinson R, et al. Understanding why people do or do not engage in activities following total joint replacement: a longitudinal qualitative study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015;23:860-7
76. Luna IE, Peterson B, Kehlet H, et al. Individualized assessment of post-arthroplasty recovery by actigraphy-a methodology study. J Clin Monit Comput 2016; epub ahead of print
77. Cook DJ, Thompson JE, Prinsen SK, et al. Functional recovery in the elderly aftermajor surgery: assessment ofmobility recovery usingwireless technology. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:1057-61
78. Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Maharaj M, et al. Physical activity measured with accelerometer and self-rated disability in lumbar spine surgery: a prospective study. Global Spine J 2016;6:459-64
79. Beevi FH, Miranda J, Pedersen CF, et al. An evaluation of commercial pedometers for monitoring slow walking speed populations. Telemed JEHealth 2016;22:441-9
80. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2725-32
81. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009;360:491-9