Media use and brain development during adolescence

Nature Communications

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Crone, Eveline A ^a   Konijn, Elly A ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENCE; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROSCIENCE; SOCIAL MEDIA; WELLBEING; ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN; EMOTION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; IMPULSIVENESS; INTERNET; MENTAL HEALTH; PEER GROUP; SOCIAL DISTANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN; EMOTIONS; HUMANS; IMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR; INTERNET; MENTAL HEALTH; PEER GROUP; SOCIAL DISTANCE; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 85042387840     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03126-x     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Prensky, M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. Horizon 9, 1-6 (2001).
2. Ståhl, T. How ICT savvy are digital natives actually? Nord. J. Digit. Lit. 12, 89-108 (2017).
3. Rideout, V. The Common Sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and Teens (Common Sense Media, San Francisco, 2015).
4. Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Ólafsson, K. &Haddon, L. Children's online risks and opportunities: Comparative findings from EU Kids Online and Net Children Go Mobile http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60513/. (2014).
5. Konijn, E. A., Veldhuis, J., Plaisier, X. S., Spekman, M. &den Hamer, A. H. in The Handbook of Psychology of Communication Technology (ed. Sundar. S.) (Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, 2015).
6. Blakemore, S. J. &Mills, K. L. Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65, 187-207 (2014).
7. Sebastian, C. L. et al. Developmental influences on the neural bases of responses to social rejection: implications of social neuroscience for education. Neuroimage 57, 686-694 (2011).
8. Valkenburg, P. M. &Taylor Piotrowski, J. How Media Attract and Affect Youth (Yale University Press., Yale, 2017).
9. Ma, J. &Yang, Y. What can we know from selfies-An exploratory study on selfie and the implication for marketers. In Global Marketing Conference at Hong Kong Proceedings 597-601 (Global Alliance of Marketing &Management Associations, 2016).
10. Nesi, J. &Prinstein, M. J. Using social media for social comparison and feedback-seeking: gender and popularity moderate associations with depressive symptoms. J. Abnorm. Child. Psychol. 43, 1427-1438 (2015).
11. Wartella, E. et al. What kind of adults will our children become? the impact of growing up in a media-saturated world. J. Child. Media 10, 13-20 (2016).
12. Ladouceur, C. D., Peper, J. S., Crone, E. A. &Dahl, R. E. White matter development in adolescence: the influence of puberty and implications for affective disorders. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2, 36-54 (2012).
13. Achterberg, M., Peper, J. S., Van Duijvenvoorde, A. C., Mandl, R. C. &Crone, E. A. Fronto-striatal white matter integrity predicts development in delay of gratification: a longitudinal study. J. Neurosci. 36, 1954-1961 (2016).
14. Huttenlocher, P. R. Morphometric study of human cerebral cortex development. Neuropsychologia 28, 517-527 (1990).
15. Tamnes, C. K. et al. Development of the cerebral cortex across adolescence: a multisample study of inter-related longitudinal changes in cortical volume, surface area, and thickness. J. Neurosci. 37, 3402-3412 (2017).
16. Mills, K. L., Lalonde, F., Clasen, L. S., Giedd, J. N. &Blakemore, S. J. Developmental changes in the structure of the social brain in late childhood and adolescence. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 123-131 (2014).
17. Goddings, A. L. et al. The influence of puberty on subcortical brain development. Neuroimage 88, 242-251 (2014).
18. Bickart, K. C., Wright, C. I., Dautoff, R. J., Dickerson, B. C. &Barrett, L. F. Amygdala volume and social network size in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 163-164 (2011).
19. Von Der Heide, R., Vyas, G. &Olson, I. R. The social network-network: size is predicted by brain structure and function in the amygdala and paralimbic regions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 1962-1972 (2014).
20. Kanai, R., Bahrami, B., Roylance, R. &Rees, G. Online social network size is reflected in human brain structure. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279, 1327-1334 (2012).
21. Pfeifer, J. H. &Blakemore, S. J. Adolescent social cognitive and affective neuroscience: past, present, and future. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 1-10 (2012).
22. Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N. &Lattanner, M. R. Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1073-1137 (2014).
23. Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G. &Runions, K. C. Bullying prevalence across contexts: a meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. J. Adolesc. Health 55, 602-611 (2014).
24. Tokunaga, R. S. Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput. Human. Behav. 26, 277-287 (2010).
25. den Hamer, A. H. &Konijn, E. A. Adolescents' media exposure may increase their cyberbullying behavior: a longitudinal study. J. Adolesc. Health 56, 203-208 (2015).
26. Williams, K. D. &Jarvis, B. Cyberball: a program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behav. Res. Methods 38, 174-180 (2006).
27. Wolf, W. et al. Ostracism online: a social media ostracism paradigm. Behav. Res. Method 47, 361-373 (2014).
28. Cacioppo, S. et al. A quantitative meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of social rejection. Sci. Rep. 3, 2027 (2013).
29. Will, G. J., van Lier, P. A., Crone, E. A. &Guroglu, B. Chronic childhood peer rejection is associated with heightened neural responses to social exclusion during adolescence. J. Abnorm. Child. Psychol. 44, 43-55 (2015).
30. van Harmelen, A. L. et al. Childhood emotional maltreatment severity is associated with dorsal medial prefrontal cortex responsivity to social exclusion in young adults. PLoS ONE 9, e85107 (2014).
31. Masten, C. L., Telzer, E. H., Fuligni, A. J., Lieberman, M. D. &Eisenberger, N. I. Time spent with friends in adolescence relates to less neural sensitivity to later peer rejection. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 106-114 (2012).
32. Dalgleish, T. et al. Social pain and social gain in the adolescent brain: A common neural circuitry underlying both positive and negative social evaluation. Sci. Rep. 7, 42010 (2017).
33. Vijayakumar, N., Cheng, T. W. &Pfeifer, J. H. Neural correlates of social exclusion across ages: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional MRI studies. Neuroimage 153, 359-368 (2017).
34. Masten, C. L. et al. Neural correlates of social exclusion during adolescence: understanding the distress of peer rejection. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 4, 143-157 (2009).
35. Moor, B. G. et al. Social exclusion and punishment of excluders: neural correlates and developmental trajectories. Neuroimage 59, 708-717 (2012).
36. Silk, J. S. et al. Increased neural response to peer rejection associated with adolescent depression and pubertal development. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 1798-1807 (2014).
37. Lieberman, M. D. &Eisenberger, N. I. The dorsal anterior cingulate cortex is selective for pain: Results from large-scale reverse inference. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15250-15255 (2015).
38. Lieberman, M. D. &Eisenberger, N. I. Neuroscience. Pains and pleasures of social life. Science 323, 890-891 (2009).
39. Guyer, A. E., McClure-Tone, E. B., Shiffrin, N. D., Pine, D. S. &Nelson, E. E. Probing the neural correlates of anticipated peer evaluation in adolescence. Child. Dev. 80, 1000-1015 (2009).
40. Rodman, A. M., Powers, K. E. &Somerville, L. H. Development of selfprotective biases in response to social evaluative feedback. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 13158-13163 (2017).
41. Achterberg, M., van Duijvenvoorde, A. C., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. &Crone, E. A. Control your anger! the neural basis of aggression regulation in response to negative social feedback. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 11, 712-720 (2016).
42. Achterberg, M. et al. The neural and behavioral correlates of social evaluation in childhood. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 24, 107-117 (2017).
43. Silk, J. S. et al. Peer acceptance and rejection through the eyes of youth: pupillary, eyetracking and ecological data from the Chatroom Interact task. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 93-105 (2012).
44. Sherman, L. E., Payton, A. A., Hernandez, L. M., Greenfield, P. M. &Dapretto, M. The power of the like in adolescence: effects of peer influence on neural and behavioral responses to social media. Psychol. Sci. 27, 1027-1035 (2016).
45. Burrow, A. L. &Rainone, N. How many likes did I get? purpose moderates links between positive social medial feedback and self-esteem. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 69, 232-236 (2017).
46. Haber, S. N. &Knutson, B. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 4-26 (2010).
47. Guroglu, B. et al. Why are friends special? Implementing a social interaction simulation task to probe the neural correlates of friendship. Neuroimage 39, 903-910 (2008).
48. Gunther Moor, B., van Leijenhorst, L., Rombouts, S. A., Crone, E. A. &Van der Molen, M. W. Do you like me? Neural correlates of social evaluation and developmental trajectories. Soc. Neurosci. 5, 461-482 (2010).
49. Guyer, A. E., Choate, V. R., Pine, D. S. &Nelson, E. E. Neural circuitry underlying affective response to peer feedback in adolescence. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 81-92 (2012).
50. Davey, C. G., Allen, N. B., Harrison, B. J., Dwyer, D. B. &Yucel, M. Being liked activates primary reward and midline self-related brain regions. Hum. Brain. Mapp. 31, 660-668 (2010).
51. Tan, P. Z. et al. Associations between maternal negative affect and adolescent's neural response to peer evaluation. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 8, 28-39 (2014).
52. Konijn, E. A. &Hoorn, J. F. in The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects (ed. Roessler, P., Hoffner, C. A. &Zoonen, L. v.) 1-15 (Wiley-Blackwell Publishers, Hoboken, NJ, 2017).
53. Silverman, M. H., Jedd, K. &Luciana, M. Neural networks involved in adolescent reward processing: An activation likelihood estimation metaanalysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage 122, 427-439 (2015).
54. Schreuders, L., Braams, B. R., Peper, J. S., Guroglu, B. &Crone, E. A. Contributions of reward sensitivity to ventral striatum activity across adolescence and adulthood. Child Dev. In press (2018).
55. Braams, B. R., van Duijvenvoorde, A. C., Peper, J. S. &Crone, E. A. Longitudinal changes in adolescent risk-taking: a comprehensive study of neural responses to rewards, pubertal development, and risk-taking behavior. J. Neurosci. 35, 7226-7238 (2015).
56. Meshi, D., Morawetz, C. &Heekeren, H. R. Nucleus accumbens response to gains in reputation for the self relative to gains for others predicts social media use. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 439 (2013).
57. Sherman, L. E., Greenfield, P. M., Hernandez, L. M. &Dapretto, M. Peer Influence via instagram: effects on brain and behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. Child. Dev. 89, 37-47 (2017).
58. Berns, G. S., Capra, C. M., Moore, S. &Noussair, C. Neural mechanisms of the influence of popularity on adolescent ratings of music. Neuroimage 49, 2687-2696 (2010).
59. Will, G. J., Crone, E. A., van den Bos, W. &Guroglu, B. Acting on observed social exclusion: developmental perspectives on punishment of excluders and compensation of victims. Dev. Psychol. 49, 2236-2244 (2013).
60. Knoll, L. J., Magis-Weinberg, L., Speekenbrink, M. &Blakemore, S. J. Social influence on risk perception during adolescence. Psychol. Sci. 26, 583-592 (2015).
61. Rodgers, R., McLean, S. &Paxton, S. Longitudinal relationships among internalization of the media ideal, peer social comparison, and body dissatisfaction: Implications for the tripartite influence model. Dev. Psychol. 51, 706-713 (2015).
62. Veldhuis, J., Konijn, E. A. &Seidell, J. C. Negotiated media effects. peer feedback modifies effects of media's thin-body ideal on adolescent girls. Appetite 73, 172-182 (2014).
63. Veldhuis, J., Konijn, E. A. &Seidell, J. C. Weight information labels on media models reduce body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls. J. Adolesc. Health 50, 600-606 (2012).
64. Zaki, J., Schirmer, J. &Mitchell, J. P. Social influence modulates the neural computation of value. Psychol. Sci. 22, 894-900 (2011).
65. Campbell-Meiklejohn, D. K., Bach, D. R., Roepstorff, A., Dolan, R. J. &Frith, C. D. How the opinion of others affects our valuation of objects. Curr. Biol. 20, 1165-1170 (2010).
66. van der Meulen, M. et al. Brain activation upon ideal-body media exposure and peer feedback in late adolescent girls. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 17, 712-723 (2017).
67. Blakemore, S. J. The social brain in adolescence. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 267-277 (2008).
68. Van Hoorn, J., Van Dijk, E., Meuwese, R., Rieffe, C. &Crone, E. A. Peer influence on prosocial behavior in adolescence. J. Res. Adolesc. 26, 90-100 (2016).
69. Van Hoorn, J., Van Dijk, E., Guroglu, B. &Crone, E. A. Neural correlates of prosocial peer influence on public goods game donations during adolescence. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 11, 923-933 (2016).
70. Dahl, R. E. &Vanderschuren, L. J. The feeling of motivation in the developing brain. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 1, 361-363 (2011).
71. Knowles, M. L. in The Oxford Handbook of Social Exclusion (ed. DeWall, C. N.) (Oxford University Press., Oxford/New York, 2013).
72. Nowland, R., Necka, E. A. &Cacioppo, J. T. Loneliness and social internet use: pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13, 70-87 (2017). 1745691617713052.
73. Konijn, E. A., Bijvank, M. N. &Bushman, B. J. I wish I were a warrior: the role of wishful identification in the effects of violent video games on aggression in adolescent boys. Dev. Psychol. 43, 1038-1044 (2007).
74. Plaisier, X. S. &Konijn, E. A. Rejected by peers-attracted to antisocial media content: rejection-based anger impairs moral judgment among adolescents. Dev. Psychol. 49, 1165-1173 (2013).
75. Casey, B. J. Beyond simple models of self-control to circuit-based accounts of adolescent behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66, 295-319 (2015).
76. Will, G. J., Crone, E. A., van Lier, P. A. &Guroglu, B. Neural correlates of retaliatory and prosocial reactions to social exclusion: Associations with chronic peer rejection. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 288-297 (2016).
77. Zvyagintsev, M. et al. Violence-related content in video game may lead to functional connectivity changes in brain networks as revealed by fMRI-ICA in young men. Neuroscience 320, 247-258 (2016).
78. Olsson, A. &Ochsner, K. N. The role of social cognition in emotion. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 65-71 (2008).
79. Konijn, E. A., Walma van der Molen, J. H. &Van Nes, S. Emotions bias perceptions of realism in audiovisual media. Why we may take Fict. Real. Discourse Process. 46, 309-340 (2009).
80. LeDoux, J. The emotional brain: past, present, future. Neurosci. Res. 68, e1-e2 (2010).
81. Pfeifer, J. H. et al. Entering adolescence: resistance to peer influence, risky behavior, and neural changes in emotion reactivity. Neuron 69, 1029-1036 (2011).
82. Rosen, M. L. et al. Salience network response to changes in emotional expressions of others is heightened during early adolescence: relevance for social functioning. Dev. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12571 (2017).
83. Guroglu, B., van den Bos, W., van Dijk, E., Rombouts, S. A. &Crone, E. A. Dissociable brain networks involved in development of fairness considerations: understanding intentionality behind unfairness. Neuroimage 57, 634-641 (2011).
84. Crone, E. A. &Dahl, R. E. Understanding adolescence as a period of socialaffective engagement and goal flexibility. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 636-650 (2012).
85. Constantinidis, C. &Klingberg, T. The neuroscience of working memory capacity and training. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 438-449 (2016).
86. Weerdmeester, J., Cima, M., Granic, I., Hashemian, Y. &Gotsis, M. A feasibility study on the effectiveness of a full-body videogame intervention for decreasing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms. Games Health J. 5, 258-269 (2016).
87. Schoneveld, E. A. et al. A neurofeedback video game (mindlight) to prevent anxiety in children: a randomized controlled trial. Comput. Human. Behav. 63, 321-333 (2016).
88. van Duijvenvoorde, A. C., Peters, S., Braams, B. R. &Crone, E. A. What motivates adolescents? Neural responses to rewards and their influence on adolescents' risk taking, learning, and cognitive control. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 70, 135-147 (2016).
89. Konijn, E. A., Veldhuis, J. &Plaisier, X. S. YouTube as a research tool: three approaches. Cyber. Behav. Soc. Netw. 16, 695-701 (2013).
90. Sundar, S. S. Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology (Wiley-Blackwell., Hoboken, NJ:, 2015).
91. Huang, C. Time Spent on social network sites and psychological well-being: a meta-analysis. Cyber. Behav. Soc. Netw. 20, 346-354 (2017).
92. Baker, D. A. &Algorta, G. P. The relationship between online social networking and depression: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Cyber. Behav. Soc. Netw. 19, 638-648 (2016).
93. Przybylski, A. K. &Weinstein, N. A large-scale test of the goldilocks hypothesis. Psychol. Sci. 28, 204-215 (2017).
94. Wilmer, H. H. &Chein, J. M. Mobile technology habits: patterns of association among device usage, intertemporal preference, impulse control, and reward sensitivity. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 23, 1607-1614 (2016).
95. Wilmer, H. H., Sherman, L. E. &Chein, J. M. Smartphones and Cognition: a review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Front. Psychol. 8, 605 (2017).
96. Reich, S. M., Subrahmanyam, K. &Espinoza, G. Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: overlap in adolescents' online and offline social networks. Dev. Psychol. 48, 356-368 (2012).
97. Lemola, S., Perkinson-Gloor, N., Brand, S., Dewald-Kaufmann, J. F. &Grob, A. Adolescents' electronic media use at night, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms in the smartphone age. J. Youth Adolesc. 44, 405-418 (2015).
98. Meshi, D., Tamir, D. I. &Heekeren, H. R. The emerging neuroscience of social media. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 771-782 (2015).
99. Chein, J., Albert, D., O'Brien, L., Uckert, K. &Steinberg, L. Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain's reward circuitry. Dev. Sci. 14, F1-F10 (2011).
100. Van Hoorn, J., Crone, E. A. &Van Leijenhorst, L. Hanging out with the right crowd: peer influence on risk-taking behavior in adolescence. J. Res Adolesc. 27, 189-200 (2017).
101. Duell, N. et al. Interaction of reward seeking and self-regulation in the prediction of risk taking: a cross-national test of the dual systems model. Dev. Psychol. 52, 1593-1605 (2016).
102. Sisk, C. L. &Foster, D. L. The neural basis of puberty and adolescence. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1040-1047 (2004).
103. Gladwin, T. E., Figner, B., Crone, E. A. &Wiers, R. W. Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 1, 364-376 (2011).
104. van Oosten, J. M. &Vandenbosch, L. Sexy online self-presentation on social network sites and the willingness to engage in sexting: a comparison of gender and age. J. Adolesc. 54, 42-50 (2017).
105. Mills, K. L. et al. Structural brain development between childhood and adulthood: convergence across four longitudinal samples. Neuroimage 141, 273-281 (2016).