Biological and functional relevance of CASP predictions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 86, Issue , 2018, Pages 374-386

  Liu, Tianyun ^a   Ish Shalom, Shirbi ^b   Torng, Wen ^a   Lafita, Aleix ^c,d   Bock, Christian ^e,f   Mort, Matthew ^g   Cooper, David N ^g   Bliven, Spencer ^c,h   Capitani, Guido ^c,d   Mooney, Sean D ^e   Altman, Russ B ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^d ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^g CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^h NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

binding site; CASP; functional relevance; microenvironment; protein structure prediction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASP PREDICTION; LIGAND BINDING; MUTATION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BIOLOGICAL PRODUCT; LIGAND; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

BINDING SITES; BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 85042289963     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.25396     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Huwe PJ, Xu Q, Shapovalov MV, Modi V, Andrake MD, Dunbrack RL Jr. Biological function derived from predicted structures in CASP11. Proteins. 2016;84(suppl 1):370–391.
2. Kryshtafovych A, Moult J, Bales P, et al. Challenging the state of the art in protein structure prediction: Highlights of experimental target structures for the 10th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction Experiment CASP10. Proteins. 2014;82(suppl 2):26–42.
3. Kryshtafovych A, Moult J, Bartual SG, et al. Target highlights in CASP9: Experimental target structures for the critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction. Proteins. 2011;79(suppl 10):6–20.
4. Kryshtafovych A, Moult J, Basle A, et al. Some of the most interesting CASP11 targets through the eyes of their authors. Proteins. 2016;84(suppl 1):34–50.
5. Yue P, Li Z, Moult J. Loss of protein structure stability as a major causative factor in monogenic disease. J Mol Biol. 2005;353(2):459–473.
6. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL Jr. A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci. 2003;12(9):2001–2014.
7. Kaufmann KW, Meiler J. Using RosettaLigand for small molecule docking into comparative models. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50769
8. Hillisch A, Pineda LF, Hilgenfeld R. Utility of homology models in the drug discovery process. Drug Discovery Today. 2004;9(15):659–669.
9. Liu T, Altman RB. Using multiple microenvironments to find similar ligand-binding sites: application to kinase inhibitor binding. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7(12):e1002326
10. Liu T, Altman RB. Identifying druggable targets by protein microenvironments matching: application to transcription factors. CPT: Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol. 2014;3:e93
11. Liu T, Altman RB. Relating essential proteins to drug side-effects using canonical component analysis: a structure-based approach. J Chem Inf Model. 2015;55(7):1483–1494.
12. Wei L, Altman RB, Chang JT. Using the radial distributions of physical features to compare amino acid environments and align amino acid sequences. Pac Symp Biocomput. 1997;465–476.
13. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins. 2004;57(4):702–710.
14. Joo K, Joung I, Lee SY, et al. Template based protein structure modeling by global optimization in CASP11. Proteins. 2016;84(suppl 1):221–232.
15. Kim DE, Chivian D, Baker D. Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(Web Server issue):W526–W531.
16. Le Guilloux V, Schmidtke P, Tuffery P. Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:168
17. Dubey BN, Lori C, Ozaki S, et al. Cyclic di-GMP mediates a histidine kinase/phosphatase switch by noncovalent domain cross-linking. Sci Adv. 2016;2(9):e1600823
18. Bhate MP, Molnar KS, Goulian M, DeGrado WF. Signal transduction in histidine kinases: insights from new structures. Structure. 2015;23(6):981–994.
19. Chen Y, Clarke OB, Kim J, et al. Structure of the STRA6 receptor for retinol uptake. Science. 2016;353(6302):
20. Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, et al. ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D862–D868.
21. Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, et al. The Human Gene Mutation Database: towards a comprehensive repository of inherited mutation data for medical research, genetic diagnosis and next-generation sequencing studies. Hum Genet. 2017;136(6):665–677.
22. Belaya K, Finlayson S, Cossins J, et al. Identification of DPAGT1 as a new gene in which mutations cause a congenital myasthenic syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1275:29–35.
23. Lazar NA. Discussion of “Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition” by Vul et al. (2009). Persp Psychol Sci. 2009;4(3):308–309.
24. Rost B, Sander C. Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins. 1994;20(3):216–226.
25. Ashkenazy H, Abadi S, Martz E, et al. ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W344–W350.
26. Miguel A, Hsin J, Liu T, Tang G, Altman RB, Huang KC. Variations in the binding pocket of an inhibitor of the bacterial division protein FtsZ across genotypes and species. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11(3):e1004117
27. Lin Y, Yoo S, Sanchez R. SiteComp: a server for ligand binding site analysis in protein structures. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(8):1172–1173.
28. Xie L, Xie L, Bourne PE. A unified statistical model to support local sequence order independent similarity searching for ligand-binding sites and its application to genome-based drug discovery. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(12):i305–i312.
29. Cao R, Wang Z, Cheng J. Designing and evaluating the MULTICOM protein local and global model quality prediction methods in the CASP10 experiment. BMC Struc Biol. 2014;14:13
30. McGuffin LJ, Atkins JD, Salehe BR, Shuid AN, Roche DB. IntFOLD: an integrated server for modelling protein structures and functions from amino acid sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(W1):W169–W173.
31. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983;2577:2637.