The value proposition of simulation-based education

Surgery (United States)

Volumn 163, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 944-949

  Cook, David A ^a,b   Andersen, Dana K ^c   Combes, John R ^d   Feldman, David L ^e,f   Sachdeva, Ajit K ^g  

^a Mayo Clinic College of Medicine   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

^d ACCREDITATION COUNCIL FOR GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION   (United States)

^e Hospitals Insurance Company Inc   (United States)

^f MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COST; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH INSURANCE; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL STUDENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENT; SIMULATION; SKILL; SURGEON; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION; GENERAL SURGERY; PROCEDURES; RESEARCH; SIMULATION TRAINING; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RESEARCH; SIMULATION TRAINING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85041953243     PISSN: 00396060     EISSN: 15327361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Cook, D.A., Hatala, R., Brydges, R., et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 306 (2011), 978–988.
2. Cook, D.A., Brydges, R., Hamstra, S.J., et al. Comparative effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation versus other instructional methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Healthc 7 (2012), 308–320.
3. Zendejas, B., Brydges, R., Wang, A.T., Cook, D.A., Patient outcomes in simulation-based medical education: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 28 (2013), 1078–1089.
4. Cook, D.A., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Hamstra, S.J., Hatala, R., Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: a systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality. Acad Med 88 (2013), 872–883.
5. Ziv, A., Wolpe, P.R., Small, S.D., Glick, S., Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med 78 (2003), 783–788.
6. Merriam-Webster Online, [Internet]; n.d. www.merriam-webster.com. (Accessed 15 January 2015)
7. Wilhaus, J., Palaganas, J., Manos, J., et al. Interprofessional Education and Healthcare Simulation Symposium [white paper]. http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/professional-development-programs/white-paper-symposium-ipe-in-healthcare-simulation-2013-(pdf).pdf?sfvrsn=0, 2013. (Accessed 2 May 2017)
8. Passiment, M., Sacks, H., Huang, G., Medical Simulation in Medical Education: Results of an AAMC Survey. 2011, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.
9. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, AHRQ Issue Brief: Health Care Simulation to Advance Safety: Responding to Ebola and Other Threats. 2015, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville (MD).
10. Dijkman, A., Huisman, C.M., Smit, M., et al. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy: increasing use of perimortem caesarean section due to emergency skills training?. BJOG 117 (2010), 282–287.
11. Katz, V.L., Dotters, D.J., Droegemueller, W., Perimortem cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 68 (1986), 571–576.
12. Schaffer, A.C., Jena, A.B., Seabury, S.A., Singh, H., Chalasani, V., Kachalia, A., Rates and characteristics of paid malpractice claims among US physicians by specialty, 1992–2014. JAMA Intern Med 177 (2017), 710–718.
13. Bixenstine, P.J., Shore, A.D., Mehtsun, W.T., Ibrahim, A.M., Freischlag, J.A., Makary, M.A., Catastrophic medical malpractice payouts in the United States. J Healthc Qual 36 (2014), 43–53.
14. Hellinger, F.J., Encinosa, W.E., The impact of state laws limiting malpractice damage awards on health care expenditures. Am J Public Health 96 (2006), 1375–1381.
15. Hanscom, R., Medical simulation from an insurer's perspective. Acad Emerg Med 15 (2008), 984–987.
16. Arriaga, A.F., Gawande, A.A., Raemer, D.B., et al. Pilot testing of a model for insurer-driven, large-scale multicenter simulation training for operating room teams. Ann Surg 259 (2014), 403–410.
17. Derevianko, A.Y., Schwaitzberg, S.D., Tsuda, S., et al. Malpractice carrier underwrites fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training and testing: a benchmark for patient safety. Surg Endosc 24 (2010), 616–623.
18. Blum, R.H., Raemer, D.B., Carroll, J.S., Sunder, N., Felstein, D.M., Cooper, J.B., Crisis resource management training for an anaesthesia faculty: a new approach to continuing education. Med Educ 38 (2004), 45–55.
19. DeMaria, S., Levine, A., Petrou, P., et al. Performance gaps and improvement plans from a 5-hospital simulation programme for anaesthesiology providers: a retrospective study. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanced Learning 3 (2017), 37–42.
20. Matthews, S., Brodman, M., D'Angelo, D., et al. Predictors of laparoscopic simulation performance in obstetrics and gynecology attendings. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 217, 2017, 596 e1-7.
21. American Board of Surgery, Training requirements—general surgery certification [Internet]. American Board of Surgery; n.d. http://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?certgsqe_training. (Accessed 14 April 2014)
22. Zendejas, B., Ruparel, R.K., Cook, D.A., Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 30 (2016), 512–520.
23. American Board of Anesthesiology, Why is the ABA Changing MOCA?. American Board of Anesthesiology [Internet] http://www.theaba.org/MOCA/About-MOCA-2-0, 2016. (Accessed 18 March 2016)
24. Andersen, D.K., The use of simulation methods for board certification—where are we?. Berg, M., (eds.) Cutting Edges in Surgical Training, 2013, Via Medica, Gdansk, Poland, 87–93.
25. Makary, M.A., Daniel, M., Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ, 353, 2016, i2139.
26. Rogers, D.A., Elstein, A.S., Bordage, G., Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery. Ann Surg 233 (2001), 159–166.
27. Seymour, N.E., Gallagher, A.G., Roman, S.A., et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236 (2002), 458–463.
28. Cooper, M.A., Ibrahim, A., Lyu, H., Makary, M.A., Underreporting of robotic surgery complications. J Healthc Qual 37 (2015), 133–138.
29. Gallagher, A.G., Smith, C.D., Bowers, S.P., et al. Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures. J Am Coll Surg 197 (2003), 479–488.
30. Laufer, S., Cohen, E.R., Kwan, C., et al. Sensor technology in assessments of clinical skill. N Engl J Med 372 (2015), 784–786.
31. Pugh, C.M., Sensors, motion tracking and data science: the quest to train MDs like elite athletes. Centers for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health [Internet] https://videocast.nih.gov/launch.asp?22167, 2017. (Accessed 6 July 2017)
32. Brydges, R., Hatala, R., Zendejas, B., Erwin, P.J., Cook, D.A., Linking simulation-based educational assessments and patient-related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 90 (2015), 246–256.
33. Fecso, A.B., Szasz, P., Kerezov, G., Grantcharov, T.P., The effect of technical performance on patient outcomes in surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 265 (2017), 492–501.
34. Birkmeyer, J.D., Finks, J.F., O'Reilly, A., et al. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 369 (2013), 1434–1442.
35. Zendejas, B., Jakub, J.W., Terando, A.M., et al. Laparoscopic skill assessment of practicing surgeons prior to enrollment in a surgical trial of a new laparoscopic procedure. Surg Endosc 31 (2017), 3313–3319.
36. Aggarwal, R., Brown, K.M., de Groen, P.C., Simulation research in gastrointestinal and urologic care: challenges and opportunities. Ann Surg, 2017 in press.
37. Issenberg, S.B., Ringsted, C., Øostergaard, D., Dieckmann, P., Setting a research agenda for simulation-based healthcare education a synthesis of the outcome from an utstein style meeting. Simul Healthc 6 (2011), 155–167.
38. Weinger, M.B., The pharmacology of simulation: a conceptual framework to inform progress in simulation research. Simul Healthc 5 (2010), 8–15.
39. Cook, D.A., One drop at a time: research to advance the science of simulation. Simul Healthc 5 (2010), 1–4.
40. McGaghie, W.C., Draycott, T.J., Dunn, W.F., Lopez, C.M., Stefanidis, D., Evaluating the impact of simulation on translational patient outcomes. Simul Healthc 6:suppl (2011), S42–S47.
41. Cox, T., Seymour, N., Stefanidis, D., Moving the needle: simulation's impact on patient outcomes. Surg Clin North Am 95 (2015), 827–838.
42. Cook, D.A., Hamstra, S.J., Brydges, R., et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach 35 (2013), e867–e898.
43. Zendejas, B., Wang, A.T., Brydges, R., Hamstra, S.J., Cook, D.A., Cost: the missing outcome in simulation-based medical education research: a systematic review. Surgery 153 (2013), 160–176.
44. Leighton, B.L., A greengrocer's model of the epidural space. Anesthesiology 70 (1989), 368–369.
45. Matsumoto, E.D., Hamstra, S.J., Radomski, S.B., Cusimano, M.D., The effect of bench model fidelity on endourological skills: a randomized controlled study. J Urol 167 (2002), 1243–1247.
46. Norman, G., Dore, K., Grierson, L., The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Med Educ 46 (2012), 636–647.
47. Hamstra, S.J., Brydges, R., Hatala, R., Zendejas, B., Cook, D.A., Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Acad Med 89 (2014), 387–392.
48. Chen, R., Grierson, L.E., Norman, G.R., Evaluating the impact of high- and low-fidelity instruction in the development of auscultation skills. Med Educ 49 (2015), 276–285.
49. Bower, J.L., Christensen, C.M., Disruptive technologies: catching the wave. Harv Bus Rev, 1995, 43–53.
50. McGaghie, W.C., Issenberg, S.B., Petrusa, E.R., Scalese, R.J., A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Med Educ 44 (2010), 50–63.
51. Cook, D.A., West, C.P., Reconsidering the focus on “outcomes research” in medical education: a cautionary note. Acad Med 88 (2013), 162–167.
52. Sachdeva, A.K., Russell, T.R., Safe introduction of new procedures and emerging technologies in surgery: education, credentialing, and privileging. Surg Clin North Am 87 (2007), 853–866.
53. Sachdeva, A.K., Blair, P.G., Lupi, L.K., Education and training to address specific needs during the career progression of surgeons. Surg Clin North Am 96 (2016), 115–128.
54. McGaghie, W.C., Issenberg, S.B., Cohen, E.R., Barsuk, J.H., Wayne, D.B., Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med 86 (2011), 706–711.
55. Cook, D.A., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Hamstra, S.J., Hatala, R., Mastery learning for health professionals using technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 88 (2013), 1178–1186.
56. Armour Forse, R., Bramble, J.D., McQuillan, R., Team training can improve operating room performance. Surgery 150 (2011), 771–778.
57. Cohen, E.R., Feinglass, J., Barsuk, J.H., et al. Cost savings from reduced catheter-related bloodstream infection after simulation-based education for residents in a medical intensive care unit. Simul Healthc 5 (2010), 98–102.
58. Sachdeva, A.K., Pellegrini, C.A., Johnson, K.A., Support for simulation-based surgical education through American College of Surgeons–accredited education institutes. World J Surg 32 (2008), 196–207.