Predictors of laparoscopic simulation performance among practicing obstetrician gynecologists

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 217, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 596.e1-596.e7

  Mathews, Shyama ^a   Brodman, Michael ^a   D'Angelo, Debra ^b   Chudnoff, Scott ^c   McGovern, Peter ^d   Kolev, Tamara ^e   Bensinger, Giti ^f   Mudiraj, Santosh ^b   Nemes, Andreea ^b   Feldman, David ^b   Kischak, Patricia ^b   Ascher Walsh, Charles ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Hospitals Insurance Company Inc   (United States)

^c MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Mount Sinai Hemophilia Center   (United States)

^e BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

gynecologic surgery; laparoscopy; simulation; virtual reality simulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GRIP STRENGTH; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; GYNECOLOGIST; HUMAN; INCISION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LIFTING EFFORT; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEW YORK; OBSTETRICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SIMULATION TRAINING; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VIRTUAL REALITY; ANATOMIC MODEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GYNECOLOGY; LAPAROSCOPY; OBSTETRICS; PHYSICIAN; STANDARDS; TIME FACTOR;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MODELS, ANATOMIC; OBSTETRICS; PHYSICIANS; TIME FACTORS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 85027491573     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: 10976868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Scott, D.J., Bergen, P.C., Rege, R.V., et al. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience?. J Am Coll Surg 191 (2000), 272–283.
2. Hamilton, E.C., Scott, D.J., Kapoor, A., et al. Improving operative performance using a laparoscopic hernia simulator. Am J Surg 182 (2001), 725–728.
3. Sutherland, L.M., Middleton, P.F., Anthony, A., et al. Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 243 (2006), 291–300.
4. Seymour, N.E., VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J Surg 32 (2008), 182–188.
5. Grantcharov, T.P., Kristiansen, V.B., Bendix, J., Bardram, L., Rosenberg, J., Funch-Jensen, P., Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91 (2004), 146–150.
6. Gurusamy, K., Aggarwal, R., Palanivelu, L., Davidson, B.R., Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 95 (2008), 1088–1097.
7. Gallagher, A.G., Jordan-Black, J.A., O'Sullivan, G.C., Prospective, randomized assessment of the acquisition, maintenance, and loss of laparoscopic skills. Ann Surg 256 (2012), 387–393.
8. Palter, V.N., Grantcharov, T.P., Individualized deliberate practice on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance of surgical novices in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 259 (2014), 443–448.
9. Palter, V.N., Orzech, N., Reznick, R.K., Grantcharov, T.P., Validation of a structured training and assessment curriculum for technical skill acquisition in minimally invasive surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 257 (2013), 224–230.
10. Sinitsky, D.M., Fernando, B., Berlingieri, P., Establishing a curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skills in the virtual reality environment. Am J Surg 204 (2012), 367–376.
11. Kundhal, P.S., Grantcharov, T.P., Psychomotor performance measured in a virtual environment correlates with technical skills in the operating room. Surg Endosc 23 (2009), 645–649.
12. Yamaguchi, S., Konishi, K., Yasunaga, T., et al. Construct validity for eye-hand coordination skill on a virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 21 (2007), 2253–2257.
13. Davis, D.A., Mazmanian, P.E., Fordis, M., et al. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 296 (2006), 1094–1102.
14. Sargeant, J., Bruce, D., Campbell, C., Practicing physicians’ needs for assessment and feedback for professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof 33 (2013), S54–S62.
15. Zendejas, B., Ruparel, R.K., Cook, D.A., Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 30 (2016), 512–520.
16. Kowalewski, T.M., White, L.W., Lendvay, T.S., et al. Beyond task time: automated measurement augments fundamentals of laparoscopic skills methodology. J Surg Res 192 (2014), 329–338.
17. Giannotti, D., Patrizi, G., Casella, G., et al. Can virtual reality simulators be a certification tool for bariatric surgeons?. Surg Endosc 28 (2014), 242–248.
18. van Dongen, K.W., Ahlberg, G., Bonavina, L., et al. European consensus on a competency-based virtual reality training program for basic endoscopic surgical psychomotor skills. Surg Endosc 25 (2011), 166–171.
19. Ericsson, K.A., Nandagopal, K., Roring, R.W., Towards a science of exceptional achievement: attaining superior performance through deliberate practice. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1172 (2009), 199–217.
20. Calatayud, D., Arora, S., Aggarwal, R., et al. Warm-up in a virtual reality environment improves performance in the operating room. Ann Surg 251 (2010), 1181–1185.