One drop at a time: Research to advance the science of simulation

Simulation in Healthcare

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-4

  Cook, David A ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG SCREENING; EDITORIAL; EDUCATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG EVALUATION; EDUCATION, PHARMACY; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 77249117278     PISSN: 15592332     EISSN: 1559713X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181c82aaa     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Weinger MB. The pharmacology of simulation: a conceptual framework to inform progress in simulation research. Simul Healthc 2010;5:8-15.
2. Norman G. RCT = results confounded and trivial: the perils of grand educational experiments. Med Educ 2003;37:582-584.
3. Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in healthcare. Simul Healthc 2007;2:126-135.
4. Groom JA. Creating new solutions to the simulation puzzle. Simul Healthc 2009;4:131-134.
5. Norman GR, Schmidt HG. The psychological basis of problem-based learning: a review of the evidence. Acad Med 1992;67:557-565.
6. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR, for the Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning and the Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education of the National Research Council, editors. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
7. Cook DA. The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it. Med Teach 2009;31:158-162.
8. Clark RE. Reconsidering research on learning from media. Rev Educ Res 1983;53:445-459.
9. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2008;300:1181-1196.
10. Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 2008;95:1088-1097.
11. Cook DA. Avoiding confounded comparisons in education research. Med Educ 2009;43:102-104.
12. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, et al. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 1999; 282:861-866.
13. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med 2003;78:783-788.
14. Cook DA. The research we still are not doing: an agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Acad Med 2005;80:541-548.
15. Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. Description, justification, and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ 2008;42:128-133.
16. Friedman Z, Siddiqui N, Katznelson R, Devito I, Bould MD, Naik V. Clinical impact of epidural anesthesia simulation on short- and longterm learning curve: high- versus low-fidelity model training. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009;34:229-232.
17. Leighton BL. A greengrocer's model of the epidural space. Anesthesiology 1989;70:368-369.
18. Backstein D, Agnidis Z, Sadhu R, MacRae H. Effectiveness of repeated video feedback in the acquisition of a surgical technical skill. Can J Surg 2005;48:195-200.
19. Stefanidis D, Walters KC, Mostafavi A, Heniford BT. What is the ideal interval between training sessions during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training? Am J Surg 2009;197:126-129.
20. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 1999.
21. Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med 2006; 119:166. e7-e16.
22. Kim J, Neilipovitz D, Cardinal P, Chiu M. A comparison of global rating scale and checklist scores in the validation of an evaluation tool to assess performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients during simulated emergencies (abbreviated as "CRM simulator study IB"). Simul Healthc 2009;4:6-16.
23. Aucar JA, Groch NR, Troxel SA, Eubanks SW. A review of surgical simulation with attention to validation methodology. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2005;15:82-89.
24. Bokken L, Rethans JJ, van Heurn L, Duvivier R, Scherpbier A, van der Vleuten C. Students' views on the use of real patients and simulated patients in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med 2009;84:958-963.
25. Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D, Tierney T, Woloshynowych M, Kneebone R. Managing intraoperative stress: what do surgeons want from a crisis training program? Am J Surg 2009;197:537-543.
26. Weller JM, Janssen AL, Merry AF, Robinson B. Interdisciplinary team interactions: a qualitative study of perceptions of team function in simulated anaesthesia crises. Med Educ 2008;42:382-388.
27. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005;27: 10-28.
28. McGaghie WC, Pugh CM, Wayne DB. Fundamentals of educational research using clinical simulation. In: Kyle R, Murray W, eds. Clinical Simulation: Operations, Engineering, and Management. Burlington, MA: Academic Press; 2008:517-526.
29. Bradley P, Postlethwaite K. Simulation in clinical learning. Med Educ 2003;37(suppl 1):1-5.
30. Kneebone R. Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: a theory-based approach. Acad Med 2005;80:549-553.
31. Bordage G. Moving the field forward: going beyond quantitativequalitative. Acad Med 2007;82(suppl 10):S126-S128.