The Word Frequency Effect in Word Processing: An Updated Review

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 45-50

  Brysbaert, Marc ^a   Mandera, Paweł ^a   Keuleers, Emmanuel ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

learning; SUBTLEX; word frequency; word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 85041812858     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963721417727521     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Brysbaert M., Lagrou E., Stevens M., (2017). (See References). An article on individual differences in the word frequency effect.
2. Brysbaert M., Stevens M., Mandera P., Keuleers E., (2016). (See References). A review of the variables influencing word processing efficiency and an introduction of the word prevalence variable.
3. Monsell S., Doyle M. C., Haggard P. N., (1989). (See References). Up to a few years ago, the main review of the word frequency effect.
4. Preston K. A., (1935). (See References). A seminal study that has been overlooked for decades but that is surprisingly modern, given its focus on individual differences.
5. Adelman J. S., Brown G. D. A., Quesada J. F., (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17, 814–823.
6. Balota D. A., Yap M. J., Cortese M. J., Hutchison K. A., Kessler B., Loftis B... Treiman R., (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459.
7. Brysbaert M., Buchmeier M., Conrad M., Jacobs A. M., Bölte J., Böhl A., (2011). The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology, 58, 412–424.
8. Brysbaert M., Ellis A. W., (2016). Aphasia and age of acquisition: Are early-learned words more resilient? Aphasiology, 30, 1240–1263.
9. Brysbaert M., Lagrou E., Stevens M., (2017). Visual word recognition in a second language: A test of the lexical entrenchment hypothesis with lexical decision times. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 530–548.
10. Brysbaert M., New B., (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990.
11. Brysbaert M., Stevens M., Mandera P., Keuleers E., (2016). The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 441–458.
12. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J., (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
13. Cop U., Keuleers E., Drieghe D., Duyck W., (2015). Frequency effects in monolingual and bilingual natural reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1216–1234.
14. Davies R. A., Arnell R., Birchenough J. M., Grimmond D., Houlson S., (2017). Reading through the life span: Individual differences in psycholinguistic effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1298–1338. doi:10.1037/xlm0000366
15. Elgort I., Brysbaert M., Stevens M., Van Assche E., (2017). Contextual word learning during reading in a second language: An eye-movement study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0272263117000109
16. Gimenes M., New B., (2016). Worldlex: Twitter and blog word frequencies for 66 languages. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 963–972.
17. Harm M. W., Seidenberg M. S., (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662–720.
18. Herdağdelen A., Marelli M., (2017). Social media and language processing: How Facebook and Twitter provide the best frequency estimates for studying word recognition. Cognitive Science, 41, 976–995. doi:10.1111/cogs.12392
19. Johns B. T., Dye M., Jones M. N., (2016). The influence of contextual diversity on word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1214–1220.
20. Johns B. T., Jones M. N., Mewhort D. J. K., (2016). Experience as a free parameter in the cognitive modeling of language. In Papafragou A., Grodner D., Mirman D., Trueswell J. C., (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2291–2296). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
21. Jones M. N., Johns B. T., Recchia G., (2012). The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 115–124.
22. Joseph H., Nation K., (2018). Examining incidental word learning during reading in children: The role of context. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 190–211.
23. Keuleers E., Diependaele K., Brysbaert M., (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, Article 174. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174
24. Kucera H., Francis W., (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
25. Kuperman V., Van Dyke J. A., (2013). Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 802–823.
26. Mandera P., (2016). Psycholinguistics on a large scale: Combining text corpora, megastudies, and distributional semantics to investigate human language processing (Doctoral dissertation, Ghent University). Retrieved from http://crr.ugent.be/papers/pmandera-disseration-2016.pdf
27. Monaghan P., Chang Y. N., Welbourne S., Brysbaert M., (2017). Exploring the relations between word frequency, language exposure, and bilingualism in a computational model of reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 1–21.
28. Monsell S., Doyle M. C., Haggard P. N., (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43–71.
29. Preston K. A., (1935). The speed of word perception and its relation to reading ability. The Journal of General Psychology, 13, 199–203.
30. van Heuven W. J. B., Mandera P., Keuleers E., Brysbaert M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1176–1190.
31. Yonelinas A. P., (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517.