Age variation in the minimum clinically important difference in SRS-22r after surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity – A single institution analysis in Japan

Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 20-25

  Arima, Hideyuki ^a,b,c   Carreon, Leah Y ^b   Glassman, Steven D ^b,c   Yamato, Yu ^a   Hasegawa, Tomohiko ^a   Togawa, Daisuke ^a   Kobayashi, Sho ^a   Yoshida, Go ^a   Yasuda, Tatsuya ^d   Banno, Tomohiro ^a   Oe, Shin ^a   Mihara, Yuki ^a   Matsuyama, Yukihiro ^a  

^a HAMAMATSU UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b NORTON LEATHERMAN SPINE CENTER   (United States)

^c University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^d HAMAMATSU MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; JAPAN; JAPANESE ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATION BACK PAIN EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY 22R; SPINE MALFORMATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; DEVICES; EVALUATION STUDY; FACTUAL DATABASE; FOLLOW UP; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCOLIOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTOR; SPINE FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; SCOLIOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; SPINAL FUSION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85040248272     PISSN: 09492658     EISSN: 14362023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. McCormick, J.D., Werner, B.C., Shimer, A.L., Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:2 (2013 Feb), 99–107.
2. Baldus, C., Bridwell, K.H., Harrast, J., Edwards, C. 2nd, Glassman, S., Horton, W., Lenke, L.G., Lowe, T., Mardjetko, S., Ondra, S., Schwab, F., Shaffrey, C., Age-gender matched comparison of SRS instrument scores between adult deformity and normal adults: are all SRS domains disease specific?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:20 (2008 Sep 15), 2214–2218.
3. Berven, S., Deviren, V., Demir-Deviren, S., Hu, S.S., Bradford, D.S., Studies in the modified Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:18 (2003 Sep 15), 2164–2169 discussion 9.
4. Bridwell, K.H., Berven, S., Glassman, S., Hamill, C., Horton, W.C. 3rd, Lenke, L.G., Schwab, F., Baldus, C., Shainline, M., Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:20 (2007 Sep 15), 2220–2225.
5. Asher, M., Min Lai, S., Burton, D., Manna, B., The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1 (2003 Jan 1), 63–69.
6. Asher, M., Min Lai, S., Burton, D., Manna, B., Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1 (2003 Jan 1), 70–73.
7. Lydick, E., Epstein, R.S., Interpretation of quality of life changes. Qual Life Res 2:3 (1993 Jun), 221–226.
8. Beaton, D.E., Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:24 (2000 Dec 15), 3192–3199.
9. Hagg, O., Fritzell, P., Nordwall, A., Swedish Lumbar Spine Study G. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:1 (2003 Feb), 12–20.
10. Hays, R.D., Woolley, J.M., The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it?. Pharmacoeconomics 18:5 (2000 Nov), 419–423.
11. Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., Guyatt, G.H., Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10:4 (1989 Dec), 407–415.
12. Crawford, C.H. 3rd, Glassman, S.D., Bridwell, K.H., Berven, S.H., Carreon, L.Y., The minimum clinically important difference in SRS-22R total score, appearance, activity and pain domains after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:6 (2015 Mar 15), 377–381.
13. Lafage, R., Schwab, F., Challier, V., Henry, J.K., Gum, J., Smith, J., Hostin, R., Shaffrey, C., Kim, H.J., Ames, C., Scheer, J., Klineberg, E., Bess, S., Burton, D., Lafage, V., International Spine Study G. Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds: should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:1 (2016 Jan), 62–68.
14. Tonosu, J., Takeshita, K., Hara, N., Matsudaira, K., Kato, S., Masuda, K., Chikuda, H., The normative score and the cut-off value of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Eur Spine J 21:8 (2012 Aug), 1596–1602.
15. Hashimoto, H., Sase, T., Arai, Y., Maruyama, T., Isobe, K., Shouno, Y., Validation of a Japanese version of the scoliosis research Society-22 patient questionnaire among idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:4 (2007 Feb 15), E141–E146.
16. Fukui, M., Chiba, K., Kawakami, M., Kikuchi, S., Konno, S., Miyamoto, M., Seichi, A., Shimamura, T., Shirado, O., Taguchi, T., Takahashi, K., Takeshita, K., Tani, T., Toyama, Y., Yonenobu, K., Wada, E., Tanaka, T., Hirota, Y., Subcommittee of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association on Low Back P, Cervical Myelopathy E. JOA back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ)/JOA cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire (JOACMEQ). The report on the development of revised versions. April 16, 2007. The subcommittee of the clinical outcome committee of the Japanese orthopaedic association on low back pain and cervical myelopathy evaluation. J Orthop Sci 14:3 (2009 May), 348–365.
17. Fukui, M., Chiba, K., Kawakami, M., Kikuchi, S., Konno, S., Miyamoto, M., Seichi, A., Shimamura, T., Shirado, O., Taguchi, T., Takahashi, K., Takeshita, K., Tani, T., Toyama, Y., Wada, E., Yonenobu, K., Tanaka, T., Hirota, Y., Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire. Part 3. Validity study and establishment of the measurement scale : subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the Japanese orthopaedic association. Jpn J Orthop Sci 13:3 (2008 May), 173–179.
18. Fukui, M., Chiba, K., Kawakami, M., Kikuchi, S., Konno, S., Miyamoto, M., Seichi, A., Shimamura, T., Shirado, O., Taguchi, T., Takahashi, K., Takeshita, K., Tani, T., Toyama, Y., Yonenobu, K., Wada, E., Tanaka, T., Hirota, Y., Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability : the subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the Japanese orthopaedic association. J Orthop Sci 12:6 (2007 Nov), 526–532.
19. Fukui, M., Chiba, K., Kawakami, M., Kikuchi, S., Konno, S., Miyamoto, M., Seichi, A., Shimamura, T., Shirado, O., Taguchi, T., Takahashi, K., Takeshita, K., Tani, T., Toyama, Y., Wada, E., Yonenobu, K., Tanaka, T., Hirota, Y., Clinical Outcomes Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association SoEoBP, Cervical M, Subcommittee on Low Back P, Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committe of the Japanese Orthopaedic A. JOA back pain evaluation questionnaire: initial report. J Orthop Sci 12:5 (2007 Sep), 443–450.
20. Asher, M., Min Lai, S., Burton, D., Manna, B., Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1 (2003 Jan 1), 74–78.
21. Copay, A.G., Subach, B.R., Glassman, S.D., Polly, D.W. Jr., Schuler, T.C., Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J 7:5 (2007 Sep-Oct), 541–546.
22. Wyrwich, K.W., Tierney, W.M., Wolinsky, F.D., Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 52:9 (1999 Sep), 861–873.
23. Jayadevappa, R., Malkowicz, S.B., Wittink, M., Wein, A.J., Chhatre, S., Comparison of distribution- and anchor-based approaches to infer changes in health-related quality of life of prostate cancer survivors. Health Serv Res 47:5 (2012 Oct), 1902–1925.
24. Wright, A., Hannon, J., Hegedus, E.J., Kavchak, A.E., Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). J Man Manip Ther 20:3 (2012 Aug), 160–166.
25. Cook, C.E., Clinimetrics corner: the minimal clinically important change score (MCID): a necessary pretense. J Man Manip Ther 16:4 (2008), E82–E83.
26. Hashizume, H., Konno, S., Takeshita, K., Fukui, M., Takahashi, K., Chiba, K., Miyamoto, M., Matsumoto, M., Kasai, Y., Kanamori, M., Matsunaga, S., Hosono, N., Kanchiku, T., Taneichi, H., Tanaka, N., Kanayama, M., Shimizu, T., Kawakami, M., Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) as an outcome measure for patients with low back pain: reference values in healthy volunteers. J Orthop Sci 20:2 (2015 Mar), 264–280.
27. Crawford, C.H. 3rd, Glassman, S.D., Bridwell, K.H., Carreon, L.Y., The substantial clinical benefit threshold for SRS-22R domains after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine Deform 4:5 (2016 Sep), 373–377.