-
3
-
-
0033109795
-
Review of Methods to Determine VA-Health Care Costs
-
Barnett, P. G., 1999. " Review of Methods to Determine VA-Health Care Costs." Medical Care 37 (4): AS9-17.
-
(1999)
Medical Care
, vol.37
, Issue.4
-
-
Barnett, P.G.1
-
4
-
-
37749013594
-
Comparison of Anchor-Based and Distributional Approaches in Estimating Important Difference in Common Cold
-
Barrett, B., R. Brown, and, M. Mundt,. 2008. " Comparison of Anchor-Based and Distributional Approaches in Estimating Important Difference in Common Cold." Quality of Life Research 17: 75-85.
-
(2008)
Quality of Life Research
, vol.17
, pp. 75-85
-
-
Barrett, B.1
Brown, R.2
Mundt, M.3
-
5
-
-
18844409426
-
Sufficiently Important Difference: Expanding the Framework of Clinical Significance
-
Barrett, B., D. Brown, M. Mundt, and, R. Brown,. 2005. " Sufficiently Important Difference: Expanding the Framework of Clinical Significance." Medical Decision Making 25: 250-61.
-
(2005)
Medical Decision Making
, vol.25
, pp. 250-261
-
-
Barrett, B.1
Brown, D.2
Mundt, M.3
Brown, R.4
-
6
-
-
0036191550
-
Many Faces of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID): A Literature Review and Directions for Future Research
-
Beaton, D. E., M. Boers, and, G. A. Wells,. 2002. " Many Faces of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID): A Literature Review and Directions for Future Research." Current Opinion in Rheumatology 14: 109-14.
-
(2002)
Current Opinion in Rheumatology
, vol.14
, pp. 109-114
-
-
Beaton, D.E.1
Boers, M.2
Wells, G.A.3
-
7
-
-
41249099987
-
Qualiveen, a Urinary-Disorder Specific Instrument: 0.5 Correspons to the Minimal Important Difference
-
Bonniaud, V., D. Bryant, B. Parratte, and, G. Guyatt,. 2008. " Qualiveen, a Urinary-Disorder Specific Instrument: 0.5 Correspons to the Minimal Important Difference." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61: 505-10.
-
(2008)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.61
, pp. 505-510
-
-
Bonniaud, V.1
Bryant, D.2
Parratte, B.3
Guyatt, G.4
-
8
-
-
0036184207
-
What Is a Clinically Meaningful Change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) Questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study 5592
-
Cella D., D. T. Eton, D. L. Fairclough, P. Bonomi, A. E. Heyes, C Silberman, M. K. Wolf, D. H. Johnson,. 2002a. " What Is a Clinically Meaningful Change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) Questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study 5592." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 55: 285-95.
-
(2002)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.55
, pp. 285-295
-
-
Cella, D.1
Eton, D.T.2
Fairclough, D.L.3
Bonomi, P.4
Heyes, A.E.5
Silberman, C.6
Wolf, M.K.7
Johnson, D.H.8
-
9
-
-
0036964529
-
Combining Anchor and Distribution-Based Methods to Derive Clinically Important Differences on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Anemia and Fatigue Scales
-
Cella, D., D. T. Eton, L. Jin-Shei, A. H. Peterman, and, D. E. Merkel,. 2002b. " Combining Anchor and Distribution-Based Methods to Derive Clinically Important Differences on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Anemia and Fatigue Scales." Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 24 (6): 547-61.
-
(2002)
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
, vol.24
, Issue.6
, pp. 547-561
-
-
Cella, D.1
Eton, D.T.2
Jin-Shei, L.3
Peterman, A.H.4
Merkel, D.E.5
-
10
-
-
0023092594
-
A New Method of Classifying Prognostic Comorbidity in Longitudinal Studies: Development and Validation
-
Charlson, M. E., P. Pompei, K. L. Ales, and, C. R. Mackenzie,. 1987. " A New Method of Classifying Prognostic Comorbidity in Longitudinal Studies: Development and Validation." Journal of Chronic Disease 40: 373-83.
-
(1987)
Journal of Chronic Disease
, vol.40
, pp. 373-383
-
-
Charlson, M.E.1
Pompei, P.2
Ales, K.L.3
MacKenzie, C.R.4
-
11
-
-
69849095945
-
Individualizing Quality-of-Life Outcomes Reporting: How Localized Prostate Cancer Treatments Affect Patients with Different Levels of Baseline Urinary, Bowel, and Sexual Function
-
Chen, R. C., J. A. Clark, and, J. A. Talcott,. 2009. " Individualizing Quality-of-Life Outcomes Reporting: How Localized Prostate Cancer Treatments Affect Patients with Different Levels of Baseline Urinary, Bowel, and Sexual Function." Journal of Clinical Oncology 27: 1-13.
-
(2009)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
, vol.27
, pp. 1-13
-
-
Chen, R.C.1
Clark, J.A.2
Talcott, J.A.3
-
12
-
-
33645022182
-
Four Methods of Estimating the Minimal Important Difference Score Were Compared to Establish a Clinically Significant Change in Headache Impact Test
-
Coeytaux, R. R., J. S. Kaufman, R. Chao, J. D. Mann, R. F. Devellis, 2006. " Four Methods of Estimating the Minimal Important Difference Score Were Compared to Establish a Clinically Significant Change in Headache Impact Test." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59: 374-80.
-
(2006)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.59
, pp. 374-380
-
-
Coeytaux, R.R.1
Kaufman, J.S.2
Chao, R.3
Mann, J.D.4
Devellis, R.F.5
-
14
-
-
0037567512
-
Defining Clinically Meaningful Change in Health Related Quality of Life
-
Crosby, R. D., R. L. Kolotkin, and, R. Williams,. 2003. " Defining Clinically Meaningful Change in Health Related Quality of Life." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56: 395-407.
-
(2003)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.56
, pp. 395-407
-
-
Crosby, R.D.1
Kolotkin, R.L.2
Williams, R.3
-
15
-
-
9644278047
-
An Integrated Method to Determine Meaningful Changes in Health Related Quality of Life
-
Crosby, R. D., R. L. Kolotkin, and, R. Williams,. 2004. " An Integrated Method to Determine Meaningful Changes in Health Related Quality of Life." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57: 1153-60.
-
(2004)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.57
, pp. 1153-1160
-
-
Crosby, R.D.1
Kolotkin, R.L.2
Williams, R.3
-
16
-
-
0036233368
-
The MacNew Heart Disease Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument: Reference Data for Users
-
Dixon, T., L. L. Y. Lim, and, N. B. Oldridge,. 2002. " The MacNew Heart Disease Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument: Reference Data for Users." Quality of Life Research 11: 173-83.
-
(2002)
Quality of Life Research
, vol.11
, pp. 173-183
-
-
Dixon, T.1
Lim, L.L.Y.2
Oldridge, N.B.3
-
17
-
-
0142011017
-
Imputation of Missing Longitudinal Data: A Comparison of Methods
-
Engels, J. M., and, P. Diehr,. 2003. " Imputation of Missing Longitudinal Data: A Comparison of Methods." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56: 968-76.
-
(2003)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.56
, pp. 968-976
-
-
Engels, J.M.1
Diehr, P.2
-
18
-
-
7044224362
-
A Combination of Distribution-and Anchor Based Approaches Determined Minimally Important Differences (MIDs) for Four Endpoints in a Breast Cancer Scale
-
Eton, D. T., D. Cella, K. J. Yost, S. E. Yount, A. H. Peterman, D. S. Neuberg, G. W. Sledge, and, W. C. Wood,. 2004. " A Combination of Distribution-and Anchor Based Approaches Determined Minimally Important Differences (MIDs) for Four Endpoints in a Breast Cancer Scale." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57: 898-910.
-
(2004)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.57
, pp. 898-910
-
-
Eton, D.T.1
Cella, D.2
Yost, K.J.3
Yount, S.E.4
Peterman, A.H.5
Neuberg, D.S.6
Sledge, G.W.7
Wood, W.C.8
-
19
-
-
0036195669
-
Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures
-
the Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. "."
-
Guyatt, G. H., D. Osoba, A. W. Wu, K. W. Wyrwich, G. R. Norman, and the Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. 2002. " Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures." Mayo Clinic Proceedings 77: 371-83.
-
(2002)
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
, vol.77
, pp. 371-383
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Osoba, D.2
Wu, A.W.3
Wyrwich, K.W.4
Norman, G.R.5
-
20
-
-
34548413580
-
How Can Quality of Life Researchers Make Their Work More Useful to Health Workers and Their Patients?
-
Gyatt, G., and, H. Schunemann,. 2007. " How Can Quality of Life Researchers Make Their Work More Useful to Health Workers and Their Patients? " Quality of Life Research 16: 1097-105.
-
(2007)
Quality of Life Research
, vol.16
, pp. 1097-1105
-
-
Gyatt, G.1
Schunemann, H.2
-
21
-
-
34347269602
-
Health-Related Quality of Life for Eating Disorders Questionnaire Version-2 Was Responsive 1-Year after Initial Assessment
-
Hayas, L. C., J. M. Quintana, J. A. Padierna, A. Bilbao, P. Munoz, and, E. F. Cook,. 2007. " Health-Related Quality of Life for Eating Disorders Questionnaire Version-2 Was Responsive 1-Year after Initial Assessment." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60: 825-33.
-
(2007)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.60
, pp. 825-833
-
-
Hayas, L.C.1
Quintana, J.M.2
Padierna, J.A.3
Bilbao, A.4
Munoz, P.5
Cook, E.F.6
-
22
-
-
0025851103
-
Interpreting Changes in Quality-of-Life Score in N or 1 Randomized Trials
-
Jaeschke, R., G. H. Guyatt, J. Keller, and, J. Singer,. 1991. " Interpreting Changes in Quality-of-Life Score in N or 1 Randomized Trials." Controlled Clinical Trials 12: 226S-33S.
-
(1991)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.12
-
-
Jaeschke, R.1
Guyatt, G.H.2
Keller, J.3
Singer, J.4
-
23
-
-
0024852022
-
Measurement of Health Status-Ascertaining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference
-
Jeschke, R., J. Singer, and, G. H. Guyatt,. 1989. " Measurement of Health Status-Ascertaining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference." Controlled Clinical Trials 10: 407-15.
-
(1989)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.10
, pp. 407-415
-
-
Jeschke, R.1
Singer, J.2
Guyatt, G.H.3
-
24
-
-
29144467134
-
A Minimal Clinically Important Difference Was Derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for Low Back Pain
-
Jordan, K., K. M. Dunn, M. Lewis, and, P. Croft,. 2006. " A Minimal Clinically Important Difference Was Derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for Low Back Pain." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59: 45-51.
-
(2006)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.59
, pp. 45-51
-
-
Jordan, K.1
Dunn, K.M.2
Lewis, M.3
Croft, P.4
-
25
-
-
0028055059
-
Determining a Minimal Important Change in Disease-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire
-
Juniper, E. F., G. H. Guyatt, A. Willan, and, L. E. Griffith,. 1994. " Determining a Minimal Important Change in Disease-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 47 (1): 81-7.
-
(1994)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.47
, Issue.1
, pp. 81-87
-
-
Juniper, E.F.1
Guyatt, G.H.2
Willan, A.3
Griffith, L.E.4
-
26
-
-
62949162721
-
Flushing Assessment Tool (FAST): Psychometric Properties of a New Measure Assessing Flushing Symptoms and Clinical Impact of Niacin Therapy
-
Kawata, A. K., D. A. Revicki, R. Thakkar, P. Jiang, S. Krause, M. H. Davidson, H. A. Punzi, and, R. J. Padley,. 2009. " Flushing Assessment Tool (FAST): Psychometric Properties of a New Measure Assessing Flushing Symptoms and Clinical Impact of Niacin Therapy." Clinical Drug Investigation 29 (4): 215-29.
-
(2009)
Clinical Drug Investigation
, vol.29
, Issue.4
, pp. 215-229
-
-
Kawata, A.K.1
Revicki, D.A.2
Thakkar, R.3
Jiang, P.4
Krause, S.5
Davidson, M.H.6
Punzi, H.A.7
Padley, R.J.8
-
27
-
-
2942522429
-
How Much Is Enough and Who Says So? the Case of the King's Health Questionnaire and Overactive Bladder
-
Kelleher, C. J., A. M. Pleil, P. R. Reese, S. M. Burgess, and, P. H. Brodish, 2004. " How Much Is Enough and Who Says So? The Case of The King's Health Questionnaire and Overactive Bladder." BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 111: 605-12.
-
(2004)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
, vol.111
, pp. 605-612
-
-
Kelleher, C.J.1
Pleil, A.M.2
Reese, P.R.3
Burgess, S.M.4
Brodish, P.H.5
-
28
-
-
30944457813
-
Distribution and Anchor-Based Approaches Provided Different Interpretability Estimates for the Hydrocephalus Outcome Questionnaire
-
Kulkarni, A. V., 2006. " Distribution and Anchor-Based Approaches Provided Different Interpretability Estimates for the Hydrocephalus Outcome Questionnaire." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59: 176-84.
-
(2006)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.59
, pp. 176-184
-
-
Kulkarni, A.V.1
-
29
-
-
47749117301
-
Validity, Responsiveness, and Minimal Important Difference for the SF-6D Health Utility Scale in a Spinal Cord Injured Population
-
Lee, B. B., M. T. King, J. M. Simpson, M. J. Haran, M. R. Stockler, O. Marial, and, G. Salkeld,. 2008. " Validity, Responsiveness, and Minimal Important Difference for the SF-6D Health Utility Scale in a Spinal Cord Injured Population." Value in Health 11 (4): 680-8.
-
(2008)
Value in Health
, vol.11
, Issue.4
, pp. 680-688
-
-
Lee, B.B.1
King, M.T.2
Simpson, J.M.3
Haran, M.J.4
Stockler, M.R.5
Marial, O.6
Salkeld, G.7
-
30
-
-
34047149832
-
Three Methods for Minimally Important Difference: No Relationship Was Found with the Net Proportion of Patients Improving
-
Lemieux, J., D. E. Beaton, S. Hogg-Johnson, L. J. Bordeleav, and, P. J. Goodwin,. 2007. " Three Methods for Minimally Important Difference: No Relationship Was Found with the Net Proportion of Patients Improving." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60: 448-55.
-
(2007)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.60
, pp. 448-455
-
-
Lemieux, J.1
Beaton, D.E.2
Hogg-Johnson, S.3
Bordeleav, L.J.4
Goodwin, P.J.5
-
31
-
-
0032109544
-
The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: Development, Reliability, and Validity of Health-Related Quality of Life Measure
-
Litwin, M. S., R. D. Hays, A. Fink, et al. 1998. " The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: Development, Reliability, and Validity of Health-Related Quality of Life Measure." Medical Care 36: 1002-12.
-
(1998)
Medical Care
, vol.36
, pp. 1002-1012
-
-
Litwin, M.S.1
Hays, R.D.2
Fink, A.3
-
32
-
-
0037980149
-
Interpretation of Changes in Health Related Quality of Life-The Remarkable Universality of Half a Standard Deviation
-
Norman, G. R., J. A. Sloan, and, K. W. Wyrwich,. 2003. " Interpretation of Changes in Health Related Quality of Life-The Remarkable Universality of Half a Standard Deviation." Medical Care 41 (5): 582-92.
-
(2003)
Medical Care
, vol.41
, Issue.5
, pp. 582-592
-
-
Norman, G.R.1
Sloan, J.A.2
Wyrwich, K.W.3
-
33
-
-
0035490980
-
Relation of Distribution-and Anchor Based Approaches in Interpretation of Changes in Health Related Quality of Life
-
Norman, G. R., F. G. Sridhar, G. H. Guyatt, and, S. D. Walter,. 2001. " Relation of Distribution-and Anchor Based Approaches in Interpretation of Changes in Health Related Quality of Life." Medical Care 39 (10): 1039-47.
-
(2001)
Medical Care
, vol.39
, Issue.10
, pp. 1039-1047
-
-
Norman, G.R.1
Sridhar, F.G.2
Guyatt, G.H.3
Walter, S.D.4
-
34
-
-
0003476934
-
-
Chestnut Hill, MA: Epidemiological Resources
-
Oakes, M., 1990. Statistical Inference. Chestnut Hill, MA: Epidemiological Resources.
-
(1990)
Statistical Inference
-
-
Oakes, M.1
-
35
-
-
0031972496
-
Interpreting the Significance of Changes in Health Related Quality of Life Score
-
Osoba, D., G. Rodrigues, J. Myles, B. Zee, and, J. Pater,. 1998. " Interpreting the Significance of Changes in Health Related Quality of Life Score." Journal of Clinical Oncology 16: 139-44.
-
(1998)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
, vol.16
, pp. 139-144
-
-
Osoba, D.1
Rodrigues, G.2
Myles, J.3
Zee, B.4
Pater, J.5
-
36
-
-
0013327506
-
Measurement of Health Outcomes in Treatment Effectiveness Evaluations
-
Patrick, D. L., and, C. Yen-Pin,. 2000. " Measurement of Health Outcomes in Treatment Effectiveness Evaluations." Medical Care 38 (suppl II): II-14-15.
-
(2000)
Medical Care
, vol.38
, Issue.SUPPL. II
-
-
Patrick, D.L.1
Yen-Pin, C.2
-
37
-
-
47849097000
-
The Minimal Important Difference of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
-
Puhan, M. A., M. Frey, S. Buchi, and, H. J. Schunemann,. 2008. " The Minimal Important Difference of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease." Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 6 (46): 1-6.
-
(2008)
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
, vol.6
, Issue.46
, pp. 1-6
-
-
Puhan, M.A.1
Frey, M.2
Buchi, S.3
Schunemann, H.J.4
-
39
-
-
56049115605
-
Clinical Cough IV: What Is the Minimal Important Difference for the Leicester Cough Questionnaire?
-
Raj, A. A., D. I. Pavord, and, S. S. Birring,. 2009. " Clinical Cough IV: What Is the Minimal Important Difference for the Leicester Cough Questionnaire? " Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology 187: 311-20.
-
(2009)
Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology
, vol.187
, pp. 311-320
-
-
Raj, A.A.1
Pavord, D.I.2
Birring, S.S.3
-
40
-
-
0030298527
-
Assessing the Minimal Important Difference in Symptoms: A Comparison of Two Techniques
-
Redelmeier, D. A., G. H. Guyatt, and, R. S. Goldstein,. 1996. " Assessing the Minimal Important Difference in Symptoms: A Comparison of Two Techniques." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 49 (11): 1215-9.
-
(1996)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.49
, Issue.11
, pp. 1215-1219
-
-
Redelmeier, D.A.1
Guyatt, G.H.2
Goldstein, R.S.3
-
41
-
-
37549004786
-
Recommended Methods for Determining Responsiveness and Minimal Important Differences for Patient-Reported Outcomes
-
Revicki, D., R. D. Hayes, D. Cella, and, J. Sloan,. 2008. " Recommended Methods for Determining Responsiveness and Minimal Important Differences for Patient-Reported Outcomes." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 68: 102-9.
-
(2008)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.68
, pp. 102-109
-
-
Revicki, D.1
Hayes, R.D.2
Cella, D.3
Sloan, J.4
-
42
-
-
1942505868
-
Interpreting Differences in Quality of Life of Life: The FACT-H&N in Laryngeal Cancer Patient
-
Ringash, J., A. Bezjak, B. O'Sullivan, and, D. S. Redelmeier,. 2004. " Interpreting Differences in Quality of Life of Life: The FACT-H&N in Laryngeal Cancer Patient." Quality of Life Research 13: 725-53.
-
(2004)
Quality of Life Research
, vol.13
, pp. 725-753
-
-
Ringash, J.1
Bezjak, A.2
O'Sullivan, B.3
Redelmeier, D.S.4
-
43
-
-
34250801499
-
Interpreting Clinically Significant Changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes
-
Ringash, J., B. O'Sullivan, A. Bezjak, and, D. A. Redelmeier,. 2007. " Interpreting Clinically Significant Changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes." Cancer 110: 196-202.
-
(2007)
Cancer
, vol.110
, pp. 196-202
-
-
Ringash, J.1
O'Sullivan, B.2
Bezjak, A.3
Redelmeier, D.A.4
-
44
-
-
7444255435
-
Reliable Change and Minimum Important Difference (MID) Proportions Facilitated Group Responsiveness Comparisons Using Individual Threshold Criteria
-
Schmitt, J. S., and, R. P. De Fabio,. 2004. " Reliable Change and Minimum Important Difference (MID) Proportions Facilitated Group Responsiveness Comparisons Using Individual Threshold Criteria." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57: 1008-18.
-
(2004)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.57
, pp. 1008-1018
-
-
Schmitt, J.S.1
De Fabio, R.P.2
-
45
-
-
27344439672
-
Minimal Important Difference (MID) of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): Results from Patients with Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria
-
Shikiar, R., G. Harding, M. Leahy, and, R. D. Lennox,. 2005. " Minimal Important Difference (MID) of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): Results from Patients with Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria." Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 3 (36): 1-5.
-
(2005)
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
, vol.3
, Issue.36
, pp. 1-5
-
-
Shikiar, R.1
Harding, G.2
Leahy, M.3
Lennox, R.D.4
-
46
-
-
80051580618
-
Cancer Statistics, 2011
-
Siegal, R., E. Ward, O. Brawley, and, A. Jemal,. 2011. " Cancer Statistics, 2011." CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 61: 212-36.
-
(2011)
CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
, vol.61
, pp. 212-236
-
-
Siegal, R.1
Ward, E.2
Brawley, O.3
Jemal, A.4
-
47
-
-
73849145996
-
The SF-36 and SGRQ: Validity and First Look at Minimum Important Differences in IPF
-
Swigris, J. J., K. K. Brown, J. Behr, R. H. du Bois, T. E. King, G. Raghu, and, F. S. Wamboldt,. 2010. " The SF-36 and SGRQ: Validity and First Look at Minimum Important Differences in IPF." Respiratory Medicine 104 (2): 296-304.
-
(2010)
Respiratory Medicine
, vol.104
, Issue.2
, pp. 296-304
-
-
Swigris, J.J.1
Brown, K.K.2
Behr, J.3
Du Bois, R.H.4
King, T.E.5
Raghu, G.6
Wamboldt, F.S.7
-
49
-
-
70649097286
-
The Minimal Detectable Change Cannot Reliably Replace the Minimal Important Difference
-
Turner, D., H. J. Schunemann, L. E. Griffith, D. E. Beaton, A. M. Griffiths, J. N. Critch, and, G. H. Guyatt, et al. 2010. " The Minimal Detectable Change Cannot Reliably Replace the Minimal Important Difference." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63: 28-36.
-
(2010)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.63
, pp. 28-36
-
-
Turner, D.1
Schunemann, H.J.2
Griffith, L.E.3
Beaton, D.E.4
Griffiths, A.M.5
Critch, J.N.6
Guyatt, G.H.7
-
50
-
-
33846005794
-
Minimally Important Change Determined by a Visual Method Integrating an Anchor-Based and a Distribution-Based Approach
-
de Vet, H. C., R. W. Ostelo, C. B. Terwee, N. van der Roer, D. L. Knol, H. Beckerman, M. Boers, L. M. Bouter,. 2007. " Minimally Important Change Determined by a Visual Method Integrating an Anchor-Based and a Distribution-Based Approach." Quality of Life Research 16: 131-42.
-
(2007)
Quality of Life Research
, vol.16
, pp. 131-142
-
-
De Vet, H.C.1
Ostelo, R.W.2
Terwee, C.B.3
Van Der Roer, N.4
Knol, D.L.5
Beckerman, H.6
Boers, M.7
Bouter, L.M.8
-
51
-
-
70649090357
-
Three Ways to Quanitfy Uncertinty in Idividually Applied "minimallly Important Change" Values
-
de Vet, H. C. W., B. Terluin, D. L. Knol, L. D. Roorda, L. B. Mokkink, R. W. Ostelo, E. J. Hendriks, L. M. Bouter, and, C. B. Terwee,. 2010. " Three Ways to Quanitfy Uncertinty in Idividually Applied "Minimallly Important Change" Values." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63: 37-45.
-
(2010)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.63
, pp. 37-45
-
-
De Vet, H.C.W.1
Terluin, B.2
Knol, D.L.3
Roorda, L.D.4
Mokkink, L.B.5
Ostelo, R.W.6
Hendriks, E.J.7
Bouter, L.M.8
Terwee, C.B.9
-
52
-
-
0033178668
-
Surveying Physicians to Determine the Minimal Important Difference: Implications for Sample-Size Calculation
-
van Walraven, C., J. L. Mahon, D. Moher, C. Bohn, and, A. Laupacis,. 1999. " Surveying Physicians to Determine the Minimal Important Difference: Implications for Sample-Size Calculation." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52 (8): 717-23.
-
(1999)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.52
, Issue.8
, pp. 717-723
-
-
Van Walraven, C.1
Mahon, J.L.2
Moher, D.3
Bohn, C.4
Laupacis, A.5
-
53
-
-
20544476950
-
Comparison of the Minimally Important Difference for Two Health State Utility Measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D
-
Walters, S. J., and, J. E. Brazier,. 2005. " Comparison of the Minimally Important Difference for Two Health State Utility Measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D." Quality of Life Research 14: 1523-32.
-
(2005)
Quality of Life Research
, vol.14
, pp. 1523-1532
-
-
Walters, S.J.1
Brazier, J.E.2
-
54
-
-
0026877917
-
The MOS 36-Item Short-for Health Survey (SF-36)-Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
-
Ware, J. E., and, C. D. Sherbourne,. 1992. " The MOS 36-Item Short-for Health Survey (SF-36)-Conceptual Framework and Item Selection." Medical Care 30: 473-83.
-
(1992)
Medical Care
, vol.30
, pp. 473-483
-
-
Ware, J.E.1
Sherbourne, C.D.2
-
55
-
-
0035112515
-
Minimal Clinically Important Differences: Review of Methods
-
Wells, G., D. Beaton, B. Shea, M. Boers, L. Simon, V. Strand, P. Brooks, and, P. Tugwell,. 2001. " Minimal Clinically Important Differences: Review of Methods." Journal of Rheumatol 28: 406-12.
-
(2001)
Journal of Rheumatol
, vol.28
, pp. 406-412
-
-
Wells, G.1
Beaton, D.2
Shea, B.3
Boers, M.4
Simon, L.5
Strand, V.6
Brooks, P.7
Tugwell, P.8
-
56
-
-
0037368520
-
Meaningful Effect Size and Patterns of Response of the Transition Dyspnea Index
-
Witek, T. J. Jr, and, D. A. Mahler,. 2003. " Meaningful Effect Size and Patterns of Response of the Transition Dyspnea Index." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56: 248-55.
-
(2003)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.56
, pp. 248-255
-
-
Witek, Jr.T.J.1
Mahler, D.A.2
-
57
-
-
1542379005
-
Minimal Important Difference Threshold and the Standard Error of Measurement: Is There a Connection?
-
Wyrwich, K. W., 2004. " Minimal Important Difference Threshold and the Standard Error of Measurement: Is There a Connection? " Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 14 (1): 97-110.
-
(2004)
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
, vol.14
, Issue.1
, pp. 97-110
-
-
Wyrwich, K.W.1
-
58
-
-
0033199526
-
Further Evidence Supporting an SEM-Based Criterion for Identifying Meaningful Intra-Individual Changes in Health Related Quality of Life
-
Wyrwich, K. W., W. M. Tirney, and, F. D. Wolinsky, 1999. " Further Evidence Supporting an SEM-Based Criterion for Identifying Meaningful Intra-Individual Changes in Health Related Quality of Life." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52 (9): 861-73.
-
(1999)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.52
, Issue.9
, pp. 861-873
-
-
Wyrwich, K.W.1
Tirney, W.M.2
Wolinsky, F.D.3
-
59
-
-
16344372151
-
A Comparison of Clinically Important Differences in Health Related Quality of Life for Patients with Chronic Lung Disease, Asthma, or Heart Disease
-
Wyrwich, K. W., W. M. Tierney, A. N. Babu, K. Kroenke, and, F. D. Wollinsky,. 2005. " A Comparison of Clinically Important Differences in Health Related Quality of Life for Patients with Chronic Lung Disease, Asthma, or Heart Disease." Health Services Research 40 (2): 577-97.
-
(2005)
Health Services Research
, vol.40
, Issue.2
, pp. 577-597
-
-
Wyrwich, K.W.1
Tierney, W.M.2
Babu, A.N.3
Kroenke, K.4
Wollinsky, F.D.5
-
60
-
-
33744518535
-
Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Incontinence Quality-of-Life Scores in Stress Urinary Incontinenece
-
Yalcin, I., D. L. Patrick, K. Summers, K. Kinchen, and, R. C. Bump,. 2006. " Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Incontinence Quality-of-Life Scores in Stress Urinary Incontinenece." Urology 67: 1304-8.
-
(2006)
Urology
, vol.67
, pp. 1304-1308
-
-
Yalcin, I.1
Patrick, D.L.2
Summers, K.3
Kinchen, K.4
Bump, R.C.5
-
61
-
-
27744526720
-
Minimally Important Differences Were Estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) Instrument Using a Combination of Distribution- and Anchor-Based Approaches
-
Yost, K. J., D. Cella, A. Chawla, E. Holmgren, D. T. Eton, J. Z. Ayanian, and, D. W. West,. 2005. " Minimally Important Differences Were Estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) Instrument Using a Combination of Distribution- and Anchor-Based Approaches." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 58: 1241-51.
-
(2005)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.58
, pp. 1241-1251
-
-
Yost, K.J.1
Cella, D.2
Chawla, A.3
Holmgren, E.4
Eton, D.T.5
Ayanian, J.Z.6
West, D.W.7
-
62
-
-
79953292342
-
Minimally Importand Differences Were Estimated for Six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer Scales in Advanced-Stage Cancer Patients
-
Yost, K. J., D. T. Eaton, S. F. Garcia, and, D. Cella,. 2011. " Minimally Importand Differences Were Estimated for Six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer Scales in Advanced-Stage Cancer Patients." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64: 507-16.
-
(2011)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.64
, pp. 507-516
-
-
Yost, K.J.1
Eaton, D.T.2
Garcia, S.F.3
Cella, D.4
|