메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1902-1925

Comparison of distribution- and anchor-based approaches to infer changes in health-related quality of life of prostate cancer survivors

Author keywords

anchor based; distribution based; health related quality of life; minimal important difference; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER PAIN; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURVIVOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMOTION; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTESTINE FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; PROSTATE CANCER; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SHORT FORM 36; SOCIAL STATUS; URINARY DYSFUNCTION;

EID: 84866516794     PISSN: 00179124     EISSN: 14756773     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01395.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (64)

References (62)
  • 3
    • 0033109795 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Review of Methods to Determine VA-Health Care Costs
    • Barnett, P. G., 1999. " Review of Methods to Determine VA-Health Care Costs." Medical Care 37 (4): AS9-17.
    • (1999) Medical Care , vol.37 , Issue.4
    • Barnett, P.G.1
  • 4
    • 37749013594 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of Anchor-Based and Distributional Approaches in Estimating Important Difference in Common Cold
    • Barrett, B., R. Brown, and, M. Mundt,. 2008. " Comparison of Anchor-Based and Distributional Approaches in Estimating Important Difference in Common Cold." Quality of Life Research 17: 75-85.
    • (2008) Quality of Life Research , vol.17 , pp. 75-85
    • Barrett, B.1    Brown, R.2    Mundt, M.3
  • 5
    • 18844409426 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sufficiently Important Difference: Expanding the Framework of Clinical Significance
    • Barrett, B., D. Brown, M. Mundt, and, R. Brown,. 2005. " Sufficiently Important Difference: Expanding the Framework of Clinical Significance." Medical Decision Making 25: 250-61.
    • (2005) Medical Decision Making , vol.25 , pp. 250-261
    • Barrett, B.1    Brown, D.2    Mundt, M.3    Brown, R.4
  • 6
    • 0036191550 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Many Faces of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID): A Literature Review and Directions for Future Research
    • Beaton, D. E., M. Boers, and, G. A. Wells,. 2002. " Many Faces of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID): A Literature Review and Directions for Future Research." Current Opinion in Rheumatology 14: 109-14.
    • (2002) Current Opinion in Rheumatology , vol.14 , pp. 109-114
    • Beaton, D.E.1    Boers, M.2    Wells, G.A.3
  • 7
    • 41249099987 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Qualiveen, a Urinary-Disorder Specific Instrument: 0.5 Correspons to the Minimal Important Difference
    • Bonniaud, V., D. Bryant, B. Parratte, and, G. Guyatt,. 2008. " Qualiveen, a Urinary-Disorder Specific Instrument: 0.5 Correspons to the Minimal Important Difference." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61: 505-10.
    • (2008) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.61 , pp. 505-510
    • Bonniaud, V.1    Bryant, D.2    Parratte, B.3    Guyatt, G.4
  • 8
    • 0036184207 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What Is a Clinically Meaningful Change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) Questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study 5592
    • Cella D., D. T. Eton, D. L. Fairclough, P. Bonomi, A. E. Heyes, C Silberman, M. K. Wolf, D. H. Johnson,. 2002a. " What Is a Clinically Meaningful Change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) Questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study 5592." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 55: 285-95.
    • (2002) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.55 , pp. 285-295
    • Cella, D.1    Eton, D.T.2    Fairclough, D.L.3    Bonomi, P.4    Heyes, A.E.5    Silberman, C.6    Wolf, M.K.7    Johnson, D.H.8
  • 9
    • 0036964529 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Combining Anchor and Distribution-Based Methods to Derive Clinically Important Differences on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Anemia and Fatigue Scales
    • Cella, D., D. T. Eton, L. Jin-Shei, A. H. Peterman, and, D. E. Merkel,. 2002b. " Combining Anchor and Distribution-Based Methods to Derive Clinically Important Differences on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Anemia and Fatigue Scales." Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 24 (6): 547-61.
    • (2002) Journal of Pain and Symptom Management , vol.24 , Issue.6 , pp. 547-561
    • Cella, D.1    Eton, D.T.2    Jin-Shei, L.3    Peterman, A.H.4    Merkel, D.E.5
  • 10
    • 0023092594 scopus 로고
    • A New Method of Classifying Prognostic Comorbidity in Longitudinal Studies: Development and Validation
    • Charlson, M. E., P. Pompei, K. L. Ales, and, C. R. Mackenzie,. 1987. " A New Method of Classifying Prognostic Comorbidity in Longitudinal Studies: Development and Validation." Journal of Chronic Disease 40: 373-83.
    • (1987) Journal of Chronic Disease , vol.40 , pp. 373-383
    • Charlson, M.E.1    Pompei, P.2    Ales, K.L.3    MacKenzie, C.R.4
  • 11
    • 69849095945 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Individualizing Quality-of-Life Outcomes Reporting: How Localized Prostate Cancer Treatments Affect Patients with Different Levels of Baseline Urinary, Bowel, and Sexual Function
    • Chen, R. C., J. A. Clark, and, J. A. Talcott,. 2009. " Individualizing Quality-of-Life Outcomes Reporting: How Localized Prostate Cancer Treatments Affect Patients with Different Levels of Baseline Urinary, Bowel, and Sexual Function." Journal of Clinical Oncology 27: 1-13.
    • (2009) Journal of Clinical Oncology , vol.27 , pp. 1-13
    • Chen, R.C.1    Clark, J.A.2    Talcott, J.A.3
  • 12
    • 33645022182 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Four Methods of Estimating the Minimal Important Difference Score Were Compared to Establish a Clinically Significant Change in Headache Impact Test
    • Coeytaux, R. R., J. S. Kaufman, R. Chao, J. D. Mann, R. F. Devellis, 2006. " Four Methods of Estimating the Minimal Important Difference Score Were Compared to Establish a Clinically Significant Change in Headache Impact Test." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59: 374-80.
    • (2006) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.59 , pp. 374-380
    • Coeytaux, R.R.1    Kaufman, J.S.2    Chao, R.3    Mann, J.D.4    Devellis, R.F.5
  • 14
    • 0037567512 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Defining Clinically Meaningful Change in Health Related Quality of Life
    • Crosby, R. D., R. L. Kolotkin, and, R. Williams,. 2003. " Defining Clinically Meaningful Change in Health Related Quality of Life." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56: 395-407.
    • (2003) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.56 , pp. 395-407
    • Crosby, R.D.1    Kolotkin, R.L.2    Williams, R.3
  • 15
    • 9644278047 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An Integrated Method to Determine Meaningful Changes in Health Related Quality of Life
    • Crosby, R. D., R. L. Kolotkin, and, R. Williams,. 2004. " An Integrated Method to Determine Meaningful Changes in Health Related Quality of Life." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57: 1153-60.
    • (2004) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.57 , pp. 1153-1160
    • Crosby, R.D.1    Kolotkin, R.L.2    Williams, R.3
  • 16
    • 0036233368 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The MacNew Heart Disease Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument: Reference Data for Users
    • Dixon, T., L. L. Y. Lim, and, N. B. Oldridge,. 2002. " The MacNew Heart Disease Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument: Reference Data for Users." Quality of Life Research 11: 173-83.
    • (2002) Quality of Life Research , vol.11 , pp. 173-183
    • Dixon, T.1    Lim, L.L.Y.2    Oldridge, N.B.3
  • 17
    • 0142011017 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Imputation of Missing Longitudinal Data: A Comparison of Methods
    • Engels, J. M., and, P. Diehr,. 2003. " Imputation of Missing Longitudinal Data: A Comparison of Methods." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56: 968-76.
    • (2003) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.56 , pp. 968-976
    • Engels, J.M.1    Diehr, P.2
  • 18
    • 7044224362 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A Combination of Distribution-and Anchor Based Approaches Determined Minimally Important Differences (MIDs) for Four Endpoints in a Breast Cancer Scale
    • Eton, D. T., D. Cella, K. J. Yost, S. E. Yount, A. H. Peterman, D. S. Neuberg, G. W. Sledge, and, W. C. Wood,. 2004. " A Combination of Distribution-and Anchor Based Approaches Determined Minimally Important Differences (MIDs) for Four Endpoints in a Breast Cancer Scale." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57: 898-910.
    • (2004) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.57 , pp. 898-910
    • Eton, D.T.1    Cella, D.2    Yost, K.J.3    Yount, S.E.4    Peterman, A.H.5    Neuberg, D.S.6    Sledge, G.W.7    Wood, W.C.8
  • 19
    • 0036195669 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures
    • the Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. "."
    • Guyatt, G. H., D. Osoba, A. W. Wu, K. W. Wyrwich, G. R. Norman, and the Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. 2002. " Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures." Mayo Clinic Proceedings 77: 371-83.
    • (2002) Mayo Clinic Proceedings , vol.77 , pp. 371-383
    • Guyatt, G.H.1    Osoba, D.2    Wu, A.W.3    Wyrwich, K.W.4    Norman, G.R.5
  • 20
    • 34548413580 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How Can Quality of Life Researchers Make Their Work More Useful to Health Workers and Their Patients?
    • Gyatt, G., and, H. Schunemann,. 2007. " How Can Quality of Life Researchers Make Their Work More Useful to Health Workers and Their Patients? " Quality of Life Research 16: 1097-105.
    • (2007) Quality of Life Research , vol.16 , pp. 1097-1105
    • Gyatt, G.1    Schunemann, H.2
  • 21
    • 34347269602 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Health-Related Quality of Life for Eating Disorders Questionnaire Version-2 Was Responsive 1-Year after Initial Assessment
    • Hayas, L. C., J. M. Quintana, J. A. Padierna, A. Bilbao, P. Munoz, and, E. F. Cook,. 2007. " Health-Related Quality of Life for Eating Disorders Questionnaire Version-2 Was Responsive 1-Year after Initial Assessment." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60: 825-33.
    • (2007) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.60 , pp. 825-833
    • Hayas, L.C.1    Quintana, J.M.2    Padierna, J.A.3    Bilbao, A.4    Munoz, P.5    Cook, E.F.6
  • 22
    • 0025851103 scopus 로고
    • Interpreting Changes in Quality-of-Life Score in N or 1 Randomized Trials
    • Jaeschke, R., G. H. Guyatt, J. Keller, and, J. Singer,. 1991. " Interpreting Changes in Quality-of-Life Score in N or 1 Randomized Trials." Controlled Clinical Trials 12: 226S-33S.
    • (1991) Controlled Clinical Trials , vol.12
    • Jaeschke, R.1    Guyatt, G.H.2    Keller, J.3    Singer, J.4
  • 23
    • 0024852022 scopus 로고
    • Measurement of Health Status-Ascertaining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference
    • Jeschke, R., J. Singer, and, G. H. Guyatt,. 1989. " Measurement of Health Status-Ascertaining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference." Controlled Clinical Trials 10: 407-15.
    • (1989) Controlled Clinical Trials , vol.10 , pp. 407-415
    • Jeschke, R.1    Singer, J.2    Guyatt, G.H.3
  • 24
    • 29144467134 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A Minimal Clinically Important Difference Was Derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for Low Back Pain
    • Jordan, K., K. M. Dunn, M. Lewis, and, P. Croft,. 2006. " A Minimal Clinically Important Difference Was Derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for Low Back Pain." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59: 45-51.
    • (2006) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.59 , pp. 45-51
    • Jordan, K.1    Dunn, K.M.2    Lewis, M.3    Croft, P.4
  • 25
    • 0028055059 scopus 로고
    • Determining a Minimal Important Change in Disease-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire
    • Juniper, E. F., G. H. Guyatt, A. Willan, and, L. E. Griffith,. 1994. " Determining a Minimal Important Change in Disease-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 47 (1): 81-7.
    • (1994) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.47 , Issue.1 , pp. 81-87
    • Juniper, E.F.1    Guyatt, G.H.2    Willan, A.3    Griffith, L.E.4
  • 26
    • 62949162721 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Flushing Assessment Tool (FAST): Psychometric Properties of a New Measure Assessing Flushing Symptoms and Clinical Impact of Niacin Therapy
    • Kawata, A. K., D. A. Revicki, R. Thakkar, P. Jiang, S. Krause, M. H. Davidson, H. A. Punzi, and, R. J. Padley,. 2009. " Flushing Assessment Tool (FAST): Psychometric Properties of a New Measure Assessing Flushing Symptoms and Clinical Impact of Niacin Therapy." Clinical Drug Investigation 29 (4): 215-29.
    • (2009) Clinical Drug Investigation , vol.29 , Issue.4 , pp. 215-229
    • Kawata, A.K.1    Revicki, D.A.2    Thakkar, R.3    Jiang, P.4    Krause, S.5    Davidson, M.H.6    Punzi, H.A.7    Padley, R.J.8
  • 28
    • 30944457813 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Distribution and Anchor-Based Approaches Provided Different Interpretability Estimates for the Hydrocephalus Outcome Questionnaire
    • Kulkarni, A. V., 2006. " Distribution and Anchor-Based Approaches Provided Different Interpretability Estimates for the Hydrocephalus Outcome Questionnaire." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59: 176-84.
    • (2006) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.59 , pp. 176-184
    • Kulkarni, A.V.1
  • 29
    • 47749117301 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Validity, Responsiveness, and Minimal Important Difference for the SF-6D Health Utility Scale in a Spinal Cord Injured Population
    • Lee, B. B., M. T. King, J. M. Simpson, M. J. Haran, M. R. Stockler, O. Marial, and, G. Salkeld,. 2008. " Validity, Responsiveness, and Minimal Important Difference for the SF-6D Health Utility Scale in a Spinal Cord Injured Population." Value in Health 11 (4): 680-8.
    • (2008) Value in Health , vol.11 , Issue.4 , pp. 680-688
    • Lee, B.B.1    King, M.T.2    Simpson, J.M.3    Haran, M.J.4    Stockler, M.R.5    Marial, O.6    Salkeld, G.7
  • 30
    • 34047149832 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Three Methods for Minimally Important Difference: No Relationship Was Found with the Net Proportion of Patients Improving
    • Lemieux, J., D. E. Beaton, S. Hogg-Johnson, L. J. Bordeleav, and, P. J. Goodwin,. 2007. " Three Methods for Minimally Important Difference: No Relationship Was Found with the Net Proportion of Patients Improving." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60: 448-55.
    • (2007) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.60 , pp. 448-455
    • Lemieux, J.1    Beaton, D.E.2    Hogg-Johnson, S.3    Bordeleav, L.J.4    Goodwin, P.J.5
  • 31
    • 0032109544 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: Development, Reliability, and Validity of Health-Related Quality of Life Measure
    • Litwin, M. S., R. D. Hays, A. Fink, et al. 1998. " The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: Development, Reliability, and Validity of Health-Related Quality of Life Measure." Medical Care 36: 1002-12.
    • (1998) Medical Care , vol.36 , pp. 1002-1012
    • Litwin, M.S.1    Hays, R.D.2    Fink, A.3
  • 32
    • 0037980149 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interpretation of Changes in Health Related Quality of Life-The Remarkable Universality of Half a Standard Deviation
    • Norman, G. R., J. A. Sloan, and, K. W. Wyrwich,. 2003. " Interpretation of Changes in Health Related Quality of Life-The Remarkable Universality of Half a Standard Deviation." Medical Care 41 (5): 582-92.
    • (2003) Medical Care , vol.41 , Issue.5 , pp. 582-592
    • Norman, G.R.1    Sloan, J.A.2    Wyrwich, K.W.3
  • 33
    • 0035490980 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Relation of Distribution-and Anchor Based Approaches in Interpretation of Changes in Health Related Quality of Life
    • Norman, G. R., F. G. Sridhar, G. H. Guyatt, and, S. D. Walter,. 2001. " Relation of Distribution-and Anchor Based Approaches in Interpretation of Changes in Health Related Quality of Life." Medical Care 39 (10): 1039-47.
    • (2001) Medical Care , vol.39 , Issue.10 , pp. 1039-1047
    • Norman, G.R.1    Sridhar, F.G.2    Guyatt, G.H.3    Walter, S.D.4
  • 34
    • 0003476934 scopus 로고
    • Chestnut Hill, MA: Epidemiological Resources
    • Oakes, M., 1990. Statistical Inference. Chestnut Hill, MA: Epidemiological Resources.
    • (1990) Statistical Inference
    • Oakes, M.1
  • 35
    • 0031972496 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interpreting the Significance of Changes in Health Related Quality of Life Score
    • Osoba, D., G. Rodrigues, J. Myles, B. Zee, and, J. Pater,. 1998. " Interpreting the Significance of Changes in Health Related Quality of Life Score." Journal of Clinical Oncology 16: 139-44.
    • (1998) Journal of Clinical Oncology , vol.16 , pp. 139-144
    • Osoba, D.1    Rodrigues, G.2    Myles, J.3    Zee, B.4    Pater, J.5
  • 36
    • 0013327506 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Measurement of Health Outcomes in Treatment Effectiveness Evaluations
    • Patrick, D. L., and, C. Yen-Pin,. 2000. " Measurement of Health Outcomes in Treatment Effectiveness Evaluations." Medical Care 38 (suppl II): II-14-15.
    • (2000) Medical Care , vol.38 , Issue.SUPPL. II
    • Patrick, D.L.1    Yen-Pin, C.2
  • 37
    • 47849097000 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Minimal Important Difference of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    • Puhan, M. A., M. Frey, S. Buchi, and, H. J. Schunemann,. 2008. " The Minimal Important Difference of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease." Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 6 (46): 1-6.
    • (2008) Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , vol.6 , Issue.46 , pp. 1-6
    • Puhan, M.A.1    Frey, M.2    Buchi, S.3    Schunemann, H.J.4
  • 39
    • 56049115605 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clinical Cough IV: What Is the Minimal Important Difference for the Leicester Cough Questionnaire?
    • Raj, A. A., D. I. Pavord, and, S. S. Birring,. 2009. " Clinical Cough IV: What Is the Minimal Important Difference for the Leicester Cough Questionnaire? " Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology 187: 311-20.
    • (2009) Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology , vol.187 , pp. 311-320
    • Raj, A.A.1    Pavord, D.I.2    Birring, S.S.3
  • 40
    • 0030298527 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing the Minimal Important Difference in Symptoms: A Comparison of Two Techniques
    • Redelmeier, D. A., G. H. Guyatt, and, R. S. Goldstein,. 1996. " Assessing the Minimal Important Difference in Symptoms: A Comparison of Two Techniques." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 49 (11): 1215-9.
    • (1996) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.49 , Issue.11 , pp. 1215-1219
    • Redelmeier, D.A.1    Guyatt, G.H.2    Goldstein, R.S.3
  • 41
    • 37549004786 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Recommended Methods for Determining Responsiveness and Minimal Important Differences for Patient-Reported Outcomes
    • Revicki, D., R. D. Hayes, D. Cella, and, J. Sloan,. 2008. " Recommended Methods for Determining Responsiveness and Minimal Important Differences for Patient-Reported Outcomes." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 68: 102-9.
    • (2008) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.68 , pp. 102-109
    • Revicki, D.1    Hayes, R.D.2    Cella, D.3    Sloan, J.4
  • 42
    • 1942505868 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interpreting Differences in Quality of Life of Life: The FACT-H&N in Laryngeal Cancer Patient
    • Ringash, J., A. Bezjak, B. O'Sullivan, and, D. S. Redelmeier,. 2004. " Interpreting Differences in Quality of Life of Life: The FACT-H&N in Laryngeal Cancer Patient." Quality of Life Research 13: 725-53.
    • (2004) Quality of Life Research , vol.13 , pp. 725-753
    • Ringash, J.1    Bezjak, A.2    O'Sullivan, B.3    Redelmeier, D.S.4
  • 43
    • 34250801499 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interpreting Clinically Significant Changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes
    • Ringash, J., B. O'Sullivan, A. Bezjak, and, D. A. Redelmeier,. 2007. " Interpreting Clinically Significant Changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes." Cancer 110: 196-202.
    • (2007) Cancer , vol.110 , pp. 196-202
    • Ringash, J.1    O'Sullivan, B.2    Bezjak, A.3    Redelmeier, D.A.4
  • 44
    • 7444255435 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reliable Change and Minimum Important Difference (MID) Proportions Facilitated Group Responsiveness Comparisons Using Individual Threshold Criteria
    • Schmitt, J. S., and, R. P. De Fabio,. 2004. " Reliable Change and Minimum Important Difference (MID) Proportions Facilitated Group Responsiveness Comparisons Using Individual Threshold Criteria." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57: 1008-18.
    • (2004) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.57 , pp. 1008-1018
    • Schmitt, J.S.1    De Fabio, R.P.2
  • 45
    • 27344439672 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimal Important Difference (MID) of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): Results from Patients with Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria
    • Shikiar, R., G. Harding, M. Leahy, and, R. D. Lennox,. 2005. " Minimal Important Difference (MID) of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): Results from Patients with Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria." Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 3 (36): 1-5.
    • (2005) Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , vol.3 , Issue.36 , pp. 1-5
    • Shikiar, R.1    Harding, G.2    Leahy, M.3    Lennox, R.D.4
  • 52
    • 0033178668 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Surveying Physicians to Determine the Minimal Important Difference: Implications for Sample-Size Calculation
    • van Walraven, C., J. L. Mahon, D. Moher, C. Bohn, and, A. Laupacis,. 1999. " Surveying Physicians to Determine the Minimal Important Difference: Implications for Sample-Size Calculation." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52 (8): 717-23.
    • (1999) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.52 , Issue.8 , pp. 717-723
    • Van Walraven, C.1    Mahon, J.L.2    Moher, D.3    Bohn, C.4    Laupacis, A.5
  • 53
    • 20544476950 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of the Minimally Important Difference for Two Health State Utility Measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D
    • Walters, S. J., and, J. E. Brazier,. 2005. " Comparison of the Minimally Important Difference for Two Health State Utility Measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D." Quality of Life Research 14: 1523-32.
    • (2005) Quality of Life Research , vol.14 , pp. 1523-1532
    • Walters, S.J.1    Brazier, J.E.2
  • 54
    • 0026877917 scopus 로고
    • The MOS 36-Item Short-for Health Survey (SF-36)-Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
    • Ware, J. E., and, C. D. Sherbourne,. 1992. " The MOS 36-Item Short-for Health Survey (SF-36)-Conceptual Framework and Item Selection." Medical Care 30: 473-83.
    • (1992) Medical Care , vol.30 , pp. 473-483
    • Ware, J.E.1    Sherbourne, C.D.2
  • 56
    • 0037368520 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Meaningful Effect Size and Patterns of Response of the Transition Dyspnea Index
    • Witek, T. J. Jr, and, D. A. Mahler,. 2003. " Meaningful Effect Size and Patterns of Response of the Transition Dyspnea Index." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56: 248-55.
    • (2003) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.56 , pp. 248-255
    • Witek, Jr.T.J.1    Mahler, D.A.2
  • 57
    • 1542379005 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimal Important Difference Threshold and the Standard Error of Measurement: Is There a Connection?
    • Wyrwich, K. W., 2004. " Minimal Important Difference Threshold and the Standard Error of Measurement: Is There a Connection? " Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 14 (1): 97-110.
    • (2004) Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics , vol.14 , Issue.1 , pp. 97-110
    • Wyrwich, K.W.1
  • 58
    • 0033199526 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Further Evidence Supporting an SEM-Based Criterion for Identifying Meaningful Intra-Individual Changes in Health Related Quality of Life
    • Wyrwich, K. W., W. M. Tirney, and, F. D. Wolinsky, 1999. " Further Evidence Supporting an SEM-Based Criterion for Identifying Meaningful Intra-Individual Changes in Health Related Quality of Life." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52 (9): 861-73.
    • (1999) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.52 , Issue.9 , pp. 861-873
    • Wyrwich, K.W.1    Tirney, W.M.2    Wolinsky, F.D.3
  • 59
    • 16344372151 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A Comparison of Clinically Important Differences in Health Related Quality of Life for Patients with Chronic Lung Disease, Asthma, or Heart Disease
    • Wyrwich, K. W., W. M. Tierney, A. N. Babu, K. Kroenke, and, F. D. Wollinsky,. 2005. " A Comparison of Clinically Important Differences in Health Related Quality of Life for Patients with Chronic Lung Disease, Asthma, or Heart Disease." Health Services Research 40 (2): 577-97.
    • (2005) Health Services Research , vol.40 , Issue.2 , pp. 577-597
    • Wyrwich, K.W.1    Tierney, W.M.2    Babu, A.N.3    Kroenke, K.4    Wollinsky, F.D.5
  • 60
    • 33744518535 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Incontinence Quality-of-Life Scores in Stress Urinary Incontinenece
    • Yalcin, I., D. L. Patrick, K. Summers, K. Kinchen, and, R. C. Bump,. 2006. " Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Incontinence Quality-of-Life Scores in Stress Urinary Incontinenece." Urology 67: 1304-8.
    • (2006) Urology , vol.67 , pp. 1304-1308
    • Yalcin, I.1    Patrick, D.L.2    Summers, K.3    Kinchen, K.4    Bump, R.C.5
  • 61
    • 27744526720 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimally Important Differences Were Estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) Instrument Using a Combination of Distribution- and Anchor-Based Approaches
    • Yost, K. J., D. Cella, A. Chawla, E. Holmgren, D. T. Eton, J. Z. Ayanian, and, D. W. West,. 2005. " Minimally Important Differences Were Estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) Instrument Using a Combination of Distribution- and Anchor-Based Approaches." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 58: 1241-51.
    • (2005) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.58 , pp. 1241-1251
    • Yost, K.J.1    Cella, D.2    Chawla, A.3    Holmgren, E.4    Eton, D.T.5    Ayanian, J.Z.6    West, D.W.7
  • 62
    • 79953292342 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimally Importand Differences Were Estimated for Six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer Scales in Advanced-Stage Cancer Patients
    • Yost, K. J., D. T. Eaton, S. F. Garcia, and, D. Cella,. 2011. " Minimally Importand Differences Were Estimated for Six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer Scales in Advanced-Stage Cancer Patients." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64: 507-16.
    • (2011) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.64 , pp. 507-516
    • Yost, K.J.1    Eaton, D.T.2    Garcia, S.F.3    Cella, D.4


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.