Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age?

Spine

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 62-68

  Lafage, Renaud ^a   Schwab, Frank ^a   Challier, Vincent ^b   Henry, Jensen K ^a   Gum, Jeffrey ^c   Smith, Justin ^d   Hostin, Richard ^e   Shaffrey, Christopher ^d   Kim, Han J ^e   Ames, Christopher ^f   Scheer, Justin ^f   Klineberg, Eric ^g   Bess, Shay ^h   Burton, Douglas ⁱ   Lafage, Virginie ^a,j  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

^b BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c NORTON LEATHERMAN SPINE CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e Baylor Scoliosis Center   (United States)

^f HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ Rocky Mountain Scoliosis and Spine Center   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Adult spinal deformity; Age; Age specific; Elderly; Health Related Quality of Life; Oswestry Disability Index; Realignment; Sagittal alignment; Sagittal balance; Sagittal malalignment; SF 36; Spino pelvic alignment; Threshold

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COBB ANGLE; DATA BASE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR PELVIC MISMATCH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PHYSICAL COMPONENT SCORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE MEMORY; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAGITTAL SPINO PELVIC ALIGNMENT; SAGITTAL VERTICAL AXIS; SHORT FORM 36; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE SURGERY; T1 PELVIC ANGLE; AGE; CLINICAL TRIAL; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PELVIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL CURVATURES; SPINE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL CURVATURES; SPINE;

EID: 84952922580     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001171     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Jackson RP, McManus AC. Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine 1994;19:1611-8.
2. Glassman SD, et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 2005;30:2024-9.
3. Schwab FJ, et al. Adult scoliosis: A quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine 2002;27:387-92.
4. Lafage V, Schwab FJ, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy J-P. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: Two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine 2009;34:E599-606.
5. Schwab F, et al. SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: A validation study. Spine 2012;37:1077-82.
6. Protopsaltis TS, Schwab FJ, Bronsard N, et al. The t1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume 2014;96:1631-40.
7. Akbar M, Terran J, Ames CP, Lafage V, Schwab FJ. Use of Surgimap Spine in sagittal plane analysis, osteotomy planning, and correction calculation. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2013;24:163-72
8. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. Older Americans 2010: Key Indicators of Well-Being. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office; July 2010.
9. Diebo B, Liu S, Lafage V, Schwab F. Osteotomies in the treatment of spinal deformities: indications, classification, and surgical planning. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014;24 (suppl 1):S11-20.
10. O'Shaughnessy B a, et al. Does a long-fusion "T3-sacrum" portend a worse outcome than a short-fusion "T10-sacrum" in primary surgery for adult scoliosis? Spine 2012;37:884-90.
11. Smith JS, et al. Dynamic changes of the pelvis and spine are key to predicting postoperative sagittal alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: A critical analysis of preoperative planning techniques. Spine 2012;37:845-53.
12. Lafage V, et al. Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: Analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine 2008;33:1572-8.
13. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G. Gravitational forces and sagittal shape of the spine. Clinical estimation of their relations. Int Orthop 2008;32:809-16.
14. Mac-Thiong J-M, et al. Can c7 plumbline and gravity line predict health related quality of life in adult scoliosis? Spine 2009;34: E519-27.
15. Tsuboi H, et al. Age-related sex differences in erector spinae muscle endurance using surface electromyographic power spectral analysis in healthy humans. Spine J 2013;13:1928-33.
16. Larsson L, Li X, Frontera WR. Effects of aging on shortening velocity and myosin isoform composition in single human skeletal muscle cells. Am J Physiol 1997;272:C638-49.
17. Lexell J. Human aging, muscle mass, and fiber type composition. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995;50 Spec No:11-16.
18. Larsson L, Grimby G, Karlsson J. Muscle strength and speed of movement in relation to age and muscle morphology. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1979;46:451-6.
19. Lane L, Bullough P. Age-related changes in the thickness of the calcified zone and the number of tidemarks in adult human articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 1980;62:372-5.
20. Lord SR, Clark RD, Webster IW. Postural stability and associated physiological factors in a population of aged persons. J Gerontol 1991;46:M69-76.
21. Baldus C, et al. The Scoliosis Research Society Health-Related Quality of Life (SRS-30) age-gender normative data: An analysis of 1346 adult subjects unaffected by scoliosis. Spine 2011;36:1154-62
22. Ware JE. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3130-9.
23. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000;25:2940-52.
24. Champain S, et al. Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies. Eur Spine J 2006;15:982-91.
25. Ware JE, Kosinski M. Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: A response. Qual Life Res 2001;10:405-13; discussion 415-20.
26. Faldini C, Di Martino A, De Fine M, et al. Current classification systems for adult degenerative scoliosis. Musculoskelet Surg 2013;97:1-8.
27. Ware JE, Gandek B, Kosinski M, et al. The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and countryspecific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1167-70.
28. Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K, et al. Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Short-Form 36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:1601-7.
29. Grevitt M, Khazim R, Webb J, et al. The short form-36 health survey questionnaire in spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:48-52.
30. Tonosu J, Takeshita K, Hara N, et al. The normative score and the cut-off value of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Eur Spine J 2012;21:1596-602.
31. Pumberger M, Froemel D, Aichmair A, et al. Clinical predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: An analysis of 248 patients. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:966-71.
32. Le Huec J-CC, Charosky S, Barrey C, et al. Sagittal imbalance cascade for simple degenerative spine and consequences: Algorithm of decision for appropriate treatment. Eur Spine J 2011;20 (suppl 5):699-703.
33. Dubousset J. Three-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity. In: Weinstein SL (ED) The pediatric spine: Principles and practice. New York: Raven Press Ltd.; 1994, pp. 479-96.
34. Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Boyce R, et al. Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: Age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine 2006;31:E959-67.
35. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, et al. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 2005;30:346-53.
36. Dubousset J, Challier V, Farcy J-P, Schwab FJ, Lafage V. Spinal alignment versus spinal balance in Global Spinal Alignment: Principles, Pathologies, and Procedures. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2014, pp. 3-9.