Diagnostic accuracy research in Glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 12, 2017, Pages

  Michelessi, Manuele ^a   Lucenteforte, Ersilia ^b   Miele, Alba ^b   Oddone, Francesco ^a   Crescioli, Giada ^b   Fameli, Valeria ^c   Korevaar, Daniel A ^d   Virgili, Gianni ^b  

^a IRCCS FONDAZIONE BIETTI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT REPORT; ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FUNDING; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OPTIC NERVE; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; REGISTER; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS; SAMPLE SIZE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STANDARD; STANDARDS FOR REPORTING OF DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY STUDIES 2015 CHECKLIST; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; PUBLISHING;

GLAUCOMA; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; PUBLISHING;

EID: 85039159313     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189716     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet 2014; 383:267-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X PMID: 24411647
2. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140:189-202. PMID: 14757617
3. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostica accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ. 2003; 326:41-4. PMID: 12511463
4. Mallett S, Halligan S, Thompson M, Collins GS, Altman DG. Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies for patient care. BMJ. 2012 Jul 2; 345:e3999. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e3999 PMID: 22750423
5. Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Altman DG, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Hooft L, et al. STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14; 6: e012799. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799 PMID: 28137831
6. Prum BE Jr, Rosenberg LF, Gedde SJ, Mansberger SL, Stein JD, Moroi SE, et al. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern(®) Guidelines. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123:P41-P111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.053 PMID: 26581556
7. Bussel II, Wollstein G, Schuman JS. OCT for glaucoma diagnosis, screening and detection of glaucoma progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98 Suppl 2:ii15-9.
8. Banister K, Boachie C, Bourne R, Cook J, Burr JM, Ramsay C, et al. Can Automated Imaging for Optic Disc and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Analysis Aid Glaucoma Detection? Ophthalmology. 2016; 123:930-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.041 PMID: 27016459
9. Rao HL, Yadav RK, Addepalli UK, Chaudhary S, Senthil S, Choudhari NS, et al. Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer assessment of spectral domain optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry to diagnose preperimetric glaucoma. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e108992. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108992 PMID: 25279801
10. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S; QUADAS-2 Steering Group. A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66:1093-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.05.014 PMID: 23958378
11. Chong GT, Lee RK. Glaucoma versus red disease: imaging and glaucoma diagnosis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012; 23:79-88. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff431 PMID: 22262083
12. Johnson ZK, Siddiqui MA, Azuara-Blanco A. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:1607-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.11.036 PMID: 17434589
13. Siddiqui MA, Azuara-Blanco A, Burr J. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in ophthalmicjournals. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89:261-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2004.051862 PMID: 15722299
14. Paranjothy B, Shunmugam M, Azuara-Blanco A. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using scanning laserpolarimetry. J Glaucoma. 2007; 16:670-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3180457c6d PMID: 18091453
15. Hong PJ, Korevaar DA, McGrath TA, Ziai H, Frank R, Alabousi M, et al. Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017 Jun 22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25797 PMID: 28640484
16. Choi YJ, Chung MS, Koo HJ, Park JE, Yoon HM, Park SH. Doesthe Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, as Defined by STARD 2015, Affect Citation? Korean J Radiol. 2016; 17:706-14. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.706 PMID: 27587959
17. Michelessi M, Lucenteforte E, Oddone F, Brazzelli M, Parravano M, Franchi S, et al. Optic nerve head and fibre layer imaging for diagnosing glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 30; (11): CD008803. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008803.pub2 PMID: 26618332
18. Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Hooft L, Moher D, et al. STARD Group. STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts. BMJ 2017; 358:j3751. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3751 PMID: 28819063
19. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al.; QUADAS-2 Group. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155:529-36. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 PMID: 22007046
20. Lisboa R, Weinreb RN, Medeiros FA. Combining structure and function to evaluate glaucomatous progression: implications for the design of clinical trials. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2013; 13:115-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2012.10.010 PMID: 23219155
21. Egger M, Jüni P, Bartlett C; CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials). Value of flow diagrams in report of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2001; 285:1996-9. PMID: 11308437
22. Korevaar DA, van Enst WA, Spijker R, Bossuyt PM, Hooft L. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD. Evid Based Med. 2014; 19:47-54. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2013-101637 PMID: 24368333
23. Fidalgo BM, Crabb DP, Lawrenson JG. Methodology and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of automated perimetry in glaucoma: evaluation using a standardized approach. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015; 35:315-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12208 PMID: 25913874