Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 523-544

  Hong, Patrick Jiho ^a   Korevaar, Daniel A ^b   McGrath, Trevor A ^a   Ziai, Hedyeh ^a   Frank, Robert ^a   Alabousi, Mostafa ^a   Bossuyt, Patrick M M ^b   McInnes, Matthew D F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

guidelines; reporting; risk of bias; STARD

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; REGISTRATION; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; METHODOLOGY; PUBLICATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 85021205608     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25797     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. McGrath T, McInnes M, Korevaar D, Bossuyt P. Meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in imaging journals: analysis of pooling techniques and their effect on summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2016;281:78–85.
2. Tunis AS, McInnes MD, Hanna R, Esmail K. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? Radiology 2013;269:413–426.
3. Lim CS, McInnes MD, Lim RS, et al. Prognostic value of Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System (PI-RADS) v. 2 assessment categories 4 and 5 compared to histopathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017;46:257–266.
4. Schieda N, Lim CS, Idris M, et al. MRI assessment of pathological stage and surgical margins in anterior prostate cancer (APC) using subjective and quantitative analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017;45:1296–1303.
5. Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM. Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68:708–715.
6. Korevaar DA, Wang J, van Enst WA, et al. Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD. Radiology 2015;274:781–789.
7. Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, de Ronde MW, Virgili G, Dickersin K, Bossuyt PM. Reporting weaknesses in conference abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies in ophthalmology. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015:1–5.
8. Dilauro M, McInnes MD, Korevaar DA, et al. Is there an association between STARD statement adherence and citation rate? Radiology 2016;280:62–67.
9. Korevaar DA, van Enst WA, Spijker R, Bossuyt PM, Hooft L. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD. Evid Based Med 2014;19:47–54.
10. Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, et al. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 2005;235:347–353.
11. Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, et al. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved? Neurology 2006;67:792–797.
12. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Radiology 2003;226:24–28.
13. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Acad Radiol 2003;10:664–669.
14. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Clin Radiol 2003;58:575–580.
15. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:51–55.
16. Wilczynski NL. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: no change since STARD statement publication—before-and-after study. Radiology 2008;248:817–823.
17. Maclean EN, Stone IS, Ceelen F, Garcia-Albeniz X, Sommer WH, Petersen SE. Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: analysis of the impact of STARD criteria. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:691–700.
18. Walther S, Schueler S, Tackmann R, Schuetz GM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M. Compliance with STARD checklist among studies of coronary CT angiography: systematic review. Radiology 2014;271:74–86.
19. Choi YJ, Chung MS, Koo HJ, Park JE, Yoon HM, Park SH. Does the reporting quality of diagnostic test accuracy studies, as defined by STARD 2015, affect citation? Korean J Radiol 2016;17:706–714.
20. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 2015:151516.
21. Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Altman DG, et al. STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open 2016;6:e012799.
22. Devillé WL, Bezemer PD, Bouter LM. Publications on diagnostic test evaluation in family medicine journals: an optimal search strategy. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:65–79.
23. Reuters T. Science citation index expanded - radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging - journal list: Thomson Reuters; 2015 [cited 2015 April 15, 2015]. Available from: http://science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=D&SC=VY.
24. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174.
25. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Group Q-S. A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:1093–1104.
26. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:25.
27. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:529–536.
28. Charles P, Giraudeau B, Dechartres A, Baron G, Ravaud P. Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review. BMJ 2009;338:b1732.
29. Mann E, Nguyen N, Fleischer S, Meyer G. Compliance with trial registration in five core journals of clinical geriatrics: a survey of original publications on randomised controlled trials from 2008 to 2012. Age Ageing 2014;43:872–876.
30. Huser V, Cimino JJ. Evaluating adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' policy of mandatory, timely clinical trial registration. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:e169–174.
31. Korevaar DA, Ochodo EA, Bossuyt PM, Hooft L. Publication and reporting of test accuracy studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. Clin Chem 2014;60:651–659.
32. Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000217.