The logic of counterfactual analysis in case-study explanation

British Journal of Sociology

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 306-338

  Mahoney, James ^a   Barrenechea, Rodrigo ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

case studies; possible worlds; qualitative methodology; Sets

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; HUMAN; LOGIC; POLITICS; SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY; THINKING; WAR;

ARMED CONFLICTS; COGNITION; HUMANS; LOGIC; POLITICS; SOCIAL THEORY; THINKING;

EID: 85038431588     PISSN: 00071315     EISSN: 14684446     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12340     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abadie, A., Diamond, A. and Hainmueller, J. 2015 ‘Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method’, American Journal of Political Science 59: 495–510.
2. Arthur, W.B. 1994 Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
3. Beach, D. Forthcoming. ‘Achieving Methodological Alignment When Combining QCA and Process Tracing in Practice’, Sociological Methods and Research.
4. Beach, D. and Rohlfing, I. Forthcoming. ‘Integrating Cross-Case Analyses and Process Tracing in Set-Theoretic Research: Strategies and Parameters of Debate’, Sociological Methods and Research.
5. Blatter, J. and Haverland, M. 2012 Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
6. Bradley, R. and Swartz, N. 1979 Possible Worlds: An Introduction to Logic and its Philosophy, Indianapolis: Hackett.
7. Brooks, S.G. and Wohlforth, W.C. 2007a ‘Power, Globalization, and the End of the Cold War: Reevaluating a Landmark Case for Ideas’, in G. Goertz and J.S. Levy (eds), Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals, New York: Routledge, 195–236.
8. Brooks, S.G., and Wohlforth, W.C. 2007b ‘New Versus Old Thinking in Qualitative Research’, in G. Goertz and J.S. Levy (eds), Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals, New York: Routledge, 261–80.
9. Capoccia, G. 2015 ‘Critical Junctures and Institutional Change’, in J. Mahoney and K. Thelen (eds), Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 147–79.
10. Capoccia, G. and Keleman, R.D. 2007 ‘The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Institutional Analysis’, World Politics 59: 341–69.
11. Casati, R. and Varzi, A. 2015 ‘Events’, in E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring edn), available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/events/
12. David, P.A. 1985 ‘Clio and the Economics of QWERTY’, American Economic Review 75: 332–7.
13. Divers, J. 2002 Possible Worlds, London: Routledge.
14. Elster, J. 1978 Logic and Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds, Chichester: Wiley.
15. English, R. 2007 ‘Perestroika without Politics: How Realism Misunderstands the Cold War's End’, in G. Goertz and J.S. Levy (eds), Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals, New York: Routledge, 237–60.
16. Fearon, J. 1991 ‘Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science’, World Politics 43: 169–95.
17. Fearon, J. 1996 ‘Causes and Counterfactuals in Social Science: Exploring an Analogy between Cellular Automata and Historical Processes’, in P. Tetlock and A. Belkin (eds), Counterfactual Analysis in World Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Gardina Pestana, C. 2006 ‘Nineteenth-Century British Imperialism Undone with a Single Shell Fragment’, in P.E. Tetlock, R.N. Lebow and G. Parker (eds), Unmaking the West: ‘What if?’ Scenarios that Rewrite World History, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 197–202.
19. George, A.L. and Bennett, A. 2005 Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Girle, R. 2003 Possible Worlds, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
21. Goertz, G. 2006 ‘Assessing the Trivialness, Relevance, and Relative Importance of Necessary or Sufficient Conditions in Social Science’, Studies in Comparative International Development 41: 88–109.
22. Goertz, G. 2017 Multimethod Research, Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies: An Integrated Approach, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Goertz, G. and Levy, J.S. 2007 ‘Causal Explanation, Necessary Conditions, and Case Studies’, in G. Goertz and J.S. Levy (eds), Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals, New York: Routledge, 9–45.
24. Goertz, G. and Starr, H. eds. 2003 Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
25. Goldstone, J.A. 2006 ‘Europe's Peculiar Path: Would the World be “Modern” if William III's Invasion of England in 1688 Had Failed?’ in P.E. Tetlock, R.N. Lebow and G. Parker (eds), Unmaking the West: ‘What if?’ Scenarios that Rewrite World History, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 168–96.
26. Goodman, N. 1947 ‘The Problem of Counterfactual Conditionals’, Journal of Philosophy 44: 113–28.
27. Hale, B. 2013 Necessary Beings: An Essay on Ontology, Modality, and the Relations between Them, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Hart, H.L.A. and Honoré, A.M. 1985 Causality in the Law, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Harvey, F.P. 2012 Explaining the Iraq War: Counterfactual Theory, Logic, and Evidence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Harvey, F.P. 2015 ‘“What If” History Matters: Comparative Counterfactual Analysis and Policy Relevance’, Security Studies 24: 413–24.
31. King, G. and Zeng, L. 2006 ‘The Dangers of Extreme Counterfactuals’, Political Analysis 14: 131–59.
32. King, G. and Zeng, L. 2007 ‘When Can History Be Our Guide? The Pitfalls of Counterfactual Inference’, International Studies Quarterly 51: 183–210.
33. Koivu, K.L. 2016 ‘The Sufficiency of Offensive Doctrine: Counterfactual Analysis and the New History of World War I’, Manuscript, University of New Mexico.
34. Lakoff, G. and Núñez, R.E. 2000 Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being, New York: Basic Books.
35. Lebow, R.N. 2007 ‘Contingency, Catalysts and Nonlinear Change: The Origins of World War I’, in G. Goertz and J.S. Levy (eds), Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals, New York: Routledge, 85–111.
36. Lebow, R.N. 2010 Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37. Levy, J.S. 2008 ‘Counterfactuals and Case Studies’, in J.M. Box-Steffensmeier, H.E. Brady, and D. Collier (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Levy, J.S. 2015 ‘Counterfactuals, Causal Inference, and Historical Analysis’, Security Studies 24: 378–402.
39. Lewis, D. 1973 Counterfactuals, Oxford: Blackwell.
40. Lewis, D. 1986 On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford: Blackwell.
41. Mackie, J.L. 1980 Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Mahoney, J. 2000 ‘Path Dependence in Historical Sociology’, Theory and Society 29: 507–48.
43. Mahoney, J. 2008 ‘Toward a Unified Theory of Causality’, Comparative Political Studies 41: 412–36.
44. Mahoney, J., Kimball, E. and Koivu, K. 2009 ‘The Logic of Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences’, Comparative Political Studies 42: 114–46.
45. Menzel, C. 2015 ‘Possible Worlds’, in E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring edn), available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/possible-worlds/.
46. Mikkelsen, K.S. 2017 ‘Fuzzy-Set Case Studies’, Sociological Methods and Research 46: 422–55.
47. Moore, B. Jr 1966 Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
48. Morgan, S.L. and Winship, C. 2015 Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Pearl, J. 2000 Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Pierson, P. 2004 Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Przeworski, A. and Teune, H. 1980 The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry, New York: John Wiley.
52. Ragin, C.C. 1987 The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
53. Ragin, C.C. 2000 Fuzzy-Set Social Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Ragin, C.C. 2008 Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55. Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C.C. eds. 2008 Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56. Roberts, C. 1996 The Logic of Historical Explanation, University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
57. Rohlfing, I. 2012 Case Studies and Causal Inference: An Integrative Approach, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
58. Schneider, C.Q. and Rohlfing, I. 2013 ‘Combining QCA and Process Tracing in Set-Theoretic Multi-Method Research’, Sociological Methods and Research 42: 559–97.
59. Schneider, C.Q. and Rohlfing, I. 2016 ‘Case Studies Nested in Fuzzy-Set QCA on Sufficiency: Formalizing Case Selection and Causal Inference’, Sociological Methods and Research 45: 526–68.
60. Schneider, C.Q. and Rohlfing, I. Forthcoming. ‘A Unifying Framework for Causal Research in Set-Theoretic Multi-Method Research’, Sociological Methods and Research.
61. Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. 2012 Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Soifer, H.D. 2015 State Building in Latin America, New York: Cambridge University Press.
63. Stalnaker, R.C. 2003 Ways a World Might Be: Metaphysical and Anti-Metaphysical Essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
64. Stalnaker, R. 2012 Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65. Tetlock, P.E. and Belkin, A. 1996a ‘Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives’, in P.E. Tetlock and A. Belkin (eds), Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66. Tetlock, P.E. and Belkin, A. eds. 1996b Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67. Tetlock, P.E. and Parker, G. 2006 ‘Why We Can't Live Without Them and How We Must Learn to Live with Them’, in P.E. Tetlock, R.N. Lebow and G. Parker (eds), Unmaking the West: ‘What if?’ Scenarios that Rewrite World History, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 14–44.
68. Weber, M. 1949 ‘Objective Possibility and Adequate Causation in Historical Explanation’, in M. Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Glencoe, NY: Free Press.
69. Woodward, J. and Hitchcock, C. 2003 ‘Explanatory Generalizations, Part I: A Counterfactual Account’, Nous 37: 1–24.