Case Studies Nested in Fuzzy-set QCA on Sufficiency: Formalizing Case Selection and Causal Inference

Sociological Methods and Research

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 526-568

  Schneider, Carsten Q ^a   Rohlfing, Ingo ^b  

^a CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

case selection; causal inference; counterfactuals; fuzzy sets; multimethod research; QCA

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977573060     PISSN: 00491241     EISSN: 15528294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0049124114532446     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. C.H.AchenChristopher H.2005. “Two Cheers for Charles Ragin.” Studies in Comparative International Development40:27–32.
2. J.A.AlemánJosé A.2010. Labor Relations in New Democracies: East Asia, Latin America, and Europe. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
3. M.BaumgartnerMichael. 2009. “Inferring Causal Complexity.” Sociological Methods & Research38:71–101.
4. M.BaumgartnerMichael. 2013a. “Detecting Causal Chains in Small-n Data.” Field Methods25:3–24.
5. M.BaumgartnerMichael. 2013b. “Parsimony and Causality.” Quality & Quantity.
6. M.BaumgartnerMichaelR.EppleRuedi. 2013. “A Coincidence Analysis of a Causal Chain: The Swiss Minaret Vote.” Sociological Methods & Research. doi:10.1177/0049124113502948
7. D.BeachDerekR.B.PedersenRasmus Brun. 2013. Process-tracing Methods. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8. A.BennettAndrewC.ElmanColin. 2006. “Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods.” Annual Review of Political Science9:455–76.
9. D.Berg-SchlosserDirkG.D.MeurGisèle DeC.C.RaginCharles C.B.RihouxBenoît. 2008. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis as an approach.” Pp. 1–18 in Configurational Comparative Methods, edited by. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. J.BlatterJoachimM.HaverlandMarkus. 2012. Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-n Research. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
11. B.F.BraumoellerBear F.G.GoertzGary. 2000. “The Methodology of Necessary Conditions.” American Journal of Political Science44:844–58.
12. M.BunzlMartin. 2004. “Counterfactual History: A User’s Guide.” American Historical Review109:845–58.
13. N.CarenNealA.PanofskyAaron. 2005. “TQCA: A Technique for Adding Temporality to Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Sociological Methods & Research34:147–72.
14. D.CollierDavidJ.LaPorteJodyJ.SeawrightJason. 2012. “Putting Typologies to Work: Concept Formation, Measurement, and Analytic Rigor.” Political Research Quarterly65:217–32.
15. H.EcksteinHarry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” Pp. 79–137 in Strategies of Inquiry. Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7, edited by.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16. P.EmmeneggerPatrick. 2011. “How Good Are Your Counterfactuals? Assessing Quantitative Macro-comparative Welfare State Research with Qualitative Criteria.” Journal of European Social Policy21:365–80.
17. T.G.FalletiTulia G.J.F.LynchJulia F. 2009. “Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies42:1143–66.
18. J.D.FearonJames D.D.LaitinDavid. 2008. “Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.” Pp. 756–76 in The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, edited by. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
19. A.L.GeorgeAlexander L.A.BennettAndrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. J.GerringJohn. 2007. “Is There a (Viable) Crucial-case Method?” Comparative Political Studies40:231–53.
21. J.GerringJohn. 2012. Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22. A.GoerresAchimK.PrinzenKatrin. 2012. “Using Mixed Methods for the Analysis of Individuals: A Review of Necessary and Sufficient Conditions and an Application to Welfare State Attitudes.” Quality & Quantity46:415–50.
23. G.GoertzGaryJ.MahoneyJames. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Qualitative and Quantitative Paradigms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. G.GoertzGaryH.StarrHarvey. 2003. Necessary Conditions. Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
25. S.C.GordonSanford C.A.SmithAlastair. 2004. “Quantitative Leverage through Qualitative Knowledge: Augmenting the Statistical Analysis of Complex Causes.” Political Analysis12:233–55.
26. P.A.HallPeter A.2008. “Systematic Process Analysis: When and How to Use it.” European Political Science7:304–17.
27. P.HedströmPeterP.YlikoskiPetri. 2010. “Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology36:49–67.
28. D.KühnDavidI.RohlfingIngo. 2010. “Causal Explanation and Multi-method Research in the Social Sciences.” IPSA Committee on Concepts and Methods, Working Paper Series Political Methodology, no. 26.
29. R.N.LebowRichard Ned. 2010. Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30. J.LevyJack. 2008. “Counterfactuals and Case Studies.” Pp. 627–44 in Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, edited by. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. J.S.LevyJack S.G.GoertzGary. 2007. Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals. London, England: Routledge.
32. D.K.LewisDavid K.1973a. “Causation.” The Journal of Philosophy70:556–67.
33. D.K.LewisDavid K.1973b. Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. E.S.LiebermanEvan S.2005. “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-method Strategy for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review99:435–52.
35. A.LijphartArend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review65:682–93.
36. J.W.LucasJeffrey W.2003. “Theory-testing, Generalization, and the Problem of External Validity.” Sociological Theory21:236–53.
37. P.MachamerPeter. 2004. “Activities and Causation: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Mechanisms.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science18:27–39.
38. P.MachamerPeterL.DardenLindleyC.F.CraverCarl F. 2000. “Thinking about Mechanisms.” Philosophy of Science67:1–25.
39. J.L.MackieJohn L.1974. The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
40. J.MahoneyJames. 2012. “The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences.” Sociological Methods & Research41:570–97.
41. J.MahoneyJamesE.KimballErinK.L.KoivuKendra L. 2009. “The Logic of Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences.” Comparative Political Studies42:114–46.
42. P.A.MelloPatrick A.2012. “A Critical Review of Applications in QCA and Fuzzy-set Analysis and a ‘Toolbox’ of Proven Solutions to Frequently Encountered Problems.” Paper presented at the APSA 2012 Annual Meeting.
43. B.A.MostBenjamin A.H.StarrHarvey. 1989. Inquiry, Logic, and International Politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
44. P.PenningsPaul. 2003. “Beyond Dichotomous Explanations: Explaining Constitutional Control of the Executive with Fuzzy-sets.” European Journal of Political Research42:541–67.
45. C.C.RaginCharles C.1987. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Quantitative and Qualitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of Berkeley Press.
46. C.C.RaginCharles C.2000. Fuzzy-set Social Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. C.C.RaginCharles C.2006. “How to Lure Analytic Social Science Out of the Doldrums: Some Lessons from Comparative Research.” International Sociology21:633–46.
48. C.C.RaginCharles C.2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
49. C.C.RaginCharles C.G.A.SchneiderGarrett Andrew. 2011. “Case-oriented Theory Building and Theory Testing.” Pp. 150–66 in The SAGE Handbook of Innovations in Social Research Methods, edited by. London, England: Sage.
50. B.RihouxBenoîtB.LobeBojana. 2009. “The Case of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Adding Leverage for Cross-case Comparison.” Pp. 222–42 in The Sage Handbook of Case-based Methods, edited by. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
51. I.RohlfingIngo. 2008. “What You See and What You Get: Pitfalls and Principles of Nested Analysis in Comparative Research.” Comparative Political Studies41:1492–514.
52. I.RohlfingIngo. 2012. Case Studies and Causal Inference: An Integrative Framework. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
53. I.RohlfingIngoC.Q.SchneiderCarsten Q. 2013. “Improving Research on Necessary Conditions: Formalized Case Selection for Process Tracing after QCA.” Political Research Quarterly66:220–35.
54. I.RohlfingIngoP.StarkePeter. 2013. “Building on Solid Ground: A Procedure for Robust Case Selection in Mixed-methods Research.” Swiss Political Science Review19:492–512.
55. S.SamfordSteven. 2010. Averting “Disruption and Reversal”: Reassessing the Logic of Rapid Trade Reform in Latin America.” Politics & Society38:373–407.
56. G.SartoriGiovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review64:1033–53.
57. J.SchafferJonathan. 2003. “Overdetermining Causes.” Philosophical Studies114:23–46.
58. C.Q.SchneiderCarsten Q.2008. The Consolidation of Democracy: Comparing Europe and Latin America. London, England: Routledge.
59. C.Q.SchneiderCarsten Q.I.RohlfingIngo. 2012. “Does Set-relational Causation Fit into a Potential Outcomes Framework? An Assessment of Gerring’s Proposal.” Newsletter of the APSA Section on Qualitative Methods and Multi-Methods Research(Spring):8–14.
60. C.Q.SchneiderCarsten Q.I.RohlfingIngo. 2013. “Combining QCA and Process Tracing in Set-theoretic Multi-method Research.” Sociological Methods & Research42:559–97.
61. C.Q.SchneiderCarsten Q.C.WagemannClaudius. 2012. Set-theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
62. C.Q.SchneiderCarsten Q.C.WagemannClaudius. 2013. “Doing Justice to Logical Remainders in QCA: Moving Beyond the Standard Analysis.” Political Research Quarterly66:211–220.
63. J.SeawrightJasonJ.GerringJohn. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly61:294–308.
64. A.Segura-UbiergoAlex. 2007. The Political Economy of the Welfare State in Latin America: Globalization, Democracy, and Development. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
65. S.-E.SkaaningSvend-Erik. 2011. “Assessing the Robustness of Crisp-set and Fuzzy-set QCA Results.” Sociological Methods & Research40:391–408.
66. A.Steglich-Petersen2012. “Against the Contrastive Account of Singular Causation.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science63:115–43.
67. J.SteinerJürgA.BächtigerAndréM.SpörndliMarkusM.SteenbergenMarco. 2004. The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy: Empirical Research and Normative Implications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
68. O.StrijbisOliver. 2013. “Prototypical Weighting: Toward a Solution for Macrosociological Comparisons of Fuzzy Cases.” Sociological Methods & Research42:458–82.
69. A.SuzukiN.Loizides. 2011. “Escalation of Interstate Crises of Conflictual Dyads: Greece-Turkey and India-Pakistan.” Cooperation and Conflict46:21–39.
70. B.VisBarbara. 2012. “The Comparative Advantages of fsQCA and Regression Analysis for Moderately Large-n Analyses.” Sociological Methods & Research41:168–98.