Gene expression trade-offs between defence and growth in English elm induced by Ophiostoma novo-ulmi

Plant Cell and Environment

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 198-214

  Perdiguero, Pedro ^a,b   Sobrino Plata, Juan ^a   Venturas, Martin ^a,c   Martín, Juan Antonio ^a   Gil, Luis ^a   Collada, Carmen ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGIA EXPERIMENTAL E TECNOLÓGICA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Dutch elm disease; microarrays; plant immune system; systemic acquired resistance; Ulmus minor; vascular pathogen

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; ARRAY; CLONE; FUNGAL DISEASE; FUNGUS; GENE EXPRESSION; HOMOLOGY; IMMUNE SYSTEM; INOCULATION; TRADE-OFF; XYLEM;

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; FUNGI; OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI; ULMUS; ULMUS MINOR; ULMUS PROCERA;

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA MICROARRAY; DOWN REGULATION; ELM; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; IMMUNOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; OPHIOSTOMA; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT DISEASE; PLANT GENE; REPRODUCIBILITY; UPREGULATION; XYLEM;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DOWN-REGULATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC MARKERS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; OPHIOSTOMA; PLANT DISEASES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ULMUS; UP-REGULATION; XYLEM;

EID: 85038412076     PISSN: 01407791     EISSN: 13653040     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/pce.13085     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Adie, B. A. T., Pérez-Pérez, J., Pérez-Pérez, M. M., Godoy, M., Sánchez-Serrano, J. J., Schmelz, E. A., & Solano, R. (2007). ABA is an essential signal for plant resistance to pathogens affecting JA biosynthesis and the activation of defenses in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 19, 1665–1681.
2. Al-Shahrour, F., Díaz-Uriarte, R., & Dopazo, J. (2004). FatiGO: A web tool for finding significant associations of Gene Ontology terms with groups of genes. Bioinformatics, 20, 578–580.
3. Anderbrant, O., Yuvaraj, J., Martin, J., Gil, L., & Witzell, J. (2017). Feeding by Scolytus bark beetles to test for differently susceptible elm varieties. Journal of Applied Entomology, 141(5), 417–420.
4. Aoun, M., Jacobi, V., Boyle, B., & Bernier, L. (2010). Identification and monitoring of Ulmus americana transcripts during in vitro interactions with the Dutch elm disease pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 74, 254–266.
5. Aoun, M., Rioux, D., Simard, M., & Bernier, L. (2009). Fungal colonization and host defense reactions in Ulmus americana callus cultures inoculated with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Phytopathology, 99, 642–650.
6. Bernier, L., Aoun, M., Bouvet, G., Comeau, A., Dufour, J., Naruzawa, E., … Plourde, K. (2015). Genomics of the Dutch elm disease pathosystem: Are we there yet? iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 8, 149–157.
7. Brasier, C. M. (2000). Intercontinental spread and continuing evolution of the Dutch elm disease pathogens. In C.P. Dunn (Ed.), The Elms: breeding, conservation and diseasemanagement (pp. 61–72). Boston, MA: Springer.
8. Breitling, R., Armengaud, P., Amtmann, A., & Herzyk, P. (2004). Rank products: A simple, yet powerful, new method to detect differentially regulated genes in replicated microarray experiments. FEBS Letters, 573, 83–92.
9. Büchel, K., McDowell, E., Nelson, W., Descour, A., Gershenzon, J., Hilker, M., … Meiners, T. (2012). An elm EST database for identifying leaf beetle egg-induced defense genes. BMC Genomics, 13, 242.
10. Chang, S., Puryear, J., & Cairney, J. (1993). A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 11, 113–116.
11. Chattaway, M. M. (1949). The development of tyloses and secretion of gum in·heartwood formation. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 2, 227–240.
12. Davies, P. J. (2010). The plant hormones: Their nature, occurrence, and functions. In P. J. Davies (Ed.), Plant hormones: Biosynthesis, signal transduction, action! (pp. 1–15). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
13. Denancé, N., Ranocha, P., Oria, N., Barlet, X., Rivière, M. P., Yadeta, K. A., … Goffner, D. (2013). Arabidopsis wat1 (walls are thin1)-mediated resistance to the bacterial vascular pathogen, Ralstonia solanacearum, is accompanied by cross-regulation of salicylic acid and tryptophan metabolism. The Plant Journal, 73, 225–239.
14. Domínguez Lerena, S. (2002). Lucha contra una condena letal: La grafiosis está provocando la extinción del olmo en todo el mundo. Ambienta: La revista del Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, 14, 35–40.
15. Dumolin, S., Demesure, B., & Petit, R. (1995). Inheritance of chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes in pedunculate oak investigated with an efficient PCR method. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 91, 1253–1256.
16. Dunn, C. P. (2000). In C.P. Dunn (Ed.), The Elms: breeding, conservation and disease management. Boston, MA: Springer.
17. Ellison, A. M., Bank, M. S., Clinton, B. D., Colburn, E. A., Elliott, K., Ford, C. R., … Lovett, G. M. (2005). Loss of foundation species: Consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3, 479–486.
18. Faccoli M. & Battisti A. (1997) Observations on the transmission of Ophiostoma ulmi by the smaller elm bark beetles (Scolytus spp.). Paper presented at the Proceedings of a IUFRO Meeting: Integrating Cultural Tactics Into the Management of Bark Beetles and Reforestation Pests, September 1–3, 1996, Vallombrosa, Italy.
19. Feys, B. J., Moisan, L. J., Newman, M. A., & Parker, J. E. (2001). Direct interaction between the Arabidopsis disease resistance signaling proteins, EDS1 and PAD4. The EMBO Journal, 20, 5400–5411.
20. Feys, B. J., Wiermer, M., Bhat, R. A., Moisan, L. J., Medina-Escobar, N., Neu, C., … Parker, J. E. (2005). Arabidopsis SENESCENCE-ASSOCIATED GENE101 stabilizes and signals within an ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY1 complex in plant innate immunity. The Plant Cell, 17, 2601–2613.
21. Gil, L., Fuentes-Utrilla, P., Soto, A., Cervera, M. T., & Collada, C. (2004). English elm is a 2,000-year-old Roman clone. Nature, 431, 1053–1053.
22. Giordano, R., Salleo, A., Salleo, S., & Wanderlingh, F. (1978). Flow in xylem vessels and Poiseuille's law. Canadian Journal of Botany, 56, 333–338.
23. Gruner, K., Griebel, T., Návarová, H., Attaran, E., & Zeier, J. (2013). Reprogramming of plants during systemic acquired resistance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4, 252.
24. Gururani, M. A., Venkatesh, J., Upadhyaya, C. P., Nookaraju, A., Pandey, S. K., & Park, S. W. (2012). Plant disease resistance genes: Current status and future directions. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 78, 51–65.
25. Hong, F., Breitling, R., McEntee, C. W., Wittner, B. S., Nemhauser, J. L., & Chory, J. (2006). RankProd: A bioconductor package for detecting differentially expressed genes in meta-analysis. Bioinformatics, 22, 2825–2827.
26. Hu, Y., Dong, Q., & Yu, D. (2012). Arabidopsis WRKY46 coordinates with WRKY70 and WRKY53 in basal resistance against pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Science, 185, 288–297.
27. Huot, B., Yao, J., Montgomery, B. L., & He, S. Y. (2014). Growth–defense tradeoffs in plants: A balancing act to optimize fitness. Molecular Plant, 7, 1267–1287.
28. Jeng, R., Alfenas, A., Hubbes, M., & Dumas, M. (1983). Presence and accumulation of fungitoxic substances against Ceratocystis ulmi in Ulmus americana: Possible relation to induced resistance. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 13, 239–244.
29. Jones, J. D., & Dangl, J. L. (2006). The plant immune system. Nature, 444, 323–329.
30. Kovalchuk, A., Keriö, S., Oghenekaro, A. O., Jaber, E., Raffaello, T., & Asiegbu, F. O. (2013). Antimicrobial defenses and resistance in forest trees: Challenges and perspectives in a genomic era. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 51, 221–244.
31. Krause, C., Ichida, J., Schreiber, L., & Domir, S. (1996). Host-parasite relationships of susceptible and resistant elm callus cultures challenged with Ophiostoma ulmi (Buisman) Nannf. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 14, 33–38.
32. Li, M., López, R., Venturas, M., Martín, J. A., Domínguez, J., Gordaliza, G. G., … Rodríguez-Calcerrada, J. (2016). Physiological and biochemical differences among Ulmus minor genotypes showing a gradient of resistance to Dutch elm disease. Forest Pathology, 46, 215–228.
33. MacMillan, C. P., Mansfield, S. D., Stachurski, Z. H., Evans, R., & Southerton, S. G. (2010). Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins: Specialization for stem biomechanics and cell wall architecture in Arabidopsis and Eucalyptus. The Plant Journal, 62, 689–703.
34. Magel, E., Jay-Allemand, C., & Ziegler, H. (1994). Formation of heartwood substances in the stemwood of Robinia pseudoacacia L. II. Distribution of nonstructural carbohydrates and wood extractives across the trunk. Trees, 8, 165–171.
35. Makandar, R., Nalam, V. J., Chowdhury, Z., Sarowar, S., Klossner, G., Lee, H., … Parker, J. E. (2015). The combined action of ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY1, PHYTOALEXIN DEFICIENT4, and SENESCENCE-ASSOCIATED101 promotes salicylic acid-mediated defenses to limit Fusarium graminearum infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 28, 943–953.
36. Mao, G., Meng, X., Liu, Y., Zheng, Z., Chen, Z., & Zhang, S. (2011). Phosphorylation of a WRKY transcription factor by two pathogen-responsive MAPKs drives phytoalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 23, 1639–1653.
37. Martín, J., Fuentes-Utrilla, P., & Witzel, J. (2010). Ecological factors in Dutch elm disease complex in Europe—A review. In L. Magnus, J. Brunet, L. Mattson & M. Nylinder (Eds.), Ecological Bulletins, Bulletin 53, Broadleaved Forests in Southern Sweden: Management for Multiple Goals (pp. 209–224). Lund, Sweden: Wiley-Blackwell.
38. Martín, J., Solla, A., Burón, M., López-Almansa, J., & Gil, L. (2006). Caracterización histórica, ecológica, taxonómica y fitosanitaria de una olmeda relicta en Rivas-Vaciamadrid (Madrid). Investigación agraria. Sistemas y recursos forestales, 15, 208–217.
39. Martín, J., Solla, A., Coimbra, M., & Gil, L. (2008). Metabolic fingerprinting allows discrimination between Ulmus pumila and U. minor, and between U. minor clones of different susceptibility to Dutch elm disease. Forest Pathology, 38, 244–256.
40. Martín, J., Solla, A., Woodward, S., & Gil, L. (2007). Detection of differential changes in lignin composition of elm xylem tissues inoculated with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi using Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy. Forest Pathology, 37, 187–191.
41. Martín, J. A., Solla, A., Coimbra, M. A., & Gil, L. (2005). Metabolic distinction of Ulmus minor xylem tissues after inoculation with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Phytochemistry, 66, 2458–2467.
42. Martín, J. A., Solla, A., Esteban, L. G., de Palacios, P., & Gil, L. (2009). Bordered pit and ray morphology involvement in elm resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 39, 420–429.
43. Martín, J. A., Solla, A., Venturas, M., Collada, C., Domínguez, J., Miranda, E., … Gil, L. (2015). Seven Ulmus minor clones tolerant to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi registered as forest reproductive material in Spain. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 8, 172–180.
44. Mittler, R. (2002). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends in Plant Science, 7, 405–410.
45. Moore, J. W., Loake, G. J., & Spoel, S. H. (2011). Transcription dynamics in plant immunity. The Plant Cell, 23, 2809–2820.
46. Nasmith, C., Jeng, R., & Hubbes, M. (2008). A comparison of in vivo targeted gene expression during fungal colonization of DED-susceptible Ulmus americana. Forest Pathology, 38, 104–112.
47. Nordin, J. H., & Strobel, G. A. (1981). Structural and immunochemical studies on the phytotoxic peptidorhamnomannan of Ceratocystis ulmi. Plant Physiology, 67, 1208–1213.
48. Ouellette G.B. (2008) Close-ups on aspects of fungal wilt diseases [online]. Available from www.wilt-ism.net [accessed 5 September 2016].
49. Ouellette, G. B., Rioux, D., Simard, M., & Cherif, M. (2004). Ultrastructural and cytochemical studies of host and pathogens in some fungal wilt diseases: Retro- and introspection towards a better understanding of DED. Forest Systems, 13, 119–145.
50. Pandey, S. P., Roccaro, M., Schön, M., Logemann, E., & Somssich, I. E. (2010). Transcriptional reprogramming regulated by WRKY18 and WRKY40 facilitates powdery mildew infection of Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 64, 912–923.
51. Perdiguero P., Venturas M., Cervera M.T., Gil L. & Collada C. (2015a) Data from: Massive sequencing of Ulmus minor's transcriptome provides new molecular tools for a genus under the constant threat of Dutch elm disease. Dryad Digital Repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.ps837.
52. Perdiguero, P., Venturas, M., Cervera, M. T., Gil, L., & Collada, C. (2015b). Massive sequencing of Ulmus minor's transcriptome provides new molecular tools for a genus under the constant threat of Dutch elm disease. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 541.
53. Pfaffl, M. W. (2001). A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Research, 29, 6.
54. Pieterse, C. M., Leon-Reyes, A., Van der Ent, S., & Van Wees, S. C. (2009). Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity. Nature Chemical Biology, 5, 308–316.
55. Pieterse, C. M., Van der Does, D., Zamioudis, C., Leon-Reyes, A., & Van Wees, S. C. (2012). Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 28, 489–521.
56. Pieterse, C. M., Zamioudis, C., Berendsen, R. L., Weller, D. M., Van Wees, S. C., & Bakker, P. A. (2014). Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 52, 347–375.
57. Rioux, D., & Ouellette, G. (1991). Barrier zone formation in host and nonhost trees inoculated with Ophiostoma ulmi. Canadian Journal of Botany, 69, 2055–2083.
58. Saeed, A. I., Bhagabati, N. K., Braisted, J. C., Liang, W., Sharov, V., Howe, E. A., … Quackenbush, J. (2006). TM4 microarray software suite. Methods in Enzymology, 411, 134–193.
59. Shain, L. (1979). Dynamic responses of differentiated sapwood to injury and infection. Phytopathology, 69, 1143–1147.
60. Sherif, S. M., Shukla, M. R., Murch, S. J., Bernier, L., & Saxena, P. K. (2016). Simultaneous induction of jasmonic acid and disease-responsive genes signifies tolerance of American elm to Dutch elm disease. Scientific Reports, 6, 21934.
61. Shigo, A. L., & Marx, H. G. (1977). Compartmentalization of decayin trees. Agriculture Information Bulletin, 405. Washington D.C. USA: United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service.
62. Smyth, G. K. (2004). Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 3(1), 1–25.
63. Smyth, G. K., & Speed, T. (2003). Normalization of cDNA microarray data. Methods, 31, 265–273.
64. Solla, A., Martín, J., Ouellette, G., & Gil, L. (2005). Influence of plant age on symptom development in Ulmus minor following inoculation by Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Plant Disease, 89, 1035–1040.
65. Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., … Lander, E. S. (2005). Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 15545–15550.
66. Takai, S., & Hiratsuka, Y. (1984). Scanning electron microscope observations of internal symptoms of white elm following Ceratocystis ulmi infection and cerato-ulmin treatment. Canadian Journal of Botany, 62, 1365–1371.
67. Van Loon, L., & Van Strien, E. (1999). The families of pathogenesis-related proteins, their activities, and comparative analysis of PR-1 type proteins. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 55, 85–97.
68. Van Loon, L. C., Rep, M., & Pieterse, C. (2006). Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 44, 135–162.
69. Venturas, M., López, R., Martín, J., Gascó, A., & Gil, L. (2014). Heritability of Ulmus minor resistance to Dutch elm disease and its relationship to vessel size, but not to xylem vulnerability to drought. Plant Pathology, 63, 500–509.
70. Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. M. A., & Klessig, D. F. (2009). Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 47, 177–206.
71. Wang, D., Pajerowska-Mukhtar, K., Culler, A. H., & Dong, X. (2007). Salicylic acid inhibits pathogen growth in plants through repression of the auxin signaling pathway. Current Biology, 17, 1784–1790.
72. Wang, H., Jiang, C., Wang, C., Yang, Y., Yang, L., Gao, X., & Zhang, H. (2015). Antisense expression of the fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein FLA6 gene in Populus inhibits expression of its homologous genes and alters stem biomechanics and cell wall composition in transgenic trees. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66, 1291–1302.
73. Yadeta, K., & Thomma, B. (2013). The xylem as battleground for plant hosts and vascular wilt pathogens. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4, 97.