Fungal colonization and host defense reactions in Ulmus americana callus cultures inoculated with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi

Phytopathology

Volumn 99, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 642-650

  Aoun, Mirella ^a   Rioux, Danny ^b   Simard, Marie ^b   Bernier, Louis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHENOL DERIVATIVE; STARCH;

ARTICLE; ELM; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; IMMUNOLOGY; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; OPHIOSTOMA; PATHOGENICITY; PLANT DISEASE; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS; OPHIOSTOMA; PHENOLS; PLANT DISEASES; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; STARCH; ULMUS;

OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI; ULMUS; ULMUS AMERICANA;

EID: 67650021595     PISSN: 0031949X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-99-6-0642     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bernards, M. A., Susag, L. M., Bedgar, D. L., Anterola, A. M., and Lewis, N. G. 2000. Induced phenylpropanoid metabolism during suberization and lignification: A comparative analysis. J. Plant Physiol. 15:601-607.
2. Bernier, L., Breuil, C., Hintz, W. E., Horgen, P. A., Jacobi, V., Dufour, J., Aoun, M., Bouvet, G., Kim, S. H., Diguistini, S., Tanguay, P., Eades, J., Burgess, S., de la Bastide, P., Pinchback, M., and Tadesse, Y. 2004. The Canadian Ophiostoma genome project. Invest. Agrar.: Sist. Recur. For. 13:105-117.
3. Bernier, L., and Hubbes, M. 1990. Mutations in Ophiostoma ulmi induced by N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine. Can. J. Bot. 68:225-231.
4. Biggs, A. R.1984. Intracellular suberin: Occurrence and detection in tree bark. IAWA Bull. 5:243-248.
5. Biggs, A. R. 1985. Suberized boundary zones and the chronology of wound response in tree bark. Phytopathology 75:1191-1195.
6. Bird, P. M. 1988. The role of lignification in plant diseases. Pages 523-536 in: Experimental and Conceptual Plant Phytopathology. R. S. Singh et al., eds. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India.
7. Campana, R. J. 1978. Inoculation and fungal invasion of the tree. Pages 17-20 in: Dutch Elm Disease, Perspectives After 60 Years, Vol. 8. W. A. Sinclair and R. J. Campana, eds. Plant Pathology, Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn., New York State Coll. Agric. Life Sci., Ithaca.
8. Chang, S., Puryear, J., and Cairney, J. 1993. A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 11:113-116.
9. Corchete, M. P., Diez, J. J., and Valle, T. 1993. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity in suspension cultures of Ulmus pumila and U. campestris treated with spores of Ceratocystis ulmi. Plant Cell Rep. 13:111-114.
10. Dai, G. H., Andary, C., Mondolot-Cosson, L., and Boubals, D. 1995. Involvement of phenolic compounds in the resistance of grapevine callus to downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola). Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 101:541-547.
11. Diez, J., and Gil, L. 1998. Effects of Ophiostoma ulmi and Ophiostoma novo-ulmi culture filtrates on elm cultures from genotypes with different susceptibility to Dutch elm disease. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 28:399-407.
12. Dixon, R. A., Dey, P. M., and Lamb, C. J. 1983. Phytoalexins: Enzy-mology and molecular biology. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 55:1-136.
13. Dixon, R. A., and Paiva, N. L. 1995. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 7:1085-1097.
14. Domir, S. C., Schreiber, L. R., and Ichida, J. M. 1991. Factors affecting growth of Ophiostoma ulmi on elm callus tissue. J. Environ. Hort. 9:211-215.
15. Domir, S. C., Schreiber, L. R., Ichida, J. M., and Eshita, S. M. 1992. Effect of elm selection, explant source and medium composition on growth of Ophiostoma ulmi on callus cultures. J. Environ. Hort. 10:59-62.
16. Duchesne, L. C., Hubbes, M., and Jeng, R. S. 1986. Mansonone E and F accumulation in Ulmus pumila resistant to Dutch elm disease. Can. J. For. Res. 16:410-412.
17. Duchesne, L. C., Jeng, R. S., and Hubbes, M. 1985. Accumulation of phytoalexins in Ulmus americana in response to infection by a non-aggressive and an aggressive strain of Ophiostoma ulmi. Can. J. Bot. 63:678-680.
18. Duchesne, L. C., Jeng, R. S., Hubbes, M., and Sticklen, M. B. 1994. Accumulations of mansonones E and F in elm callus cultures inoculated with Ophiostoma ulmi. Can J. Plant Pathol.16:118-121.
19. Eshita, S. M., Kamalay, J. C., Gingas, V. M., and Yaussy, D. A. 2000. Establishment and characterization of American elm cell suspension cultures. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 61:245-249.
20. Et-Touil, A., Brasier, C. M., and Bernier, L., 1999. Localization of a pathogenicity gene in Ophiostoma novo-ulmi and evidence that it may be introgressed from O. ulmi. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 12:6-15.
21. Et-Touil, A., Rioux, D., Mathieu, F. M., and Bernier, L. 2005. External symptoms and histopathological changes following inoculation of elms putatively resistant to Dutch elm disease with genetically close strains of Ophiostoma. Can. J. Bot. 83:656-667.
22. Ghanati, F., Morita, A., and Yokota, H. 2002. Induction of suberin and increase of lignin content by excess boron in tobacco cells. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 48:357-364.
23. Huntley, G. D. 1982. The elm - A resurgent resource or a persistent problem? Pages 103-111 in: Proceedings of Dutch Elm Disease, Symposium and Workshop. E. S. Kondo, Y. Hiratsuka, and W. B. G. Denyer, eds. Environment Canada, Canadian Forestry Service, and Province of Manitoba, Department of Natural Resources, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
24. Jensen, W. A. 1962. Botanical Histochemistry: Principles and Practice. W. R. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
25. Jones, D. H. 1984. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase: Regulation of its induc-tion, and its role in plant development. Phytochemistry 23:1349-1359.
26. Krause, C. R., Ichida, J. M., Schreiber, L. R., and Domir, S. 1996. Host-parasite relationships of susceptible and resistant elm callus cultures challenged with Ophiostoma ulmi (Buisman) Nannf. J. Environ. Hort. 14:33-38.
27. Lee, S.-W., Nazar, R. N., Powell, D. A., and Robb, J. 1992. Reduced PAL gene suppression in Verticillium-infected resistant tomatoes. Plant Mol. Biol. 18:345-352.
28. Mittempergher, L., and Santini, A. 2004. The history of elm breeding. Invest. Agrar.: Sist. Recur. For. 13:161-177.
29. Mould, M. J. R., and Robb, J. 1992. The Colletotrichum trifolii-Medicago sativa interface, in culture: A cytological analysis. Can. J. Bot. 70:114-124.
30. Mullick, D. B. 1975. A new tissue essential to necrophylactic periderm formation in the bark of four conifers. Can. J. Bot. 53:2443-2457.
31. Murashige, T., and Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473-497.
32. Nasmith, C., Jeng, R., and Hubbes, M. 2008. A comparison of in vivo targeted gene expression during fungal colonization of DED-susceptible Ulmus americana. For. Pathol. 38:104-112.
33. Nicole, M., Chamberland, H., Nandris, D., and Ouellette, G. B. 1992. Cellulose is degraded during phloem necrosis of Hevea brasiliensis. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 22:266-277.
34. Oosterhaven, K., Hartmans, K. J., Scheffer, J. J. C., and Vanderplas, L. H. W. 1995. S-carvone inhibits phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity and suberization during wound-healing of potato tubers. J. Plant Physiol. 146:288-294.
35. Ouellette, G. B. 1982. Comparative ultrastructural observations of reactions of xylem parenchyma cells to Ceratocystis ulmi infection in Ulmus spp. Pages 267-297 in: Proceedings of Dutch Elm Disease, Symposium and Workshop. E. S. Kondo, Y. Hiratsuka, and W. B. G. Denyer, eds. Environment Canada, Canadian Forestry Service, and Province of Manitoba, Department of Natural Resources, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
36. Pearce, R. B. 1996. Antimicrobial defences in the wood of living trees. New Phytol. 132:203-233.
37. Pijut, P. M., Domir, S. C., Lineberger, R. D., and Schreiber, L. R. 1990. Use of culture filtrates of Ceratocystis ulmi as bioassay to screen for disease tolerant Ulmus americana. Plant Sci. 70:191-196.
38. Pijut, P. M., Lineberger, R. D., Domir, S. C., Ichida, J. M., and Krause, C. R. 1990. Ultrastructure of cells of Ulmus americana cultured in vitro and exposed to the culture filtrate of Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 80:764-767.
39. Reynolds, E. S. 1963. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 17:208-212.
40. Rioux, D., Chamberland, H., Simard, M., and Ouellette, G. B. 1995. Suberized tyloses in trees: An ultrastructural and cytochemical study. Planta 196:125-140.
41. Rioux, D., and Ouellette, G. B. 1989. Light microscope observations of histological changes induced by Ophiostoma ulmi in various nonhost trees and shrubs. Can. J. Bot. 67:2335-2351.
42. Rioux, D., and Ouellette, G. B. 1991. Barrier zone formation in host and nonhost trees inoculated with Ophiostoma ulmi. I. Anatomy and histochemistry. Can. J. Bot. 69:2055-2073.
43. Rioux, D., and Ouellette, G. B. 1991. Barrier zone formation in host and nonhost trees inoculated with Ophiostoma ulmi. II. Ultrastructure. Can. J. Bot. 69:2074-2083.
44. Scheffer, R. J., and Elgersma, D. M. 1982. A scanning electron microscope study of cell wall degradation in elm wood by aggressive and nonaggressive isolates of Ophiostoma ulmi. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 12:25-28.
45. Schreiber, L. R., and Domir, S. C. 1994. Efficacy of criteria to identify aggressiveness in Ophiostoma ulmi and resistance in American elm germ plasm. Plant Dis. 78:629-632.
46. Shigo, A. L. 1984. Compartmentalization: A conceptual framework for understanding how trees grow and defend themselves. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 22:189-214.
47. Shigo, L., and Tippett, J. T. 1981. Compartmentalization of American elm tissues infected by Ceratocystis ulmi. Plant Dis. 65:715-718.
48. Simard, M., Rioux, D., and Laflamme, G. 2001. Formation of ligno-suberized tissues in jack pine resistant to the European race of Gremmeniella abietina. Phytopathology 91:1128-1140.
49. Smalley, E. B., and Guries, R. P. 1993. Breeding elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 31:325-352.
50. Strack, D. 1997. Phenolic metabolism. Pages 387-416 in: Plant Biochemistry. P. M. Dey and J. B. Harborne, eds. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
51. Townsend, A. M., Bentz, S. E., and Johnson, G. R. 1995. Variation in response of selected American elm clones to Ophiostoma ulmi. J. Environ. Hort. 13:126-128.
52. Valette, C., Andary, C., Geiger, J. P., Sarah, J. L., and Nicole, M. 1998. Histochemical and cytochemical investigations of phenols in roots of banana infected by the burrowing nematode Radopholus similis. Phytopathology 88:1141-1148.
53. Wattendorff, J. 1974. Ultrahistochemical reactions of the suberized cell walls in Acorus, Acacia, and Larix. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 73:214-225.
54. Woods, A. C., and Holmes, F. W. 1974. Extraction of fluid from healthy and Dutch elm-diseased elm branches using hydraulic compression. Phytopathology 64:1265-1267.
55. Woodward, S., and Pearce, R. B. 1988. Responses of Sitka spruce callus to challenge with wood decay fungi. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 18:217-229.
56. Yang, D., and Bernier, L. 1996. Production and use of calli from yellow birch buds for in vitro assessment of virulence of Nectria galligena isolates. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 45:175-177.
57. Yang, D., Hubbes, M., Jr., Jeng, R. S., and Hubbes, M. 1994. A glycoprotein isolated from culture filtrates of Ophiostoma ulmi as a mansonone-inducing elicitor on elm callus. Mycol. Res. 98:295-300.
58. Yang, D., Jeng, R. S., and Hubbes, M. 1989. Mansonone accumulation in elm callus induced by elicitors of Ophiostoma ulmi, and general properties of elicitors. Can. J. Bot. 67: 3490-3497.