Genomic prediction and GWAS of Gibberella ear rot resistance traits in dent and flint lines of a public maize breeding program

Euphytica

Volumn 214, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Han, Sen ^a,b   Miedaner, Thomas ^a   Utz, H Friedrich ^a   Schipprack, Wolfgang ^a   Schrag, Tobias A ^a   Melchinger, Albrecht E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b Monsanto Holland BV   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Fusarium; Genomic prediction; GWAS; Heterotic pools; Maize; Training set

Indexed keywords

EID: 85037736110     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: 15735060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-017-2090-2     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Abouzied MM, Azcona JI, Braselton WE, Pestka JJ (1991) Immunochemical assessment of mycotoxins in 1989 grain foods: evidence for deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) contamination. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:672–677
2. Albrecht T, Auinger HJ, Wimmer V, Ogutu JO, Knaak C, Ouzunova M, Piepho HP, Schön CC (2014) Genome-based prediction of maize hybrid performance across genetic groups, testers, locations, and years. Theor Appl Genet 127:1375–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-014-2305-z
3. Auinger HJ, Schönleben M, Lehermeier C et al (2016) Model training across multiple breeding cycles significantly improves genomic prediction accuracy in rye (Secale cereale L.). Theor Appl Genet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2756-5
4. Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, van Duijn CM (2007) GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 23(10):1294–1296
5. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289–300
6. Bernardo R (2008) Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: learning from the last 20 years. Crop Sci. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0131
7. Bolduan C, Miedaner T, Schipprack W, Dhillon BS, Melchinger AE (2009) Genetic variation for resistance to ear rots and mycotoxins contamination in early European maize inbred lines. Crop Sci 49:2019–2028. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.12.0701
8. Brauner PC, Melchinger AE, Schrag TA, Utz HF, Schipprack W, Kessel B, Ouzunova M, Miedaner T (2016) Low validation rate of quantitative trait loci for Gibberella ear rot resistance in European maize. Theor Appl Genet 130:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2802-3
9. Browning BL, Browning SR (2009) A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. Am J Hum Genet 84:210–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005
10. Crossa J, Campos GDL, Pérez P, Gianola D, Burgueño J, Araus JL, Makumbi D, Singh RP, Dreisigacker S, Yan J, Arief V, Banziger M, Braun HJ (2010) Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics 186:713–724. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.118521
11. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA (2008) Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS ONE 3:e3395. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003395
12. de los Campos G, Vazquez AI, Fernando R, Klimentidis YC, Sorensen D (2013) Prediction of complex human traits using the genomic best linear unbiased predictor. PLoS Genet 9:e1003608. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003608
13. De Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Spelman RJ, Goddard ME (2008) Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics 179:1503–1512. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.084301
14. De Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2009) Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations. Genetics 183:1545–1553. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.109.104935
15. Endelman JB (2011) Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. Plant Genome 4:250–255. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024
16. Fischer S, Möhring J, Schön CC, Piepho HP, Klein D, Schipprack W, Utz HF, Melchinger AE, Reif JC (2008) Trends in genetic variance components during 30 years of hybrid maize breeding at the University of Hohenheim. Plant Breed 451:446–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01475.x
17. Flint-Garcia SA, Thornsberry JM, Iv ESB (2003) Structure of linkage disequlibrium in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54:357–374. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134907
18. Ganal MW, Durstewitz G, Polley A et al (2011) A large maize (zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome. PLoS ONE 6(12):e28334. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028334
19. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ASReml User Guide Release 3.0 VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK www.vsni.co.uk
20. Giraud H, Lehermeier C, Bauer E et al (2014) Linkage disequilibrium with linkage analysis of multiline crosses reveals different multiallelic QTL for hybrid performance in the flint and dent heterotic groups of maize. Genetics 198:1717–1734. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.169367
21. Goddard M (2009) Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136:245–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0
22. Goddard ME, Hayes B, McPartlan H, Chamberlain AJ (2006) Can the same genetic markers be used in multiple breeds? 8th World Congr Genet Appl to Livest Prod August 13–18, 2006, Belo Horizonte, MG, Bras 4–7
23. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ, Meuwissen THE (2011) Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet 128:409–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00964.x
24. Guo Z, Tucker DM, Basten CJ et al (2014) The impact of population structure on genomic prediction in stratified populations. Theor Appl Genet 127:749–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-013-2255-x
25. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM (2007) The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Gentetics 177:2389–2397. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.081190
26. Habier D, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ (2013) Genomic BLUP decoded: a look into the black box of genomic prediction. Genetics 194:597–607. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.152207
27. Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding, 2nd edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames
28. Han S, Utz HF, Liu W, Schrag TA, Stange M, Würschum T, Miedaner T, Bauer E, Schön CC, Melchinger AE (2016) Choice of models for QTL mapping with multiple families and design of the training set for prediction of Fusarium resistance traits in maize. Theor Appl Genet 129:431–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-015-2637-3
29. Harrris BL, Johnson DL, Spelman RJ (2008) Genomic selection in New Zealand and the implications for national genetic evaluation. In: Proc Interbull Meet Niagara Falls, Canada, pp 325–330
30. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME (2009) Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci 92:433–443. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1646
31. Hill WG, Robertson A (1968) Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor Appl Genet 38:226–231
32. Jannink JL, Lorenz AJ, Iwata H (2010) Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. Brief Funct Genom 9:166–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elq001
33. Kang HM, Zaitlin NA, Wade CM, Kirby A, Heckerman D, Daly MJ, Eskin E (2008) Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics 178:1709–1725. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.08010
34. Kebede AZ, Woldemariam T, Reid LM, Harris LJ (2016) Quantitative trait loci mapping for Gibberella ear rot resistance and associated agronomic traits using genotyping-by-sequencing in maize. Theor Appl Genet 129:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-015-2600-3
35. Kemper KE, Hayes BJ, Daetwyler HD, Goddard ME (2015a) How old are quantitative trait loci and how widely do they segregate? J Anim Breed Genet 132:121–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12152
36. Kemper KE, Reich CM, Bowman PJ, Vander Jaqt CJ, Chamberlain AJ, Mason BA, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2015b) Improved precision of QTL mapping using a nonlinear Bayesian method in a multi-breed population leads to greater accuracy of across-breed genomic predictions. Genet Sel Evol 47:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-014-0074-4
37. Lehermeier C, Krämer N, Bauer E et al (2014) Usefulness of multiparental populations of maize (Zea mays L.) for genome-based prediction. Genetics 198:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.161943
38. Lehermeier C, Schön CC, de los Campos G (2015) Assessment of genetic heterogeneity in structured plant populations using multivariate whole-genome regression models. Genetics 201:323–337. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.177394
39. Li Y, Shi W, Shen J et al (2012) Development of a rapid competitive indirect ELISA procedure for the determination of deoxynivalenol in cereals. Food Agric Immunol 23:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540105.2011.589046
40. Lorenz AJ, Smith KP (2015) Adding genetically distant individuals to training populations reduces genomic prediction accuracy in barley. Crop Sci 55:2657–2667. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.12.0827
41. Lorenz AJ, Smith KP, Jannink J (2012) Potential and optimization of genomic selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in six-row barley. Crop Sci 52:1609–1621. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2011.09.0503
42. Lund MS, Su G, Janss L, Guldbrandtsen B (2014) Invited review: genomic evaluation of cattle in a multi-breed context. Livest Sci 166:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.05.008
43. Mackay TFC, Stone EA, Ayroles JF (2009) The genetics of quantitative traits: challenges and prospects. Nat Rev Genet 10:565–577. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2612
44. Martin M, Miedaner T, Dhillon BS, Ufermann U, Kessel B, Ouzunova M, Schipprack W, Melchinger AE (2011) Colocalization of QTL for Gibberella ear rot resistance and low mycotoxin contamination in early European maize. Crop Sci 51:1935–1945. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2010.11.0664
45. Martin M, Miedaner T, Schwegler DD, Kessel B, Ouzunova M, Dhillon BS, Schipprack W, Utz HF, Melchinger AE (2012) Comparative quantitative trait loci mapping for Gibberella ear rot resistance and reduced deoxynivalenol contamination across connected maize populations. Crop Sci 52:32–43. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2011.04.0214
46. Melchinger AE (1999) Genetic diversity and heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) Genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA—CSSA, Madison, WI, USA, pp 99–118
47. Melchinger AE, Utz HF, Schön CC (1998) Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and large bias in estimates of QTL effects. Genetics 149:383–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/1369-5266(88)80015-3
48. Meuwissen TH, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819–1829
49. Miedaner T, Han S, Kessel B, Ouzunova M, Schrag T, Utz HF, Melchinger AE (2015) Prediction of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone concentrations in Fusarium graminearum inoculated backcross populations of maize by symptom rating and near-infrared spectroscopy. Plant Breed 134:529–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12297
50. Mode CJ, Robinson HF (1959) Pleitropism and the genetic variance and covariance. Biometrics 15:518–537. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527650
51. Möhring J, Piepho H (2009) Comparison of weighting in two-stage analysis of plant breeding trials. Crop Sci 49:1977–1988. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.02.0083
52. Oldenbourg E, Bramm A, Valenta H (2007) Influence of nitrogen fertilization on deoxynivalenol contamination of winter wheat—experimental field trials and evaluation of analytical methods. Mycotox Res 23:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02946018
53. Olson KM, VanRaden PM, Tooker ME (2012) Multibreed genomic evaluations using purebred Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. J Dairy Sci 95:5378–5383. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5006
54. Pérez P, de los Campos G (2014) Genome-wide regression and prediction with the BGLR statistical package. Genetics 198:483–495. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.164442
55. R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org
56. Reif JC, Hamrit S, Heckenberger M, Schipprack W, Maurer HP, Bohn M, Melchinger AE (2005a) Trends in genetic diversity among European maize cultivars and their parental components during the past 50 years. Theor Appl Genet 111:838–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-0004-5
57. Reif JC, Melchinger AE, Frisch M (2005b) Genetical and mathematical properties of similarity and dissimilarity coefficients applied in plant breeding and seed bank management. Crop Sci 45:1–7. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0001
58. Riedelsheimer C, Melchinger AE (2013) Optimizing the allocation of resources for genomic selection in one breeding cycle. Theor Appl Genet 126:2835–2848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-013-2175-9
59. Riedelsheimer C, Czedik-Eysenberg A, Grieder C, Lisec J, Technow F, Sulpice R, Altmann T, Stitt M, Willmitzer L, Melchinger AE (2012a) Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize. Nat Genet 44:217–220. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.1033
60. Riedelsheimer C, Lisec J, Czedik-Eysenberg A, Sulpice R, Fils A, Grieder C, Altmann T, Stitt M, Willmitzer L, Melchinger AE (2012b) Genome-wide association mapping of leaf metabolic profiles for dissecting complex traits in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:8872–8877
61. Riedelsheimer C, Endelman JB, Stange M, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL, Melchinger AE (2013) Genomic predictability of interconnected biparental maize populations. Genetics 194:493–503. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.150227
62. Schopp P, Müller D, Technow F, Melchinger AE (2017) Accuracy of genomic prediction in synthetic populations depending on the number of parents, relatedness and ancestral linkage disequilibrium. Genetics 205:441–454. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.116.193243
63. Schulz-Streeck T, Ogutu JO, Karaman Z, Knaak C, Piepho HP (2012) Genomic selection using multiple populations. Crop Sci 52:2453–2461. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.03.0160
64. Stich B, Möhring J, Piepho HP, Heckenberger M, Buckler ES, Melchinger AE (2008) Comparison of mixed-model approaches for association mapping. Genetics 178:1745–1754. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.079707
65. Storey JD, Tibshirani R (2003) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:9440–9445. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1530509100
66. Technow F, Riedelsheimer C, Schrag TA, Melchinger AE (2012) Genomic prediction of hybrid performance in maize with models incorporating dominance and population specific marker effects. Theor Appl Genet 125:1181–1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1905-8
67. Technow F, Bürger A, Melchinger AE (2013) Genomic prediction of northern corn leaf blight resistance in maize with combined or separated training sets for heterotic groups. G3: Genes Genomes Genet 3:197–203. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.112.004630
68. Technow F, Schrag TA, Schipprack W, Bauer E, Simianer H, Melchinger AE (2014a) Genome properties and prospects of genomic prediction of hybrid performance in a breeding program of maize. Genetics 197:1343–1355. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.165860
69. Technow F, Schrag TA, Schipprack W, Melchinger AE (2014b) Identification of key ancestors of modern germplasm in a breeding program of maize. Theor Appl Genet 127:2545–2553
70. Tenaillon MI, Sawkins MC, Long AD et al (2001) Patterns of DNA sequence polymorphism along chromosome 1 of maize (Zea mays ssp. mays L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:9161–9166
71. Unterseer S, Pophaly SD, Peis R et al (2016) A comprehensive study of the genomic differentiation between temperate Dent and Flint maize. Genome Biol 17:137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1009-x
72. Utz HF (2011) PLABSTAT: a computer program for the statistical analysis of plant breeding experiments. University of Hohenheim, Germany
73. Utz HF, Melchinger AE, Schön CC (2000) Bias and sampling error of the estimated proportion of genotypic variance explained by quantitative trait loci determined from experimental data in maize using cross validation and validation with independent samples. Genetics 154:1839–1849
74. VanRaden PM (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 91:4414–4423. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0980
75. Weber KL, Thallman RM, Keele JW et al (2012) Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes. J Anim Sci 90:4177–4190. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2011-4586
76. Westhues M, Schrag TA, Heuer C, Thaller G, Utz HF, Schipprack W, Thiemann A, Seifert F, Ehret A, Schlereth A, Stitt M, Nikoloski Z, Willmitzer L, Schön CC, Scholten S, Melchinger AE (2017) Omics-based hybrid prediction in maize. Theor Appl Genet 130:1927–1939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-017-2934-0
77. Wientjes YCJ, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL (2013) The effect of linkage disequilibrium and family relationships on the reliability of genomic prediction. Genetics 193:621–631. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.146290
78. Wientjes YCJ, Calus MPL, Goddard ME, Hayes BJ (2015) Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction. Genet Sel Evol 47:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0124-6
79. Wientjes YCJ, Bijma P, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL (2016) An equation to predict the accuracy of genomic values by combining data from multiple traits, populations, or environments. Genetics 202:799–823. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.183269
80. Wimmer V, Albrecht T, Auinger HJ, Schön CC (2012) Synbreed: a framework for the analysis of genomic prediction data using R. Bioinformatics 28:2086–2087. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts335
81. Windhausen VS, Atlin GN, Hickey JM, Crossa J, Jannink JL, Sorrells ME, Raman B, Cairns JE, Tarekegne A, Semangn K, Beyene Y, Grudloyma P, Technow F, Riedelsheimer C, Melchinger AE (2012) Effectiveness of genomic prediction of maize hybrid performance in different breeding populations and environments. G3: Genes Genomes Genet 2(11):1427–1436
82. Yan J, Shah T, Warburton Ml, Buckler ES, McMullen MD, Crouch J (2009) Genetic characterization and linkage disequilibrium estimation of a global maize collection using SNP markers. PLoS ONE 4:e8451
83. Yan J, Warburton M, Crouch J (2011) Association mapping for enhancing maize (Zea mays L.) genetic improvement. Crop Sci 51:433–449. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2010.04.0233
84. Yang J, Benyamin B, Mcevoy BP et al (2010) Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet 42:565–569. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.608
85. Yu J, Pressoir G, Briggs WH et al (2006) A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat Genet 38:203–208. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1702
86. Zhou L, Ding X, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Lund MS, Sun G (2013) Consistency of linkage disequilibrium between Chinese and Nordic Holsteins and genomic prediction for Chinese Holsteins using a joint reference population. Genet Sel Evol 45:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-45-7
87. Zila CT, Samayoa LF, Santiago R, Butrón A, Holland JB (2013) A genome-wide association study reveals genes associated with Fusarium ear rot resistance in a maize core diversity panel. G3: Genes Genomes Genet 3:2095–2104. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.113.007328
88. Zila CT, Ogut F, Romay MC, Gardner CA, Buckler ES, Holland JB (2014) Genome-wide association study of Fusarium ear rot disease in the U.S.A. maize inbred line collection. BMC Plant Biol 14:372. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-014-0372-6