Error profiling for evaluation of machine-translated text: A Polish-English case study

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1764-1770

  Weiss, Sandra ^a   Ahrenberg, Lars ^b  

^a Department of Culture and Communication ^*  (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Error analysis; Machine translation evaluation; Polish English machine translation

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; ERRORS;

MACHINE TRANSLATION EVALUATIONS; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS; STATE OF THE ART; TEXT COHESION; WRONG ANSWERS;

TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

EID: 85037352252     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Halliday, M A K, & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. (R. Quirk, Ed.) (Vol. 9, p. 374). London: Longman Group Ltd.
2. Hovy, E., King, M., & Popescu-Belis, A. (2003). Principles of Context-Based Machine Translation Evaluation. Machine Translation, (17), 43-75.
3. Gorczyca, D. (2010). Tekst w Internecie. Zarzdzanie Zmianami Biuletyn POU, 5.
4. Jones, D., Shen, W., Granoien, N., Herzog, M. And Weinstein, C. (2005). Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, McLean, VA
5. Popovi, M. And Burchardt, A. (2011). From Human to Automatic Error Classification for Machine Translation Output. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of EAMT, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 265-272.
6. Singhal, Meena (1998) A Comparison of L1 and L2 Reading: Cultural Differences and Schema. The Internet TESL Journal. Vol. IV, No. 10, October 1998
7. Specia, L. (2011). Exploiting objective annotations for measuring translation post-editing effort. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, pp. 73-80, Leuven, Belgium.
8. Taylor, K. And White, J. (1998). Predicting What MT is Good for: User Judgements and Task Performance. In Proceedings of the Third Conference of AMTA, Langhorne, PA.
9. Vilar, D., Xu, J., D'Haro, L. F., & Ney, H. (2006). Error Analysis of Statistical Machine Translation Output. Proceedings of the Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (pp. 697-702).
10. Voss, C. R. And Tate, C. R. (2006). Task-based Evaluation of Machine Translation (MT) Engines: Measuring How Well People Extract Who, When, Where-Type Elements in MT Output. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of EAMT, Oslo, Norway.
11. White, J. S., O'Conell, T., & O'Mara, F. (1994). The ARPA MT evaluation methodologies: evolution, lessons, and future approaches. Proc of the AMTA (pp. 193-205).
12. Wojak, A., & Graliski, F. (2010). Matura Evaluation Experiment Based on Human Evaluation of Machine Translation. Proceedings of the International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology (pp. 547-551). Pozna, Poland.
13. Xiong, Deyi, Zhang, Min, and Haizhou, Li (2010). Error detection for statistical machine translation using linguistic features. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 604-611.