An adaptive laboratory evolution method to accelerate autotrophic metabolism

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 1671, Issue , 2018, Pages 149-161

  Zhang, Tian ^a,b   Tremblay, Pier Luc ^a,b  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Acetogen; Adaptive laboratory evolution; Autotroph; CO2 fixation; Methanol; Microbial electrosynthesis; Sporomusa ovat a

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; CARBON DIOXIDE;

ADAPTIVE LABORATORY EVOLUTION; AUTOTROPHY; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIAL METABOLISM; CELL METABOLISM; HETEROTROPHY; LABORATORY TECHNIQUE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SPOROMUSA; SPOROMUSA OVATA; ADAPTATION; ENERGY METABOLISM; EVOLUTION; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLISM; VEILLONELLACEAE;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; AUTOTROPHIC PROCESSES; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; ENERGY METABOLISM; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; VEILLONELLACEAE;

EID: 85035096558     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7295-1_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Elena SF, Lenski RE (2003) Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 4:457–469. doi:10.1038/nrg1088
2. Dragosits M, Mattanovich D (2013) Adaptive laboratory evolution – principles and applications for biotechnology. Microb Cell Factories 12:64. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-12-64
3. Patzschke A, Steiger MG, Holz C et al (2015) Enhanced glutathione production by evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Biotechnol J 10:1719–1726. doi:10. 1002/biot.201400809
4. Zambanini T, Sarikaya E, Kleineberg W et al (2016) Efficient malic acid production from glycerol with Ustilago trichophora TZ1. Biotechnol Biofuels 9:67. doi:10.1186/s13068-016-0483-4
5. Hu B, Yang Y-M, Beck DAC et al (2016) Comprehensive molecular characterization of Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 adapted for 1-butanol tolerance. Biotechnol Biofuels 9:84. doi:10.1186/s13068-016-0497-y
6. Horinouchi T, Tamaoka K, Furusawa C et al (2010) Transcriptome analysis of parallel-evolved Escherichia coli strains under ethanol stress. BMC Genomics 11:579. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-579
7. Atsumi S, Wu T-Y, Machado IMP et al (2010) Evolution, genomic analysis, and reconstruction of isobutanol tolerance in Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol 6:449. doi:10.1038/msb. 2010.98
8. Reyes LH, Almario MP, Winkler J et al (2012) Visualizing evolution in real time to determine the molecular mechanisms of n-butanol tolerance in Escherichia coli. Metab Eng 14: 579–590. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2012.05.002
9. Oide S, Gunji W, Moteki Y et al (2015) Adaptive laboratory evolution conferred cross-tolerance to thermal and solvent stress to Cory-nebacterium glutamicum. Appl Environ Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.03973-14
10. Tremblay P-L, Summers ZM, Glaven RH et al (2011) A c-type cytochrome and a transcriptional regulator responsible for enhanced extracellular electron transfer in Geobacter sulfurreducens revealed by adaptive evolution. Environ Microbiol 13:13–23. doi:10.1111/j. 1462-2920.2010.02302.x
11. 2 to organic products. Sci Rep 5:16168. doi:10.1038/srep16168
12. LaCroix RA, Sandberg TE, O’Brien EJ et al (2015) Use of adaptive laboratory evolution to discover key mutations enabling rapid growth of Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 on glucose minimal medium. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:17–30. doi:10.1128/AEM.02246-14
13. Möller B, Oßmer R, Howard BH et al (1984) Sporomusa, a new genus of gram-negative anaerobic bacteria including Sporomusa sphaer-oides spec. nov. and Sporomusa ovata spec. nov. Arch Microbiol 139:388–396. doi:10.1007/BF00408385
14. Poehlein A, Gottschalk G, Daniel R (2013) First insights into the genome of the Gram-negative, endospore-forming organism Sporomusa ovata strain H1 DSM 2662. Genome Announc 1:e00734–e00713. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00734-13
15. Drake HL, Gößner AS, Daniel SL (2008) Old acetogens, new light. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1125:100–128. doi:10.1196/annals.1419.016
16. Nevin KP, Woodard TL, Franks AE et al (2010) Microbial electrosynthesis: feeding microbes electricity to convert carbon dioxide and water to multicarbon extracellular organic compounds. mBio 1:e00103–e00110. doi:10. 1128/mBio.00103-10
17. Tremblay P-L, Zhang T (2015) Electrifying microbes for the production of chemicals. Front Microbiol 6:201. doi:10.3389/fmicb. 2015.00201
18. 2 by a highly structured biofilm assembled with reduced graphene oxide–tetraethylene penta-mine. J Mater Chem A 4:8395–8401. doi:10. 1039/C6TA02036D
19. Aryal N, Halder A, Tremblay P-L et al (2016) Enhanced microbial electrosynthesis with three-dimensional graphene functionalized cathodes fabricated via solvothermal synthesis. Electrochim Acta 217:117–122. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.063
20. Schrader J, Schilling M, Holtmann D et al (2009) Methanol-based industrial biotechnology: current status and future perspectives of methylotrophic bacteria. Trends Biotechnol 27:107–115. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.10. 009
21. Patterson JA, Ricke SC (2015) Effect of ethanol and methanol on growth of ruminal bacteria Selenomonas ruminantium and Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens. J Environ Sci Health B 50:62–67. doi:10.1080/03601234.2015.965639
22. Nicolaou SA, Gaida SM, Papoutsakis ET (2010) A comparative view of metabolite and substrate stress and tolerance in microbial bio-processing: from biofuels and chemicals, to biocatalysis and bioremediation. Metab Eng 12:307–331. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2010.03. 004
23. McClure R, Balasubramanian D, Sun Y et al (2013) Computational analysis of bacterial RNA-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e140. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt444