Gene-based pathogen detection: Can we use qPCR to predict the outcome of diagnostic metagenomics?

Genes

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2017, Pages

  Andersen, Sandra Christine ^a   Fachmann, Mette Sofie Rousing ^a   Kiil, Kristoffer ^b   Nielsen, Eva Møller ^b   Hoorfar, Jeffrey ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b STATENS SERUM INSTITUT   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; DNA sequencing; Feces; Testing; Zoonoses

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM DETECTION; CAMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI; COLONY FORMING UNIT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA EXTRACTION; DNA FRAGMENTATION; FECES ANALYSIS; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; METAGENOMICS; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SEROVAR TYPHIMURIUM; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 85035030347     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/genes8110332     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Deurenberg, R.H.; Bathoorn, E.; Chlebowicz, M.A.; Couto, N.; Ferdous, M.; García-Cobos, S.; Kooistra-Smid, A.M.D.; Raangs, E.C.; Rosema, S.; Veloo, A.C.M., et al. Application of next generation sequencing in clinical microbiology and infection prevention. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 243, 16–24.
2. Rådström, P.; Knutsson, R.; Wolffs, P.; Dahlenborg, M.; Löfström, C. Pre-PCR processing of samples: Strategies to generate PCR-compatible samples. Methods Mol. Biol. 2004, 26, 133–146.
3. Josefsen, M.H.; Andersen, S.C.; Christensen, J.; Hoorfar, J. Microbial food safety: Potential of DNA extraction methods for use in diagnostic metagenomics. J. Microbiol. Methods 2015, 114, 30–34.
4. Hedman, J.; Rådström, P. Overcoming inhibition in real-time diagnostic PCR. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 943, 17–48.
5. Shakya, M.; Quince, C.; Campbell, J.H.; Yang, Z.K.; Schadt, C.W.; Podar, M. Comparative metagenomic and rRNA microbial diversity characterization using archaeal and bacterial synthetic communities. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 1882–1899.
6. Bahl, M.I.; Bergström, A.; Licht, T.R. Freezing fecal samples prior to DNA extraction affects the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio determined by downstream quantitative PCR analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2012, 329, 193–197.
7. Van Dijk, E.L.; Jaszczyszyn, Y.; Thermes, C. Library preparation methods for next-generation sequencing: Tone down the bias. Exp. Cell Res. 2014, 322, 12–20.
8. Wesolowska-Andersen, A.; Bahl, M.I.; Carvalho, V.; Kristiansen, K.; Sicheritz-Pontén, T.; Gupta, R.; Licht, T.R. Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis. Microbiome 2014, 2, 19.
9. Claassen, S.; du Toit, E.; Kaba, M.; Moodley, C.; Zar, H.J.; Nicol, M.P. A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples. J. Microbiol. Methods 2013, 94, 103–110.
10. Kennedy, N.A.; Walker, A.W.; Berry, S.H.; Duncan, S.H.; Farquarson, F.M.; Louis, P.; Thomson, J.M.; Satsangi, J.; Flint, H.J.; Parkhill, J., et al. The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88982.
11. Knudsen, B.E.; Bergmark, L.; Munk, P.; Lukjancenko, O.; Priemé, A.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Pamp, S.J. Impact of sample type and DNA isolation procedure on genomic inference of microbiome composition. Appl. Environ. Sci. 2016.
12. Ariefdjohan, M.W.; Savaiano, D.A.; Nakatsu, C.H. Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens. Nutr. J. 2010, 9, 23.
13. Nechvatal, J.M.; Ram, J.L.; Basson, M.D.; Namprachan, P.; Niec, S.R.; Badsha, K.Z.; Matherly, L.H.; Majumdar, A.P.N.; Kato, I. Fecal collection, ambient preservation, and DNA extraction for PCR amplification of bacterial and human markers from human feces. J. Microbiol. Methods 2008, 72, 124–132.
14. Wood, D.E.; Salzberg, S.L. Kraken: Ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, R46.
15. Petersen, T.N.; Lukjancenko, O.; Thomsen, M.C.F.; Maddalena Sperotto, M.; Lund, O.; Møller Aarestrup, F.; Sicheritz-Pontén, T. MGmapper: Reference based mapping and taxonomy annotation of metagenomics sequence reads. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176469.
16. Ounit, R.; Wanamaker, S.; Close, T.J.; Lonardi, S. CLARK: Fast and accurate classification of metagenomic and genomic sequences using discriminative k-mers. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 236.
17. Segata, N.; Waldron, L.; Ballarini, A.; Narasimhan, V.; Jousson, O.; Huttenhower, C. Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes. Nat. Methods 2013, 9, 811–814.
18. Andersen, S.C.; Kiil, K.; Harder, C.B.; Josefsen, M.H.; Persson, S.; Nielsen, E.M.; Hoorfar, J. Towards diagnostic metagenomics of Campylobacter in fecal samples. BMC Microbiol. 2017, 17, 33.
19. McMurdie, P.J.; Holmes, S. Waste not, want not: Why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10, e1003531.
20. Krause, M.; Josefsen, M.H.; Lund, M.; Jacobsen, N.R.; Brorsen, L.; Moos, M.; Stockmarr, A.; Hoorfar, J. Comparative, collaborative, and on-site validation of a TaqMan PCR method as a tool for certified production of fresh, Campylobacter-free chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 5463–5468.
21. Löfström, C.; Krause, M.; Josefsen, M.H.; Hansen, F.; Hoorfar, J. Validation of a same-day real-time PCR method for screening of meat and carcass swabs for Salmonella. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9, 85.
22. R Core Team. R: A Language and environment for statistical computing; Vienna, Austria, 2014. Available online:http://www.R-project.org/(accessed on 14 November 2017).
23. Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2009, 26, 139–140.