HamleDT: To parse or not to parse?

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 2735-2741

  Zeman, Daniel ^a   Marecek, David ^a   Popel, Martin ^a   Ramasamy, Loganathan ^a   Stepánek, Jan ^a   Zabokrtsky, Zdenek ^a   Hajic, Jan ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Annotation scheme; Dependency treebank; Harmonization

Indexed keywords

TREES (MATHEMATICS);

ANNOTATION SCHEME; HARMONIZATION; MULTI LANGUAGES; RESEARCH PURPOSE; TREE STRUCTURES; TREEBANKS;

FORESTRY;

EID: 85034101012     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Itzair Aduriz, María Jesüs Aranzabe, Jose Mari Ar-riola, Aitziber Atutxa, Arantza Díaz de Ilarraza, Aitzpea Garmendia, and Maite Oronoz. 2003. Construction of a Basque dependency treebank. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories.
2. Susana Afonso, Eckhard Bick, Renato Haber, and Diana Santos. 2002. "Floresta sintá(c)tica": a tree-bank for Portuguese. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 1968-1703.
3. Nart B. Atalay, Kemal Oflazer, Bilge Say, and Informatics Inst. 2003. The annotation process in the Turkish treebank. In In Proc. of the 4th Intern. Workshop on Linguistically Interpreteted Corpora (LINC.
4. David Bamman and Gregory Crane. 2011. The Ancient Greek and Latin dependency treebanks. In Caroline Sporleder, Antal Bosch, and Kalliopi Zer-vanou, editors, Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing, pages 79-98. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
5. Kepa Bengoetxea and Koldo Gojenola. 2009. Exploring treebank transformations in dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the International Conference RANLP-2009, pages 33-38, Borovets, Bulgaria, September. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Eckhard Bick, Heli Uibo, and Kaili Müürisep. 2004. Arborest - A VISL-style treebank derived from an Estonian constraint grammar corpus. In Proceedings of Treebanks and Linguistic Theories.
7. Igor Boguslavsky, Svetlana Grigorieva, Nikolai Grig-oriev, Leonid Kreidlin, and Nadezhda Frid. 2000. Dependency treebank for Russian: Concept, tools, types of information. In Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 2, pages 987-991. Association for Computational Linguistics Morristown, NJ, USA.
8. Cristina Bosco, Simonetta Montemagni, Alessandro Mazzei, Vincenzo Lombardo, Alessandro Lenci, Leonardo Lesmo, Giuseppe Attardi, Maria Simi, Alberto Lavelli, Johan Hall, Jens Nilsson, and Joakim Nivre. 2010. Comparing the influence of different treebank annotations on dependency parsing.
9. Sabine Brants, Stefanie Dipper, Silvia Hansen, Wolfgang Lezius, and George Smith. 2002. The TIGER treebank. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Tree-banks and Linguistic Theories, Sozopol.
10. Montserrat Civit, Maria Antònia Martí, and Nüria Bufí. 2006. Cat3LB and Cast3LB: From constituents to dependencies. In Tapio Salakoski, Filip Ginter, Sampo Pyysalo, and Tapio Pahikkala, editors, FinTAL, volume 4139 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 141-152. Springer.
11. Mihaela Cǎlǎcean. 2008. Data-driven dependency parsing for Romanian. Master's thesis, Uppsala University, August.
12. Dóra Csendes, János Csirik, Tibor Gyimóthy, and An-drás Kocsor. 2005. The Szeged treebank. In Václav Matoušek, Pavel Mautner, and Tomáš Pavelka, editors, TSD, volume 3658 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 123-131. Springer.
13. Sašo Džeroski, Tomaž Erjavec, Nina Ledinek, Petr Pa-jas, Zdeněk Žabokrtski, and Andreja Žele. 2006. Towards a Slovene dependency treebank. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, LREC 2006, pages 1388-1391, Genova, Italy. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
14. Jan Hajič, Jarmila Panevová, Eva Hajičová, Petr Sgall, Petr Pajas, Jan Štěpánek, Jiří Havelka, Marie Mikulová, Zdeněk Žabokrtski, and Magda Ševčíková-Razímová. 2006. Prague Dependency Treebank 2.0. CD-ROM, Linguistic Data Consortium, LDC Catalog No.: LDC2006T01, Philadelphia.
15. Katri Haverinen, Timo Viljanen, Veronika Laippala, Samuel Kohonen, Filip Ginter, and Tapio Salakoski. 2010. Treebanking Finnish. In Markus Dickinson, Kaili Müürisep, and Marco Passarotti, editors, Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT9), pages 79-90.
16. Samar Husain, Prashanth Mannem, Bharat Ambati, and Phani Gadde. 2010. The ICON-2010 tools contest on Indian language dependency parsing. In Proceedings of ICON-2010 Tools Contest on Indian Language Dependency Parsing, Kharagpur, India.
17. Yasuhiro Kawata and Julia Bartels. 2000. Stylebook for the Japanese treebank in Verbmobil. In Report 240, Tübingen, Germany, September 29.
18. Matthias T. Kromann, Line Mikkelsen, and Stine Kern Lynge. 2004. Danish dependency treebank.
19. Ryan McDonald, Slav Petrov, and Keith Hall. 2011. Multi-source transfer of delexicalized dependency parsers. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 62-72, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK., July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. Simonetta Montemagni, Francesco Barsotti, Marco Battista, Nicoletta Calzolari, Ornella Corazzari, Alessandro Lenci, Antonio Zampolli, Francesca Fan-ciulli, Maria Massetani, Remo Raffaelli, Roberto Basili, Maria Teresa Pazienza, Dario Saracino, Fabio Zanzotto, Nadia Mana, Fabio Pianesi, and Rodolfo Delmonte. 2003. Building the Italian syntactic-semantic treebank. In Anne Abeillé, editor, Building and using Parsed Corpora, Language and Speech series, pages 189-210, Dordrecht. Kluwer.
21. Jens Nilsson, Johan Hall, and Joakim Nivre. 2005. MAMBA meets TIGER: Reconstructing a Swedish treebank from antiquity. In Proceedings of the NODALIDA Special Session on Treebanks.
22. Jens Nilsson, Joakim Nivre, and Johan Hall. 2006. Graph transformations in data-driven dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 257-264. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. Prokopis Prokopidis, Elina Desipri, Maria Koutsom-bogera, Harris Papageorgiou, and Stelios Piperidis. 2005. Theoretical and practical issues in the construction of a Greek dependency treebank. In In Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), pages 149-160.
24. Loganathan Ramasamy and Zdeněk Žabokrtski. 2012. Prague dependency style treebank for Tamil. In Proceedings of LREC 2012, İstanbul, Turkey.
25. Mohammad Sadegh Rasooli, Amirsaeid Moloodi, Manouchehr Kouhestani, and Behrouz Minaei-Bidgoli. 2011. A syntactic valency lexicon for Persian verbs: The first steps towards Persian dependency treebank. In 5th Language & Technology Conference (LTC): Human Language Technologies as a Challenge for Computer Science and Linguistics, pages 227-231, Poznań, Poland.
26. Kiril Simov and Petya Osenova. 2005. Extending the annotation of BulTreeBank: Phase 2. In The Fourth Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT 2005), pages 173-184, Barcelona, December.
27. Otakar Smrž, Viktor Bielicki, Iveta Kouřilová, Jakub Kráčmar, Jan Hajič, and Petr Zemánek. 2008. Prague Arabic dependency treebank: A word on the million words. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Arabic and Local Languages (LREC 2008), pages 16-23, Marrakech, Morocco. European Language Resources Association.
28. Mihai Surdeanu, Richard Johansson, Adam Meyers, Lluís Màrquez, and Joakim Nivre. 2008. The CoNLL-2008 shared task on joint parsing of syntactic and semantic dependencies. In Proceedings of CoNLL.
29. Mariona Taulé, Maria Antònia Martí, and Marta Re-casens. 2008. AnCora: Multilevel annotated corpora for Catalan and Spanish. In LREC. European Language Resources Association.
30. Reut Tsarfaty, Joakim Nivre, and Evelina Anders-son. 2011. Evaluating dependency parsing: Robust and heuristics-free cross-annotation evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 385-396, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK., July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
31. Leonoor van der Beek, Gosse Bouma, Jan Daciuk, Tanja Gaustad, Robert Malouf, Gertjan van Noord, Robbert Prins, and Begoña Villada. 2002. Chapter 5. The Alpino dependency treebank. In Algorithms for Linguistic Processing NWO PIONIER Progress Report, Groningen, The Netherlands.
32. Zdeněk Žabokrtski, Jan Ptáček, and Petr Pajas. 2008. TectoMT: highly modular mt system with tec-togrammatics used as transfer layer. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 167-170, Columbus, Ohio, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
33. Daniel Zeman. 2008. Reusable tagset conversion using tagset drivers. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis, and Daniel Tapias, editors, Proceedings of the Sixth International Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, LREC 2008, pages 28-30, Marrakech, Morocco, May. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).