Dynamic gene-resource landscape management of Norway spruce: Combining utilization and conservation

Frontiers in Plant Science

Volumn 8, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Lstibůrek, Milan ^a   El Kassaby, Yousry A ^b   Skrøppa, Tore ^c   Hodge, Gary R ^d   Sønstebø, Jørn H ^c   Steffenrem, Arne ^c  

^a CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF BIOECONOMY RESEARCH   (Norway)

^d NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Climate change; DNA markers; Gene diversity; In situ selection; Tree improvement

Indexed keywords

EID: 85034093906     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1664462X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01810     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Alfaro, R. I., Fady, B., Vendramin, G. G., Dawson, I. K., Fleming, R. A., Sáenz-Romero, C., et al. (2014). The role of forest genetic resources in responding to biotic and abiotic factors in the context of anthropogenic climate change. For. Ecol. Manage. 333, 76–87. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.006
2. Allendorf, F. W. (1986). Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo Biol. 5, 181–190. doi:10.1002/zoo.1430050212
3. Birdal, A. C., Avdan, U., and Türk, T. (2017). Estimating tree heights with images from an unmanned aerial vehicle. Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk 1–13. doi:10.1080/19475705.2017.1300608
4. Chen, C., Mitchell, S. E., Elshire, R. J., Buckler, E. S., and El-Kassaby, Y. A. (2013). Mining conifers’ mega-genome using rapid and efficient multiplexed high-throughput genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) SNP discovery platform. Tree Genet. Genomes 9, 1537–1544. doi:10.1007/s11295-013-0657-1
5. Chen, Z. Q., Karlsson, B., and Wu, H. X. (2017). Patterns of additive genotype-by-environment interaction in tree height of Norway spruce in southern and central Sweden. Tree Genet. Genomes 13, 25. doi:10.1007/s11295-017-1103-6
6. Danell, Ö (1991). Survey of past, current and future Swedish forest tree breeding. Silvae Fenn. 25, 241–247. doi:10.14214/sf.a15621
7. Edvardsen, O. M., Steffenrem, A., Johnskås, O. R., Johnsen, Ø., Myking, T., and Kvaalen, H. (2010). Strategi for Skogplanteforedling 2010-2040 (høringsutkast). [Strategy for tree breeding 2010-2040 (proposal)]. (Hamar: The Norwegian Forest Seed Center), 28.
8. El-Dien, O. G., Ratcliffe, B., Klápště, J., Porth, I., Chen, C., and El-Kassaby, Y. A. (2016). Implementation of the realized genomic relationship matrix to open-pollinated white spruce family testing for disentangling additive from nonadditive genetic effects. G3 6, 743–753. doi:10.1534/g3.115.025957
9. El-Kassaby, Y. A., Cappa, E. P., Liewlaksaneeyanawin, C., Klápště, J., and Lstibůrek, M. (2011). Breeding without breeding: is a complete pedigree necessary for efficient breeding? PLOS ONE 6:e25737. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025737
10. El-Kassaby, Y. A., and Lstibůrek, M. (2009). Breeding without breeding. Genet. Res. 91, 111–120. doi:10.1017/S001667230900007X
11. Gilmour, A. R., Gogel, B. J., Cullis, B. R., and Thompson, R. (2009). ASReml User Guide Release 3.0. Hemel Hempstead: VSN International Ltd.
12. Grattapaglia, D., and Resende, M. D. (2011). Genomic selection in forest tree breeding. Tree Genet. Genomes 7, 241–255. doi:10.1007/s11295-010-0328-4
13. Haapanen, M., and Mikola, J. (2008). “Forest tree breeding 2050,” in Proceedings of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 71: Finland’s Long-Term Tree Breeding Program. Helsinki: Finnish Forest Research Institute.
14. Hartl, D. L., and Clark, A. G. (2007). Principles of Population Genetics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
15. Hayes, B. J., Bowman, P. J., Chamberlain, A. J., and Goddard, M. E. (2009). Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 92, 433–443. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1646
16. Henderson, C. R. (1976). A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics 32, 69–83. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-41-25
17. Ingvarsson, P. K., and Street, N. R. (2011). Association genetics of complex traits in plants. New Phytol. 189, 909–922. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03593.x
18. Jansson, G., Hansen, J. K., Haapanen, M., Kvaalen, H., and Steffenrem, A. (2016). The genetic and economic gains from forest tree breeding programmes in Scandinavia and Finland. Scand. J. For. Res. 32, 273–286. doi:10.1080/02827581.2016.1242770
19. Langvall, O. (2011). Impact of climate change, seedling type and provenance on the risk of damage to Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings in Sweden due to early summer frosts. Scand. J. For. Res. 26, 56–63. doi:10.1080/02827581.2011.564399
20. Lefèvre, F., Koskela, J., Hubert, J., Kraigher, H., Longauer, R., Olrik, D. C., et al. (2013). Dynamic conservation of forest genetic resources in 33 European countries. Conserv. Biol. 27, 373–384. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01961.x
21. Lindgren, D., and Mullin, T. J. (1997). Balancing gain and relatedness in selection. Silvae Genet. 46, 124–128.
22. Lstibůrek, M., Hodge, G. R., and Lachout, P. (2015). Uncovering genetic information from commercial forest plantations—making up for lost time using “breeding without breeding”. Tree Genet. Genomes 11, 55. doi:10.1007/s11295-015-0881-y
23. Lstibůrek, M., Ivanková, K., Kadlec, J., Kobliha, J., Klápště, J., and El-Kassaby, Y. A. (2011). Breeding without breeding: minimum fingerprinting effort with respect to the effective population size. Tree Genet. Genomes 7, 1069–1078. doi:10.1007/s11295-011-0395-1
24. Lstibůrek, M., Klápště, J., Kobliha, J., and El-Kassaby, Y. A. (2012). Breeding without breeding: effect of gene flow on fingerprinting effort. Tree Genet. Genomes 8, 873–877. doi:10.1007/s11295-012-0472-0
25. Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J., and Goddard, M. E. (2001). Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819–1829.
26. Muranty, H., Jorge, V., Bastien, C., Lepoittevin, C., Bouffier, L., and Sanchez, L. (2014). Potential for marker-assisted selection for forest tree breeding: lessons from 20 years of MAS in crops. Tree Genet. Genomes 10, 1491–1510. doi:10.1007/s11295-014-0790-5
27. Myking, T., Rusanen, M., Steffenrem, A., Kjær, E. D., and Jansson, G. (2016). Historic transfer of forest reproductive material in the Nordic region: drivers, scale and implications. Forestry 89, 325–337. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpw020
28. Namkoong, G. (1979). “Introduction to quantitative genetics in forestry,” in USDA Forest Service Bulletin No. 1588. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service, 342.
29. Neves, L. G., Davis, J. M., Barbazuk, W. B., and Kirst, M. (2013). Whole-exome targeted sequencing of the uncharacterized pine genome. Plant J. 75, 146–156. doi:10.1111/tpj.12193
30. Nystedt, B., Street, N. R., Wetterbom, A., Zuccolo, A., Lin, Y.-C., Scofield, D. G., et al. (2013). The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature 497, 579–584. doi:10.1038/nature12211
31. Parducci, L., Edwards, M. E., Bennett, K. D., Alm, T., Elverland, E., Tollefsrud, M. M., et al. (2012a). Response to comment on “Glacial survival of boreal trees in northern Scandinavia”. Science 338, 742. doi:10.1126/science.1225476
32. Parducci, L., Jørgensen, T., Tollefsrud, M. M., Elverland, E., Alm, T., Fontana, S. L., et al. (2012b). Glacial survival of boreal trees in Northern Scandinavia. Science 335, 1083–1086. doi:10.1126/science.1216043
33. Savill, P., Evans, J., Auclair, D., and Falck, J. (1997). Plantation Silviculture in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Skrøppa, T., and Steffenrem, A. (2015). Selection in a provenance trial of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) produced a land race with desirable properties. Scand. J. For. Res. 31, 439–449. doi:10.1080/02827581.2015.1081983
35. Solberg, S., Naesset, E., and Bollandsas, O. M. (2006). Single tree segmentation using airborne laser scanner data in a structurally heterogeneous spruce forest. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 72, 1369–1378. doi:10.14358/PERS.72.12.1369
36. Steffenrem, A., Lohne, T. P., Kvaalen, H., and Solberg, S. (2014). “Tree height estimation in progeny trials using UAS photogrammetry,” in Proceedings of the 2014 IUFRO Forest Tree Breeding Conference, Prague.
37. Steffenrem, A., Solheim, H., and Skrøppa, T. (2016). Genetic parameters for wood quality traits and resistance to the pathogens Heterobasidion parviporum and Endoconidiophora polonica in a Norway spruce breeding population. Eur. J. For. Res. 135, 815–825. doi:10.1007/s10342-016-0975-6
38. Tollefsrud, M. M., Kissling, R., Gugerli, F., Johnsen, Ø., Skrøppa, T., Cheddadi, R., et al. (2008). Genetic consequences of glacial survival and postglacial colonization in Norway spruce: combined analysis of mitochondrial DNA and fossil pollen. Mol. Ecol. 17, 4134–4150. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03893.x
39. White, T., Adams, W. T., and Neale, D. B. (2007). Forest genetics. Wallingford: CABI. doi:10.1079/9781845932855.0000