Multi-polygenic score approach to trait prediction

Molecular Psychiatry

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2018, Pages 1368-1374

  Krapohl, E ^a   Patel, H ^b   Newhouse, S ^b,c   Curtis, C J ^a,b   Von Stumm, S ^d   Dale, P S ^e   Zabaneh, D ^a   Breen, G ^a,b   O'Reilly, P F ^a   Plomin, R ^a  

^a MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HUMAN; MENTAL CAPACITY; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; MULTIPOLYGENIC SCORE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; SAMPLE SIZE; SCORING SYSTEM; COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FORECASTING; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETICS; MALE; PHENOTYPE; PROCEDURES; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ADOLESCENT; BODY MASS INDEX; COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FORECASTING; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETIC TESTING; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HUMANS; MALE; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 85034049516     PISSN: 13594184     EISSN: 14765578     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2017.163     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Eicher JD, Landowski C, Stackhouse B, Sloan A, Chen W, Jensen N et al. GRASP v2.0: an update on the Genome-Wide Repository of Associations between SNPs and phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43: D799-D804.
2. Visscher PM, Brown MA, McCarthy MI, Yang J. Five years of GWAS discovery. Am J Hum Genet 2012; 90: 7-24.
3. Wood AR, Esko T, Yang J, Vedantam S, Pers TH, Gustafsson S et al. Defining the role of common variation in the genomic and biological architecture of adult human height. Nat Genet 2014; 46: 1173-1186.
4. Locke AE, Kahali B, Berndt SI, Justice AE, Pers TH, Day FR et al. Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature 2015; 518: 197-206.
5. Dudbridge F. Power and predictive accuracy of polygenic risk scores. PLoS Genet 2013; 9: e1003348.
6. Palla L, Dudbridge F. A fast method that uses polygenic scores to estimate the variance explained by genome-wide marker panels and the proportion of variants affecting a trait. Am J Hum Genet 2015; 97: 250-259.
7. Euesden J, Lewis CM, O'Reilly PF. PRSice: polygenic risk score software. Bioinformatics 2014; 31: 1466-1468, btu848.
8. Visscher PM, Yang J. A plethora of pleiotropy across complex traits. Nat Genet 2016; 48: 707-708.
9. Bulik-Sullivan B, Finucane HK, Anttila V, Gusev A, Day FR, Loh P-R et al. An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat Genet 2015; 47: 1236-1241.
10. Pickrell JK, Berisa T, Liu JZ, Ségurel L, Tung JY, Hinds DA. Detection and interpretation of shared genetic influences on 42 human traits. Nat Genet 2016; 48: 709-717.
11. Krapohl E, Euesden J, Zabaneh D, Pingault J-B, Rimfeld K, von Stumm S et al. Phenome-wide analysis of genome-wide polygenic scores. Mol Psychiatry 2016; 21: 1188-1193.
12. Solovieff N, Cotsapas C, Lee PH, Purcell SM, Smoller JW. Pleiotropy in complex traits: challenges and strategies. Nat Rev Genet 2013; 14: 483-495.
13. Zou H, Hastie T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 2005; 67: 301-320.
14. Maier R, Moser G, Chen G-B, Ripke S, Cross-Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Coryell W et al. Joint analysis of psychiatric disorders increases accuracy of risk prediction for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Am J Hum Genet 2015; 96: 283-294.
15. Baselmans BM, Jansen R, Dongen J, van, Bao Y, Smart M, Kumari M et al. Multivariate genome-wide and integrated transcriptome and epigenome-wide analyses of the well-being spectrum. bioRxiv 2017; doi: 10.1101/115915.
16. Ferreira MAR, Purcell SM. A multivariate test of association. Bioinformatics 2009; 25: 132-133.
17. Turley P, Walters RK, Maghzian O, Okbay A, Lee JJ, Fontana MA et al. MTAG: multi-trait analysis of GWAS. bioRxiv 2017; doi: 10.1101/118810.
18. Selzam S, Krapohl E, von Stumm S, O'Reilly PF, Rimfeld K, Kovas Y et al. Predicting educational achievement from DNA. Mol Psychiatry 2017; 22: 267-272.
19. Krapohl E, Plomin R. Genetic link between family socioeconomic status and children's educational achievement estimated from genome-wide SNPs. Mol Psychiatry 2016; 21: 437-443.
20. Kovas Y, Haworth CMA, Dale PS, Plomin R. The genetic and environmental origins of learning abilities and disabilities in the early school years. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 2007; 72, vii 1-144.
21. McCarthy S, Das S, Kretzschmar W, Durbin R, Abecasis G, Marchini J. A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. bioRxiv 2015; 48: 1279-1283, 35170.
22. Zheng J, Erzurumluoglu AM, Elsworth BL, Kemp JP, Howe L, Haycock PC et al. LD Hub: a centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis. Bioinformatics 2017; 33: 272-279.
23. Bulik-Sullivan BK, Loh P-R, Finucane HK, Ripke S, Yang J, Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium et al. LD score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 2015; 47: 291-295.
24. Vilhjálmsson BJ, Yang J, Finucane HK, Gusev A, Lindström S, Ripke S et al. Modeling linkage disequilibrium increases accuracy of polygenic risk scores. Am J Hum Genet 2015; 97: 576-592.
25. Kuhn M. Building predictive models in R using the caret package. J Stat Softw 2008; 28: 1-26.
26. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 1996; 58: 267-288.
27. Zhou D-X. On grouping effect of elastic net. Stat Probab Lett 2013; 83: 2108-2112.
28. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw 2010; 33: 1-22.
29. Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence- Volume 2. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1995 (cited 14 December 2016), pp 1137-1143. Available from http://dl. acm.org/citation.cfm?id = 1643031.1643047.
30. Efron B. Estimating the error rate of a prediction rule: improvement on cross-validation. J Am Stat Assoc 1983; 78: 316-331.
31. Efron B, Tibshirani R. Improvements on cross-validation: the 632+ bootstrap method. J Am Stat Assoc 1997; 92: 548-560.
32. Kim J-H. Estimating classification error rate: repeated cross-validation, repeated hold-out and bootstrap. Comput Stat Data Anal 2009; 53: 3735-3745.
33. Malenka RC, Nestler E, Hyman S, Sydor A, Brown R. Molecular Neuropharmacology: A Foundation for Clinical Neuroscience. McGraw Hill Medical Book: New York, 2009.
34. Aron AR, Schlaghecken F, Fletcher PC, Bullmore ET, Eimer M, Barker R et al. Inhibition of subliminally primed responses is mediated by the caudate and thalamus: evidence from functional MRI and Huntington's disease. Brain 2003; 126: 713-723.
35. Jahanshahi M, Obeso I, Rothwell JC, Obeso JA. A fronto-striato-subthalamicpallidal network for goal-directed and habitual inhibition. Nat Rev Neurosci 2015; 16: 719-732.
36. Seger CA, Cincotta CM. The roles of the caudate nucleus in human classification learning. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 2941-2951.
37. Ruscio J. A probability-based measure of effect size: robustness to base rates and other factors. Psychol Methods 2008; 13: 19-30.
38. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Academic Press: New York, NY, US, 1988.
39. Dong J, Chen Y, Tang Y, Xu F, Yu C, Li Y et al. Body mass index is associated with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0144872.
40. Wray NR, Lee SH, Mehta D, Vinkhuyzen AAE, Dudbridge F, Middeldorp CM. Research review: polygenic methods and their application to psychiatric traits. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2014; 55: 1068-1087.
41. Majumdar A, Haldar T, Bhattacharya S, Witte J. An efficient Bayesian meta-analysis approach for studying cross-phenotype genetic associations. bioRxiv. 2017; doi: 10.1101/101543.
42. Zhu X, Feng T, Tayo BO, Liang J, Young JH, Franceschini N et al. Meta-analysis of correlated traits via summary statistics from GWASs with an application in hypertension. Am J Hum Genet 2015; 96: 21-36.
43. Bhattacharjee S, Rajaraman P, Jacobs KB, Wheeler WA, Melin BS, Hartge P et al. A subset-based approach improves power and interpretation for the combined analysis of genetic association studies of heterogeneous traits. Am J Hum Genet 2012; 90: 821-835.
44. Shim H, Chasman DI, Smith JD, Mora S, Ridker PM, Nickerson DA et al. A multivariate genome-wide association analysis of 10 LDL subfractions, and their response to statin treatment, in 1868 Caucasians. PLOS ONE 2015; 10: e0120758.
45. Bolormaa S, Pryce JE, Reverter A, Zhang Y, Barendse W, Kemper K et al. A multi-trait, meta-analysis for detecting pleiotropic polymorphisms for stature, fatness and reproduction in beef cattle. PLOS Genet 2014; 10: e1004198.