Addicted to answers: Need for cognitive closure and the endorsement of conspiracy beliefs

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 109-117

  Marchlewska, Marta ^a   Cichocka, Aleksandra ^b   Kossowska, Małgorzata ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^c JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

conspiracy beliefs; need for cognitive closure; uncertainty threat

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; REFUGEE; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 85033578637     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2308     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20, 637–647. http://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00160
2. Barnett, V., & Lewis, T. (1994). Outliers in statistical data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Bilewicz, M., Winiewski, M., Kofta, M., & Wójcik, A. (2013). Harmful ideas. The structure and consequences of anti-semitic beliefs in Poland. Political Psychology, 34, 821–839. http://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12024
4. Chirumbolo, A. (2002). The relationship between need for cognitive closure and political orientation: The mediating role of authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 603–610. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00062-9
5. Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., & Golec de Zavala, A. (2015). Does self-love or self-hate predict conspiracy beliefs? Narcissism, self-esteem, and the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 157–166. http://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615616170
6. Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., Golec de Zavala, A., & Olechowski, M. (2015). ‘They will not control us’: Ingroup positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies. British Journal of Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12158
7. Douglas, K., Sutton, R., Jolley, D., & Wood, M. (2015). The social, political, environmental and health-related consequences of conspiracy theories: Problems and potential solutions. In M. Bilewicz, A. Cichocka, & W. Soral (Eds.), The psychology of conspiracy. Taylor and Francis.
8. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Ford, T. E., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1995). Effects of epistemic motivations on the use of accessible constructs in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 950–962. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295219009
10. Freund, T., Kruglanski, A., & Shpitzajzen, A. (1985). The freezing and unfreezing of impressional primacy: Effects of the need for structure and the fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 479–487. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167285114013
11. Goclowski, M., Barteczko, A., & Koper, A. (2015). Polish opposition warns refugees could spread infectious diseases. Reuters. Retrieved October 15 from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-poland-idUSKCN0S918B20151015.
12. Golec, A., & Federico, C. (2004). Understanding responses to political conflict: Interactive effects of the need for closure and salient conflict schemas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 750–762. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.750
13. Golec de Zavala, A., & Cichocka, A. (2012). Collective narcissism and anti-semitism in Poland. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15, 213–229. http://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211420891
14. Golec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1074–1096. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0016904
15. Golec de Zavala, A., Federico, C., Cisłak, A., & Sigger, J. (2008). Need for closure and coercion in inter-group conflicts: Experimental evidence for the mitigating effect of accessible conflict schemas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 84–105. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.438
16. Grzesiak-Feldman, M., & Haska, A. (2012). Conspiracy theories surrounding the Polish presidential plane crash near Smolensk, Russia. Retrieved November 22 from Deconspirator website: http://deconspirator.com/2012/11/22/conspiracy-theories-surrounding-the-polish-presidential-plane-crash-near-smolensk-russia/
17. Hadi, A. S., & Velleman, P. F. (1997). Computationally efficient adaptive methods for the identification of outliers and homogeneous groups in large data sets. Proceedings of the Statistical Computing Section, American Statistical Association, 1, 24–29.
18. Hogg, M. A., & Adelman, J. (2013). Uncertainty-identity theory: Extreme groups, radical behavior, and authoritarian leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 436–454. http://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12023
19. Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un-)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28, 25–43. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930
20. Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PloS One, 9, e89177. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
21. Klein, C. T. F., & Webster, D. M. (2000). Individual differences in argument scrutiny as motivated by need for cognitive closure. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 119–129. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2202_5
22. Knolle, K. (2015). German pilot said to have suffered from depression, anxiety. Reuters. Retrieved March 27 from http://in.reuters.com/article/france-germanwings-crash-co-pilot-idINKBN0MN0OV20150327.
23. Kofta, M., & Sedek, G. (2005). Conspiracy stereotypes of Jews during systemic transformation in Poland. International Journal of Sociology, 35, 40–64. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2005.11043142
24. Kossowska, M., & Bukowski, M. (2015). Motivated roots of conspiracies: The role of certainty and control motives in conspiracy thinking. In M. Bilewicz, A. Cichocka, & W. Soral (Eds.), Psychology of conspiracy (pp. 145–161). New York: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
25. Kossowska, M., Hanusz, K., & Trejtowicz, M. (2012). Skrócona wersja Skali Potrzeby Poznawczego Domknięcia. Dobór pozycji i walidacja skali. [Short version of the need for cognitive closure: Item selection and scale validation]. Psychologia Społeczna, 7, 89–99.
26. Kossowska, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2003). The relationship between need for closure and conservatism in Western and Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 24, 501–518. http://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00338
27. Kowalczuk, K., Sobiecka, S., & Stalmach, R. (2015). Polacy o uchodźcach w internecie i w realu. Komunikat z badań. [Poles on refugees: in the internet and the real life. The research report]. Warsaw: CBOS.
28. Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Motivations for judging and knowing: Implications for causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundation of social behavior Vol. 2 (pp. 333–368). New York: Guilford.
29. Kruglanski, A. W., Freund, T., & Bar-Tal, D. (1996). Motivational effects in the mere-exposure paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 479–499. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199605)26:3<479::AID-EJSP770>3.0
30. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”. Psychological Review, 103, 263–283. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263
31. Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., & Moscovitch, D. A. (2008). On the belief in God: Towards an understanding of the emotional substrates of compensatory control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1559–1562. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.007
32. Leman, P. J., & Cinnirella, M. (2013). Beliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 378. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg
33. Roets, A., Kruglanski, A. W., Kossowska, M., Pierro, A., & Hong, Y.-Y. (2015). The motivated gatekeeper of our minds: New directions in need for closure theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 221–283. http://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.001
34. Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2008). Why some hate to dillydally and others do not: The arousal-invoking capacity of decision-making for low and high-scoring need for closure individuals. Social Cognition, 26, 333–346. http://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.3.333
35. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2013). Life after p-hacking. Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology. New Orleans, LA 17–19 January 2013. Available: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2205186.
36. Smith, T., & Novella, S. (2007). HIV denial in the internet era. PLoS Medicine, 4, e256. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040256
37. Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133, 572–585. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006
38. van Prooijen, J. W., & Jostmann, N. B. (2013). Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 109–115. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1922
39. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
40. Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322, 115–117. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159845
41. Whitson, J., Galinsky, A. D., & Kay, A. (2015). The emotional roots of conspiratorial perceptions, system justification, and belief in the paranormal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 89–95. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.002