Assessment of novel tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 3: Comprehensive chemical characterisation of harmful and potentially harmful aerosol emissions

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 93, Issue , 2018, Pages 14-33

  Forster, Mark ^a   Fiebelkorn, Stacy ^a   Yurteri, Caner ^a   Mariner, Derek ^a   Liu, Chuan ^a   Wright, Christopher ^a   McAdam, Kevin ^a   Murphy, James ^a   Proctor, Christopher ^a  

^a BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

1R6F reference cigarette; 3R4F reference cigarette; Next generation products; Preclinical assessment; Tobacco heating product; Toxicant reduction

Indexed keywords

CIGARETTE SMOKE; NICOTINE;

AEROSOL; AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; CANADA; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMOKING; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; TOBACCO; TOBACCO HEATING PRODUCT; UNITED STATES; ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; DANGEROUS GOODS; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE; HEATING; PROCEDURES; SMOKE;

AEROSOLS; ELECTRONIC NICOTINE DELIVERY SYSTEMS; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; HEATING; SMOKE; TOBACCO PRODUCTS;

EID: 85033492673     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: 10960295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. ANVISA, Brazil Resolution RDC No. 90 of the Federal Sanitation Agency, Effective 27 December 2007. 2007, National Health Surveillance Agency SEPN 515, Bldg. B, Ed. Omega − Brasilia (DF) 70770–502 http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/anvisa/2007/rdc0090_27_12_2007.pdf (in Portuguese) (Accessed 27 January 2017).
2. Baker, R.R., A review of pyrolysis studies to unravel reaction steps in burning tobacco. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 11 (1987), 555–573.
3. Baker, R.R., The development and significance of standards for smoking-machine methodology. Beitr. Tab. Int. 20 (2002), 23–41.
4. Baker, R.R., Smoke generation inside a burning cigarette: modifying combustion to develop cigarettes that may be less hazardous to health. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 32:4 (2006), 373–385.
5. Benowitz, N.L., Nicotine addiction. N. Engl. J. Med. 362 (2010), 2295–2303.
6. Burns, D.M., Dybing, E., Gray, N., Hecht, S., Anderson, C., Sanner, T., O'Connor, R., Djordjevic, M., Dresler, C., Hainaut, P., Jarvis, M., Opperhuizen, A., Straif, K., Mandated lowering of toxicants in cigarette smoke: a description of the World Health Organization TobReg proposal. Tob. Control 17 (2008), 132–141.
7. Eaton, D., Jakaj, B., Forster, M., Nicol, J., Mavropoulou, E., Scott, J.K., Liu, C., McAdam, K.G., Murphy, J., Proctor, C.J., Assessment of Tobacco Heating Product THP1.0. Part 2: Product Design, Operation and Thermophysical Characterisation. Reg Tox Pharm. 2017.
8. European Commission, Special eurobarometer 429: attitudes of europeans towards tobacco and electronic cigarettes. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_429_en.pdf, 2015 Accessed 27 January 2016.
9. European Commission, 10 key changes for tobacco products sold in the EU. Press Release, May 20, 2016 http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-1762_en.htm, 2016 Accessed 30 January 2016.
10. Farsalinos, K.E., Le Houezec, J., Regulation in the face of uncertainty: the evidence on electronic nicotine delivery systems (e-cigarettes). Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 8 (2015), 157–167.
11. Food and Drug Administration, Harmful and potentially harmful constituents in tobacco products and tobacco smoke. Established list, April 2012 http://www.fda.gov/downloads/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/UCM297981.pdf, 2012 Accessed 27 January 2017.
12. Food and Drug Administration, Draft guidance for industry: reporting harmful and potentially harmful constituents in tobacco products and tobacco smoke under section 904(a)(3) of the Federal Food. Drug, Cosmet. Act, 2012, 1–10 http://www.fda.gov/downloads/TobaccoProducts/Labeling/RulesRegulationsGuidance/ucm297828.pdf Accessed 27 January 2017.
13. Food and Drug Administration, Deeming tobacco products to Be subject to the federal Food, Drug, and cosmetic act, as amended by the family smoking prevention and tobacco control act. http://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/Labeling/RulesRegulationsGuidance/ucm394909.htm, 2016 Accessed 27 January 2016.
14. Food and Drug Administration, Premarket tobacco product applications for electronic nicotine delivery systems. Guid. Industry – Draft Guid., 2016, 25–27 http://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/Labeling/RulesRegulationsGuidance/ucm499351.htm Accessed 27 January 2016.
15. Flora, J.W., Meruva, N., Huang, C.B., Wilkinson, C.T., Ballentine, R., Characterization of potential impurities and degradation products in electronic cigarette formulations and aerosols. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 74 (2016), 1–11.
16. Forster, M., Liu, C., Duke, M.G., McAdam, K.G., Proctor, C.J., An experimental method to study emissions from heated tobacco between 100 to 200°C. Chem. Cent. J., 9, 2015, 20.
17. Fowles, J., Dybing, E., Application of toxicological risk assessment principles to the chemical constituents of cigarette smoke. Tob. Control 12:4 (2003), 424–430.
18. Gee, J., Prasad, K., Slayford, S., Gray, A., Nother, K., Cunningham, A., Mavropoulou, E., Proctor, C.J., Assessment of Tobacco Heating Product THP1.0. Part 8: Study to Determine Puffing Topography, Mouth Level Exposure and Consumption Among Japanese Users. 2017, Reg Tox Pharm.
19. Ghosh, D., Jeannet, C., An improved Cambridge filter pad extraction methodology to obtain more accurate water and “tar” values: in situ Cambridge filter pad extraction methodology. Beiträge zur Tab. Int. 26:2 (2014), 38–50.
20. Gonzalez-Suarez, I., Martin, F., Marescotti, D., Guedj, E., Acali, S., Johne, S., et al. In vitro systems toxicology assessment of a candidate modified risk tobacco product shows reduced toxicity compared to that of conventional cigarette. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 29 (2016), 3–18.
21. Health Canada, Tobacco reporting regulations. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/tobac-tabac/legislation/reg/indust/method/index-eng.php#main, 1999 Accessed 27 January 2017.
22. Health Canada, Determination of “Tar” Nicotine and Carbon Monoxide in Mainstream Tobacco Smoke, Method T-115. 1999.
23. Hoffmann, D., Hoffmann, I., Letters to the editor, tobacco smoke components. Beitr. Tab. Int. 18 (1998), 49–52.
24. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking. 2004, IARC, Lyon, France.
25. International Organization for Standardization, Tobacco and Tobacco Products —Atmosphere for Conditioning and Testing. ISO 3402:1999, 1999, ISO, Geneva.
26. International Organization for Standardization, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025:2005, 2005, ISO, Geneva.
27. Jaunky, T., Adamson, J., Santopietro, S., Terry, A., Thorne, D., Breheny, D., Proctor, C.J., Gaca, M., Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 5: In vitro dosimetric and cytotoxic assessment. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2017 (this series).
28. ® Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) and Conventional Cigarette Products. Poster 1861, 2012, Society of Toxicology, San Francisco March 11–15, 2012.
29. Lauterbach, J.H., et al. Suggested Protocol for Estimation of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents in Mainstream Aerosols Generated by Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS). Poster 1860, 2012, Society of Toxicology, San Francisco March 11–15, 2012.
30. Liu, C., McAdam, K.G., Perfetti, T.A., Some recent topics in cigarette smoke science. Mini-Rev. Mini-Rev. Org. Chem. 8 (2011), 349–359.
31. Marco, E., Grimalt, J.O., A rapid method for the chromatographic analysis of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath of tobacco cigarette and electronic cigarette smokers. J. Chromatogr. A 1410 (2015), 51–59.
32. Margham, J., McAdam, K., Forster, M., Liu, C., Wright, C., Mariner, D., Proctor, C., Chemical composition of aerosol from an e-cigarette: a quantitative comparison with cigarette smoke. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 29:10 (2016), 1662–1678 2016 Oct 17.
33. McNeill, A., Brose, L.S., Calder, R., Hitchman, S.C., Hajek, P., McRobbie, H., E-cigarettes: an evidence update A report commissioned by Public Health England. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/457102/Ecigarettes_an_evidence_update_A_report_commissioned_by_Public_Health_England_FINAL.pdf, 2015 Accessed 27 January 2016.
34. Moennikes, O., Vanscheeuwijck, P.M., Friedrichs, B., Anskeit, E., Patskan, G.J., Reduced toxicological activity of cigarette smoke by the addition of ammonia magnesium phosphate to the paper of an electrically heated cigarette: subchronic inhalation toxicology. Inhal. Toxicol. 20:7 (2008), 647–663 2008 May.
35. Proctor, C.J., Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 1: Series introduction. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2017 (this series).
36. Royal College of Physicians, Nicotine without Smoke: Tobacco Harm Reduction., 2016 A report by the Tobacco Advisory Group of the Royal College of Physicians, London, April 28, 2016 https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/nicotine-without-smoke-tobacco-harm-reduction-0 Accessed 27 January 2016.
37. Rodgman, A., Perfetti, T.A., The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke. second ed., 2013, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
38. Roemer, E., Schramke, H., Weiler, H., Buettner, A., Kausche, S., Weber, S., Berges, A., Stueber, M., Muench, M., Trelles-Sticken, E., Pype, J., Kohlgrueber, K., Voelkel, H., Wittke, S., Mainstream smoke chemistry and in vitro and in vivo toxicity of the reference cigarettes 3R4F and 2R4F. Beitrage zur Tab. Int. 25:1 (2012), 316–335.
39. Schaller, J.P., Keller, D., Pogent, L., Pratte, P., Kaelin, E., McHugh, D., Cudazzo, G., Smart, D., Tricker, A.R., Gautier, L., Yerly, M., Pires, R.R., Le Bouhellec, S., Ghosh, D., Hofer, I., Garcia, E., Van Scheeuwijck, P., Maeder, S., Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 2: chemical composition, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and physical properties of the aerosol. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 81:Suppl. 2 (2016), S27–S47.
40. Schoenborn, C.A., Grindi, R.M., Electronic Cigarette Use Amongst Adults. 2015 NCHS Data Brief No. 217, October 2015 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db217.pdf Accessed 23 June 2016.
41. Schorp, M.K., Tricker, A.R., Dempsey, R., Reduced exposure evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette smoking system. Part 1: non-clinical and clinical insights. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 64 (2012), S1–S10.
42. Sleiman, M., Logue, J.M., Montesinos, V.N., Russell, M.L., Litter, M.I., Gundel, L.A., Destaillats, H., Emissions from electronic cigarettes: key parameters affecting the release of harmful chemicals. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2016, 10.1021/acs.est.6b01741 Published online July 27, 2016.
43. Smith, M.R., Clark, B., Lüdicke, F., Schaller, J.-P., Vanscheeuwijck, P., Hoeng, J., Peitsch, M.C., Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. Part 1: description of the system and the scientific assessment program. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2016, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.07.006 pii: S0273–2300(16)30189-1.
44. Stabbert, R., Voncken, P., Rustemeier, K., Haussmann, H.J., Roemer, E., Schaffernicht, H., Patskan, G., Toxicological evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette. Part 2: Chemical composition of mainstream smoke. J. Appl. Toxicol. 23:5 (2003), 329–339.
45. Taiwanese Department of Health, Tobacco Hazards Prevention and Control Act. Bureau of Health Promotion, 2012, Department of Health, Taiwan (R.O.C) http://www.hpa.gov.tw/English/ClassShow.aspx?No=200907130001 Accessed 27 January 2017.
46. Taylor, M., Thorne, D., Carr, T., Breheny, D., Walker, P., Proctor, C.J., Gaca, M., Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 6: A comparative in vitro study using contemporary screening approaches. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2017 (this series).
47. Tayyarah, R., Long, G.A., Comparison of select analytes in aerosol from e-cigarettes with smoke from conventional cigarettes and with ambient air. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 70 (2014), 704–710.
48. Thorne, D., Breheny, D., Proctor, C.J., Gaca, M., Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 7: Comparative in vitro toxicological evaluation. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2017 (this series).
49. University of Kentucky Center for Tobacco Reference Products, 3R4F Preliminary Analysis. 2008 https://ctrp.uky.edu/resources/pdf/webdocs/3R4F%20Preliminary%20Analysis.pdf Accessed 10 August 2017.
50. University of Kentucky Center for Tobacco Reference Products, Certificate of Analysis: 1R6F Certified Reference Cigarette. 2016 https://ctrp.uky.edu/resources/pdf/webdocs/CoA_1R6F.pdf Accessed 10 August 2017.
51. US Department of Health and Human Services, The Health Consequences of Smoking 50 Years of Progress: a Report of the Surgeon General, 2014., 2014, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Atlanta, USA 2014 http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/index.html Accessed 27 January 2017.
52. West, R., Beard, E., Brown, J., Trends in electronic cigarette use in england. Smoking toolkit study STS140122. http://www.smokinginengland.info/latest-statistics/, 2015 Accessed 23 June 2016.
53. WHO Study Group, The scientific basis of tobacco product regulation. World Health Organ Tech. Rep. Ser. 945 (2007), 1–112.
54. Zenzen, V., Diekmann, J., Gerstenberg, B., Weber, S., Wittke, S., Schorp, M.K., Reduced exposure evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette smoking system. Part 2: smoke chemistry and in vitro toxicological evaluation using smoking regimes reflecting human puffing behaviour. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 64 (2012), S11–S14.