Fake empathy and human- robot interaction (HRI): A preliminary study

International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 44-59

  Vallverdú, Jordi ^a   Nishida, Toyoaki ^b   Ohmoto, Yoshisama ^b   Moran, Stuart ^c   Lázare, Sarah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Emotions; Empathy; Fake; HRI; Human Robot Interaction; Robots; WOZ

Indexed keywords

MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; ROBOTS; SURVEYS; VIDEO RECORDING;

BASIC EMOTIONS; EMOTIONS; EMPATHY; FAKE; HUMAN RESPONSE; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI); ROBOT SKILLS; SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 85033380873     PISSN: 15483908     EISSN: 15483916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/IJTHI.2018010103     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bainbridge, W. A., Hart, J., Kim, E. S., & Scassellati, B. (2009). The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(2), 2009-2010.
2. Bartneck, C. (2004). From Fiction to Science - A Cultural Reflection on Social Robots. Robotics. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.4.9805
3. Bartneck, C. (2008). Who like androids more: Japanese or US Americans? In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, August 1-3. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2008.4600724
4. Bartneck, C., Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kato, K. (2005). A cross-cultural study on attitudes towards robots. In Proceedings of the HCI International (pp. 1981-1983). Retrieved from http://bartneck.de/publications/2005/nars/bartneckHCII2005.pdf
5. Bartneck, C., Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kennsuke, K. (2005) "Cultural Differences in Attitudes Towards Robots. In Proceedings of the AISB Symposium on Robot Companions: Hard Problems And Open Challenges In Human-Robot Interaction, Hatfield.
6. Carpenter, J., Davis, J., Lee, T., Erwin-Steward, L., Bransford, J., & Vye, N. (2009). Gender representation and humanoid robots designed for domestic use. The International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(3), 261-265. doi:10.1007/s12369-009-0016-4
7. Couper, M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2004). Does voice matter? an interactive voice response (IVR) experiment. Journal of Official Statistics, 20(3), 551-570.
8. Crivelli, C., Jarillo, S., Russell, J. A., & Fernández-Dols, J.-M. (2016). Reading emotions from faces in two indigenous societies. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 145(7), 830-843. doi:10.1037/xge0000172 PMID:27100308
9. De Vignemont, F., & Singer, T. (2006). The empathic brain: How, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 435-441. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008 PMID:16949331
10. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71-100. doi:10.1177/1534582304267187 PMID:15537986
11. Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006). Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. TheScientificWorldJournal, 6, 1146-1163. doi:10.1100/tsw.2006.221 PMID:16998603
12. Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99(3), 550-553. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.550 PMID:1344638
13. Ekman, P. (1999). Basic Emotions. In Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45-60). http://doi.org/ doi:10.1002/0470013494.ch3
14. Grodzinsky, F. S., Miller, K. W., & Wolf, M. J. (2015). Developing Automated Deceptions and the Impact on Trust. Philosophy & Technology, 28(1), 91-105. doi:10.1007/s13347-014-0158-7
15. Hall, E. T. (1963, October). A System for the Notation of Proxemic Behavior. American Anthropologist, 65(5), 1003-1026. doi:10.1525/aa.1963.65.5.02a00020
16. Hufendiek, R. (2016). Affordances and the normativity of emotions. Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1144-7
17. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., Legrenzi, M. S., & Caverni, J. P. (1999). Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review, 106(1), 62-88. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.62 PMID:10197363
18. Jung, E. H., Waddell, T. F., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Feminizing Robots: User Responses to Gender Cues on Robot Body and Screen. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '16 (pp. 3107-3113). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. http://doi.org/ doi:10.1145/2851581.2892428
19. Krämer, U. M., Mohammadi, B., Doñamayor, N., Samii, A., & Münte, T. F. (2010). Emotional and cognitive aspects of empathy and their relation to social cognition: An fMRI-study. Brain Research, 1311, 110-120. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.043 PMID:19944083
20. Kwak, S. S., Yunkyung, K., Kim, E., Shin, C., & Cho, K. (2013). What makes people empathize with an emotional robot?: The impact of agency and physical embodiment on human empathy for a robot. In Proceedings of 2013 IEEE RO-MAN (pp. 180-185).
21. Leite, I., Pereira, A., Mascarenhas, S., Martinho, C., Prada, R., & Paiva, A. (2013). The influence of empathy in human-robot relations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(3), 250-260. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.005
22. Matsumoto, D. (2004). Paul Ekman and the legacy of universals. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(1), 45-51. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2003.09.005
23. Nummenmaa, L., Hirvonen, J., Parkkola, R., & Hietanen, J. K. (2008). Is Emotional Contagion Special? An Fmri Study on Neural Systems for Affective and Cognitive Empathy. NeuroImage, 43(3), 571-580. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.014 PMID:18790065
24. Ohmoto, Y., Ohashi, H., Takahashi, A., & Nishida, T. (2010). Capture and Express Behavior Environment (CEBE) for Realizing Enculturating Human-Agent Interaction. In T. Ishida (Ed.), Culture and Computing, LNCS 6259 (pp. 41-54). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17184-0-4
25. Paepcke, S., & Takayama, L. (2010). Judging a bot by its cover: an experiment on expectation setting for personal robots. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI '10) (pp. 45-52). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press. doi:10.1145/1734454.1734472
26. Paiva, A., Dias, J., Sobral, D., Woods, S., & Hall, L. (2004). Building Empathic Lifelike Characters: the proximity factor. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Empathic Agents AAMAS (Vol. 4).
27. Powers, A., Kramer, A. D. I., Lim, S., Kuo, J., Lee, S. L., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Vol. 2005, pp. 158-163). http://doi.org/ doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513773
28. Ramachandran, V. S. (2004). A Brief Tour of Human Consciousness. New York: Pi Press, Pearson Education.
29. Riek, L. D. (2012). Wizard of Oz Studies in HRI: A Systematic Review and New Reporting Guidelines. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(1).
30. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 169-192. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 PMID:15217330
31. Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A. M., Schulte, F. P., Eimler, S. C., Hoffmann, L., Sobieraj, S., Maderwald, S., & Brand, M. et al. (2013). Neural correlates of empathy towards robots. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI '13) (pp. 215-216). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press.
32. Tapus, A., & Mataric, M. J. (2007). Emulating Empathy in Socially Assistive Robotics. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics (pp. 93-96).
33. Vallverdú, J. (2011). The Eastern Construction of the Artificial Mind. Enrahonar, 47, 171-185.
34. Vallverdu, J. (2013). Ekmans paradox and a naturalistic strategy to escape from it. International Journal of Synthetic Emotions, 4(2), 1-7. doi:10.4018/ijse.2013070101
35. Vallverdu, J., & Trovato, G. (2016). Emotional affordances for human-robot interaction. Adaptive Behavior, 24(5), 320-334. doi:10.1177/1059712316668238
36. Walters, M. L., Dautenhahn, K., Te Boekhorst, R., Koay, K. L., Syrdal, D. S., & Nehaniv, C. L. (2009). An empirical framework for human-robot proxemics. In Proc. of New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction: symposium at the AISB09 convention (pp. 144-149).
37. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes (pp. 48-71). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.