Feminizing robots: User responses to gender cues on robot body and screen

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 07-12-May-2016, Issue , 2016, Pages 3107-3113

  Jung, Eun Hwa ^a   Waddell, T Franklin ^a   Sundar, S Shyam ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anthropomorphism; Anxiety; Computers are social actors; Robot gender; Source orientation

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

ANTHROPOMORPHISM; ANXIETY; COMPUTERS ARE SOCIAL ACTORS; FEMALE WORKERS; ROBOT BODY; ROBOT GENDER; ROBOT MORPHOLOGY; SOCIAL ROBOTICS; SOURCE ORIENTATIONS; USER EVALUATIONS;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 85014717524     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2851581.2892428     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Abele, A. E. The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: findings from a prospective study. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85, 4(2003), 768-776.
2. Baker, K. A. Who saves the animated world? The sex-role stereotyping of superheroes and superheroines in children's animated programming. Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations (2004), 962
3. Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Croft, E., and Zoghbi, S. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 1(2009), 71-81.
4. Breazeal, C. Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 3(2003), 167-175.
5. Eyssel, F., and Hegel, F. (S) he's got the look: Gender stereotyping of robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 9(2012), 2213-2230.
6. Fiske, S. T. Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998, 357-411.
7. Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., and Powers, A. Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. Proceedings of Robot and Human Interactive Communication, (2003), 55-60.
8. Lee, K. M., Peng, W., Jin, S.-A., and Yan, C. Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction. Journal of Communication, 56 4(2006), 754-772.
9. Li, D., Rau, P. P., and Li, Y. A cross-cultural study: effect of robot appearance and task. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2, 2(2010), 175-186.
10. Macrae, C. N., and Martin, D. A boy primed Sue: Feature-based processing and person construal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(2007), 793-805.
11. Mason, M. F., Cloutier, J., and Macrae, C. N. On construing others: Category and stereotype activation from facial cues. Social Cognition, 24(2006), 540-562.
12. Morgan, M., and Shanahan, J. The state of cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54, 2(2010), 337-355.
13. Nass, C., Moon, Y., and Green, N. Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 10(1997), 864-876.
14. Shibata, T. and Tanie, K. Physical and affective interaction between human and mental commit robot. In Robotics and Automation, IEEE (2001), 2572-2577
15. Sundar, S. S. and Nass, C. Source orientation in human-computer interaction: Programmer, networker, or independent social actor? Communication Research, 27, 6(2000), 683-703.
16. Tay, B., Jung, Y., and Park, T. When stereotypes meet robots: The double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human-robot interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 38(2014), 75-84.
17. Waddell, T. F., Zhang, B., and Sundar, S. S. Humancomputer interaction. In C. R. Berger & M. E. Roloff (Eds.), International encyclopedia of interpersonal communication. Wiley, Malden, MA, forthcoming.