3.2-Å-resolution structure of the 90S preribosome before A1 pre-rRNA cleavage

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2017, Pages 954-964

  Cheng, Jingdong ^a   Kellner, Nikola ^b   Berninghausen, Otto ^a   Hurt, Ed ^b   Beckmann, Roland ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDONUCLEASE; HETERODUPLEX; INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; RNA 18S; SMALL NUCLEOLAR RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN; FUNGAL PROTEIN; RIBOSOME DNA; RNA PRECURSOR;

90S PRERIBOSOME; ARTICLE; CHAETOMIUM; CHAETOMIUM THERMOPHILUM; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIBOSOME; RNA CONFORMATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; GENETICS; SMALL RIBOSOMAL SUBUNIT; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

CHAETOMIUM; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; FUNGAL PROTEINS; RIBOSOME SUBUNITS, SMALL, EUKARYOTIC; RNA PRECURSORS; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 18S;

EID: 85032881411     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3476     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Woolford, J. L. Jr. & Baserga, S. J. Ribosome biogenesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 195, 643-681 (2013).
2. Henras, A. K., Plisson-Chastang, C., O'Donohue, M. F., Chakraborty, A. & Gleizes, P. E. An overview of pre-ribosomal RNA processing in eukaryotes. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 6, 225-242 (2015).
3. Turowski, T. W. & Tollervey, D. Cotranscriptional events in eukaryotic ribosome synthesis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 6, 129-139 (2015).
4. Grandi, P. et al. 90S pre-ribosomes include the 35S pre-rRNA, the U3 snoRNP, and 40S subunit processing factors but predominantly lack 60S synthesis factors. Mol. Cell 10, 105-115 (2002).
5. Dragon, F. et al. A large nucleolar U3 ribonucleoprotein required for 18S ribosomal RNA biogenesis. Nature 417, 967-970 (2002).
6. Chaker-Margot, M., Hunziker, M., Barandun, J., Dill, B. D. & Klinge, S. Stage-specific assembly events of the 6-MDa small-subunit processome initiate eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 920-923 (2015).
7. Pérez-Fernández, J., Martín-Marcos, P. & Dosil, M. Elucidation of the assembly events required for the recruitment of Utp20, Imp4 and Bms1 onto nascent preribosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 8105-8121 (2011).
8. Zhang, L., Wu, C., Cai, G., Chen, S. & Ye, K. Stepwise and dynamic assembly of the earliest precursors of small ribosomal subunits in yeast. Genes Dev. 30, 718-732 (2016).
9. Granneman, S., Petfalski, E., Swiatkowska, A. & Tollervey, D. Cracking pre-40S ribosomal subunit structure by systematic analyses of RNA-protein cross-linking. EMBO J. 29, 2026-2036 (2010).
10. Lebaron, S. et al. Rrp5 binding at multiple sites coordinates pre-rRNA processing and assembly. Mol. Cell 52, 707-719 (2013).
11. Lin, J., Lu, J., Feng, Y., Sun, M. & Ye, K. An RNA-binding complex involved in ribosome biogenesis contains a protein with homology to tRNA CCA-adding enzyme. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001669 (2013).
12. Mougey, E. B. et al. The terminal balls characteristic of eukaryotic rRNA transcription units in chromatin spreads are rRNA processing complexes. Genes Dev. 7, 1609-1619 (1993).
13. Dutca, L. M., Gallagher, J. E. & Baserga, S. J. The initial U3 snoRNA: pre-rRNA base pairing interaction required for pre-18S rRNA folding revealed by in vivo chemical probing. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 5164-5180 (2011).
14. Horn, D. M., Mason, S. L. & Karbstein, K. Rcl1 protein, a novel nuclease for 18 S ribosomal RNA production. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 34082-34087 (2011).
15. Karbstein, K. & Doudna, J. A. GTP-dependent formation of a ribonucleoprotein subcomplex required for ribosome biogenesis. J. Mol. Biol. 356, 432-443 (2006).
16. Kornprobst, M. et al. Architecture of the 90S pre-ribosome: a structural view on the birth of the eukaryotic ribosome. Cell 166, 380-393 (2016).
17. Chaker-Margot, M., Barandun, J., Hunziker, M. & Klinge, S. Architecture of the yeast small subunit processome. Science 355, eaal1880 (2017).
18. Sun, Q. et al. Molecular architecture of the 90S small subunit pre-ribosome. eLife 6, e22086 (2017).
19. Zhang, C. et al. Integrative structural analysis of the UTPB complex, an early assembly factor for eukaryotic small ribosomal subunits. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 7475-7486 (2016).
20. Hunziker, M. et al. UtpA and UtpB chaperone nascent pre-ribosomal RNA and U3 snoRNA to initiate eukaryotic ribosome assembly. Nat. Commun. 7, 12090 (2016).
21. Pöll, G. et al. In vitro reconstitution of yeast tUTP/UTP A and UTP B subcomplexes provides new insights into their modular architecture. PLoS One 9, e114898 (2014).
22. Tafforeau, L. et al. The complexity of human ribosome biogenesis revealed by systematic nucleolar screening of pre-rRNA processing factors. Mol. Cell 51, 539-551 (2013).
23. Bleichert, F., Granneman, S., Osheim, Y. N., Beyer, A. L. & Baserga, S. J. The PINc domain protein Utp24, a putative nuclease, is required for the early cleavage steps in 18S rRNA maturation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9464-9469 (2006).
24. Wells, G. R. et al. The PIN domain endonuclease Utp24 cleaves pre-ribosomal RNA at two coupled sites in yeast and humans. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 5399-5409 (2016).
25. Wimberly, B. T. et al. Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit. Nature 407, 327-339 (2000).
26. Meyer, B. et al. The Bowen-Conradi syndrome protein Nep1 (Emg1) has a dual role in eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis, as an essential assembly factor and in the methylation of 1191 in yeast 18S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 1526-1537 (2011).
27. Thomas, S. R., Keller, C. A., Szyk, A., Cannon, J. R. & Laronde-Leblanc, N. A. Structural insight into the functional mechanism of Nep1/Emg1 N1-specific pseudouridine methyltransferase in ribosome biogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 2445-2457 (2011).
28. Ben-Shem, A., Jenner, L., Yusupova, G. & Yusupov, M. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic ribosome. Science 330, 1203-1209 (2010).
29. Lamanna, A. C. & Karbstein, K. An RNA conformational switch regulates pre-18S rRNA cleavage. J. Mol. Biol. 405, 3-17 (2011).
30. Granneman, S., Kudla, G., Petfalski, E. & Tollervey, D. Identification of protein binding sites on U3 snoRNA and pre-rRNA by UV cross-linking and high-throughput analysis of cDNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9613-9618 (2009).
31. Granneman, S. et al. The hU3-55K protein requires 15. 5K binding to the box B/C motif as well as flanking RNA elements for its association with the U3 small nucleolar RNA in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 48490-48500 (2002).
32. Sharma, K. & Tollervey, D. Base pairing between U3 small nucleolar RNA and the 5 end of 18S rRNA is required for pre-rRNA processing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 6012-6019 (1999).
33. Shah, B. N., Liu, X. & Correll, C. C. Imp3 unfolds stem structures in pre-rRNA and U3 snoRNA to form a duplex essential for small subunit processing. RNA 19, 1372-1383 (2013).
34. Marmier-Gourrier, N., Cléry, A., Schlotter, F., Senty-Ségault, V. & Branlant, C. A second base pair interaction between U3 small nucleolar RNA and the 5-ETS region is required for early cleavage of the yeast pre-ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 9731-9745 (2011).
35. Liu, P. C. & Thiele, D. J. Novel stress-responsive genes EMG1 and NOP14 encode conserved, interacting proteins required for 40S ribosome biogenesis. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 3644-3657 (2001).
36. Milkereit, P. et al. A Noc complex specifically involved in the formation and nuclear export of ribosomal 40 S subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 4072-4081 (2003).
37. Wegierski, T., Billy, E., Nasr, F. & Filipowicz, W. Bms1p, a G-domain-containing protein, associates with Rcl1p and is required for 18S rRNA biogenesis in yeast. RNA 7, 1254-1267 (2001).
38. Karbstein, K., Jonas, S. & Doudna, J. A. An essential GTPase promotes assembly of preribosomal RNA processing complexes. Mol. Cell 20, 633-643 (2005).
39. McCaughan, U. M. et al. Pre-40S ribosome biogenesis factor Tsr1 is an inactive structural mimic of translational GTPases. Nat. Commun. 7, 11789 (2016).
40. Madru, C. et al. Chaperoning 5S RNA assembly. Genes Dev. 29, 1432-1446 (2015).
41. Zheng, S., Lan, P., Liu, X. & Ye, K. Interaction between ribosome assembly factors Krr1 and Faf1 is essential for formation of small ribosomal subunit in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 22692-22703 (2014).
42. Strunk, B. S. et al. Ribosome assembly factors prevent premature translation initiation by 40S assembly intermediates. Science 333, 1449-1453 (2011).
43. Lu, J., Sun, M. & Ye, K. Structural and functional analysis of Utp23, a yeast ribosome synthesis factor with degenerate PIN domain. RNA 19, 1815-1824 (2013).
44. Thoms, M. et al. The exosome is recruited to RNA substrates through specific adaptor proteins. Cell 162, 1029-1038 (2015).
45. Wu, S. et al. Diverse roles of assembly factors revealed by structures of late nuclear pre-60S ribosomes. Nature 534, 133-137 (2016).
46. Barrio-Garcia, C. et al. Architecture of the Rix1-Rea1 checkpoint machinery during pre-60S-ribosome remodeling. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 37-44 (2016).
47. Sardana, R. et al. The DEAH-box helicase Dhr1 dissociates U3 from the pre-rRNA to promote formation of the central pseudoknot. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002083 (2015).
48. Segerstolpe, Å. et al. Multiple RNA interactions position Mrd1 at the site of the small subunit pseudoknot within the 90S pre-ribosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 1178-1190 (2013).
49. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331-332 (2017).
50. Zhang, K. Gctf: real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1-12 (2016).
51. Scheres, S. H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519-530 (2012).
52. Kimanius, D., Forsberg, B. O., Scheres, S. H. & Lindahl, E. Accelerated cryo-EM structure determination with parallelisation using GPUs in RELION-2. eLife 5, e18722 (2016).
53. Scheres, S. H. & Chen, S. Prevention of overfitting in cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 9, 853-854 (2012).
54. Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63-65 (2014).
55. Rabl, J., Leibundgut, M., Ataide, S. F., Haag, A. & Ban, N. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic 40S ribosomal subunit in complex with initiation factor 1. Science 331, 730-736 (2011).
56. Biasini, M. et al. SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W252-W258 (2014).
57. Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C. & Ferrin, T. E. Visualizing density maps with UCSF Chimera. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 281-287 (2007).
58. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486-501 (2010).
59. Zuker, M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3406-3415 (2003).
60. Popenda, M. et al. Automated 3D structure composition for large RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e112 (2012).
61. Lin, J. et al. Structural basis for site-specific ribose methylation by box C/D RNA protein complexes. Nature 469, 559-563 (2011).
62. Buchan, D. W., Minneci, F., Nugent, T. C., Bryson, K. & Jones, D. T. Scalable web services for the PSIPRED Protein Analysis Workbench. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, W349-W357 (2013).
63. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213-221 (2010).
64. Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A. & Dodson, E. J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 53, 240-255 (1997).
65. Nicholls, R. A., Fischer, M., McNicholas, S. & Murshudov, G. N. Conformationindependent structural comparison of macromolecules with ProSMART. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 70, 2487-2499 (2014).
66. Brown, A. et al. Tools for macromolecular model building and refinement into electron cryo-microscopy reconstructions. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 71, 136-153 (2015).
67. Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12-21 (2010).
68. Fernández, I. S., Bai, X. C., Murshudov, G., Scheres, S. H. & Ramakrishnan, V. Initiation of translation by cricket paralysis virus IRES requires its translocation in the ribosome. Cell 157, 823-831 (2014).